Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

  wasp said:
In approx 13 minutes.

 

What is the current time there? It's currently almost 18 GMT according to the world clock. Are you accounting for daylight savings time?

 

I would have thought your daily candle open time would have been closer to the Asian market open hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
What is the current time there? It's currently almost 18 GMT according to the world clock. Are you accounting for daylight savings time?

 

I would have thought your daily candle open time would have been closer to the Asian market open hours.

 

My bad, thought you meant 240m. It is 7:24 local time and my daily candle is at 11pm so 3 hours 36 minutes to go....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
My bad, thought you meant 240m. It is 7:24 local time and my daily candle is at 11pm so 3 hours 36 minutes to go....

 

Ahhh, that's much better. Thanks for the clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasp, on your chart for today that you posted in the traders log, you have a short horizontal line penciled in around mid-July that just incorporates the small dip / reversal that took place. You explained that the short lines are just for reference and you don't use them to base decisions off of. Why pencil them in at all if they aren't used to make decisions? I'm confused why they're shown if you don't make use of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Wasp, on your chart for today that you posted in the traders log, you have a short horizontal line penciled in around mid-July that just incorporates the small dip / reversal that took place. You explained that the short lines are just for reference and you don't use them to base decisions off of. Why pencil them in at all if they aren't used to make decisions? I'm confused why they're shown if you don't make use of them.

 

Do you mean this one?

short.thumb.gif.7bf68f69bf6096066b17f1804a55d540.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That one, along with any others similar (ie short, not whole screen) are purely minor levels between my major levels which I was looking at and monitoring for their effectiveness of turning price. These minor levels came out 50/50 and whilst I am not using them because of this reason, they are still there for my interest and confirmation occasionally but it is only the major full screen levels that matter to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am getting a bit fed up with this to be honest.

 

My stops and risk is based on the statistics of this market moving 200 points on average in a good move, and stops at 60 are justified.

 

At the moment the profits are hardly any better than the stops and whilst it spikes about and takes 3 hours to move 50 pips, it just doesn't warrant my methods.

 

The reward just isn't justifying the risk. Its either a case of waiting for better times, or reducing the stops. Have to think about this....!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
I am getting a bit fed up with this to be honest.

 

My stops and risk is based on the statistics of this market moving 200 points on average in a good move, and stops at 60 are justified.

 

At the moment the profits are hardly any better than the stops and whilst it spikes about and takes 3 hours to move 50 pips, it just doesn't warrant my methods.

 

The reward just isn't justifying the risk. Its either a case of waiting for better times, or reducing the stops. Have to think about this....!

 

wasp,

are you trading just the GY, or splitting your resources across multiple pairs?

 

I am finding the spikey action equally frustrating, as it takes out my stops, only to resume the trend.

good luck with it, and also cowpip, quite a fascinating thread what with no indicators and all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Myrtle, these conditions suck ay! I am only trading GBPJPY at the moment, trying to concentrate the capital into the 'biggest' moving market! Except at the moment, in comparison, its the smallest!

 

As for indicators, we are using them, S and R!

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________

 

I liked this post I made somewhere else.............

 

  wasp said:
Dave, a market stall owner sold fruit. He sold a lot of oranges. When he first started trading, he sold them for 5p each. They sold better than whisky at an alcoholics anonymous meeting. He put them up to 10p, still sold... 20p, 30p... Obviously good oranges.

 

At 30p the sales started slowing down, he dropped them to 25p and they were selling again. Dave, being a greedy bugger went to 35p and business was okay. Jumped up to 45p and only a few went here and there. Things started to peak. He dropped back down to 40p, then 35p... business was still slow... He went back down to 30p, things picked up and he saw all his old customers come back. He kept them there for a little while, then as things stayed constant, he started to push prices up again. The same thing happened at 45p as they were again, too expensive.

 

This time, a stall opened next to him with even juicier oranges. Dave had to drop prices to 30p again but still no good, he had a bit of interest.. but he had to go back to 25p...

 

Economists and bloomberg analysts said after the event that it was the new stall, the fact it started raining oranges and something else to do with America probably, technical analysts looked at the stats in a chart, saw key levels sat at 25p, 30p, an 45p.

 

Supply, demand, support, resistance. Call it what you will and view it through FA or TA, but at the end of the day, TA always works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
I am getting a bit fed up with this to be honest.

 

My stops and risk is based on the statistics of this market moving 200 points on average in a good move, and stops at 60 are justified.

 

At the moment the profits are hardly any better than the stops and whilst it spikes about and takes 3 hours to move 50 pips, it just doesn't warrant my methods.

