Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

Wasp,

 

Great thread, I'm enjoying it immensely. Thanks to you, Firewalker and Cowpip for your time and effort.

 

Question for Wasp:

 

Have you ever used this strategy with other charting packages? The reason I ask is Alpari is based on a different time zone than FXDD which is different than ProRealTime, which is different from Oanda. You get the picture. If so, can you say which ones(s) and which time zones(i.e. GMT, GMT+1, GMT-1, etc.,) did or didn't work out?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Nope, never tried it.... Would be interesting to see how much it may differ but it works as is so I hall be content personally!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheeky!

 

Well I was going to skip today but after missing out on a 150 trade off the bottom of yesterdays drop, I took a sneaky long today to make up for it!

 

Alright Wasp... what caused you to take the long at that particular location, rather than at the base of the other three trend-lines you had drawn?

 

I had a horrible night. Two more losses (rather big ones too). The 4-hour candles just weren't talking nice. It's way too whippy. My stop's, as large as they were, still were not large enough to get out of the way of the whips.

 

So, I ended up (don't laugh - too hard) a whopping +5 pips for the entire week.

 

Dude, that really REALLY sucks when I was up 300 mid-week. These last two days shot me dead.

 

BTW, Why did you take the entry you took, and not one of the other trend-line breaks? Somehow, you managed to pick the right one.

 

Congrats on your 700 pip week. That's one duzy of a good job! I can't tell you how badly I want to replicate your performance. I KNOW I can. But I'm still screwing something up somewhere.

 

EDIT: I still obviously have more study-time ahead of me this weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alright Wasp... what caused you to take the long at that particular location, rather than at the base of the other three trend-lines you had drawn?

 

BTW, Why did you take the entry you took, and not one of the other trend-line breaks? Somehow, you managed to pick the right one.

 

One more question before you hit the pubs... what size of stops were you using on this last play? Same as usual, or slightly larger?

 

I took that last one because that one tested the lower support line whilst the rest were still sat up at resistance. I used the normal stops etc and I actually got stopped out and that is why I re-entered much lower. It was against my plan but I just went with my gut through experience and that made me get in.

 

I had a horrible night. Two more losses (rather big ones too). The 4-hour candles just weren't talking nice. It's way too whippy. My stop's, as large as they were, still were not large enough to get out of the way of the whips.

 

So, I ended up (don't laugh - too hard) a whopping +5 pips for the entire week.

 

Dude, that really REALLY sucks when I was up 300 mid-week. These last two days shot me dead.

 

Ouch! Look at the S/R on my chart... the fact that it was only sitting under R and not near S should have made you see that only a short was valid and also, after a big movement like that you should expect some whippy moves, especially pre-NFP. That comes from experience and screen time though so will become more obvious the longer you trade.

 

Congrats on your 700 pip week. That's one duzy of a good job! I can't tell you how badly I want to replicate your performance. I KNOW I can. But I'm still screwing something up somewhere.

 

EDIT: I still obviously have more study-time ahead of me this weekend.

 

Thanks and don't try and copy me, find your own way... you know it makes sense! It turns out I trade very much like Wyckoff. I have never read anything (knowingly) by Wyckoff yet our styles are similar. Had I read Wyckoff and tried to copy him, I doubt I would be as succesful, its the trial and error that has got me where I am.

 

I still have more studdy to do myself as I could have done better but don't despair, with enough time scrutinzing the market, you will get there.

 

Have a good weekend!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the largest 'gap' over a weekend that I can remember.

 

Wasp, do you have any good real time forex news sources on the web? The Reuters FXHub recently shut down(which I felt was one of the best outlets) and nothing else seems to come close.

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's the largest 'gap' over a weekend that I can remember.

 

Wasp, do you have any good real time forex news sources on the web? The Reuters FXHub recently shut down(which I felt was one of the best outlets) and nothing else seems to come close.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Yep, largest I've seen too!

 

I have a live account with Alpari for trying things out on and secondary charts with no downtime and they offer dow jones newswire for free. I don't generally pay that much attention to the news though (over than a general overview - Alistair Dariling last weekend, Fannie and Freddie this weekend et...)

 

They are pretty good though... Fast with figures and announcements and overall news. You can open an account with Alpari with just a tenner, never trade but just their facilities as it were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm carrying this response over here from the Live trade thread... I'm learning, Wasp! ;)

 

It's up to 193.85/4.05 on Oanda as I write this.

