Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

LS_Chad

New Features in Investor/RT 9.1

Recommended Posts

We are on the verge of releasing 9.1 and I wanted to start highlighting some of the new features to look forward to. We should have a beta ready next week, possibly early in the week. I'll be adding to the list below over the coming days.

 

1) Support for the TransAct/Infinity platform.

 

We are putting the finishing touches on the integration of Investor/RT and TransAct/Infinity data. We are excited about launching this combination in beta over the coming week. This should be a very powerful combination.

 

2) Ability to compute the average volume or average range of time periods throughout the day.

 

Over the years I've had a number of request along the following lines: "Is there any way for me to compute the average volume of the first 5 minutes of the session over the last 10 session (50 session, etc). Then compute the avg volume of the 2nd 5-minute period, etc. And then be able to compare the volume of that period today with the average to get a relative strength. I've no added options to Session Statistics indicator to do this type of per-bar averaging, and to do it not only on volume, but range, change, and many other criteria.

 

Below is an example:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2008/07/11/BracketAverages_2

 

BracketAverages_2.png

 

These are 30-minute bars/brackets, showing the average ranges and volumes over a 50 day period of each 30-minute bracket. The relative strengths are also included (dividing the current value by the average, then multiplying by 100). From this chart, you can clearly see, not surprisingly, that the first 30 minutes of the session carries the heaviest volume and largest range (on average), followed closely by the 2nd 30-minute period.

 

3) Cloning Trendlines and extending them into the future.

 

Trendlines can now be easily cloned (duplicating the trendlines with those of same length and slope) and dragged so that the endpoints extend into the future (past the current bar).

 

4) Cumulative VWAP from any starting date/time

 

We've added the ability to create cumulative VWAP lines beginning at any past date/time and going to present. These can be easily duplicated/dragged/dropped for quick positioning at extreme highs / lows. These are useful for creating support and resistance lines during uptrend and downtrends when drawn from extreme lows and highs respectively.

 

5) Market Profile custom TPO sequence

 

Users may now specify their own sequence of TPOs instead of the standard ABCDEFGHIJKLMNPQ.... Users may specify not only letters, but numbers, or other characters such as +, -, $, #, etc. The sequence specified will be repeated if more there are more letters in the profile than specified. For instance, if a user specified simple "+" then "+" would be used over and over for each TPO. This new feature works well in conjunction with the ability to custom the color of each TPO. Here is an extreme example:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2008/07/09/myMP_2

myMP_2.png

 

 

[...more details and features coming tomorrow....]

Edited by LS_Chad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Awesome updates, Chad.

 

Couple of questions:

 

A. Will there ever be support for OEC / Open E Cry in I/RT or Market Delta?

 

B. Is there support for tick-by-tick data replay on demand ?

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  LS_Chad said:
forsearch,

 

I have now downloaded and taken a look at the API for open e cry. That could be in our near future but no guarantees.

 

Take a look at this video on global playback: http://www.linnsoft.com/videos/playback/

 

Thanks - will do.

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another note on the feature I mentioned above to "compute the average volume or average range of time periods throughout the day." This can be applied to any time-based periodicity, including minute bars, or second bars. You can also do averages of the cumulative values (volumes, ranges, etc) for the session, at each bar through the session. You can see a good example below which shows the 10 day averaging of the cumulative volume (3rd pane). You can clearly see from the curve how the volume ramps up in the morning, levels off around lunchtime, and then ramps back up into the close. The 3rd pane shows the relative strength...how the cumulative volume of the day measured up at each bar compared to the average volume at that point for the previous 10 days.

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2008/07/13/VolumeAverages.png

 

VolumeAverages.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an hourly chart showing the average volumes of each hour (10 day). I've flagged the first bar of each week. About 450,000 contracts, on average, trade during the first hour of the session for the ES.

 

VolumeAverages_3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A new option has been added to the Zig Zag Indicator to allow users to automatically draw fib levels at users specified percentages. Also, the user now has the option to "box" each leg of the zig zag. Here is an example of both in action:

 

ZigRetracementsAndBoxes.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.