Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Trade Discussion and Analysis

Recommended Posts

Getting a bit fed up with lagging trendlines and going to try this week as attached.

 

There may be some bizarre calls and losses but all the clues are there. S/R lines from 240m stays and usual 25p stops....

anew.thumb.gif.0a96aec014b1f5f09ff05a2580ce9175.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think I said something like that 5 days ago ;)

 

I know but these up moves are so ****ing pitiful that I am just hoping the short will come to get it out of this stupid up-trend and go back to some big swings or into a down trend.

 

I can't even swap markets as the EURUSD and GBPUSD, as well as GBPJPY is the same..... Why can't people move it as easily on the rise as well as the fall! :angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know but these up moves are so ****ing pitiful that I am just hoping the short will come to get it out of this stupid up-trend and go back to some big swings or into a down trend.

 

I can't even swap markets as the EURUSD and GBPUSD, as well as GBPJPY is the same..... Why can't people move it as easily on the rise as well as the fall! :angry:

 

you mean to tell us that you were not aware of the entirety of this beforehand?

 

(arent you shooting yourself in the foot, since you beleive the 240-mins are the key, yet you are trading off events not near the 240-min pivotal areas.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you mean to tell us that you were not aware of the entirety of this beforehand?

 

Yes, but I live in eternal hope!

 

(arent you shooting yourself in the foot, since you beleive the 240-mins are the key, yet you are trading off events not near the 240-min pivotal areas.)

 

Yes I am, thought I'd be able to do better with candle analysis but decided to stick with my simple methods as you note there. I'm not clever enough to do the whole candle by candle analysis! I know when I'm pushing it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be back when the ranges come back too.... this is not worth getting out of bed for :( :ciao:

 

Swapping to longer term trades in the meantime...

range.thumb.gif.3380de42bbca5c58bf1c1d05b597dfdb.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
go big FW!

 

I look at hourly and daily charts too... and sometimes I wonder whether swing trading can yield to better profits, but I quickly realize it would be difficult to do so, especially since there are less opportunities. If you have 10 trades a year or 100 or 1000, there are more swings to catch and short term trends to ride. Ofcourse you don't want to get into every little tiny retracement.

 

Basic problem I had this week, was that there was no or little follow through to the downside. I've attached some red dots, I don't know all my entries by head but these should be close. After the trendline from 13130 to 12450 broke, I should have realized it might consolidate or retrace a portion of that move. Unfortunately I was too focused on a trend continuation that I shorted each swing up, instead of taking the long at 12450 when there was no Lower low. Beside, the level had been support from in the past.

 

I'll write some more of this in my blog, because this thread isn't about me. But this is one of those moves where if you shorted from the high, stayed in till the TL broke, you could've bagged about 600 points. With intraday trading (which means close out at the EOD), you've got no other option than to re-enter each day. But only in an ideal environment you get that entry where you want it, and sometimes price runs of without you...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6831&stc=1&d=1212231985

ym_shorts.thumb.GIF.0f46bbf28091476c00fa633db1e555ce.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly the same problem I have had with EJ lately. The bigger TF trend has been up yet, I take long and short signals so when the market hits that larger TF on the uptrend, the shorts have no follow through and I'm late on the long instead.

 

Life is much easier when markets swing up and down and great returns can be made from both swings but it is a bit harder in an uptrend.

 

For me, I do not label myself as _____ trader, I just go with the flow of the market and with FX, that is easier as we never close... thus switching to holding for a few days a time is much easier.

 

Anyhow, I'll contribute more on your blog as you post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just extended your major dtl and circled where traders stepped up to the plate before........

erie

 

 

Interesting. By extending it do you pay attention to it, I mean, do you expect that trendline to provide clues to the action in the future?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting. By extending it do you pay attention to it, I mean, do you expect that trendline to provide clues to the action in the future?

 

Why not? It is a major TL. It is not predicting , but anticipating........( yes I pay attention to it)

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not? It is a major TL. It is not predicting , but anticipating........( yes I pay attention to it)

erie

 

I know it's not predicting.

As to "why not", I'd say basically because it's been breached. The trend might still be down, but I believe that any reactions to that line in the future will be mostly coincidental. But each to their own :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know it's not predicting.

As to "why not", I'd say basically because it's been breached. The trend might still be down, but I believe that any reactions to that line in the future will be mostly coincidental. But each to their own :)

 

It's not to my own :) the Bible: Technical analysis of stock trends, by Edwards and Magee discusses extending major TL's .

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not to my own :) the Bible: Technical analysis of stock trends, by Edwards and Magee discusses extending major TL's .

erie

 

The only reason I would extend a trendline is to see if there is a 'reaction' afterwards (what Schabacker calls a throwback) from the other side.

 

If we take the red line dbphoenix annotated as the correct trendline, than you can see there is a potential throwback (green oval), but it coincides with my S/R zone around 12700. So for me, it's just coincidental.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6907&stc=1&d=1212586903

 

I'm curious as to what practical implications are for extending the trendline beyond this point. What exactly would you expect to see after the line has already been breached and touched from the other side and price is moving away from it?

throwback.GIF.b4d5f8ec797137a10daf049838264ff3.GIF

Edited by firewalker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only reason I would extend a trendline is to see if there is a 'reaction' afterwards (what Schabacker calls a throwback) from the other side.

 

If we take the red line dbphoenix annotated as the correct trendline, than you can see there is a potential throwback (green oval), but it coincides with my S/R zone around 12700. So for me, it's just coincidental.

 

I'm curious as to what practical implications are for extending the trendline beyond this point. What exactly would you expect to see after the line has already been breached and touched from the other side and price is moving away from it?

 

If we take Db's trendline as the correct one then price is still under it, correct?

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If we take Db's trendline as the correct one then price is still under it, correct?

erie

 

"still" yes, now it is again :)

 

But not after it spent several weeks above it. Not just sticky above it, but clearly in free space...

If you read the chart from left to right then one could see this:

(a) break of the trendline end of April

(b) touched the trendline around May 9 from the top side and went higher

© continued to move higher towards last week of May, byebye downtrend?

 

I mean, S/R may be broken at one point, but it can still provide S/R later. I'm not that sure about what it is exactly you expect trendlines to do after they've been breached (other than show the 'general' movement is still downwards, but you don't need a trendline for that).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"still" yes, now it is again :)

 

I mean, S/R may be broken at one point, but it can still provide S/R later. I'm not that sure about what it is exactly you expect trendlines to do after they've been breached (other than show the 'general' movement is still downwards, but you don't need a trendline for that).

 

All I said was to extend a "major" trendline, the trendline gives general direction ( you've already said that ) . As far as breaching a trendline it, just shows a change in sentiment, that sentiment could be temporary and then a resumption of the major trend. It is different with short term trendlines, generally they are what they are, short term in nature. As a daytrader you basically deal with short term trendlines.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, that trendline in red is dead and should have been stopped when price crossed it and ignored from then on, a new trendline drawn (as was in black). Any touches thereafter as fw says, purely coincidential. It is no longer valid nor useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.