Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

  wasp said:
Its the same thing again as on T2W. No one knew how big the move would be but the TA beat the FA too it again and showed everything!

 

The reason?

"rumors of a long-term government solution to its crisis" :o

 

Yet that announcement was made early morning, not later in the day where the actual bounce occurred...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
The reason?

"rumors of a long-term government solution to its crisis" :o

 

Yet that announcement was made early morning, not later in the day where the actual bounce occurred...

 

I would have said it was the FSA resolve that made a huge difference and the bounce happened prior. Actually no, wouldn't effect the USA much would it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what does all this FSA/SEC regulations mean to you guys?

 

ATM, the FSA has restricted the financials in the UK but will it really extend to all the indices?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
So what does all this FSA/SEC regulations mean to you guys?

 

ATM, the FSA has restricted the financials in the UK but will it really extend to all the indices?

 

There's also talk about more regulation in the options market, so they are definitely stepping up a plate, including derivatives... :\

 

I wish they looked inside, because it's their own cheap and easy money that created this bubble in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
There's also talk about more regulation in the options market, so they are definitely stepping up a plate, including derivatives... :\

 

I wish they looked inside, because it's their own cheap and easy money that created this bubble in the first place.

 

That would mean admitting they screwed up though.

 

Told you to go FX! We're sorted!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Extract from the speech by Callum McCarthy, Chairman of the Financial Services Authority to the Lord Mayor's City Banquet at the Mansion House this evening.

 

"We have been much concerned – as have many – at the volatility and what I would describe as incoherence in the trading of equities, particularly for financial institutions. There is a danger in a trading system which allows financial institutions to be targeted and subject to extreme short selling pressures, because movements in equity prices can be translated into uncertainty in the minds of those who place deposits with those institutions with consequent financial stability issues. We have seen acute examples of this phenomenon in both London and New York this week.

 

 

"The FSA has therefore decided to introduce a rule wtich will take effect from tomorrow, to require both the disclosure of short positions on a daily basis in respect of financial institutions; and a prohibition in any active increase in a net short position in a financial stock by whatever instrument. There will be an exception for market makers to enable them to meet client demand.

 

"We intend this prohibition to run in the first instance for some 120 days, during which time we will review both its effectiveness and the general policy we wish to adopt in respect of short selling more generally. This is a measure which reflects the present turbulence in markets. It is designed to have a calming effect – something which the equity markets for financial firms badly need. I hope that practitioners will support both the ambition and the chosen means of achieving it."

 

 

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/handbook/instrument2_2008_50.pdf

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/handbook/list_instrument200850.pdf

Edited by wasp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So for the next 4 months, there is no shorting of financial stocks, and possibly this will extend to other sectors too.

 

Does it not make sense then, to just buy the dips till January at least, or, wait for a drop then buy as much as possible into the FTSE now and hold till the new year?

 

As Yazoo said, the only way is up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
So for the next 4 months, there is no shorting of financial stocks, and possibly this will extend to other sectors too.

 

Does it not make sense then, to just buy the dips till January at least, or, wait for a drop then buy as much as possible into the FTSE now and hold till the new year?

 

As Yazoo said, the only way is up?

 

I'm not so sure. What happens if you are the last man holding the bag? It might not be possible to initiate new short positions, but if you want to sell what you are holding you still need to get buyers interested. So suppose 50 people own 100 shares bought at $20. They want to sell it at $22, right now the price is $21. But nobody wants to buy from them, they only want to pay $18. The way I see it there are two possibilities: no transaction takes place and thus liquidity dries up (something which happened in the Freddie Mac chart I posted), or both sides agree on the transaction and price gaps down to $18.

 

I know this is a very simplified example, but why should price necessarily go up (yes initially...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
I'm not so sure. What happens if you are the last man holding the bag? It might not be possible to initiate new short positions, but if you want to sell what you are holding you still need to get buyers interested. So suppose 50 people own 100 shares bought at $20. They want to sell it at $22, right now the price is $21. But nobody wants to buy from them, they only want to pay $18. The way I see it there are two possibilities: no transaction takes place and thus liquidity dries up (something which happened in the Freddie Mac chart I posted), or both sides agree on the transaction and price gaps down to $18.

