Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

I can see the changes now. I was seeing the same file before, but now it's different. Maybe you changed it? Or my browser crapped up. No matter. I can see the differences now. Thanks.

 

A case of screenitis me thinks... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I still cannot believe what I am seeing; the possible profits, and knowing I missed the lot! (and bought into it losing money instead!)

 

It should have been the best week of the year and I should be on the phone to my travel agent ffs!

 

Better to be out, wishing you were in, then the opposite...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hindsight is 20-20 my friend. You traded what you saw. We all did. I could go nuts looking backward at lost profits. It does no good though. Just have to pick ourselves up off the floor (in my case, the basement) and start over.

 

The danger that many people make is they sell into support. The problem in downtrends this vigorous is that it's not really possible to tell where support will be, which makes it difficult for me to sell into the trend after such a hard sell off. I'm not going to feel good about selling into this until I see a good retrace. That could take days or weeks, but until then, I'll just play it as I see it, even if I'm not seeing it right at the moment I take the trade. It's all I can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
firewalker

View Post

 

I think in this case it has more to do with the trader not identifying S/R correctly

 

100%. :crap::angry:

 

it is a shortcoming in a plan that is looking to pin-point reversals, but when a nice big fat juicy trend arrives, not only is it capable of missing the trend, but can also lose by trying to fight/reverse the trend.

THE PLAN does not like strong trends, especially if you have plenty of S/R lines in place that the trend is running into, which (if), like today have been of no significance on H4 GJ.

 

But as said, this is due to identifying areas of S/R that did not act as such. However, this is no simple excuse. As GJ pointed out, past areas of major S/R that seem important can be passed through in a hurry, and past minor S/R can then become significant.

Therefore identifying areas of S/R that will or will not be significant is not an exact science & does require some luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and that part I really do not like.

 

Yep. Sorry bud. But like you said, an S/R line + or - 1 pip in a different place can see you miss the win and hit a loss, or vice-versa. No-ones fault really, it just happens.

 

I don't mind knowing/thinking there is a bit of random luck involved in the outcome of trades. That way i am inclined to take it less personally when i lose. As long as the method/logic/reason for entering was sound, its just a matter of working the averages in your favour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep. Sorry bud. But like you said, an S/R line + or - 1 pip in a different place can see you miss the win and hit a loss, or vice-versa.

 

I don't mind knowing/thinking there is a bit of random luck involved in the outcome of trades. That way i don't take it personally when i lose. As long as the method/logic/reason for entering was sound, its just a matter of working the averages in your favour.

 

Not me. Unless I can be 100% certain in what I am doing, even if I am only sure of 70% success, I am not going to do it until so. I am going back to the drawing board to improve things for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not me. Unless I can be 100% certain in what I am doing, even if I am only sure of 70% success, I am not going to do it until so. I am going back to the drawing board to improve things for sure.

 

And THAT precious little quality is what separates the men from the boys... The ability and willingness to adjust strats when needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And THAT precious little quality is what separates the men from the boys... The ability and willingness to adjust strats when needed.

 

Considering this market is moved by banks with billions at their disposal to ensure they make the same, to think you can accept anything less than the best to compete is ignorant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not me. Unless I can be 100% certain in what I am doing, even if I am only sure of 70% success, I am not going to do it until so. I am going back to the drawing board to improve things for sure.

 

Fewer, still relevent S/R lines like you posted a few posts back, will certainly make things less congested.

 

As you said, HMA's, and your trendline/s would have scooped the lot today :confused::crap: But you weren't to know it would be an 800 pipper!

 

But HMA's/trendlines could also have seen +100 retreat to 0, as could the S/R lines alone. So there's no easy answer, without a crystal ball.

 

But i agree that being sure that all S/R lines present, are STILL relevent reasons to consider SARing is important. This would have decreased your losses today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing that strikes me about only keeping relevent S/R on a chart is -

 

Because S/R levels are always changing slghtly, doesn't this essentially mean that the only lines you should be keeping on a chart are the unhit lower highs in a downtrend, and the unhit higher lows in an uptrend?

Because any other former S/R levels will already have been breached, and thus no longer relevant as S/R has moved on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing that strikes me about only keeping relevent S/R on a chart is -

 

Because S/R levels are always changing slghtly...

 

I don't believe that is true. As I said before, most of the S/R lines (if you study back in time) are almost always accurate (virtually to the pip) over a life-span as far back as my platform goes (many years).

 

Yes, price can respond within a 20 to 30 pip range of that center-zone, but if you actually look closely at price, you'll see that there is a remarkably coherent line that marks S/R over long periods of time.

 

Just because price slices through one zone does not necessarily negate it. Years of developing as a zone should not be easily negated in a few weeks.

 

EDIT: That does not mean you can't ignore it when you notice price isn't adhering to it. You can. But I believe you can't entirely axe it. It could have future relevance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing that strikes me about only keeping relevent S/R on a chart is -

 

Because S/R levels are always changing slghtly, doesn't this essentially mean that the only lines you should be keeping on a chart are the unhit lower highs in a downtrend, and the unhit higher lows in an uptrend?

Because any other former S/R levels will already have been breached, and thus no longer relevant as S/R has moved on?

 

Exactly as I am thinking atm. Yes, on the larger TF S/R tends to carry alot but, on a day to day basis for a trader, you need something that adapts.

 

I shouldn't have gone with the template I did at the start of the week and expect that to hold all week.

