Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

  firewalker said:
As to answer your question "why"... because we have different styles and I feel much more comfortable after having nailed the entry and managing the trade. If I were too look for more entries, I'd need to take more trades, which means more stress, more potential for error, more potential for stops hit. So in the end => more risk, financially and emotionally... but that's me! :\

 

wuss! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
wuss! :rofl:

 

How much is your total risk, meaning the stop size of all your trades together?

If you compare that to the profits you gained, then I think there's a possibility that I gained more relative to what I risked. Yeah I might not win the highest net profit contest... and I'm sure that's no 1 on the wish list of most traders!

 

After having had a second look at your chart, I must admit you really squeezed every single point out of that, didn't you? :applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
How much is your total risk, meaning the stop size of all your trades together?

If you compare that to the profits you gained, then I think there's a possibility that I gained more relative to what I risked. Yeah I might not win the highest net profit contest... and I'm sure that's no 1 on the wish list of most traders!

 

I risk 4% of my entire capital on any one trade and only have one trade at a time. I am all in from the word go till my exit.

 

  firewalker said:
After having had a second look at your chart, I must admit you really squeezed every single point out of that, didn't you? :applaud:

Damn straight! Why not?!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That said, I am looking to improve and reduce my risk exposure plan atm (without trying to reduce returns)...

 

Thing is I cannot think of anything better than less % or tighter stops...:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
I risk 4% of my entire capital on any one trade and only have one trade at a time. I am all in from the word go till my exit.

 

Didn't mean it like that actually...

 

Suppose you risk (on average) 50 pips per trade and you took 10 trades to make 500 pips, then you risked as much as you gained. On the other hand suppose you took 5 trades on which you risked each 20 pips, but gained 250 pips net.

 

Personally I'd favour trading a system like the second one.

 

But yours is best of both worlds by the looks of it...

Btw, I see three red crosses on your chart, but no negative pips. Were all those breakeven trades??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
That said, I am looking to improve and reduce my risk exposure plan atm (without trying to reduce returns)...

 

Thing is I cannot think of anything better than less % or tighter stops...:\

 

That's because there isn't anything else to do :o

I'm off, catch ya later!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Didn't mean it like that actually...

 

Suppose you risk (on average) 50 pips per trade and you took 10 trades to make 500 pips, then you risked as much as you gained. On the other hand suppose you took 5 trades on which you risked each 20 pips, but gained 250 pips net.

 

Personally I'd favour trading a system like the second one.

 

Yes, the latter sounds better but never found something that good. I have been tightening my stops but only so tight you can get them and of course, no one can say how much a market will move on each trade/day/week.....

 

  firewalker said:
But yours is best of both worlds by the looks of it...

Btw, I see three red crosses on your chart, but no negative pips. Were all those breakeven trades??

 

No they are full losses, I just didn't put the figures on there as its in my blog essentially for me and I know how much the loss was. Its just there for storage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the lively discussion guys! Very informative. I traded my version of Wasp's strategy on paper this week for the first time. Came out 30 pips down(sorry cowpip. I had said 20-25 in an email to you) which I consider a smashing success. I made a gob of errors both in poor entries and poor exits, but that's fine by me as I'm learning and making it my own.

 

Thanks again for sharing Wasp, Cowpip and Firewalker. Much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Cowpip has been trying to adopt your approach I read, but perhaps he might feel more comfortable trading something that he made himself, that way he knows it inside out.

 

I appreciate the post-fest you guys had after-hours. There's some good information in there.

 

Yes, firewalker, I am trying to find my own method that works as well as Wasp's. All the years that I've been trading, I have not looked hardly at all at GJ. I have always shied away from it because it was so volatile (and I was burned sufficiently on my initial attempts to play it to stay away). As a result, I never learned the personality of this pair. And that is, very likely, the dominant reason for many of my problems.

 

I'm learning that it's "personality" is very similar to $/yen, except the moves are accentuated by about a factor of 10. That's taken some time to get used to. I'm aware of most of the tricks that the market plays, but for some reason, just haven't been able to translate what I've seen in the personality of other pairs to GJ. It's been almost like starting over from scratch.

 

But I'm getting it. And I'll nail this sucker yet. Getting bucked off won't discourage me from trying to ride this bronco. I'll tame the beast. Just need a little more time.