 

I know this is a very simplified example, but why should price necessarily go up (yes initially...)

 

A loss of liquidity will be the main effect, IMO. They're really shooting themself in the foot and making everything worse, while avoiding the root cause of the crisis.

 

PS. Glad someone else remembers Yazoo, that well known pump-and-dump merchant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like a cover of a led zeppelin album!*

 

It is amazing how S and R really can show so much. Just chuck in a trendline to filter out the rejections en route.

 

I am finding it hard to find a market this sort of action doesn't happen on either (FX especially)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(*many steps and columns - thanks Wayne and Garth!)

steps.thumb.gif.2ccad64b775adda6f7745e17a2292360.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I have never really worked out by using these levels is how you get the best entries?

 

With S/R and TL's I cn get in so tight I can have a stop so minimal it would even please Socrates but to anyone who pays more attention to these (Hrh and LrH etc), hwo do you get in at the best places?

 

The circled areas are the turning points but waiting for A HrH etc would mean a huge chunk missed.

higher.thumb.gif.d4e961f5e5d54b3e392fc954cf28c15d.gif

5aa70e8a8e29b_morehrh.thumb.gif.f2df75dc82a475a3bfcee6ec44c3ce6b.gif

Edited by wasp
more detailed chart added

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both mini bull cycles broke and bounced off 138 extension. 10500 was mega support but the extended fib refined the entry to 470...

 

It can be 127, 138 or 161.8 extensions. However as previously we had bounced at 138 on the penultimate break then one may assume the same forces are in play for this little bull cycle.

 

Hope this helps.

5aa70e8a9889b_YMfibext.thumb.png.cd4445269e835e3642606452a13519fa.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smbtnt said:
Both mini bull cycles broke and bounced off 138 extension. 10500 was mega support but the extended fib refined the entry to 470...

 

It can be 127, 138 or 161.8 extensions. However as previously we had bounced at 138 on the penultimate break then one may assume the same forces are in play for this little bull cycle.

 

Hope this helps.

 

 

How how this move worked with the fibs? I don't use them and not sure even where/how to put them on a chart!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smbtnt said:
sorry do not understand??

 

You're prior chart (before the open) had fib levels on them.

 

What does it look like now?

 

I don't know how to use them at all so was curious to how the YM looks now (with them) after the open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
You're prior chart (before the open) had fib levels on them.

 

What does it look like now?

 

I don't know how to use them at all so was curious to how the YM looks now (with them) after the open.

 

Sorry, I did not make myself clear, the extended fibs are used to gauge value areas after a significant move or vice versa. After such a sgnificant move up which was not expected by anyone on this planet except 0.0000001% of the population this beast needs to calm down before extensions can be calculated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smbtnt said:
Sorry, I did not make myself clear, the extended fibs are used to gauge value areas after a significant move or vice versa. After such a sgnificant move up which was not expected by anyone on this planet except 0.0000001% of the population this beast needs to calm down before extensions can be calculated.

 

Ahh, I see, cheers. I don't really understand fibs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few charts to start pipmonster...........

 

(ignore the volume)

 

 

EVERY tick and candle tells a story. EVERY minute explains everything and EVERY minute is an opportunity. There is NO randomness in the markets.

g1.thumb.gif.6d5e175413d4e69d18ccce907be0f9e8.gif

g2.thumb.gif.7bc4e1fb93e33950481f17428988106e.gif

g3.thumb.gif.07c59b982531d70dff252c988d1db6bb.gif

g4.thumb.gif.6d710599c22c41676495e4c7817c90f1.gif

Edited by wasp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have one last chart showing your approximate entries and exits?

 

One of my problems is not keeping HhH/HrL and LrH/LrL in the front of my thinking. I became myopic in trying to plot trend lines correctly. It seems also I'm not letting price action develop sufficiently before jumping into a trade.

 

Once again, thanks for your unselfish guidance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.