Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Flojomojo

Thoughts on Forex Volume

Recommended Posts

Actually seems to me the best one could hope to do would be disprove the theory as there might be a third (unknown) process driving both series and that's one of a couple of places where Granger breaks down (based on my admittedly limited understanding).

 

A third process... oh yes... undoubtably there is. Take your pick: seismic events, the rate of meteor falls, sunspot counts, confirmed werewolf sightings, and the rates of humping elephants. One of those will surely be correlated. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you might be judging those that hang out here rather harshly and with a broad brush.
My intent was not to be harsh, apologies for coming across like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A third process... oh yes... undoubtably there is. Take your pick: seismic events, the rate of meteor falls, sunspot counts, confirmed werewolf sightings, and the rates of humping elephants. One of those will surely be correlated. ;)

 

And of course there is GJ closing out positions for holiday cash. I would guess planetary alignment is not highly correlated as there is no central exchange for FX and hence not a single location to calculate aspects from.

 

My intent was not to be harsh, apologies for coming across like that.

 

Hehe I am thick skinned and not one of the industrious anyway. There are one or two here that are pretty rigorous and a bit more 'quantitative'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And of course there is GJ closing out positions for holiday cash. I would guess planetary alignment is not highly correlated as there is no central exchange for FX and hence not a single location to calculate aspects from.

 

Heh heh... yip.

 

I think this topic has been exhausted. Thanks GammaJammer for your persistence and clarity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree - been done to death a bit (and I admit towards the end I was getting bored and fractious meself). Prior to that, hope I added a few useful insights.

 

And thanks Blowfish for your comments on Granger causality - interesting. And you're right - the people who are comfortable working with something like R or Matlab probably aren't mucking about in spot FX ;) My point was a more general one though that the tools to progress the debate a little DO exists, and they would at least be a welcome breath of fresh air and a change from all the conjecture.

 

Good afternoon / evening all.

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.