 

Can we safely assume the retrace is on? :o

 

I'm putting on my fundamental hat for a moment here folks.

 

Yes, the US government have bailed out fannie and freddie. BUT, a good number of banks (I don't know how many - but undoubtably there are quite a few, as the FDIC had to issue a statement to help "guide" them) have some good chunks of cash in those companies and are liable to lose it over the next week. The FDIC wouldn't have issued their brief statement about regional banks needing to consult with their larger brethren to help resolve capital requirements issues (if fan/fred lose their share value).

 

No one is going to want to invest in these companies when the government plans on SCALING BACK business activities during the next 18 months, or when their dividends are getting discontinued. Also, who is going to want to invest in a company when the share holders will have no say in the governance of the company? If anyone does buy shares, they'll be very very brief purchases. Once the world realizes there is no VALUE in holding shares, their shares will probably vanish. And as share prices drop in value, the losses of the banks holding those shares will increase. But I honestly don't know if any wise banks would wait that long. They may dump them on Monday and preserve whatever value is left in their shares. Someone this weekend said, "Once the government bailouts fail to produce a meaningful rally in the stock markets, that's when you'll see a crash." We may be closer to that moment now.

 

At any rate, this gap higher could easily be a trap. I'm holding fire at least until that first 4-hour candle finishes forming. Who knows what shape it will take?

 

Fundamentals aside, all we really need to worry about is what price is doing NOW. Everything else is secondary. Yes, that was a pretty amazing gap higher. It may get filled later. It may not. I don't really care, as long as price tells me which way it's going to move and I'm in on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm carrying this response over here from the Live trade thread... I'm learning, Wasp! ;)

 

I'm putting on my fundamental hat for a moment here folks.

 

Yes, the US government have bailed out fannie and freddie. BUT, a good number of banks (I don't know how many - but undoubtably there are quite a few, as the FDIC had to issue a statement to help "guide" them) have some good chunks of cash in those companies and are liable to lose it over the next week. The FDIC wouldn't have issued their brief statement about regional banks needing to consult with their larger brethren to help resolve capital requirements issues (if fan/fred lose their share value).

 

No one is going to want to invest in these companies when the government plans on SCALING BACK business activities during the next 18 months, or when their dividends are getting discontinued. Also, who is going to want to invest in a company when the share holders will have no say in the governance of the company? If anyone does buy shares, they'll be very very brief purchases. Once the world realizes there is no VALUE in holding shares, their shares will probably vanish. And as share prices drop in value, the losses of the banks holding those shares will increase. But I honestly don't know if any wise banks would wait that long. They may dump them on Monday and preserve whatever value is left in their shares. Someone this weekend said, "Once the government bailouts fail to produce a meaningful rally in the stock markets, that's when you'll see a crash." We may be closer to that moment now.

 

I'm no fan of fundamentals as, whilst I agree with you, who knows what those with money are really thinking. See, with a chart, you can say, statistically, support breaking then price failing to re-breach it means it will then go down further, simple as... but, and this is why I don't use it, as gammajammer once posted on T2W, just because (for example), NFP comes in higher than last month, the figure alone is so inconsequential as there are a hundred factors and hundred other roll on effects that the bank guys could be thinking something entirely different overall... Just to unpredictable.

 

At any rate, this gap higher could easily be a trap. I'm holding fire at least until that first 4-hour candle finishes forming. Who knows what shape it will take?

 

Forget the gap... it means NOTHING. Whoever said 'all gaps must be filled' is taking the piss... All gaps WILL be filled, eventually, of course they will but to factor the gap into a trade other than S/R en-route is as mad as those with 4 indicators on a chart! IMO of course!

 

Fundamentals aside, all we really need to worry about is what price is doing NOW. Everything else is secondary. Yes, that was a pretty amazing gap higher. It may get filled later. It may not. I don't really care, as long as price tells me which way it's going to move and I'm in on it.

 

That's my thinking... Right here, right now.... S/R and trends, same old, same old... Always governs it and whether volatile or dead, the only thing that changes is the end of week pip count.... The reasons always stay the same.....

 

I am sitting aside personally till I get a S/R and trnedline break and confirmation as its all too hectic for my liking right now... wait for the dust to settle.

