Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

The Lounge

Recommended Posts

I hear I am no longer No 1 on that other forum! :beer:

 

If only the replacement occasionally posted something regards trading....! Seems his signature is quite apt.

 

I wonder when they will change the website name to 'big unrelated-to-anything chat site'!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I hear I am no longer No 1 on that other forum! :beer:

 

If only the replacement occasionally posted something regards trading....! Seems his signature is quite apt.

 

I wonder when they will change the website name to 'big unrelated-to-anything chat site'!

 

You never really deserved that no 1 spot in the first place!

 

Blimey! I definitely don't deserve being only 4th :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To reach & maintain no1 - a member needs to form a network of pip buddies. This is a mutually beneficial relationship, selfless & all serving. Much alike bees, continually working for & servicing one another, with pips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To reach & maintain no1 - a member needs to form a network of pip buddies. This is a mutually beneficial relationship, selfless & all serving. Much alike bees, continually working for & servicing one another, with pips.

 

This really is not important but FYI, my last 10, none of which are 'rep buddy' posts. Well, maybe one from FW!

jtrader.gif.574e2ae1c7c2f3d0ead75c6fdc44dc40.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This really is not important but FYI, my last 10, none of which are 'rep buddy' posts. Well, maybe one from FW!

 

I never said they were. I was talking generally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This really is not important but FYI, my last 10, none of which are 'rep buddy' posts. Well, maybe one from FW!

 

Seems to me like Bladerunner is your bitch aaaah! 5 reps out of 10, I mean, does he fancy you or WHAT?! :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You mean the 'much alike bees' wasn't even the slightest hint at a certain wasp? :o

 

Jesus lighten up guys - no hidden meaning at all. I never even thought about bees & wasps tbh - was just wanting a good simile - bees didnt quite work thought.

 

Point is the top spot is infectious - the member in it attracts is more likely to attract more & more good post reps in the hope that they will return the favour. If a member never ereturned rep, they have alot less given to them also i bet.

 

Maybe this shows what i meant -

 

"When ze seagullls follow ze trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into ze sea!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jesus lighten up guys - no hidden meaning at all. I never even thought about bees & wasps tbh - was just wanting a good simile - bees didnt quite work thought.

 

even if you didn't did it on purpose, nice tongue in cheek comment! lol

 

The only reason I started making a couple of posts is because wasp's thread has potential! (That and the fact I need to have a comfortable buffer to remain the no1 in terms of #posts :o)

 

Carry on!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, maybe I misunderstood about page five or six, but IMHO, I see S/R as logically valid first, then trendlines, then volume - - why?

S/R: I can put up almost any tick OR volume chart and find the S/R levels.

TL: regression or simple pitchfork (within reason) then a secondary line to find a possible target

Vol: segmented volume by contracts (at least three groups) does show quantified activity - - where it fails is on the amount of effort to change price on low, choking volume.

Others use bonds inverted, tick data, etc. but they are just variations on a theme...

Would like to hear more of yall's experience...

turbothis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.