Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wasp

Bulls N Bears.. Its All in My Mind

bulls n bears  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. bulls n bears

    • Glass half full? I am just as comfortable long
      1
    • Glass half empty? I'm only happy when I'm shorting
      3
    • Who cares - just concentrate on whats in the glass and ignore bull/bear factor
      16


Recommended Posts

I have this tendency to only feel overtly confident when a market is heading down. This isn't based purely on a psychological factor, a high rate of the time, (currencies) will drop a hell of a lot easier, smoother and longer in a downward movement.

 

Someone once mentioned I should flip the screens so I am always in a 'bear' market and I think it may help!

 

It is a negative, cynical outlook on the world that does it I believe. I am long eurjpy right this second and I do not believe this will break the highs and continue up for a few hundred pips.

 

If I turned the screen upside down though, I would be marking on the major levels for the next 300 pips lower ready.........

 

Anyhow, I am curious to others thoughts on whether they find their personality plays a part in this way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have this tendency to only feel overtly confident when a market is heading down. This isn't based purely on a psychological factor, a high rate of the time, (currencies) will drop a hell of a lot easier, smoother and longer in a downward movement.

 

Someone once mentioned I should flip the screens so I am always in a 'bear' market and I think it may help!

 

It is a negative, cynical outlook on the world that does it I believe. I am long eurjpy right this second and I do not believe this will break the highs and continue up for a few hundred pips.

 

If I turned the screen upside down though, I would be marking on the major levels for the next 300 pips lower ready.........

 

Anyhow, I am curious to others thoughts on whether they find their personality plays a part in this way?

 

I have pretty much the same mindset.

It seems to me that prices can collapse down with gaps, more easily more often, than they tend to rise.

It would be interesting to know some actual stats on this in terms of seconds/minutes/pips movement etc. as perhaps there is a possiblity that i am over imagining the significance of the difference between rise/fall speed/ease.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think part of it for me at least is knowing that when the market drops, it drops much quicker than it typically rises. When we are in a true down move, that thing can move b/c there are many that simply only go long. Some can ONLY go long (mutual funds). So when those stop levels are hit, there can be a tremendous domino effect.

 

There is a big danger however in getting overly optimistic about taking shorts. Need to take what's in front of you w/ no bias whether that trade is long or short, unless of course your methodology calls for that bias.

 

Usually we see longs grind it out and take time to get to profit areas (unless drive by news), meanwhile a shorting wave can take seconds or minutes depending on the move you are riding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It is a negative, cynical outlook on the world that does it I believe ...

 

Anyhow, I am curious to others thoughts on whether they find their personality plays a part in this way?

 

You may be cynical on the world, but you must be optimistic on yourself. You would have to be in order to trade well. I prefer shorting, too. I think it is because of the quick profits. I also think it is because the market turns over more quickly at tops than bottoms. I find I have more stop losses in buying than in shorting. Because it takes longer, I think bottoms are harder to read than tops, so that is another factor for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you find though that folks have a tendancy to embrace & overemphasize bad news more than they do good news?

 

I guess that (fear) simply knocks onto trading as it does in the wider world. I guess maybe a good percentage of it is pre-conditioned.

 

Offer someone an item of good news & they'll fish & ferret around for confirmation first, allowing the good news to begin cooling off.

 

Pitch in a sorry tale of woe or panic & they go all out & stampede it to death :o

 

Human nature is a strange condition for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never pick the tops and bottoms, I just wait for it to start a new trend, so short or long doesn't matter much to me. I do agree that in the stock/index futures world down is faster than up most of the time but I find I probably do about as well in either situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have this tendency to only feel overtly confident when a market is heading down. This isn't based purely on a psychological factor, a high rate of the time, (currencies) will drop a hell of a lot easier, smoother and longer in a downward movement.

 

Hi wasp,

 

With regard to currencies - that is completely and totally all in your mind. Currencies are a relationship. No matter which way it is moving, one of the currencies is appreciating while the other is depreciating. Does it make sense to you if I said a spread (relationship) of gold and silver always "will drop a hell of a lot easier, smoother and longer in a downward movement". Thinking about the basis for your assumptions can go a long way towards your personal growth.

 

My best regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you find though that folks have a tendancy to embrace & overemphasize bad news more than they do good news?

 

I guess that (fear) simply knocks onto trading as it does in the wider world. I guess maybe a good percentage of it is pre-conditioned.

.

 

I think that's a good point... fear is imo a greater emotion than greed. Markets are just a representation of human psychology, right?