 

The reward just isn't justifying the risk. Its either a case of waiting for better times, or reducing the stops. Have to think about this....!

 

This scenario more or less captures the very essence of any dilemna about trading, a trading paln etc. that i have ever had. When R & R equal themselves out, you at least need a comfortable majority of winners to make the plan satisfactory.

 

Then playing about with stop sizes etc. to find the optimal overall performance. Its often swings and rounabouts Reducing the SL, in my experience of testing this type of idea, often makes little difference, for better or worse. Other times it can make a big difference for better or worse. If only we knew what was going to happen next. That would solve the problems totally. We need an insider......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've taken a sound little beating, to be sure. But I have been using half the normal size during this time as I get more familiar with this particular method of playing. The strategy itself seems sound to me (Wasp's performance is evidence enough) and fits my methods almost like a glove. I've been over-analyzing on the lower time-frames, which has been my downfall thus far.

 

Like Wasp says... the market isn't behaving according to the statistical norms, which dulls the edge somewhat. I suspect things won't begin to revert back to something more normal until after this week is done. NFP last week and rate decisions galore this week will probably keep many of the big players side-lined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:

Like Wasp says... the market isn't behaving according to the statistical norms, which dulls the edge somewhat. I suspect things won't begin to revert back to something more normal until after this week is done. NFP last week and rate decisions galore this week will probably keep many of the big players side-lined.

 

Not sure NFP and the rates play that much part in a non US related market (I am not a fan of anything US related and their egos hence trading this pair!) and I think its more down to the time of year and caution by banks as they are all losing money! Which makes me smile regardless!!

 

But, yes.... It certainly dulls the edge that's for sure :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I have noticed is that when the dollar is the dominant mover, the cross pairs tend to go sideways. I don't know why... maybe people tend to fixate on what's moving as opposed to those that aren't?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW wasp

 

i just ran a quick 6 month back-test of my HMA EA on H4 for the majors, a few other pairs, plus most yen pairs.

 

Its been a few months since i have done this, and usually these backtest results have been very pleasing. However, the past 6 months has returned across the board really poor test results, which must mean that the H4 trends have been generally choppy over the last 6 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think, since the credit crunch/housing collapse is mainly UK/US, the bank guys have been trading dollar crosses more so.

 

Not sure what gammajammer would think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  JT1 said:
BTW wasp

 

i just ran a quick 6 month back-test of my HMA EA on H4 for the majors, a few other pairs, plus most yen pairs.

 

Its been a few months since i have done this, and usually these backtest results have been very pleasing. However, the past 6 months has returned across the board really poor test results, which must mean that the H4 trends have been generally choppy over the last 6 months.

 

HMAs!!??

naughty, naughty! :eek:

 

I am by no means a no-indicator bod, but the narrow ranges are more obvious on the 4-hrs, giving rise to potential breakout modes, as are pin-bar type events. but still I dont trade them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  myrtleturtle said:
HMAs!!??

naughty, naughty! :eek:

 

I am by no means a no-indicator bod, but the narrow ranges are more obvious on the 4-hrs, giving rise to potential breakout modes, as are pin-bar type events. but still I dont trade them.

 

Yes, "indicator" is a dirty word for me

:missy::helloooo:

Tis better to go down fighting, and believing you know what is happening, and having a reason for doing what you did, rather than placing this responsibility into the hands of some visual representation of a mathematical formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question for you Wasp. In a case where price runs well past your entry and then comes back (like now, after testing the next resistance level), do you ever close your position and try to reorient it at another location, or have you found that doing so doesn't usually provide you with a better entry?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the current example, the 4-hour candle has closed in a bearish config, so I would probably hold. But if it closed in a candle such as something like a spinning top-instead, how would you handle it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Another question for you Wasp. In a case where price runs well past your entry and then comes back (like now, after testing the next resistance level), do you ever close your position and try to reorient it at another location, or have you found that doing so doesn't usually provide you with a better entry?

 

Nope, whenever I think I am getting a better price it always carries on going the other way so I just stick to what the new 240 min candle says!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  myrtleturtle said:
you are essentially always in the market.

your rules are Stop and Reverse?

are there any conditions under which you are actually out of the market?

 

I'll let Wasp respond to this one, but from what I understand, if conditions deteriorate such that the risk to reward ratio moves toward unity, it's worth stepping out and waiting or search for another pair (or change stop sizes and target sizes). But that's just common sense.

 

For myself, if I take too many consecutive losses, I'll step out and reassess, as that's usually a sign of a mis-step. But again, that's just common sense too.

 

EDIT: Forgot... if I get the timing off, I'll personally step out and wait until I get a valid signal.

Edited by cowpip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.