 

I would go long into the rest of this move till the down turn normally off this hourly candle as it is sat on S/R but going to wait.... As firewalker keeps reminding me, 'flat, is a position'!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it just goes to show ay, if you keep going long enough, the big moves counter the small ones and come the end of the year, it always averages out nicely....

 

Of course its not always easy to not think about your account balance / pip count till the year end but still, nie to ee the life come back into the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firewalker,

Would you mark on this chart your trend, reversal , and retracement? I know it is after the fact , but i'm curious. Notice there is no after hour bars here. This may solve some of your question.

erie

 

I've only looked at your chart, and not included anything that came before. So my interpretation is strictly based on this snapshot, although otherwise I'd always look to the left of my charts to see where previously potential S/R levels lie.

 

There are obviously more retracements and more trends on your chart than I've annotated, so I only included what I thought was important enough to mention.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7813&stc=1&d=1220911426

erie.GIF.219d2f5a012892f61c3517b2b1b10945.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok , FW, thanks. Simply put I looked at it like this........look for "r" at zone of reversal and then take it from there. Does that help?

erie

 

Thanks erie, I take it you see price action as a reversal because it breaks the last swing low. But before that it made a higher high, so I'm not confident the trend has reversed. Depending on the importance of that 1900 level, I'd even consider everything up to the 21st as a retracement.

 

When price bounces of 1900 and reacts up to almost 1950, I have a trend continuation signal.

 

Now if you consider that reversal to be R, I take it this is how you see things?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7823&stc=1&d=1220944976

es.GIF.93560bb1b724d7ef393e3d9babbedcdf.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes. That sums it up. It is what you see that counts though.

 

It's easy to say in hindsight, but if I looked upon things that way, then yes I probably would've been on the right side of a trade more than not.

 

As we're talking about the summer months, how do you view July? It's one big range where I would not feel comfortable trading from anything in the middle tbh...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's easy to say in hindsight, but if I looked upon things that way, then yes I probably would've been on the right side of a trade more than not.

 

As we're talking about the summer months, how do you view July? It's one big range where I would not feel comfortable trading from anything in the middle tbh...

 

Forget about the summer months, your question was about finding proper s/r and i answered ,"if you were having problems you were missing something". That it is obvious to me , it is not apparent to you and you also have not obviously learned anything here. Soooo...

I leave this with you to contemplate and good trading to you......... :)

 

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That it is obvious to me , it is not apparent to you and you also have not obviously learned anything here. Soooo...

I leave this with you to contemplate and good trading to you......... :)

 

Oh, come now. That's a little harsh. There is no absolute "right" or "wrong" here. Your method, Erie, may be perfectly sound - but WILL still fail at times. Firewalker's view may also be perfectly sound, but WILL also fail at times.

 

Attaching a requirement that firewalker needs to learn something from your example is irrelevant here, since there are undoubtably numerous examples where he could say the same thing of you.

 

Everyone sees things differently. Let's all respect that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forget about the summer months, your question was about finding proper s/r and i answered ,"if you were having problems you were missing something". That it is obvious to me , it is not apparent to you and you also have not obviously learned anything here. Soooo...

I leave this with you to contemplate and good trading to you......... :)

 

erie

 

To be honest, I learned that you and me might have different approaches, but that doesn't change the fact that my only issues were with the summer doldrums...

 

Finding proper S/R has worked fine (I'd say near perfect) for the last 7 days, and strangely enough I have not changed my approach in any way.

 

I respect your differences, but (thanks cowpip) if that's a reason to end this discussion then I feel sorry. After all, a market exists because of people with different opinions. If everybody would be thinking the same, you wouldn't be making money either...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasp, when you get a chance, I'd appreciate some clarity on the following chart.

 

I've circled an area where price on the hourly has gyrated. According to your trend-line drawing rules, we need to see a higher high and a higher low before we can "connect the dots." In the case circled, would you refrain from connecting the high to the open of the largest right-side red bar because the "pull-back" didn't technically create a higher high and a higher low?

 

I personally would be inclined to draw the trend-line - it just seems to fit. But I'm curious how you would handle it?

 

Thanks.

 

PS: It's a 30 minute chart, not an hourly like I said... but let's pretend it was an hourly chart, ok?

SEP1008A.thumb.gif.b1cc674329db8f6e710772ad8950f26e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.