Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

How is Your Trade Aggressiveness?

Recommended Posts

The more threads I have read, whether it is about a trading style, a type of method to trade, a timeframe preference.. each thread invariably tends to take a detour briefly.. One poster thinks another is being hateful or stepping on their method, the other poster backpedals signaling that "was not the intent” and it occurred to me that a lot of these tend to boil down to one simple statement: "Oh well I trade this way because that is what I am comfortable with and what works for me." Generally one trader is far more aggressive in their trade choices than the other trader in the conversation.

 

With my study of VSA I also saw this come to pass even with Tom Williams and Todd K (both work together in the same company and present VSA to students.) Tom Williams is an aggressive trader- when he has determined that he is looking to go long when he sees a bar that suits his fancy and BAM he is in. Todd K on the other hand waits for confirmation. He will wait out the next bar or even two before he gets in to his position.

 

What this does for the more conservative trader is give him/her a higher probability of success. What it does for the aggressive trader is let him/her be in on the entire start of the move when it does plow northward.

 

I have a good fellow trader who is more "confirmation oriented" and I tend to be the Tom Williams aggressive trader apparently.

 

I wanted to get a feel of how some of the traders here feel they fit into what category vs. the other? If I see a beautiful bull move on the horizon but will be unable to physically be at my platform to pull the trigger at the "perfect moment" I will accept the drawdown to be sure I get in on the trade. My fellow and well-respected trader from above would think I was crazy because he'd wait for the confirmation of that trend to form before pulling the trigger. Plus he is less susceptible to the fact that if it did decide to punch down a tad lower- I am now either stopped out or riding a nasty drawdown before the good times come.

 

I'd be interested in hearing others own self-reflection of what type of trader they really are. I'd be very interested in people who once sat in the "Aggressive Chair" and had a moment of clarity to become a more "Conservative Trader."

 

Once again I see an inadvertent lesson I was taught by a wonderful friend and fellow trader that I had to come too on my own... my aggressive days may be coming to an end... I may be leaning towards the “Conservative” and “boring” side with higher probability of win than I currently do now!

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Naturally, I am a more aggressive trader. For equities, I like to be in the trade before the breakout. But on the other hand, I never enter with a big position. In fact, I am extremely conservative in that sense. I realize that if the breakout doesn't come and the stock moves the other way, it quickly wipes out the position due to various components against me such as IV, Delta, etc.

 

On the ES, I typically don't wait for confirmation if I see a setup. I just enter and adjust my risk/reward accordingly. But again, I never take on a big position, but the trade itself could be deemed "aggressive."

 

I also take on other approaches in options that aren't aggressive at all, such as credit spreads. This allows a more consistent income, but it's not as exciting. It's kind of like the bread and butter, it gets the job done. I utilize my other trading strategies because I find it to be more challenging, and I like a challenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread... throughout the early years of my trading career, I went through a phase where I would be right about short term moves in the market but could not seem to profit from it. After thorough analysis, I realized I was overly aggresssive which forced me to jump into trades too early. Even my old mentor mentioned I was too aggressive. As a result, one of the things I struggled to change was to hold myself back and wait for further confirmation.... allowing me to time my trades better.

 

This took practice and time as I started to learn that being conservative didnt necessarily mean you had less balls. It was simply practicing more discipline and patience. In the end, all that really mattered was your PNL.... and thus changed my style of trading to a more sniper approach, crafting my timing and entry as careful as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MidKnight said:
99.9% of the traders out there want confirmation. With that in mind, it makes more sense for me to be on the aggressive side.

 

All my best,

MK

 

I think there are degrees to the confirmation. This could be one extra bar, two bars, indicator based, etc... The more confirmation you require, you are in with the herd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Degree of aggression can be measured by degree of 'earliness' or 'lateness' as measured from a turning point. By waiting for confirmation you often give up trade location to have confirmation and also momentum already on your side. As you note the very earliest (most aggressive traders) will trade before the turn. (buying into a selling climax) This by definition would be counter trend trading.

