Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlowFish

Hedging Against Property Market Decline

Recommended Posts

I asked this before a while back, and possibly this is not what James had in mind for this sections so apologies if that is the case.

 

I have a modest property portfolio (all UK based) that I don't want to unwind. I feel that further house price decline is on the cards and would like to minimise the effect of it. Can anyone suggest instruments or tactics to hedge against this decline?

 

Thanks,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In very general terms (and to kick off the forum the right way) What I personally would do in your shoes is to try and break your overall risk portfolio down into it's component parts. That way you can seperate them into most likely 3 camps

 

1) Risks you can control and hedge accurately

 

2) Risks you can hedge roughly

 

3) Risks you have no control over

 

So what are the exact factors that would make house prices dip further?

 

An obvious one and good starting point is rate hikes. This probably falls into category 2 unless you have a really accurate model for forecasting just how much your portfolio will take a hit for say a 50bp hike by the BoE. But you can mitigate this risk via interest rate derivatives.

 

Second one - general housing market sentiment. V hard to control, but maybe a proxy can be achieved by constructing a short basket of UK housebuilders? Or even having a SB position on that sector?

 

I'm sure there are otehr factors, but it's not cut and dried what to do. Hopefully this acts as a pointer though.

 

make sense?

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GJ, yes that makes very good sense - it had not occurred to me to think of things in that way. Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

EDIT: Incidentally I am surprised that this is not a fairly common requirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GJ, yes that makes very good sense - it had not occurred to me to think of things in that way.

 

Very welcome. This is pretty much the essence of portfolio risk management

 

Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

At a guess (and it is a guess, but an educated one) otc economic derivatives. Probably a bank will make a market in this stuff. Goldies and Deutsche launched this kind of thing for NFP a few years back and it did well. Have a feeling it's even exchange traded now but don't quote me on that.

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

EDIT: Incidentally I am surprised that this is not a fairly common requirement.

 

The instruments I am aware of track either Rightmove or HBOS House Price Index. Its a synthetic product thats not exchange traded (some people have issues with this) but in my experience it accurately tracks the respective indexes. The issue is in the spread which can be quite large, but if you are hedging with a 6-12mth+ timeframe then it's workable.

 

Not sure I understand your question about laying off the risk?

 

I have friends who own very sizable property portfolios in London and I was surprised how little interest they had in the concept of locking in their current profits by hedging. One guy in particular says he's in it for the long long term and is going to ride the 'dip' and not complicate his business by introducing concepts he doesn't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re laying off risk this quote from http://www.financial-spread-betting.com/Property-spread-betting.html puts it better than I could.

 

A pretty clear picture of a decisive shift in sentiment is emerging. John Austin, head of proprietary products at IG Index, says that because of this the firm's house price markets are currently suspended and it is only accepting bets to close existing positions. 'There has been such a run of stories in the press talking of meltdown in the housing market that the volume of sell-side business left us with no choice but to close our book to new business for the time being,' he explains.

 

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

 

Fine - just mark the price way lower if you're long and worried. P*ssies. That's market making. They just don't like the money if it aint easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

 

I've just been into my IG account and it looks like I can go short.

 

That aside, I totally agree with GJ, making a market when it suits should be outlawed! When Ladbrokes first started offering books they were well known to 'investigate and offer a price' on anything (within legal and ethical boundaries) Thats how they made their name. If IG pull the plug on loss making products they'll quickly lose ground to a companies that don't! P*ssies indeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fine - just mark the price way lower if you're long and worried. P*ssies. That's market making. They just don't like the money if it aint easy.

Yeah, that doesn't make much sense. I've never heard of a bookie shutting down a line because of overwhelming bets on one side.. just change the line (even if you have to change it a lot), and it will balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for shorting REITs to hedge, but watch out on possible hidden beta exposure. I believe (don't have the hard facts with me right now though) that REITs are more market sensitive than the actual housing market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Atto, If I understand this correctly any company that complies with the appropriate regulatory requirements can get its self listed as REIT? Again if I have got things straight there is and index of all the REIT's (though I can't seem to find a ticker for that so wonder if its traded?) Interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe (don't have the hard facts with me right now though) that REITs are more market sensitive than the actual housing market.

