Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

EMC2Trader

Daytrading - Big Picture/Volume Analysis

Recommended Posts

BF,

 

You are misrepresenting a few things. First, youve drawn the conclusion that everyone will take every trade listed, and Ive gone into great detail about taking the listed track record and showing how to formulate realistic trading expectations, with the understanding that the track record enables you to exceed expectations as opposed to having to trade perfectly, which is a flaw for many trading programs out there.

 

Why wouldn't you execute every trade exactly listed in the track record? Perhaps you dont have time to trade all day. Perhaps after taking three small losses in a row, you lose confidence to pull the trigger on the next trade...etc...

 

So it is clear your only intention is to rip something down without even bothering to understand what it is all about, and on top of that not even to present all the facts as listed.

 

Second, I have no problem with your skepticism, but please dont extrapolate that to assume you know how I trade, or how others using this appraoch trade. You have no idea!

 

A valid criticism of the trading approach would come from someone who has tried the approach, and would tell you first hand that it isnt useful.

 

Fortuntely, I have only received the opposite feedback

 

So frankly, other than your advice to check everything out as closely as possible ahead of time, your other criticisms are entirely baseless, especially because I go out of my way to present the realistic side of trading when it comes to performance, track records, discipline, following a trading plan, trading goals, etc. which of course you convienently choose not to recognize.

 

Finally, heres what I find interesting...I noticed you wrote the following in an earlier post about someone who had a trading approach:

 

"So maybe if this new person would like to contribute to the forum and talk about what they've learned, how they use it, etc. etc. it might hold something."

 

So here I am doing just that, discussing the importance I place on the bigger picture and volume, and you still find the need to critcize, so theres obviously a lot more hypocracy on your end, than on mine....

 

But Im not here to argue any more about this. If you feel the need to continue to attack then fine, just so long as Ive made it clear you are doing so without any facts whatsoever...

 

 

Question to our kind vendor - do YOU take all of YOUR trades?

 

If you do, no need to sell the key for 500 bucks. You should EASILY have made over $500k by now w/ those numbers.

 

But, of course you are not doing that, so then it's time to prey on people that don't know better and charge them a whole 500 bucks for that special key.

 

If the course is as good as you say it is, then share it with TL. This forum after all is a forum of GIVING - see DB's area for a great example of this. While he has a book for sale at a very nominal fee, there is a ton of information provided there.

 

Or if that will not work, provide a "TL" discount and like DB, sell it for a under $100 so more can take part and actually give it a test. If you do that, I personally will purchase it out of good faith.

 

So let TL put the system to the test and maybe you can help out some guys that really need it and can't afford the 500 bucks right now - you know, all in the spirit of TL and bettering each other.

 

We can put the track record to rest and move forward if you think you can do that here in the TL community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, it wouldn't, and that's my point. This sort of calculated misrepresentation has no place on TL, and discussion of the volume indicator can go on without any reference to it.

 

OK, fair enough, perhaps it was not 'plain' (it was to me, but I looked further than the home page) however that is still no excuse to attribute claims that where not made.

 

Mind you it never ceases to amaze me peoples poor comprehension skills in general, they see what they want to see. (and that's not directed at any of the protagonists in this debate btw). A pet peeve of mine are logical fallacies (unless I use them myself ;-)) this smacked of argumentum ad hominem (agan just IMO). I.e attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself.

 

I am still interested in why some think it is OK for people like JR to post (who also has hypothetical results on his site and is clearly a vendor with a capital V). I guess the heart of the matter is people believe the figures to be falsified in some way? Of course that is likely because they mis understand what they represent.

 

Anyway I apologise for perpetuating this particular debate when we are all in agreement it has no place here. (in my defence I didn't start it!) It's fun to lock horns now and then (especially with Brown!):fight::beer:

 

I hope a mod will clean this up as there are some interesting ideas (to me at least) in the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am still interested in why some think it is OK for people like JR to post (who also has hypothetical results on his site and is clearly a vendor with a capital V). I guess the heart of the matter is people believe the figures to be falsified in some way? Of course that is likely because they mis understand what they represent.

 

Perhaps it's a matter of creds. I'm not a fan of JR by any means, but I'm not about to squawk about a post or two, any more than I'd squawk about posts from LBR.

