Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

charcoalstick

Reading the Price Action by Looking at Each Trade

Recommended Posts

Everything other than this is in some sense a summary of the underlying statistic (trade by trade information).

 

So, just as an ma or more complex indicator summarizes price bar information, price bars summarize trade by trade inputs.

 

The question cs, is what speed are you going to trade at (slower suggests more summarization is acceptable) and are you capable of getting more out it by letting your brain summarize the trades rather than letting software do it by creating bar/candlestick/xxx charts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Everything other than this is in some sense a summary of the underlying statistic (trade by trade information).

 

So, just as an ma or more complex indicator summarizes price bar information, price bars summarize trade by trade inputs.

 

The question cs, is what speed are you going to trade at (slower suggests more summarization is acceptable) and are you capable of getting more out it by letting your brain summarize the trades rather than letting software do it by creating bar/candlestick/xxx charts?

 

u phrase the stuff i m trying to say in a really better way..

 

that is the disadvantage using candlestick or indicator based on formula/software to "summarise the trades" as you describe it...some info could be lost along the way or biased in certain way...

 

the best is to just use the RAW data trade by trade..but the problem is werther your brain is capable of doing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
that is the disadvantage using candlestick or indicator based on formula/software to "summarise the trades" as you describe it...some info could be lost along the way or biased in certain way...

At times, I'm most interested in (selectively) losing information :). If I am able to make effective trading decisions off a 5-minute chart, then the additional information would only cause information overload.

 

In a bigger picture, if you were position trading and planned to hold for months, how much information is gained from the tick data? How does the fact that someone went long 5 contracts affect your position?

 

Check out Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. It's not a trading book, but speaks volumes about selective ignorance and information overload.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Instead of candlestick, would it be better to read the price action by looking at the demand and supply trade by trade, that is just following each executed trade?

 

You could plot this on a chart.

Call it a Charcoalstick chart.

You could write a book.

We could start a sub-forum on Charcoalstick charts.

Great possibilities...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check out Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. It's not a trading book, but speaks volumes about selective ignorance and information overload.

 

Thanks for this, I had a look at a description of the book at this site, looks really interesting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could plot this on a chart.

Call it a Charcoalstick chart.

You could write a book.

We could start a sub-forum on Charcoalstick charts.

Great possibilities...

 

 

You know one of my plans was to invent a new way to visualise (chart) market data. Bars,candles,point and figure, MP, equivolume, Helkinaskis, Ichicoopark (not sure about the spelling on the last two). There must be room for another.

 

Some sort of 3d effect would be good with modern computing power. Trouble is my imagination is not what it used to be :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trouble is my imagination is not what it used to be :)

I've put much thought into doing this as well, but I realized that no matter how you display the data, you're never going to find "new" data from it. The closest exception to this I can think of is Market Profile, as it changes how volume is displayed over both axis.

 

Outside of that, you have two main pieces of data: price and volume. You can distort, contort, and retort them however you want, but that's all we really have. For example, range bars "simplify" price action and enable us to identify breakouts and trends easier; however, the exact same information is just as available from a normal time chart (the high's and low's are the same, as is the general price action). Volume charts give us a good indication of price over volume; however, all that is changed is relative timeframe (as close price action is occasionally "closer" or "further" out due to volume), and the data is the same.

 

Visually, some charts may help you identify what you're looking for, but you're looking at the same side of the same coin. Almost anything you deduce from range bar, volume, tick, time, PnF, etc charts could be deduced from another (given no data smoothing or loss).

 

Market Profile (and any other chart with Volume at Price), as I mentioned, is different because it opens the y-axis for the display of volume. This is novel, because it allows us to visualize volume in a new way. In my opinion, you'd need an innovation like this to significantly improve a chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this Blink book has done something to my imagination ... I really like his message, which I think is nicely summarised as "the power of the trained mind to make split second decisions" (from the Wikipedia page).

 

This is what short time-frame traders (day-traders and scalpers) are doing all the time.