 

Att is a chart showing the essential levels I should have had ONLY but I didn't partly because I thought I had it perfect already and partly because I am working of a laptop and need to use a bigger screen!

 

Like price, S/R is fluid and you need to be fluid with it.

p2.thumb.jpg.413981343d62d4121b42a72bad3c23c5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Using the above alone, broken down to this on the hourly, paints a different picture altogether.

 

Only on the one occasion would there be a long option.

5aa70e7c5a83a_sr2.thumb.gif.55f65cd28272ccd1cf85456000ba0326.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lets go short term trading!

 

Trading what? Right now... I'm trading my money for losses! Woo hoo! Everyone should play this game! I don't like the direction this trade is taking. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Short-term is probably wise given that this is going to consolidate soon (if it hasn't already begun).

 

Can you help me decipher what it is I'm looking at?

 

The triangles are?.... the numbers are pip counts?... I recognize the S/R easy enough, but I'm not sure by the triangles how you intend to play them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Short-term is probably wise given that this is going to consolidate soon (if it hasn't already begun).

 

Can you help me decipher what it is I'm looking at?

 

The triangles are?.... the numbers are pip counts?... I recognize the S/R easy enough, but I'm not sure by the triangles how you intend to play them.

 

The numbers are (rough) pip counts, the triangles are entries when S or R rejects and thats about it. Same as 240m, just on a shorter TF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A whole of trades and a whole lot of risk going against the flow if you ask me... why not - assuming you are short - stay in until the trend is over?

 

...because, today was unusual, and without taking into consideration these shorter term moves, you can end up watching it retrace which, had I done over the last 2 months, I would have given back 90% of my trades.

 

This way, I am not giving anything back, nor am I buying and buying and buying into a trend.

 

I agree, cherry pick the best is a great idea, in theory, but not always best in practise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 3rd April 2025.   Gold Prices Pull Back After Record High as Traders Eye Trump’s Tariffs.   Key Takeaways:   Gold prices retreated after hitting a record high of $3,167.57 per ounce due to profit-taking. President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all US imports, escalating trade tensions. Gold remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal. Investors await US non-farm payroll data for further market direction. Fed rate cut bets and weaker US Treasury yields underpin gold’s bullish outlook. Gold Prices Retreat from Record Highs Amid Profit-Taking Gold prices saw a pullback on Thursday as traders opted to take profits following a historic surge. Spot gold declined 0.4% to $3,122.10 per ounce as of 0710 GMT, retreating from its fresh all-time high of $3,167.57. Meanwhile, US gold futures slipped 0.7% to $3,145.00 per ounce, reflecting broader market uncertainty over economic and geopolitical developments.   The recent rally was largely fueled by concerns over escalating trade tensions after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new import tariffs. The 10% baseline tariff on all goods entering the US further deepened the global trade conflict, intensifying investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold. However, as traders locked in gains from the surge, prices saw a modest retracement.   Trump’s Tariffs and Their Market Implications On Wednesday, Trump introduced a sweeping tariff policy imposing a 10% baseline duty on all imports, with significantly higher tariffs on select nations. While this move was aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, it sent shockwaves across global markets, fueling inflation concerns and heightening trade war fears.   Gold’s Role Amid Trade War Escalations Despite the widespread tariff measures, the White House clarified that reciprocal tariffs do not apply to gold, energy, and ‘certain minerals that are not available in the US’. This exemption suggests that central banks and institutional investors may continue favouring gold as a hedge against economic instability. One of the key factors supporting gold is the slowdown that these tariffs could cause in the US economy, which raises the likelihood of future Federal Reserve rate cuts. Gold is currently in a pure momentum trade. Market participants are on the sidelines and until we see a significant shakeout, this momentum could persist.   Impact on the US Dollar and Bond Yields Gold prices typically move inversely to the US dollar, and the latest developments have pushed the dollar to its weakest level since October 2024. Market participants are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a Fed rate cut, as the tariffs could weigh on economic growth.   Additionally, US Treasury yields have plummeted, reflecting growing recession fears. Lower bond yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making it a more attractive investment.         Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch Gold’s recent rally has pushed it into overbought territory, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) above 70. This indicates a potential short-term pullback before the uptrend resumes. The immediate support level lies at $3,115, aligning with the Asian session low. A further decline could bring gold towards the $3,100 psychological level, which has previously acted as a strong support zone. Below this, the $3,076–$3,057 region represents a critical weekly support range where buyers may re-enter the market. In the event of a more significant correction, $3,000 stands as a major psychological floor.   On the upside, gold faces immediate resistance at $3,149. A break above this level could signal renewed bullish momentum, potentially leading to a retest of the record high at $3,167. If bullish momentum persists, the next target is the $3,200 psychological barrier, which could pave the way for further gains. Despite the recent pullback, the broader trend remains bullish, with dips likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.   Looking Ahead: Non-Farm Payrolls and Fed Policy Traders are closely monitoring Friday’s US non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, which could provide critical insights into the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. A weaker-than-expected jobs report may strengthen expectations for an interest rate cut, further boosting gold prices.   Other key economic data releases, such as jobless claims and the ISM Services PMI, may also impact market sentiment in the short term. However, with rising geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and a weakening US dollar, gold’s safe-haven appeal remains strong.   Conclusion: While short-term profit-taking may trigger minor corrections, gold’s long-term outlook remains bullish. As global trade tensions mount and the Federal Reserve leans toward a more accommodative stance, gold could see further gains in the months ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.