Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

waveslider

Tradestation Just Lost My Business... Looking for a New Platform/broker

Recommended Posts

  daedalus said:
Well i've used TS for over two years now, and while they aren't perfect I have had no issues regarding data slowness, etc. Thats all a bunch of ET B.S. like most things over there are. In fact, they've done extensive upgrading recently to get even faster data.

 

This debacle the other day was the first time i've ever experience anything like that.

 

Curious on the bugs with MC. I have heard that from a friend as well when he tried them. I really want those guys to get the kinks ironed out of that platform because it is just soooo cool.

 

Anyway, I do manual backtesting as well with the same kind of logic. There really isn't too many ways around it.

 

I don't trade automated setups so i've never used the backtesting extensively but EL is fairly easy to code, but like anything, TS wants you to have to pay to go to education schools, etc for coding help, etc.

 

That being said there are tons of sites like this one and kreslik that have loads of indicators already created and ready to go for you.

 

Hope this helps.

 

It does help, thanks. I tend to take ET with a big grain of salt, because they are a bunch of let's say pretenders and unstable ppl. but these came from ppl. that don't scream everyday. Ppl. that lost over several hundred bucks to a few thousand due to the platform locking up all in a fast moving market, that's why I went hmm, do I want to do that? I know no broker is perfect just trying to due some DD. This is the most recent thread I was talking about if your are interested. http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133483&highlight=tradestation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consider yourself lucky then. Guess somebody has to win the lottery.

 

I also have been using TS for a long time, but only as a broker during the last 2 years. I have often defended TS in the past, but I am done with that. Their data speed/stability seems to degrade with each passing month, and the frequency of freezeups seems to increase with each passing month. Suffice to say they need to get their act together or they will continue to lose customers.

 

 

  daedalus said:
Well i've used TS for over two years now, and while they aren't perfect I have had no issues regarding data slowness, etc. Thats all a bunch of ET B.S. like most things over there are. In fact, they've done extensive upgrading recently to get even faster data.

 

This debacle the other day was the first time i've ever experience anything like that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an issue where it locked up and i missed out on a trade about a month ago. I emailed customer service and was credited 99.95 for my issue. Make sure they know what you're problems are. They seem to be aware that many people are not happy with the recent happenings and are really making an effort to make good on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
They seem to be aware that many people are not happy with the recent happenings and are really making an effort to make good on it.

 

I was with TS for 3 years and it was the same circle... big problems ==> outrage ==> TS fixes problems... a few months go by ==> big problems ==> outrage.... repeat over and over.

 

I have come to the conclusion that Tradestations architecture is flawed. Simple as that. The idea of combining best-of-breed software (EL) with a brokerage was beautiful on paper -- it just hasn't worked out in execution.

 

Tradestation will figure out the current problems and then there will be new big problems. It is not surprising, this is the history of the software industry as system environments are dynamic and wreak havoc on dated architectures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Another reason to diversify your portfolio and setup.

 

You need accounts with at least two different and unrelated brokers.

 

You also need charting and data from two or more separate providers.

 

Redundancy is key.

 

Putting all your eggs in one basket is a recipe for failure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update -

TS did refund me for the $ lost during their outage. Still, I was unhappy in how they dealt with the whole situation in general. There was very little updating, everyone was in the dark, wait time on the phone was 3+ hours. The platform is good, the data is good, could be better. Forsearch is right about diversification, but sometimes that still doesn't help when you can't get the broker on the phone.

Frank's probably right about the architecture, it would cost them a lot to start over, and would be worth it to their clients, but not the company.

Agree that easylanguage is truly great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  waveslider said:
Forsearch is right about diversification, but sometimes that still doesn't help when you can't get the broker on the phone.

 

Thus you'd want to immediately take an opposing trade with your other broker to hedge your position, if your stop won't take you out.

 

You ARE trading with stops, right? :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a good idea, but my stops are VERY close sometimes (usually not more than 2 pts in ES) , So I would not know if the position was still active or not, and may be putting on a naked hedge. What happens if my stop is hit and the broker doesn't fill it because his network is down too? Tradestation has their stops held until they are activated (not actually in the markets), unless I am mistaken.

 

That works for longer term positions, of course, but a intraday outage wouldn't affect those positions so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my 2 cents here. I have often felt the same way. The grass is not always greener. I suspect in the end the problems with TS will work out. At least I would say that I would rather have their engineers working to fix it than another startup ( or just charting ) company.

 

I worked for a major tech firm for years before I became a trader. Fortune 50 and it is no different when it comes to engineering/software changes.

 

It's like a marriage on the rocks. Just try to give it a chance. In my opinion its not worth your valuable time to start going down another road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been with neoticker since 2005 , I do agree with some of the statments regarding the learning curve to program your ideas in neoticker. However , I am at a level now where i can program almost anything , and it has been worth my persistence . I have been able to program some great indicators that almost rival the institutional algorithmic models out there, which gives me a large edge . I would not be able to trade or see underneath the hood of the market without my neoticker. It has taken a while to get there but there is no better support service for a software company that answers all questions programming or otherwise within a couple of hours usually , so I would recomend them without a doubt..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had a "significant" problem with TradeStation in over 10+ years to give me a reason to leave to another trading software. But I do not execute trades through them. Eggs are kept in separate baskets, always.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunTrader said:
I haven't had a "significant" problem with TradeStation in over 10+ years to give me a reason to leave to another trading software. But I do not execute trades through them. Eggs are kept in separate baskets, always.

