Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

  cowpip said:
Yep. But the 4-hour gave a good signal, which you appear to have rode higher.

 

EDIT: Or was it the trend lines that prompted you to go long?

 

Yes well.... the reversal took place after a fake drop and whilst the 4hr now says short, the trendline additions have been vital to enrich and increase previous periods thricefold on average and thus, a singular rejection of the 4 hour S/R is not enough. I took an equal position on USDNOK based on exactly this previous expectation and that has failed for the exact same reasons.

 

To trade purely off the one signal and assuming support will equal resistance at every turn is not enough and despite this being in a current downtrend, what good is it if when the market trades sideways or any other condition. A discipline based on only market condition is not enough as as soon as the conditions change, you are ruined.

 

The dual combination is vital and only the rejection of S/R and the trendline coupled with the crossover of said lines put me in this long position and only will both of those happening again, change my mind on direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cowpip: I notice your stop-losses on GJ seem to be around the 60-pip mark.

how do you decide the size of stop-loss? is it derived from ATR? or swing-high/lows?

thanks

 

PS: good stuff posting your trades, esp as you seem to be trading around the clock, judging by tour late-night and very early morning posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  myrtleturtle said:
cowpip: I notice your stop-losses on GJ seem to be around the 60-pip mark.

how do you decide the size of stop-loss? is it derived from ATR? or swing-high/lows?

thanks

 

You should really be asking Wasp, as I'm just mimicking his strat the best I can.

 

Wasp found (and I agree) that 60ish stop-losses generally keep your stop safe, unless you have the direction all wrong. It has nothing to do with atr, although I personally like to get my stop above swing highs/lows, if I can. And if I can get it above the swing highs/lows and above the next SR, even better.

 

Yeah, I trade 24/5 now... just wake up for 5 or so mins every 4 hours. It pays dividends, if you have the luxury of sleeping a little more when you need it (and don't have to go to a j.o.b.).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Merely a statistical edge/amount reached through tried, measured and tested analysis of my entry criteria, and P:L thereafter once tested at variables for size, leverage, movement, 24hr trading and economic releases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
But seriously....... I don't want much... Just S to return to R then maybe break and the next to become S and break up through both to a previous S turned R etc, so on and so forth.... All neatly packaged with trendlines to stop me taking reversals I shouldn't but not turning to quick so I miss out...

 

Just that, each for +100 a time and it can trend up, down or backwards for all I care as long as the above works!

 

There...... like that.... S to R to S to R with trendline confirmation.......

 

IT can do it occasionally!

5aa70e818f70c_welldone.thumb.gif.3ac146d6d56682bfae9bcdcdc1db2587.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
There...... like that.... S to R to S to R with trendline confirmation.......

 

IT can do it occasionally!

 

Beautiful Wasp... wish I would have been thinking straight. Grrr...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Well Firewalker... I tip my hat to you. Looks like you may be right about this 190 area after all.

 

Not bad for someone who's not really trading that instrument eh :groove:

 

Is that 190 exactly?? :shocked:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7725&stc=1&d=1220545261

gbpjpy_190.thumb.gif.ddd3238c4adeb29582e4aa528c02478f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
What can I say? Perhaps I should be trading this instrument and see if I can get more pips than you :haha:

 

So err, how was your ROI for the months of July and August? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All three are imminent, ie, 1 candle away from reversing or continuing......

 

You are already in them all. What are you doing?

 

Exit and wait, stay in and see, reverse now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the big question now is, is THIS the reversal we've all been waiting for on GJ?

 

Yeah, I know it's unanswerable. But if it doesn't reverse here, it may be some time before we see the likes of 197 again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
So the big question now is, is THIS the reversal we've all been waiting for on GJ?

 

Yeah, I know it's unanswerable. But if it doesn't reverse here, it may be some time before we see the likes of 197 again.

 

Concentrate on the day to day and be ready for anything and that possible reversal. I will continue as is (bounce to S to R to S etc...) and not worry about the big reversal, its not relevant to day/swing traders imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Closed it for +260 to add to my +240 already and I am done, pre NFP (Not a big fan of NFP) and its been a stressful, annoying week so I am outta here.......

 

Have a good one all.......

 

Congrats Wasp. That last one pulled you through nicely. I'm ticked I missed it, but oh well... there's more fish in the sea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
This thread is to remove the risk/temptation to over trade through boredom...

 

It will be various charts from various markets for analysis (per Barjons WOT threads) so when you have itchy fingers, analyse and predict these instead!

 

Starting it off, we have 3 FX charts...

 

Firewalker believes reversals only happen at S/R whereas I know FX is a bitch and it can happen when you least expect it so, a simple 1=, 2=, 3= and answer stay in or reversal....

 

All can play and we'll jump around from FX to Indices to stocks etc, with volume and without..

 

Don't get me wrong... I think reversals that happen 'out of the blue' have less chance of being a 'true' reversal.

 

Knowing when a news release comes out is important when analysing these charts. I mean, if for some reason we see a huge bar on very wide spread that, for no apparent reason and not around an S/R level, suddenly makes a U-turn, then I would suspect this happens because of an economic release.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
All three are imminent, ie, 1 candle away from reversing or continuing......

 

You are already in them all. What are you doing?

 

Exit and wait, stay in and see, reverse now?

 

I see you started a new thread, so I think it's best I reply over there...

don't want to disrupt the flow of your losing trades in this thread :stick out tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So....... Each chart is 1 candle from either reversing or continuing and you said to me, major reversals only happen at S/R........

 

Come on... which way for each?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.