Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Guest forsearch

How to Place Users on Ignore?

Recommended Posts

Guest forsearch

Mods,

How do I place users or their posts on ignore at TL?

 

Many forums have this function; could a mod chime in and advise how it is done at TL?

 

I'm tired of abusive posts and private messages from one frustrated poster in particular.

 

Thanks,

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Click on their name

2) View their "Public Profile"

3) In upper left corner click "User Lists"

4) Choose "Add to Ignore List"

 

There may be a quicker way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Thanks HLM!

 

This seems to work quite well for regular users.

 

Problem is I now get this error message when I try to block this one person:

 

Sorry ***** is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her

 

Guess they must be a part-time mod of a forum sub-section or something....

 

Could James or a full-time mod could advise further?

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I think that it should be ok to put mods on ignore. If they are active posters, James, they can post as much tripe as anyone - and their biases can be even stronger. If you're ignoring someone so that you don't get irritated into a fight it would seem even more important to do that with a moderator.

 

You'll notice if they delete or edit your posts even when you don't see their posts.

 

FWIW :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the issue here guys?

Is there something we can resolve easily perhaps?

 

Let me know if I can help at all.

 

MC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

MC,

The issue has been stated.

 

Thanks, Kiwi for cogently explaining a good reason why.

 

Just need to know if there is a way to enable this option, ASAP.

 

-fs

Edited by forsearch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MC,

The issue has been stated.

 

Thanks, Kiwi for cogently explaining a good reason why.

 

Just need to know if there is a way to enable this option, ASAP.

 

-fs

 

Not as a moderator, we have no board setting access. James will have to be involved on this if there is even anything he can do.

 

I run a vbulletin board and I'm 99.9% sure you cannot ignore admins/mods no matter what. The only thing that could be done is to revoke that persons mod status so you could ignore them.

 

NOTE that even ignored peoples posts will show up if quoted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
The only thing that could be done is to revoke that persons mod status so you could ignore them.

 

I guess that's something that James will have to decide based on the merits of the situation.

 

But I'd rather ignore them than complain and whine about their behavior; you full-time mods and James have better things to worry about than some part-timer mod stuck on silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess that's something that James will have to decide based on the merits of the situation.

 

But I'd rather ignore them than complain and whine about their behavior; you full-time mods and James have better things to worry about than some part-timer mod stuck on silly.

 

I disagree with this, as mods we represent the community and our actions reflect on James and TL. I mean, sure everyone has their opinions but there's certainly a clear line where things become unprofessional and should be dealt with.

 

If someone is PM'ing you to continue to beef or cause drama that has to be dealt with. I don't knowfor TL as I see it and it would be like me getting in a pissing ma the background but mods should be held to a higher standard IMO. Mods in a way work tch with a customer here at work. It just can't happen, the mod can put you on ignore or better yet just step aside and drop it.

 

Again, I have no idea of the background here either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a former supermod over at T2W I only half agree with you mcichocki (there must be a story to go with that name?).

 

A supermod should be held to a special standard of behaviour.

 

But to promote discussion and/or information it is not a bad thing to create special forums. In those special forums the mod isn't there to uphold the standards of the site but to promote the specialness of the forum by filtering. You could argue that they should do both ---- but we are humans and being a fantastic trader or knowing something special doesn't imply good qualities for a supermod.

 

One could say that forsearch should stay out of those forums but maybe the boards systems apply the "can't ignore the mod" rule in all forums even though they are not a mod there.

 

So, I second forsearch and suggest that either:

- we can ignore mini-mods; or

- we can innore all mods if the first can't be achieved.

 

To be honest I think we should be able to ignore anyone. In fact I'm just going to add someone to my list (not in this discussion).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damnation and blast it!

 

The person I added (because I don't particularly like them and think their posts are too frequent and in my opinion sometimes foolish) is in the category:

 

Sorry the_irritating_person is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her.

 

They don't show as a moderator.

 

By way of contrast I checked and I could ignore forsearch if I wanted to but I don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no way for the system to add a moderator to the ignore list. I do not want to customize this and enable it as communication between members is a must. If there is a problem with any of the mods, just pm me and I will try to think of a solution. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Sorry the_irritating_person is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her.

They don't show as a moderator.

 

Guess I'm not the only one who feels a certain irritating_person on TL is a PITA, but I can't ignore them.

 

Anyway, whether they should be moderating on this site is not my call, nor is it the focus of my support ticket.

 

And contrary to that irritating_person's opinion, I could really care less about them - hence the desire to place them on ignore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL James, filtered communications is good (I don't listen to the prime minister or that silly woman on Channel 7 and my life is better for both). Hopefully its an easy fix.

 

I solved the problem last time by simply leaving the site for a couple of years.

 

It seems a little early to repeat that so they're currently on my "mental ignore" but like "mental stops" they just are not quite as good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't listen to the prime minister ... my life is better

 

I hear ya Kiwi - avoiding the Krudd is difficult (baby kisser extraordinaire) but well worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Kiwi,

 

I'm with you. Unfortunately I've gotten several unacceptable PMs as well, so it's long since crossed the line of merely irritating, you know?

 

Still, at the end of the day, it's James' board to manage as he sees fit. If letting one of his quasi-mods act up is OK by him, then so be it.

 

But I should have the ability to ignore them without leaving the board altogether.

 

I thought TL was above this ET crap, but I've been wrong before too.

 

Shame...

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.