Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jonbig04

Edge VS Mentality

Recommended Posts

  strtedat22 said:
Blowfish,

 

I needed to make everything as real as possible so i fooled myself into thinking my paper account was my real account. Using only 1 contract at a time i could feel the rush of making a trade. This is obviously done after i have my strategy in place :cool:For all beggining traders out there treat paper accounts as if they are real accounts. Thats the only way youre gonna learn without losing "real" money. Use it as a educational tool to prepare yourself for the real world.

 

This is one of the best pieces of advice that ANYONE can read. If you new and trying to learn via Demo Trading- Trade it like it is real!

 

I have known people who launched Demo Accounts with far more capital than they could actually ever start their account with in real life- Why? Makes it a pointless excercise IMO.

 

I even talked with one trader while doing Demo's (this was in prep for utilizing a real account- so no time to be fooling around) that decided to buy 100 lots on a currency pair, said "oh it was funny, I was up like a half million and then was down like $1.5 million by the end of the day- it was funny!" I just looked at them and said "Hmm" That was a wasted day to actually learn something if you ask me.

 

Trade it like its real!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Sledge said:
This is one of the best pieces of advice that ANYONE can read. If you new and trying to learn via Demo Trading- Trade it like it is real!

 

I have known people who launched Demo Accounts with far more capital than they could actually ever start their account with in real life- Why? Makes it a pointless excercise IMO.

 

I even talked with one trader while doing Demo's (this was in prep for utilizing a real account- so no time to be fooling around) that decided to buy 100 lots on a currency pair, said "oh it was funny, I was up like a half million and then was down like $1.5 million by the end of the day- it was funny!" I just looked at them and said "Hmm" That was a wasted day to actually learn something if you ask me.

 

Trade it like its real!

 

 

 

It is real....:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jonbig04 said:
It is real....:)

 

You are 100% Correct. I explain to people that even if you are placing trades on a demo- it is the live market, it rips through your emotions of euphoria, fear, indecision, greed and countless others if you sit and watch it with a "live trade" in play.

 

When they still scratch their head at me- not understanding- I say "Look this isn't like a video game- where their is some pre-defined outcome" "Their is no princess to save at the end of the castle- and if you hit the right buttons or jump to the right mushroom- that their is one and only one way to "win the game." The only difference between a $2 Grand Win on a Demo and a $2Grand win on a live account is the fact that you decided to test a theory without risking the money for real- BUT BUT BUT- ONLY if you approach a demo- as if it were real $, you think long and hard about your trades, you plan and execute- just as if their was real $ on the line- not wanting to lose the "fake $" and take it JUST as seriously as if it were real. You'll get pissed if you lose $100 on a Demo, just as if you lost $100 for real!

 

My .02 on that!

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Sledge said:
You are 100% Correct. I explain to people that even if you are placing trades on a demo- it is the live market, it rips through your emotions of euphoria, fear, indecision, greed and countless others if you sit and watch it with a "live trade" in play.

 

When they still scratch their head at me- not understanding- I say "Look this isn't like a video game- where their is some pre-defined outcome" "Their is no princess to save at the end of the castle- and if you hit the right buttons or jump to the right mushroom- that their is one and only one way to "win the game." The only difference between a $2 Grand Win on a Demo and a $2Grand win on a live account is the fact that you decided to test a theory without risking the money for real- BUT BUT BUT- ONLY if you approach a demo- as if it were real $, you think long and hard about your trades, you plan and execute- just as if their was real $ on the line- not wanting to lose the "fake $" and take it JUST as seriously as if it were real. You'll get pissed if you lose $100 on a Demo, just as if you lost $100 for real!

 

My .02 on that!

Aaron

 

I have the broken calculator, pencils, and twisted paper clips to prove that it's very much real to me lol:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a simple test about the importance of edge vs mentality.

 

Pick a strategy that you know makes money eg open range breakout.

Write down entry , exit and stop parameters.

Trade EXACTLY according to this plan.

Repeat this exact trade 20 times.

 

It will make you money ( not necessarily in the 20 trades ) BUT do you have the mindset to do it?

 

95% of people cannot do this - If you think you can try a demo account if you like. But assess at the end of 20 how you did - and don't lie to yourself.

 

I have been trading full time for 6 years and never found anyone who can get to 20 without "interfering" with it!

 

So the edge is there, but the mentality to follow the chosen plan may prevent someone from adopting the correct behaviour modifications to become a successful trader.

 

What's important is NOT the edge - it's the ability to follow it.

 

For the first 3 years of my trading I thought the edge was the thing and it really isn't. Doesn't stop me constantly striving to develop a better mousetrap however!

 

Just to spur the conversation on however - to follow the plan you have to "own" the edge .... discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your whole premise is based on picking a winning strategy. "Pick a strategy that you know makes money eg open range breakout."

 

Without that, your mindset is useless. If you don't have a winning strategy and follow the 20 trades exactly per the rules, you will have a great mindset, but still not be profitable.

 

  Quote
What's important is NOT the edge - it's the ability to follow it.