 

I am currently searching for a broker where I can trade volume specifically, but without having this bundle "broker/platform/datafeed " all-in-one solution as with Tradestation.....

 

So where do you execute your trades ?

 

Thanks for any suggestion.

 

Michael :pc guru:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRADECENTERLLC.[Open e- cry.]No charge for LIVE FEED.Competetive pricing.Great service[ask for DREW.I ave been using their paper trading platform for months for a small fee.Again no cost for live feed & their charting is pretty good.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  the_Gridder said:
I am currently searching for a broker where I can trade volume specifically, but without having this bundle "broker/platform/datafeed " all-in-one solution as with Tradestation.....

 

So where do you execute your trades ?

 

Thanks for any suggestion.

 

Michael :pc guru:

IB - Interactive Brokers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody!

Have you ever tested Strategy Runner? I heard it's good for short-term strategies, very fast, allows to trade in the DOM and to launch automatic trading on their server (you shouldn't keep your PC on)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities mag. 2009 annual poll results

 

Stock Brokerages:

1) IB

2) TS

Futures Brokerages

1) IB

2) TS

Forex Brokerages

1) IB

2) TS

Real-Time Data

1) TS

2) eSignal

Institutional & Professional Platforms

1) TS

2) IB

Options Analysis Software

1) IB

2) TS

Options Trading Systems

1) TS

2) Optionetics

Futures Trading Systems

1) TS

2) eSignal

Stock Trading Systems

1) TS

2) eSignal (Advanced GET)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you know something may be amiss when the IB feed beats out the likes of CQG, Reuters, and Bloomberg, but it's still interesting. Though I probably could have guessed that the two most used feeds are IB and TS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That'll be due to the fact that at least most people that use CQG, do not read SAC magazine!

 

  diablo272 said:
Well you know something may be amiss when the IB feed beats out the likes of CQG, Reuters, and Bloomberg, but it's still interesting. Though I probably could have guessed that the two most used feeds are IB and TS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Diablo:

The IB feed didn't beat out Bloomberg, etc. The IB brokerage was voted #1 but the data feed wasn't even honorable mention.

 

Here's the complete list of survey winners for RT data:

Winner: TS

First Runner-up: eSignal

Finalists: Bloomberg

MetaStock QuoteCenter

TeleChart Platinum

Semi-Finalists: Genesis Financial

Reuters Data

Honorable Mention: DTN.IQ

 

Here's the complete list of survey winners for Institutional Platforms:

Winner: TS

First Runner-up:: IB

Finalist: eSignal

Semi-Finalists: Bloomberg

Honorable Mention: NinjaTrader

Reuters

 

 

If memory serves correctly, TS is only about 10% as large as IB in terms of its client base. TradeStation can be used as a platform without using the brokerage ($250/mo.). CQG, MetaStock QuoteCenter and RealTick were listed as top contenders in 2008, but dropped off the list in 2009. TeleChart, MetaStock, VectorVest Pro, and Amibroker, etc. were listed under the Standalone Analytical Software.

 

 

I watched a Linda Raschke webinar last night promoting her execution/charting platform Photon Trader (futures and CME currencies currently). She also uses TS and CQG. She uses TS for charting and back testing, etc., but not for execution. She said that she sometimes uses CQG for execution occasionally (as she has for years). PhotonTrader has drag and drop chart ordering like NinjaTrader. I've also read that LightSpeed Trading is good, except with volume spike days (like TS).

 

Here's Barron's Broker table for 2009 (stock oriented):

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/barronsbroker-final2.pdf

 

Tools of the Trade - Barrons.com[/media]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

momentom:

 

You stated: "Interesting idea. Let's make a decision based upon the opinion of a group of people of whom probably 90% are using those tools to lose money."

 

1) Your statement is sarcastic and unconstructive. “Sarcasm is anger’s ugly cousin.” The purpose of the forum is traders helping (building up, not tearing down) other traders.

2) Your 90% figure seems baseless in the absence of any evidence.

3) Your statement seems illogical. I can buy my 350-lb. neighbor the best basketball shoes in the world and there’s still no way he beat LeBron James or Kobe Bryant even if they’re forced to play in wingtips or barefoot. Translation: Usually, a great tool doesn’t make a poor trader a great trader and a poor tool doesn’t make a great trader a poor trader.

4) Your statement is inaccurate. It assumes that I posted the data and expected people to make a decision solely from the survey. . I only posted the data as just that; data. I proposed no “idea” – no opinion. Since you deal in opinions, it is my opinion that “the best platform” for an individual will vary with that individual’s different market, trading style and needs.

5) Apparently you use or formerly used and recommended both TS & IB which were the top 2 winners in most of the categories in my original post. So you are or were using the same tools that the so-called 90% losers recommended. “I use both. If you want the charting platform use TS otherwise I would use IB.” http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f92/beginning-trader-needs-imput-ib-tradestation-2422.html

 

If you can show that I’m factually incorrect in these 5 statements, then by all means do so. I’ve read some of your postings and you seem fairly knowledgeable. In this case you were both rude (sarcasm is considered rudeness) and wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.