 

The later you trade (the further away) the less aggressive you are. You pay for this with poorer trade location and so potentially higher risk. As I mentioned above you have momentum working for you as compensation. 'Break out' traders and 'trend followers' are the latest. Of course if you are really late trading a pull back for example you run the risk of trading straight into the next turn.

 

Getting the right style (early or late) for your personality is one of the fundamental choices you make as a trader so worthy of special consideration.

 

Personally I trade early (I try and trade as close to the turn as possible) and with quite a high frequency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Sledge said:
The more threads I have read, whether it is about a trading style, a type of method to trade, a timeframe preference.. each thread invariably tends to take a detour briefly.. One poster thinks another is being hateful or stepping on their method, the other poster backpedals signaling that "was not the intent” and it occurred to me that a lot of these tend to boil down to one simple statement: "Oh well I trade this way because that is what I am comfortable with and what works for me." Generally one trader is far more aggressive in their trade choices than the other trader in the conversation.

 

With my study of VSA I also saw this come to pass even with Tom Williams and Todd K (both work together in the same company and present VSA to students.) Tom Williams is an aggressive trader- when he has determined that he is looking to go long when he sees a bar that suits his fancy and BAM he is in. Todd K on the other hand waits for confirmation. He will wait out the next bar or even two before he gets in to his position.

 

What this does for the more conservative trader is give him/her a higher probability of success. What it does for the aggressive trader is let him/her be in on the entire start of the move when it does plow northward.

 

I have a good fellow trader who is more "confirmation oriented" and I tend to be the Tom Williams aggressive trader apparently.

 

I wanted to get a feel of how some of the traders here feel they fit into what category vs. the other? If I see a beautiful bull move on the horizon but will be unable to physically be at my platform to pull the trigger at the "perfect moment" I will accept the drawdown to be sure I get in on the trade. My fellow and well-respected trader from above would think I was crazy because he'd wait for the confirmation of that trend to form before pulling the trigger. Plus he is less susceptible to the fact that if it did decide to punch down a tad lower- I am now either stopped out or riding a nasty drawdown before the good times come.

 

I'd be interested in hearing others own self-reflection of what type of trader they really are. I'd be very interested in people who once sat in the "Aggressive Chair" and had a moment of clarity to become a more "Conservative Trader."

 

Once again I see an inadvertent lesson I was taught by a wonderful friend and fellow trader that I had to come too on my own... my aggressive days may be coming to an end... I may be leaning towards the “Conservative” and “boring” side with higher probability of win than I currently do now!

Aaron

 

 

Mainstream TA is an endless supply of patterns, techniques, methods etc. Depending on which books a person reads, what they see in a chart and the individuals personality is all relavant.

 

Personally i've never really understood the aggresive/passive arguement, Jeckyll and Hyde trading in an individual can't be good for the curve.

 

Good trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Interesting thread... After thorough analysis, I realized I was overly aggresssive which forced me to jump into trades too early. Even my old mentor mentioned I was too aggressive. As a result, one of the things I struggled to change was to hold myself back and wait for further confirmation.... allowing me to time my trades better.

 

This took practice and time as I started to learn that being conservative didnt necessarily mean you had less balls. It was simply practicing more discipline and patience. In the end, all that really mattered was your PNL.... and thus changed my style of trading to a more sniper approach, crafting my timing and entry as careful as possible.

 

James-

Thank you, After self-analysis, I appear to be in your former state. I don't like drawdown, but my trades virtually always work out and end in the + side of my sheet (sometimes not at the dollar figure I had intended because of the further downward movement.) I think I would prefer to be a little later in the move- but be more certain that the move is going to bank money.

 

Anyone here work out their trades in this way, I have been toying with it but not come close to mastereing it at all:

 

Instead of doing an instant execution trade and having drawdown, you put in a pending order at some pre-determined price and when the market does go in your direction, you are filled. This way their is little or no drawdown and you are in on the major part of the move. I'm looking at this as a potential way to solve both problems. I get into the major part of the move, but don't ride the drawdown. If the order doesn't fill, I'll reassess after and see if their is a better entry.

 

Thoughts?

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.