 

A great mindset, will not turn a losing strategy into a profitable one, esepcially if you follow the rules 100%. You need both. An edge and the ability to follow it. Even your arguement assumed you start with a winning strategy to "test" your mindset.

 

This is like saying to be a Formula 1 champion, you just need to be a good driver and that the car is irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I came to conclusion that I cannot develop the proper mindset without consistently profitable strategy. I think that the proper strategy and proper mindset are closely bound together.

The proper strategy is the one you develop yourself, specify it to the least point and thoroughly test it. With this procedure you build the proper mindset - the confidnce in the strategy, flexibilty, readiness, sense for nuances.

I think that wrong mindset is often caused by laziness during building a strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew I shouldn't have done this.

 

Let me give you a winning strategy then. This is on the mini Dow.

 

Wait for 60 minutes from the day open.

Buy the breakout, sell the breakdown from the opening range.

 

Put your stop the other side of the range.

Close at end of day.

 

Now I am NOT saying that you will make money in 20 trades - but you certainly should not lose much. Most of the time you should make money (about 97% of the time). Trade it and develop it as you go along.

One thing I do guarantee though - you will be a much better trader at the end of the 20 trades than you were at the beginning.

 

"This is like saying to be a Formula 1 champion, you just need to be a good driver and that the car is irrelevant."

There is a certain misunderstanding here - of course edge is important. You must have a positive expectancy. BUT in my opinion gaining the right mindset has very little to do with edge and is MUCH more important in the long run.

To continue the analogy - this is a lifelong race, winners get to the end, 95% retire or crash- so does it matter if you drive a Mcclaren or a Ford?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Its 50/50.

 

Without discipline, no matter how good the plan, you will fail.

 

Without a plan, no matter how much discipline you have, you will fail.

 

Also, if you have a plan where you're right 7-8 times out of 10 instead of 5/10, I think it's more easy to stay disciplined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Also, if you have a plan where you're right 7-8 times out of 10 instead of 5/10, I think it's more easy to stay disciplined.

 

"Fail to plan = plan to fail"

 

Also how can you objectively measure how you are doing/ whether you are getting there if you don't know what you want to do ( "make money " is not an objective - 200% gain on capital is).

 

From my minimal research I have found most traders hover around the 50-55% "right" mark. One or two very successful ones average about 40%.

 

I am talking long term averages here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Mindset said:

 

From my minimal research I have found most traders hover around the 50-55% "right" mark.

 

If that's the case, I'm not surprised that you've "never found anyone" with the necessary discipline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
If that's the case, I'm not surprised that you've "never found anyone" with the necessary discipline.

 

You'll have to explain that comment dbphoenix.

I myself average 45% "right". You seem to be implying that your average is significantly higher? - if so I take my hat off to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jonbig04 said:
The very successful traders I know are "right" about 30% of the time. Its about profit via R/R. Being right is pointless. IMO

 

Have you personally tried trading something where you're right 50% or less?

I'm sure some traders "with the right mindset" manage to do just fine, but I'm not one of them. And I think that a lot of people would have much less trouble if they could trade something which means being right 80% of the time. Nearly all of the time that means trading less though, and being very very patient. And that's another matter :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Have you personally tried trading something where you're right 50% or less?

I'm sure some traders "with the right mindset" manage to do just fine, but I'm not one of them. And I think that a lot of people would have much less trouble if they could trade something which means being right 80% of the time. Nearly all of the time that means trading less though, and being very very patient. And that's another matter :)

 

ha I'm right WAY less than that!!:rofl: But I'm sure there is no "correct" way, different personalities for different methods etc. However my R/R is what I keep in check so being wrong doesn't bother me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jonbig04 said:
ha I'm right WAY less than that!!:rofl: But I'm sure there is no "correct" way, different personalities for different methods etc. However my R/R is what I keep in check so being wrong doesn't bother me.

 

On the other hand, you've only just begun being mentored in whatever it is you're doing, so perhaps you ought to let all of this percolate for several months before drawing any conclusions.

 

Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the win/loss ratio system / edge specific?

Certain systems do just fine at 30% W/L

Others need > 50%, etc

 

Finding just any old edge will not work. The type of system one can 'manage' / 'stick to' / 'implement the appropriate mentality' is determined long before he or she begins trading...One must find an edge that really fits him or her individually - at ‘true nature’ level. That is why I recommend not separating their discovery and development at all… not making one more important than the other because it seems first temporally or in priority.

grasshopper had to grab that pot with both forearms...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
On the other hand, you've only just begun being mentored in whatever it is you're doing, so perhaps you ought to let all of this percolate for several months before drawing any conclusions.

 

Just a thought.

 

 

 

Thats true. Thats what I meant about being right way less than 50% :). However I do believe being right second to being profitable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jonbig04 said:
However I do believe being right second to being profitable.

 

Theoretically. But most beginners will find it difficult to stick with a system that's right only 30% of the time, profitable or not. Which is where discipline becomes an issue. Discipline is far less an issue, if an issue at all, working with a system with a hit rate of 60 or 70% or better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DbPhoenix

Do you think it's realistic for a beginning trader to find a trading method that is 60% + right? And Profitable?

