Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I would like to know if there are people who hedge open intraday positions (by example x contracts ES) to prevent an account blowout by an unpredictable event? Is this practically and financially do-able? My first thought was by options but I have no idea how/if this could be done!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is extremely rare that an unpredictable event will cause an account blowup intraday except if you are over-leveraged. Even with futures it would require a massive move against your position to trigger a margin call. In case it would, that individual should probably stop trading anyway.

 

To get back to your question, it makes sense to hedge against a long-biased portfolio with a short position in index futures or ETF's if you expect a minor correction. This is a measure to protect a certain amount of profits and reduce exposure.

 

Or if you wanted to hedge an individual position, options are a solution, as well. Say you are long GE stocks and expect earnings to disappoint but you remain bullish for the long-term. What you do is buy put options and pay this premium to protect your unrealized profits. So either earnings are as expected and you let your options expire worthless or earnings disappoint and you reap in the profits or even make use of your rights to sell the stock at a higher than market price. In either case options are understood as an insurance against adverse price movements and that's the primary reason why they have been introduced to the market.

 

Whether hedging makes sense in day trading remains to be discussed. I personally don't think it is necessary, let alone helpful intraday because reducing size would have the same effect as hedging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets say I risk 2% of my account if I take a position in ES. My stop is placed 20 points away from my entry. If I don't want to be (over-)leveraged that means that I need to have a 50K $ account to trade just one contract. What if 'something' happened ...

 

My stop does not get filled at -20 points. That should result in a bigger drawdown (>2%) but not an account blowup. Ok.

 

The market is halted while in a position and re-opens with a big gap away from my entry. This could seriously damage my account. Or do I overestimate this risk by looking for a hedge? Or do you think that by the time the market is halted you should be out of the position?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

big point value for ES is $50.

so one contract X 20 points is $1000.

Plus margin requirement +/- $4500 (overnight margin)

2% is a VERY conservative risk with futures since they are leveraged so much. Also, futures e-mini markets don't get halted often (I haven't seen it).

 

As far as hedging goes:

 

If you are position trading the contract - ie. you have a signal on a daily chart that says go long - you open up your position. As long as the signal is valid (you decide this, maybe say if it is above/below the close of the entry day) you let the trade work. If it goes against you, use some other product to hedge. The idea is to let the technical signal work for you in the ES contract, because theoretically the statistics should back the trade.

I think Palatine has a point that usually you would only hedge positions that aren't so liquid intraday (normally a stock position), or something you want to hold for the long term for tax purposes.

Personally, I use the leveraged ETFs (QID,QLD,SSO,SDS) to hedge positions (not futures positions). These ETFs have good volume and percentage movements.

 

futures markets like ES are so liquid that the best idea is just to exit your position (have tighter stops) rather than hedge. Either that, or double the max historical drawdown of your entry signal, add that to the margin requirement and that would be a good min. account size.

 

hope that helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.