 

Stands to reason as it's a long complicated process actually selling a house compared to trading a commoditised instrument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But for people / institutions that trade REITS in size, presumably (and I know nothing at all about this market btw) there must be analysts who will pore over the actual portfolio composition of a given REIT and come up with a fair value (roughly at least) for it, trading when price moves away from this become over extended. Or not......

 

Help me out here.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And on that point. Presumably it also means that if an individual were to use a REIT to hedge property exposure (and I don't even know if you can short sell them so this could all be moot) wouldn't one also have to take into account possible tracking error depending on what the property portfolio you are protecting looks like. E.G. hedging a high end London residential portfolio with a commercial property based, Manchester centric property vehicle would presumably not be anything like a perfect hedge (extreme example just to make a point).

 

Am I talking out my @rse here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No not at all GJ these are all things that perplex me. I think I need to talk to someone who knows, whilst there is a fair amount of information on the interweb it seems to be largely to attract investors. (invest in property without having to worry about managing a portfolio).

 

The other thing is the composition of the various portfolios (none seem to have much/any residential which is what interests me particularly). I have looked at basic price charts for several and they seem to broadly follow a very similar pattern .......Except a couple with large retail property exposure had massive drops a couple of months ago. Kind of perplexing (as most if not all have some retail element) and worrying too, if you are on the wrong side of such a quick and violent move.

 

Short term volatility looks like an issue too (as may have been mentioned) though as a trader I look at that and think hmm those waves would be nice to trade. Got to keep sight of what the object of the exercise is :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably a big part of why they are ofen weighted towards commercial exposure is that you can trade bigger 'blocks'. It's unweildy to trade £300k houses if you have a few hundred million to invest - easier to buy a small office block than a bunch of houses, logistically I reckon.

 

I may well be talking out me aris for all I know, but my god I'm convincing sometimes ;)

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey BlowFish,

 

I don't know whether this issue is still current with you since you opened this thread some time ago (btw, you were right about the property prices dropping), but you could have a look at Eurex' IPD UK Annual All Property Index Futures (PUKA).

 

Not only is it futures, but the contract size is just £50k which makes it easier to reflect your actual portfolio. Don't have any idea about the actual liquidity though (it says minimum quote size is 20 contract [=£1 million in value] which isn't too bad for hedging). I just heard about it when Eurex announced it some time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks AK,

 

Actually I think it is always 'current'. Obviously adjusting a property portfolio takes a bit more than a mouse click! Any instrument that lets you hedge (even if you are just a simple home owner) is worth investigation.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting discussion and something I personally haven't thought too much into. However a number of things come to mind.

 

The first thing that hits me is your projected time frame of holding the property BF. I am not too sure about Europe but out here in Australia, banks won't force you to get property revalued unless you are changing the mortgage in some way.

 

If you are planning on holding for a number of years to come (as most property investors tend to do unless they are doing renovations and flipping them), then a good hedge in one way is to simply avoid re-financing as much as possible. Of course this is only worthwhile if a) you plan to hold for say at least 10 years and b) you can afford to continue to pay the repayments quite comfortably.

 

There are the smaller details of locking in fixed rates vs variable ones due to the current rate situation but I think that depends on a property value vs repayments cases by case basis on each property.

 

This does appear to be a typical buy and hold strategy where not realizing paper losses doesn't necessarily mean you haven't lost. However it is the same in any type of trading. If you trade intra day, you don't have to close your trade after 2 minutes because it is in the red when you are looking to hold the position for a couple of hours.

 

Shorter term losses can be held onto and unrealized if your view is to hold for much longer. The same as buy and hold investors if their current outlook on stocks is 10 years plus. Even if they bought at the top of this market back in 2007, it may be premature to close out positions now if they wanted to hold into 2020 on most stocks.

 

So really my point based on what happens out here in Australia, there may not be a need to hedge against one's property portfolio beyond trying to increase rent, if banks don't force you to re-value your property and you plan on holding long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.