 

Each week, I learn more of the behavior. And I figure I'm probably seeing some of the worst behavior that's possible to be seen in the current market environment. And that's good. I want to know the extremes of its behavior.

 

The pullbacks have sometimes been so violent that I've misinterpreted them as reversals (as I did this week). I wasn't quite prepared for that, so that is something else I won't easily forget.

 

I'm definitely making progress on the S/R lines, which is a good thing. They're so critical, it's crucial to get them right.

 

Another week or two and I'm confident I can start pulling in some decent profits more consistently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I saw you weren't keen on the 'laptop by the bed' theory either.

 

I try to trail on an hourly basis over S/R now as I become more risk averse and thankfully, its not every hour but still it requires constant 24hr awareness.

 

I know full well what you mean about the fear and late entries, after that dodgy 4, I was more than cautious to say the least...

 

Whilst SHIT WILL HAPPEN is now printed on my wall, I have now set it in my plan that if I have 4 losses in a row, I walk until I have faith again...

 

Not easy I know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasp, how long do you wait until you move your stop? I know it used to be after it passed the second SR level, but I wonder if that's how you're still doing it in these conditions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Yep, long too.......

 

I move/trail my stop only on the hour once over S/R....

 

Sure, but how far (in the case of a long) below S/R do you move it? Or do you move it to match S/R (would seem to make better sense to move it below the S/R 10 or 20 pips).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Sure, but how far (in the case of a long) below S/R do you move it? Or do you move it to match S/R (would seem to make better sense to move it below the S/R 10 or 20 pips).

 

Oh sorry, normally around 30 pips or half way between the prior 2 S/R...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Ahhh yes!!! Very nice and big smile!

 

I know I should have held it to the very end (this is where I get weak), but I need the profits, so I bailed at +320.

 

That was a slam-dunk! Cool! Fully paid for my losses today and padded the 'ol account too. :cool:

 

Time will breed patience and you will learn that overall, for the bank balance and for the psych, you can and should hold and trail or whatever works for you.

 

TBH, I doubt this will go much higher but for me, I used to kick myself for taking profits early and letting others I could have taken, reverse and after many months realised, as it is a marathon, not a sprint, its best to take the overall best average.

 

For the meantime though, nice one!

 

If only Lehmans and Co had us trading for them, they might be richer now!!! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Time will breed patience and you will learn that overall, for the bank balance and for the psych, you can and should hold and trail or whatever works for you.

 

Yeah. That's my next challenge. It could easily run up a tad higher and fill that gap before it gives up for the day. I really did want to hold it until I get another signal, but man... such a quick move higher gets me nervous for an equally quick reverse right back down. And I'd have to (yet again) dig up that dead dog and shoot it some more if that happened. And by now, it's gotta be stinking pretty bad. I do like this all-in, all-out philosophy though. It works for me.

 

  wasp said:
TBH, I doubt this will go much higher but for me, I used to kick myself for taking profits early and letting others I could have taken, reverse and after many months realised, as it is a marathon, not a sprint, its best to take the overall best average.

 

Yeah, it might not run higher. That's quite a trip already. I find it very interesting how it's been almost entirely GBP that has done the running. I would have thought it would have tanked given the skiddish nature of the market. Just goes to show that you can't trade what you think.

 

  wasp said:
If only Lehmans and Co had us trading for them, they might be richer now!!! :rofl:

 

LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GJ has been all over the map lately. This volatility is awesome when you're on the right side of the trade. But it can be an awful thing when you aren't. What might have taken price an hour or two to move now only takes mere minutes. It's definitely a more dangerous playground now. Just look at the daily ranges lately. This entire week it's been 500 pip daily ranges. Wow. You don't see that very often!

SEP1808A.thumb.gif.f9b61d74a0ffbf9c784820bde96de3b9.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are so right about geppy, cowpip. She's been a tough filly to ride today. I've taken a beating again. Just can't seem to find the handle. If I think up, it goes down and vice versa. I can just be thankful I'm on demo right now, getting this setup together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's happening that makes it 'witching day'? Is it because of the uncertainty of tomorrow's market?

 

BTW, are you having much luck in this market today? Just wondering if you're sitting on your hands for the most part while the market whips up and down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
That said, I am looking to improve and reduce my risk exposure plan atm (without trying to reduce returns)...

 

Thing is I cannot think of anything better than less % or tighter stops...:\

 

Not trading is always the ultimate way to reduce risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.