Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Bid/Ask Indicator Similar to TradeFlow in CQG

Recommended Posts

When applied to a tick chart, the width/color of the bars reacts much differently than when on a time based chart.......I think CQG even uses a different approach for tick charts. I'm sure lack of programmatic access to the bid/ask data in tradestation is definitely a hindrance, but nevertheless I like where this indicator is headed.........very useful.:cool:

 

JC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what i meant was

is there a way to specify, the volume differences for the bars? cause really low volume are really small which is good, but the big volume bars alot of them are the same size after a certain volume, like 20,000 contracts on a 2 minutes is the same width as a 10,000 volume bar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 6 bar levels in TS.....What you described is the problem with the indicator......it has to be calibrated to the chart you are using. I have had best results on minute charts and very small tick charts......i.e 55 tick.

Here's what the inputs mean:

AvgLength(5)-----> Length that volume average is calculated over

LowestVolWidth(0)-----> Width of thinnest bar type

LowVolWidth(1)-----> Width of next bar type

NormalVolWidth(3)-----> ""

HighVolWidth(3.5)-----> ""

HighestVolWidth(5)-----> ""

LowestVolumeMult(.25)-----> Threshold Percent of Average volume to calculate thinnest bar type

LowVolumeMult(.5)----->next percent volume threshold

HighVolumeMult(.9)----->next threshold

HighestVolumeMult(1.25)------->next threshold

 

so Volume Multiple*Average Volume over x bars=Volume trigger threshold.

You probably want to adjust the HighestVolumeWidth input. A higher value of 6 will make the bars larger...Alternatively you can adjust the sensitivity of how the larger bars are triggered by adjusting the HighestVolumeMult input...Or you can adjust the AVGLength, but this will affect all bar types.

 

Hope this helps.

 

JC

Edited by caglebagle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MRC & Co

Do you boys actually find trade flow (difference between the bid ask trades) makes any difference at further points in time?

 

I mean, if you know there is a buyer or a seller in there at certain points, you will obviously know if the bids or asked have seen more trades and the outcome of this previously is shown simply within the price action.

 

Do you have an actual example of how you use this as your candlestick setup on your charts? (I use CQG myself but not with tradeflow currently, never even thought of it until seeing this post).

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JT It is not a 'system' but the answer to your question is almost surely No. Simply as there is no way to collect the data that is required for this sort of analysis.

 

MRC there are two questions really. Does order flow have a short term effect on price? And are these indicators an effective tool to guage order flow? A search for delta or market delta should reveal a couple of discussions that might interest you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MRC & Co

True Blow.

 

I will do a search for market delta. Seen that video of this CQG trade flow (order ticker or whatever it's caleld) in action live, but it's really just the tape, nothing that can't be seen in the price ladder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guessing NT is NinjaTrader rather than NeoTicker but the answer is yes and yes anyway. Check there forums for buy sell pressure indicators. Of course display options are kind of limited to your chart options however this can be overridden if you want to get really stuck in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Blowfish,

 

thank you for your reply I checked all the volume indicators on Ninja Forum which by the way I was reffering to (Ninja Trader) sorry not to be as clear on my first post the one Soultrader is referring to is not found and default buy sell pressure is different I looked at this one ...

 

http://www.ninjatrader-support.com/HelpGuideV6/helpguide.html?BuySellPressure

 

could not get any good use of it and no compare to the one Soultrader is referring since they show equi volume so I was wondering if it would somehow be available for NT ?

 

 

cheers

Franko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blowfish,

 

thank you for your reply I checked all the volume indicators on Ninja Forum which by the way I was reffering to (Ninja Trader) sorry not to be as clear on my first post the one Soultrader is referring to is not found and default buy sell pressure is different I looked at this one ...

 

http://www.ninjatrader-support.com/HelpGuideV6/helpguide.html?BuySellPressure

could not get any good use of it and no compare to the one Soultrader is referring since they show equi volume so I was wondering if

 

it would somehow be available for NT ?

 

cheers

Franko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of these types of indicators around (several at NT forums) usually the differences are how the information is displayed. You might have to do some modification in how the data is displayed to get the same display as CQG if you can't find one that is like that 'out of the packet'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmm..so you mean I shall rather contact people at the

NT forum to get this coded since my C# knowledge is not enough to get this ...

 

or is there anyone else here who has the skills cooking the code

which blu ray was able to get running for TS - in order to be available as well for Ninja ?

 

regards

F

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ask on the ninja forum they will just tell you they don't support custom plotting.

This stuff isn't straight forward in ninja, I would love to code this up for you but if you don't want to wait a few years for me to get up to speed :) your only real option would be to try one of the hired guns...

this guy I think will give you a price quote on programming it for you.

http://www.affordableindicators.com/

I've never used him before but he would probly be the cheapest and may find the challenge interesting in and of itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

F as Darth points out it will probably need the custom plot facilities to get it looking like that as things are now. Actually this might be a very worthwhile thing to discover more about, it certainly interests me.

 

I really know little about C# OR ninja for that matter. The whole approach is quit 'high level' which means there are routines and procedures to do most things (methods I guess is the correct name). Personally I find this hard to work with. I prefer to work with a small set of primitives, by the time you find the correct method and established exactly how it works on stuff you could have written something from scratch using the handful of well defined primitives!

 

What I am saying in a round about way is I can't give much in the way of assistance.

 

The reason I said 'as things are now' is that Ninja 7.0 is fairly imminent (that can be a long time in the software biz :)) and one area that may well be improved (it is lacking right now) is plot types for studies. You could contact them to ask if a hi lo plot type for studies will be available in 7.0.

 

Another alternative is tradestation or multicharts, I think BluRay did a version of this in Easy Language (might be mistaken there).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Allright thanks

 

I understand for now it is not available ...for Ninja

alternative would be TS just to test it and see if it is worth working with it

since I use Ninja for charting I may consider this solution at a later stage ....maybe.

 

Anyways appreciate your comments

 

cheers

Franko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Personally I find this hard to work with. I prefer to work with a small set of primitives, by the time you find the correct method and established exactly how it works on stuff you could have written something from scratch using the handful of well defined primitives!

 

You should check out the chartcontrol thread I started in the tools/ninja section here. Ninjascript certainly is in an odd place when it comes to doing something like this cqg chart. More primitives/basic functions is what I hope that thread will eventually evolve to. Maybe you can explain how tradestation does this as it was quite impressive to see how fast people knocked off this chart here..

I guess part of this is that when you override plot there are no limits to what you can do since your just drawing things based on X/Y cordinates on the canvas. Adding the fat/skiny bars would be trivial in ninja if the basics were done differently. The strange thing I'm finding with ninjascript is that its a modern OOP language with everything from the ninja guys done like its just a scripting language. No modularity, no code reuse...

I wouldn't hold your breath for this stuff in ninja 7. Their support is amazing for what they do support but I think anything more as far as charting opens up the C# can of worms which they are pretty clear they will not support much outside very basic programming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why it is trivial in TS is that there is a Hi Lo plot style for indicators. You can calculate the %age @bid nad @ASK to split the bar, work out the 4 values (trivial) Hi,splitpoint splitpoint,low and simply plot as a red hi lo segment and a green hi lo segment.

 

It's sometimes the simplest things that make life easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
The reason why it is trivial in TS is that there is a Hi Lo plot style for indicators. You can calculate the %age @bid nad @ASK to split the bar, work out the 4 values (trivial) Hi,splitpoint splitpoint,low and simply plot as a red hi lo segment and a green hi lo segment.

 

"Unfortunately this is not supported right now" :crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.