Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sign in to follow this  
Soultrader

Greed: Being a Dick for a Tick

Recommended Posts

Typical new trader mistake: being greedy for that extra tick.

 

How many times have we waited for the extra tick just to see our profits rapidly disappear and exiting with a much smaller profit?

 

How many times have we limped in with a solid hand just to face a very tough decision at the flop/turn/river just to end up losing the hand?

 

How many times have we slow played a hand just to get beat at the river?

 

These are all examples of greed in play trying to seek that extra profit. In the long run, this sort of play style will only hurt you in terms of PNL.

 

Lets take a look at a few classic poker mistakes.

 

1.Limping in with pocket Aces expecting a re-raise preflop or someone making their top pair on the flop.

 

This is a sneaky tactic but a dangerous one. The rewards may be high but the risk is high in my opinion. In trading, its sort of like trying to catch a falling knife. Why is this dangerous? Few reasons. First, many players are emotionally attached to good hands like pocket Aces. This makes it rather hard to impossible for them to lay down these hands. Second, limping in preflop allows mediocre hands like Q10 or J10 to play as well. A two pair is devastating when holding pocket Aces. Third, these hands tend to get out of control.... under certain sitatuions, one can be forced to make a decision to go all-in. Obviously one has a huge advantage pre-flop going all-in. But what if you made it cheap preflop which in turn ended up with 2-3 other players.... lets name a few possibilities of your opponents after the flop.

 

1. Flush Draw with top pair

2. high pair

3. trips

4. two pair

5. straight draw (though I doubt they will call an all-in)

 

The above scenarios are cards that your opponent may call when put in an all-in situation against your aces. Now, right away if your opponent has the following hands: #3, #4 you are behind. #1 gives your opponent plenty of outs resulting in a gamble. Poker should be won with skill... never gambling.

 

On the other hand, if he has #2 there is a good chance of doubling up. #5 is most likely out of the question as anyone who would go all-in with a straight draw are plain idiots.

 

Now, all of a sudden your pocket Aces do not look to comforting does it?

 

How many times have you folded pocket Aces and turns up to be the right decision? How many times have you gone all-in with Aces after the flop just to be beat? Personally I dont make much money with pocket Aces. Its a very volatile pair of cards. I tend to push strong preflop and just try to take it down at the flop. Most of my money comes from practicing patience, understanding the psych of my opponent, and taking in solid made hands. In other words, waiting for optimal setups.

 

2. Slow Playing

 

Here is an example of a hand from last night.

 

My cards: Q7

Opponent: ?

 

Preflop: I called and opponent checks

Flop: 2, Q, 5

 

I check and my opponent raises $400. I call thinking I may have him trapped.

 

Turn: 2, Q, 5, K

 

Now I am thinking if my opponent thinks he has a better hand than I do, he will bet. So I patiently check... my opponent surprisngly checks. Now this opponent is good enough to play all types of mind tricks. We read each other so much that sometimes we have to play dumb. In this case, he was playing dumb and pretending to show weakness by checking on the turn.

 

River: 2, Q, 5, K, 7

 

I just made my two pair. Knowing that if my opponent was slow playing me, this could become a monster pot if I play him right. So I check pretending to have missed the flush. (flush draw since flop, though it was irrelevant for me)

 

My opponent raises $1750. In my mind, this is precisly where I want him to be. No raise pre-flop meant he was not holding two face cards or any pocket pair. In other words, the odds of trips or KQ was low. A straight was out of the question, and with no flush possibility it meant that I would have to put him on a pair of Kings or two pair, possible with a queen. I pondered thinking for any clues that could put him on a K5 or K2. I knew K7 was probably not the case as I had a 7. But I sensed that he had something made from the flop and was slow playing early.... meaning that the K or 7 probably did not help him. I decided to re-raise $2,000. My raise blew his mind... and as frustrated as he seemed he called.

 

He had a Q5 and I beat him with my Q7. This was a huge pot that almost doubled me up when I was somewhat small stacked and put me back to chip leader. So why did my opponent lose? He slow played. He bet weak on the flop and checked on the turn. This gave me a free river card, something that should of never happened. If he had raised at the turn, it would of made it extremely difficult for me to call with a queen and a weak kicker knowing that he raised flop and followed by a king at the turn.

 

How many times have we slow played our two pairs till the river just to have your opponent catch a higher two pair? Or perhaps the board pairs up and all of a sudden your low two pair is no longer good? Slow playing is very rewarding as long as you have your opponent trapped. But slow playing to be greedy is a very dangerous tactic. Learn to take down pots. A free card for your opponent is actually a very expensive card for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But slow playing to be greedy is a very dangerous tactic. Learn to take down pots. A free card for your opponent is actually a very expensive card for you.

 

I was that guy James - slow play as much as I could. And most times it would pay off until you check someone right into a straight or flush. Enough of those and you realize that sometimes, just take the pot down and move on. Better to take the pot and have profit vs. going broke over a slow play gone bad.

 

I think this concept is not stressed enough in poker books. I've read plenty and i think it needs stressed more, as you have done here James.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.