Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

rsagi

Brokers Trading Against the Retail Trader

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am interested in knowing what you think about the claims that a broker with a trading desk may be trading against the retail trader - us...:)

 

Am I avoiding this issue when I use market orders so they cant "find" my stop loss/limit?

 

I currently use Fidelity ATP - how is the platform for daytrading + scalping stocks vs. IB/TS/Mbtrading/MT/Ninja etc? I havent seen any input on the forum here regarding platforms suck as LIGHTSPEED + HYDRA? How do platforms such as REDI compare?

 

I know a guy who scalps using ATP buying 5,000- 8,000 ETF shares and enjoys the platform - any thoughts? (I know he also has an account with IB.) I found it to be really interesting that when he was asked if he uses "smart routing" - he said NO - he found no slippage issues or added value in doing so- again What Are Your Thoughts on This ONE???

 

Also, what about short inventory when it comes to big companies such as Fidelity vs. others? - I only DayTrade ETF's and stocks above $10 - no OTC etc.

 

My apologies that this is a bit of a long post ... ;)

 

Looking forward to your response,

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why you would use a platform such as Fidelity ATP if you're day trading and especially scalping. I had Fidelity and I thought their charts were lacking to say the least. And if you're using market orders it's not a matter of being "found" or not, you're setting yourself up for bad fills. If you use limit orders you might miss a few, but those few ticks can add up over the course of say a year.

 

Someone like Brownsfan would probably be able to answer your question about your broker trading against you. I've heard examples of brokers taking the opposite side of your trade in anticipation that you screw up, and eventually blow up. But I'm not sure if that's myth or real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree about their Charts. I also think that the execution screens - the lack of keyboard based quick execution is just aweful.

 

You criticized the charts - but more importantly, what are your thoughts about the fills by fidelity vs. others?

 

Best,

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I've never really had a problem. When I traded equities I typically took a long term approach (several weeks) so I wasn't so worried about where I was filled. Now I only use Fidelity for options, and I always enter limit orders. The one time I did use a market order, however, I got a shitty price and I deserved it.

 

But I'm not sure if ATP has an order book style execution platform available, that way you can work your bid like you could on say an ES trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I c

 

Two more questions.

 

1. Since you do options- do you know a FREE or cost based options "scanner" where I can search for options with the highest premium for covered call purposes? Any interesting tools out there for options volatility/implied volatility etc? I couldn't find one on Fidelity.

 

 

 

2. Who is the broker with the largest/MAX LEVERAGE Intra day for stocks?

 

Best,

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi All,

 

I am interested in knowing what you think about the claims that a broker with a trading desk may be trading against the retail trader - us...:)

 

Am I avoiding this issue when I use market orders so they cant "find" my stop loss/limit?

 

I currently use Fidelity ATP - how is the platform for daytrading + scalping stocks vs. IB/TS/Mbtrading/MT/Ninja etc? I havent seen any input on the forum here regarding platforms suck as LIGHTSPEED + HYDRA? How do platforms such as REDI compare?

 

I know a guy who scalps using ATP buying 5,000- 8,000 ETF shares and enjoys the platform - any thoughts? (I know he also has an account with IB.) I found it to be really interesting that when he was asked if he uses "smart routing" - he said NO - he found no slippage issues or added value in doing so- again What Are Your Thoughts on This ONE???

 

Also, what about short inventory when it comes to big companies such as Fidelity vs. others? - I only DayTrade ETF's and stocks above $10 - no OTC etc.

 

My apologies that this is a bit of a long post ... ;)

 

Looking forward to your response,

 

Steve

 

Here's an article on brokers trading against you if you are interested.

 

In short, it says the following. Brokers tend to fall into one of the three categories, Market Makers, STP brokers and ECN's.

 

An STP broker passes all it's clients trades directly to liquidity provider and has nothing to gain from it's clients losing and never trades against them. If anything, an STP broker would want to see it's clients succeed and make money so that they keep on trading.

 

ECN brokers simple provide a true market place where all their clients, retail traders, banks, financial institutions can trade against each other on an equal basis - ECN brokers don't care which of their clients wins and which of their clients lose as they're clients are effectively trading against each other.

 

Market Makers (brokers with a dealing desk). These brokers initially take the otherside of their clients trades and in doing so literally make a market and provide liquidity. They could, if they wanted to, hold on to the otherside of their clients trades and profit from their clients losses if they wanted to but they probably don't. Most market makers probably just seek to match their clients trades with the trades of other clients who want to do the opposite and hedge the difference (what they can't match) in the market and seek to profit from the spread.

 

Hope that helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally these tricks only happen in market-maker type of situations [forex--although it is rare to see this now as there are lots of tools to readily determine trad. Regulated environments traded on an exchange I didn't know that could happen. Aren't these ETF/Stocks traded on or through an exchange or are these off-exchange transactions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.