 

One of the criticisms of Gladwells book (again, taking this from the Wikipedia page, link above), is from Steve Sailer:

"But as far as I can tell, his book reduces to two messages:

* Go with your gut reactions, but only when they are right."

 

There is another point Sailer makes but its not relevant here.

 

But that first criticism ... does this remind anyone of trading and how we get out of decisions that are 'not right'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of the criticisms of Gladwells book (again, taking this from the Wikipedia page, link above), is from Steve Sailer:

"But as far as I can tell, his book reduces to two messages:

* Go with your gut reactions, but only when they are right."

 

But that first criticism ... does this remind anyone of trading and how we get out of decisions that are 'not right'?

Perfectly valid gripe about the book. However, I'm not sure he would tell a trader to ever go with their gut. Since we're dealing with patterns, we can very easily be duped by our brians into seeing what we want to see.

 

I wouldn't parallel the book directly to trading, but use it as a constant lesson that "less is more". I'm not sure the exact primise is applicable to trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've put much thought into doing this as well, but I realized that no matter how you display the data, you're never going to find "new" data from it. The closest exception to this I can think of is Market Profile, as it changes how volume is displayed over both axis..

 

I've started working on writing up a boxplot in Ninja, i'm actually kind of suprised we don't have boxplots in software already.

boxplot.gif

 

To me its not an issue of finding new data, of course your not going to find something that is not there. To me the issue is what is the best respresentation of the data that is not either ignoring some of the data or weighting some of the data more than others giving a distortion to the data. If you take traditional candles for instance, there is somewhat of an arbitrary overweighting to the candle body depending on what time frame you decide on.

 

To me the order book is the big thing in the equation that we are missing, looking at the raw order book and just calling it nosie to me is a lack of imagination as far as a descriptive summary goes...although I can't really think of anything usefull in this area either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me the issue is what is the best respresentation of the data that is not either ignoring some of the data or weighting some of the data more than others giving a distortion to the data. If you take traditional candles for instance, there is somewhat of an arbitrary overweighting to the candle body depending on what time frame you decide on.

 

To me the order book is the big thing in the equation that we are missing, looking at the raw order book and just calling it nosie to me is a lack of imagination as far as a descriptive summary goes...although I can't really think of anything usefull in this area either.

You're absolutely right; I didn't think of that. I'd love to assist with development if you want (or even just testing). I use Ninja as well.

 

I like that POC candlestick idea, and I have a few others to add to it. Let me think about this, and I think we can come up with some innovative ideas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually for me it is to help visualise what is important. For example a reason I will sometimes use candles on a very low time frame chart is to better see price rejection (by virtue of the wicks). It is not seeing more or less data it is to better notice what is important.

 

This on the ES as we speak might help illustrate, see the wicks at the top?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For example a reason I will sometimes use candles on a very low time frame chart is to better see price rejection (by virtue of the wicks).
The flaw with candlesticks is that they weigh the open and close, when intraday, the bar open/close means very little specifically. What I mean by that is depending on what time / timeframe is governing the candles, you could end up with different stories regarding price.

 

I could create an artificial example, but I'm sure you know what I'm saying. If in your tick chart you had 10 extra ticks in the beginning, those wicks could easily be closes. Furthermore, bodies you see could be wicks depending on when the bar closed.

 

I'd love to see a way to display data that gives weight to total value for that bar (if it's far away from a wick, you know price was rejected, verses happening to close down and exposing a wick) in a friendly manner. With this said, I think there is some value in candles (and the ability to ignore wicks) for daily and larger timeframes, as it represents a market open to close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The flaw with candlesticks is that they weigh the open and close, when intraday, the bar open/close means very little specifically. What I mean by that is depending on what time / timeframe is governing the candles, you could end up with different stories regarding price.

 

I could create an artificial example, but I'm sure you know what I'm saying. If in your tick chart you had 10 extra ticks in the beginning, those wicks could easily be closes. Furthermore, bodies you see could be wicks depending on when the bar closed.