 

Still, JT1 put forward an interesting question. We should back up what we "feel" or "think" by some numbers. Just out of curiosity, I'd like to know about how sharp rises and falls generally compare. It's also interesting we always talk about "selling climaxes" but a buying climax is mentioned far less...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Days with the greatest gain (net and percentage wise):

 

http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showavgstats#no3

 

Days with the greatest loss (net and percentage wise):

 

http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showavgstats#no4

 

 

It's remarkable, that aside from 1914 and the crash in 1987, the greatest gain days are all around +/- 10%, but the worst days are actually smaller percentage wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It helps to know whether you trade better to the long side or to the short side, or if there isn't much of a difference. Do you keep metrics on your trading? For example, What percentage of your shorts are winners vs what percentage of your longs. What about points or pips? Does your average short result in more profit, or is it your average long? There are lots of ways to evaluate this, but you need the basic data. Let me know if you would like a simple log and worksheet to do this and I can post what i use.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It helps to know whether you trade better to the long side or to the short side, or if there isn't much of a difference. Do you keep metrics on your trading? For example, What percentage of your shorts are winners vs what percentage of your longs. What about points or pips? Does your average short result in more profit, or is it your average long? There are lots of ways to evaluate this, but you need the basic data. Let me know if you would like a simple log and worksheet to do this and I can post what i use.

 

Eiger

 

Keeping a log is a good idea for these things. But whether you trade better on the short or long side, is often a result of the current cycle the market is in imo. For example, last year's parabolic rise pretty much screamed for the long side...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... But whether you trade better on the short or long side, is often a result of the current cycle the market is in imo. For example, last year's parabolic rise pretty much screamed for the long side...

 

That's definately true over the short term. Longer term, though, the market cycles should even out and you will get a truer picture of your strength (long or short), if you have one.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plunging (shorting) is far less stressful for me, as there is far more chance that there will be gaps down, than the typical steady climb up.

Sure, sometimes there can be gaps up if price is climbing quickly and for a reason such as after a news release or a sudden break above R, but not generally i don't think.

I feel justified in favouring longs over shorts. However, if i get 2 signals on 2 instruments on the same candle, one long & one short - trading only 1 at a time on the shorter timeframes, i don't automatically pick the short - i look to see which choice makes most sense in the context of the overall chart. If they look about even stevens, i'll go with the short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"In judging volume behavior, allowance must be made for the fact that declining markets normally are accompanied by lower volume than advancing markets except, perhaps, at times when active liquidation is taking place. The reason for this is that bull movements attract a much greater public following than bear movements." - Wyckoff quoted from here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f131/determining-the-trend-of-the-market-3873.html

 

I'd like to quote jasont as well, from something he wrote in his blog:

"Another reason I think is that the market moves down a lot quicker than it moves up. I guess due to the speed of the selling it is harder for people to get on board in comparison to buying."

 

I'm bit surprised this thread hasn't got more attention, as I think it's an interesting topic to debate.

 

If the public can't short (because not every investment tool allows the man in the street to sell short), or does not want to (because he prefers to "buy and hold"), why do we assume that selling happens faster than buying?

 

Or is it perhaps not selling, but just liquidation of actual positions?

If the public can only go long, and participation is greater in upmoves, should we not expect those moves to happen quicker and be steeper?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for bringing my attention to this thread Firewalker.

 

Jocelyn said "Don't you find though that folks have a tendancy to embrace & overemphasize bad news more than they do good news?" The people that know I trade the markets often only ask me how my trading is going when we are declining and often only ask what to do when we are declining. Of course I never have the answers for them but they still seem to gain an irrational thought process when faced with the possible idea of loss. These are all mum and dad investors who would never short a market mind you.

 

I don't necessarily think people assume the market drops quicker than it rises but more so see that it does. I haven't done a full scale investigation to what I am about to say but the following is something I have loosely picked up on. When we turn down after a move up, we usually take maybe 2 or 3, 5 minute bars on the ES to change direction. However when we turn up after a move down, we often see 3-5 5 minute bars on the ES to change direction.

 

As I said this is not a fact based analysis but just something I have broadly noticed. It is probably also why I am better at long trades than short. In fact my statistics on winning long trades are twice as good as my short trades. It is a bit of a psychological reason, due to seeing the market drop quicker than it rises, I often get in too early because I am afraid of missing out on the move. However I believe the long moves take more time so I wait for more confirmation.

 

If you were to draw the markets as waves, the tops of the waves would have shaper turns than the bottoms which would be more broad based. I agree that this thread should have more attention. It is an interesting phenomenon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Or is it perhaps not selling, but just liquidation of actual positions?

If the public can only go long, and participation is greater in upmoves, should we not expect those moves to happen quicker and be steeper?

 

 

 

Interesting!

 

 

Maybe the fear of a drop is greater than the fear of a rise? But, it's institutional money that makes the market, so why do they stop competing so suddenly, and probably more importantly, what's the strategy/call for the resumption of the competing? What are the institutions up to?:question:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In an article link provided by eggbeangame (http://www.zealllc.com/2008/spxdown.htm), the author states:

 

"While bears are much tougher trading environments than bulls, they can still be traded profitably by the prudent."

 

What do you think/experience? Is a bear market more difficult to trade than a bull? Is it because the average volatility usually is greater? Does it have an affect on your strategy for intraday trading?

 

There are many more experienced traders here than me, so let's hear those with the experience :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.