 

Maybe you have got to that great place with your experience but for a beginning trader I think that is unrealistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sevensa said:
A great mindset, will not turn a losing strategy into a profitable one, esepcially if you follow the rules 100%. You need both. An edge and the ability to follow it. Even your arguement assumed you start with a winning strategy to "test" your mindset.

 

This is like saying to be a Formula 1 champion, you just need to be a good driver and that the car is irrelevant.

 

 

Thats a great post, and so true. I think its pretty funny how many people focus on "edge" or "mindset" and think they have what they need. The reality is there is no single thing you can do in trading that will make you successful. Its a package deal. You need the whole package to become and stay successful long term in this business.

 

The other thing I think is funny is how people talk about how one thing is more important than the other. Not true in my opinion. Your Formula 1 example is a great, good driver, bad car, still equals loser. You gotta have the whole package.

 

I think there are two types of people, those that focus on what they are good at, and those that focus on what they are bad at. I personally focus on the mental aspect of the trading, because seeing an edge has always been easy for me, but I struggled with the mental/discipline aspect of trading for a while. So thats the part that I must stay ever vigilant with.

 

It sucks to blow out a weeks worth of profits just because you veered from your system and thought you could out-think the market. I have done that in the past, now I have a rule to keep that from happening. I have a post-it note next to my screen that says "Never try something new while the market is open" (I believe I got that gem from a Bill Eng book). What that means to me is if that revolutionary idea pops up during trading, write it down and check it out later to see if its valid. Something that simple has saved me tons of money. Enough here, I am getting off topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Mindset said:
DbPhoenix

Do you think it's realistic for a beginning trader to find a trading method that is 60% + right? And Profitable?

 

Maybe you have got to that great place with your experience but for a beginning trader I think that is unrealistic.

 

 

I would not get caught up with the percentage right. Whats 60% right today may be 70% right next month, and 40% right the month after that. Things change and go through cycles.

 

The edge that you gave up because it was 35% right could have huge profitability if used with the correct money management. While the edge that is 80% right may only pay out a few tics.

 

Go for the whole package, percentage correct is only 1 aspect of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Mindset said:
DbPhoenix

Do you think it's realistic for a beginning trader to find a trading method that is 60% + right? And Profitable?

 

 

Perhaps if beginning traders weren't in such a rush to place their bets and spin the wheel, they'd have a more thorough and practical understanding of what's realistic.

 

But we're already at the point where people aren't reading the thread but beginning again, so what's being said has been said already, and repetition simply makes the thread longer still. So happy trading, everyone. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread and it's topic have never been far from my mind. I've been learning a lot in the past few months and I have drawn some conclusions. We all know that a trader needs both discipline and an "edge". But I still hold to my opinion that you really don't have to have much of an edge to make it as a successful trader, you just need to be completely disciplined. It's true that without any edge at all you will never amount to anything, but the simply fact is you don't NEED that much of an edge to be a successful trader. When I say successful, I mean a trader who can make a very good living trading, call it six figures a year. As far as I know, most traders don't do that. Don't get me wrong, my absolute end goal is to be able to read PA like a book and have impeccable discipline, but I maintain that this is an END goal. When I started this thread I scarcely knew any other traders. Now I know a lot of them. I've seen, with my own eyes, a trader make 7 figures in a day. I know traders who average well into six figures a week, I know traders who have never made a penny, and I know traders who average a hundred ES points a week on SIM, but can't make a dime cash. I know all kinds of traders! And its great because I can really take an objective step back and see where the problems are. The truth is very few hard working, PA based traders are making consistent good money trading. Despite the fact that they seem to know every kind of PA formation and can spot things that I could never see. To me its almost as if they are trading to learn PA, as opposed to making money. I'm learning to trade to make money. PA is just a vehicle on that road to profitability. It seems like a lot of traders are so bogged down because they are trying to "master" PA and its every aspect. Why? Why not just develop a system that makes, say 5 ES points a week, consistently week after week. Laugh if you want, but just do some basic arithmetic and if you slowly build your capital, you will find that soon 5 points a week trading hundreds of contracts can be pretty lucrative indeed.

 

While its true a lot of traders fail because they are looking for a shortcut in indicators, and don't want to put together a system and are basically...lazy. I really tend not to focus on those because it seems to me a lot of hard working traders are out there making no money. And I really believe that's because they spend their time trying to master PA as a whole, instead of using PA to eek out a slight edge and then maintain complete discipline in order to heavily capitalize off of that edge. Sure I want to master PA too, but for right now I just want to make a couple hundred thousand a year from home and to do that, all I need is slight advantage and complete discipline. When we get there THEN we can start trying to quantify every nuance of PA.

 

Maybe I'm wrong and all my peers are making six figures a year already, but I don't think so. If you aren't, yet you manage to make a few points a week consistently may I ask why?

 

Just my $0.02.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.