 

I'd love to see a way to display data that gives weight to total value for that bar (if it's far away from a wick, you know price was rejected, verses happening to close down and exposing a wick) in a friendly manner. With this said, I think there is some value in candles (and the ability to ignore wicks) for daily and larger timeframes, as it represents a market open to close.

 

The thing is it dosen't matter where you start with 'fast' tick charts you are not really looking at candle patterns per se you are just using it as a way of getting into the 'flow' of things. As you get flurries of activity at S/R levels you can see 'walls' form and break. Its a fairly intuitive thing. If price hits the wall and falls back it leaves wicks (several). I use it more like a proxy for the tape than as a regular chart. On the whole I use bars it's just this visualisation helps to see price rejection.

 

Maybe a brick display (like the old pong games) with the order book changes filling up new bricks and trades at the ask knocking them out would do the job?you could even have price like the ball bouncing between S/R on the micro scale. That's interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotcha, I fully understand what you're saying. I use the same technique for entries / exits often. Something you hit on one of your charts is using volume on a tick chart, which in effect, shows order size for the tick bar.

 

I highlighted in your attachment significant volume bars that peak above the rest for the benefit of everyone else. Notice what happens to price action after a volume peak. Almost every micro-wave was identified extremely close to the high/low (within 1-2 bars and 1-2 ticks on the chart).

attachment.php?attachmentid=7187&stc=1&d=1214491237

 

I've used this for entries / exits for a while, and I think it's a very valuable tool on the micro scale (I wouldn't trade based only on these, but they help get a good price). Any ideas how we could integrate this into a standard time chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While we are on a role, here was something I played with a while ago (can't find the thread but it was one of the ones dealing with market delta).

 

It is a 1 tick wide constant range bar with delta plotted at the bottom. The idea was that the 1 tick wide represents a bid ask pair and the delta would display the action for that level. I did not presue it but I have just put together another chart. Whilst the delta stuff didn't pan out (volume seems to work equally well) it seems to show how price moves at a 'wall' well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is probably doing the same thing. Basically, we've identified that volume acts in certain ways at micro-tops and micro-bottoms in relation to the number of orders. On the last chart I annotated, a short/long entry could easily be improved by a few ticks if you pay attention to this. I'm not sure if Delta has any advantages, because it doesn't nessessarily tell you anything else (though it may help with a direction bias).

 

What if we were able to identify these "wall points" on a time chart with a symbol on the bar, like an asterisk? In addition to POC, this could give us a very good idea of value and market flow. Thoughts?

 

(As a note, something I want to stay away from is busying up a chart, without adding much additional value.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are coming perilously close to discovering the true nature of price movement as well as that of support and resistance. You're seeing the "message" of what most everybody else sees as "noise".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're absolutely right; I didn't think of that. I'd love to assist with development if you want (or even just testing). I use Ninja as well.

 

That would be cool, I think I've put things on hold though until the next version of Ninja when they said it will have support for historic fills for delta/bid/ask stuff.

Have you done much with overriding plot in ninja? I was starting to make some progress, then my computer crashed and I haven't gotten at my old drive yet.

What I really want to do is have something like Market Delta's delta bars but seperate the bid/ask into 2 columns. You can set market delta to only plot at X ammount of transactions at one side of the bid/ask. Its especially nice for trading breakouts because if the market is stuck, bars don't get plotted until the breakout occurs. Here is a mock up I did a few months ago, and another one with a 3d order book thing but I don't know if that would really be usefull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe a brick display (like the old pong games) with the order book changes filling up new bricks and trades at the ask knocking them out would do the job?you could even have price like the ball bouncing between S/R on the micro scale. That's interesting.

 

Haha, thats great. Can you describe this a little more? I think you mean the game "Breakout"? How ironic the game is called "breakout". :)

breakout.jpg

 

Also, Intrabar POC/PVP is really nice to have. Market delta already does this by putting a line at what price had the most activity at in each bar. Its really nice to see in a trend, especially for the market profile concept of higher/lower prices atracting activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.