Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

namstrader

Market Profile Picture of Yesterday's Value Range Projection

Recommended Posts

This is my first attempt to show a picture attachment and not sure if it will work.

 

What I am trying to show is something interesting observed yesterday on the ym.

 

Taking Thursday Value range of 72pts and applying this to the early morning low of 12538 you then get 12600. If you double this Value range from thurs. x 2, you then project a target of 12672 on the ym. Like a double value range projection, liken to a IB expansion of x 2 that occurs often. So this is just an observation that taking yesterdays Value range and applying to todays early high or low can show possible targets projected. I am amazed when I see this often after analysis, trusting in real time is pretty difficult now for me. When seeing things so often this will breed confidence to have patience to just let it unfold and hold until completion. From being a scalper and failing miserably, I am reprogramming mindset to ride trends and pullbacks to completions of projections and targets. It becomes more of a faith based trading system that evolves from observations and analysis. Work has been done and now must trust, rather than earlier fear based or emotion based trading that grabbed when there in profit.

3464-41265f9f7d98153d.png.0feeed31974652e2dec3dc69155fc7c0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be much discussion of intraday MP, or at least I haven't found it, so I appreciate your effort.

 

I don't use MP per se, at least in terms of all the calculation, but I do look at the day in terms of a volume range and a price range, which I hope is not too far off the MP intent.

 

Therefore, your take on this seems perfectly reasonable to me, though I arrive at more or less the same conclusion from a different route. For instance, the price and volume ranges established Wednesday put a midpoint around 625 (this may or may not coincide with the POC). Therefore, I'd be looking to enter somewhere near 550 and exit somewhere near 700 (or vice versa), depending on what opportunities present themselves before the open and during the day. But I'd also watch the 625 area since price may just decide to reverse and end up back where it started.

 

And, yes, it is interesting to see how price travels among the midpoint and the extremes. Auction market theory definitely brings something to the table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a example of using the volume histrogram intra-day. Lots of time I see these larger volume areas that will act like the center point of a equal distribution to each side of this point, like a POC. All I do is project to the other side a possible target that completes the bell shape curve look. At the completion I can then fade too.

3468-41265fa138f5c28f.thumb.png.cc7e011f0ee5ce57b41f7bd78b94dc2b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the ZN (interest rates chart) I can also use as a inverse relationship confirmation to the YM. Very Often both take off, in opposite directions and keeping eye on the ZN can give me a heads up before I get my head taken off.

3470-41265fa14775f31b.thumb.png.5361f13655b5859eb377df6ccc20890e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again today Friday, using the value area yesterday thurs. of 12661 to 12577, I find a likely, haha, low or high price in the morning session and then if I project this price with adding the yesterday value range total, I then can sense a possible target to keep in mind. So with a value range of 84pts. and added to the low of 12524, I get a projected target completion of 12608. Hit. Take a contract off or go kiss something cause it magically happened.

3471-41265fa150c6bb5b.png.ddde6459bad6313e335890e8049ae0cb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be slightly off-topic but, in regards to intraday market profile levels, I use this especially for the KOSPI 2000. What I do is have developing value areas plotted on my candlestick charts. I use these as dynamic support and resistance levels.

 

If you wonder why in rangebound market, price turns before reaching the previous swing low/high... take a look at the developing value area. It can be quite enlightening :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Might be slightly off-topic but, in regards to intraday market profile levels, I use this especially for the KOSPI 2000. What I do is have developing value areas plotted on my candlestick charts. I use these as dynamic support and resistance levels.

 

If you wonder why in rangebound market, price turns before reaching the previous swing low/high... take a look at the developing value area. It can be quite enlightening :)

 

This was an interesting feature of yesterday's trading in the NQ. Support was found 10pts higher, resistance was found 10pts higher, and the midpoint was raised 10pts at the close. The entire area was uprooted and moved in toto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.