 

But so many new traders (not referring to anyone in particular) "discover" what's already known by most of those with more experience, add a little of their own jargon, then decide to share their epiphanies for money. This is in stark contrast to those who've been around the block more than a few times and give away an enormous amount of information for nothing (Steenbarger, for example). JR has also given away a great deal for nothing, and a trader with intelligence ought to be able to put together the rest of it by himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps it's a matter of creds. I'm not a fan of JR by any means, but I'm not about to squawk about a post or two, any more than I'd squawk about posts from LBR.

 

But so many new traders (not referring to anyone in particular) "discover" what's already known by most of those with more experience, add a little of their own jargon, then decide to share their epiphanies for money. This is in stark contrast to those who've been around the block more than a few times and give away an enormous amount of information for nothing (Steenbarger, for example). JR has also given away a great deal for nothing, and a trader with intelligence ought to be able to put together the rest of it by himself.

 

Yes fair comment. When starting out you could do a lot worse than the law of charts as an intro to PA. It is a decent enough framework to build from and assuredly better than starting with a bunch of oscillators and squiggles. Actually I mentored with Joe must have been <blush> about 10 years ago. I am embarrassed to admit its probablly easier to list the courses, seminars and books I don't have. :/ You can see why I am an easy mark for the hucksters! Still at least I am well qualified to talk about trading products and services! hehe.

 

Your correct about sharing epiphanies too, there's not that much new in trading (if you have as much stuff on your shelves as I do!) For example, Carter and Steners (who seem to be 'tolerated' vendors) shamelessly re-package indicators that are in the public domain and sell them for 100's of $$$'s a pop. Personally I find that at best morally dubious and for me it calls into question their whole raison d'etre. It amazes me they are still considered vendors of the good kind by many.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marsup....As you may have noted, I only show up here to discuss views on the market that some may find of interest, and Im not here claiming to "control the ES" ..and Im not here claiming to have cracked the code of the ES...." Where have I ever mentioned or implied that. and why do you assume thats the case?

 

Hello EMC2,

making anything in the range of 300 points/ 1 ES per month puts you in the league of the best traders on this globe,this is what I'm saying. Even if your posted "potential trades" are just that, i.e. theoretically possible trade setups, your methods would still be unbelievably good. I'm sure there are enough traders who would find ways to take every possible trade according to your method, even if that meant that they would have to get a divorce, live on delivered Pizza and find a medical solution to prevent having to go the bathroom during trading hours. With these kind of results possible...heck, I think I would do it, too.

Unfortunately, all this seems to good to be true.

 

I also truly have no problem if you doubt everything I am saying here, or find this information meaningless for you--Im sure youve head me say that everyone has a right to view anything however they like, but since you and others are manking many assumptions I do have one thing I am curious about:

 

If I list a track record of trades every day (the exact time, the entry and exit, for each trade etc.)which includes as many losers as winners, that falls in place mechanically the same way everyday from 8:30-3:15 according to the same set of rules over and over again, do you think Im just making these trades up out of thin air?

There are so many vendors with time stamped trades posted on their websites showing good results which are not that great once you look closer, so your "track record" does not necessarily improve your credibility imho. That's just the way it is.

 

I guess Im just really curious if thats the perception? Do you think Im making them up after the fact, and that you could never take any of these trades in real time?

I'm very sceptical about the track record, yes. Like you say, one has to do their DD, and this cannot be achieved by looking at your website alone.

I guess I wonder if a specific listing of every single trade holds any more value than the host of all these fancy videos I see that highlight a trade of the day, or how all the indicators line up beautifully for a trade here and there, etc.....

I will admit, listing every trade is much better than only showing one trade of the day that went really well, but in the end, even a detailed track record isn't worth much if there is no proof. This can only come through reputable satisfied customers or through posting trades live in a room with clear entries and exits for some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly. I like the idea, so let's keep discussion kosher. I'd like to see more live examples if you could, EMC2, as well.

 

Also, feel free to stop by the TL chat room (link is above) during market hours. I'd love to hear what you're seeing real time.

 

 

Just for the record, I have tried to go to the chat room many times today, and almost everytime it locks up shortly after I get in there......Does TL really have a chat room that just doesnt work with IE?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.