Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

maildigger

Risk/reward in the Long Run ...

Recommended Posts

A) What kind of risk/reward are you looking for in combination with the % winners/losers?

 

B) Assume you have a small edge (55% winners, 45% losers) as a trader. What kind of risk/reward would you consider as enough in the long run ( 1:1 / 1:1.5 / 1:2 / 1:2.5)?

Edited by maildigger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would want at least 1:1.5 (risk $1 to make $1.50) if your odds are like that. Obviously, the more the better. This way, if you take a series of losers after a series of winners you won't be back at break even.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that there needs to be a "Realism" factor in this ratio. Anyone can say they want to risk 1 to make 10, but how realistic is that you are going to make ten before losing 1? If you can consistently stay about 1, and depending on your trading costs, you can go around 50% and break-even. Being more realistic, you would probably have to go around 55-60%.

 

Then the question becomes how do you quantify this throughout the day. Do you keep a constant 1:1.5 ratio? So either you have a fixed profit in mind and your stop will be based on that, or your profit objective will be based of your stop. Either way, you will be hard pressed to remain consistent. What I mean is, some trades will require smaller stops which means smaller profit objectives ( if you are staying at a constant 1:1.5). Now a problem will arise if you take your profitable trades on the smaller profit objectives, but take your losses on the larger stop/profit objective trades.

 

Some trades might say, well no matter what I'll have a 2 point stop and a 4 point target. This might work for some, but without using market structure to figure profit objectives and stops, I believe you will find yourself frustrated with the amount of stop outs.

 

I am not suggesting that money and risk management isn't key in successful day trading, I just do not believe the risk-reward ratio is as important as everyone makes it out to be. It looks good on paper, but in practice it can be hard to maintain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A) What kind of risk/reward are you looking for in combination with the % winners/losers?

 

B) Assume you have a small edge (55% winners, 45% losers) as a trader. What kind of risk/reward would you consider as enough in the long run ( 1:1 / 1:1.5 / 1:2 / 1:2.5)?

 

 

Risk to Reward is a stat you evaluate in hindsight.

 

You can ESTIMATE your reward, and (generally) fix your risk. In my opinion, risk/reward is completely over emphasised. It is an assumption. The trader who thinks he can fix his risk has never had a stock gap, undergo a trading-hold, your broker/platform/exchange/internet go down, etc.

 

Similar story for win/loss %. Who cares, seriously? Today I had 7 losers in a row, scratching / -1 tick trades. Then I hit a winner, got onto a runner, scaled in aggressively and made a little over +40 ticks.

 

Win to loss at that point in time = 10% winners / 90% losers.

 

The important stats are things like:

 

-Average winner vs average loser

-largest winner vs largest loser

-distribution of winners/losers above your average (i.e. averages can be misleading, especially if you have a small sample)

- Max/average adverse excursion & max/average favorable excursion

 

Am I on my own in thinking this? perhaps worthy of a discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree r/r is only an assumption that you will get that, but in reality it rarely happens as expected. Even when you try to keep as such, you become boxed in by that very concept you do reach your reward target, not letting profits run becomes a crutch down the road. For me, the best judge of good strategy is avg win/avg loss in combo with #losses/#wins. If you find out your # wins to losses you have an idea how to work on picking better setups with smaller stop losses but not the target as it's more unpredictable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you don't care about risk:reward ... Scaling out is essential? Or how do you determine where to get out?

 

Judging by your posts here and elsewhere, you appear to be fairly new, and much of what you want to know may become clear as you become more experienced (I'd like to say "will" become clear, but that is often not the case). Issues of nearby rewards and tight stops and trailing stops and risk:reward ratios and where do I enter/exit and how I do I distinguish up from down are among the most common puzzlements that beset beginners and are all a consequence of their not knowing just what it is that they're looking at.

 

Once you understand what you're looking at and become familiar with it, you should be able to determine the best entry for your risk tolerance, and you will have defined what constitutes a reversal signal (I say "should" because many people never do). Once that's accomplished, it's simply (but not necessarily easily) a matter of entering when you're supposed to and staying in until you get your reversal signal. At that point, all the issues regarding stops and r:r and cutting profits short and so forth will for the most part evaporate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you don't care about risk:reward ... Scaling out is essential? Or how do you determine where to get out?

 

Perhaps I wasn't clear.

 

The example of scaling in was just an example to illustrate you can have many losing trades, and then one winning trade to finish in profit.

 

Often it is much better to "work hard" to get a good entry price, rather than take a trade, and wait.

 

The entire concept of risk to reward assumes you know your risk AND reward to begin with.

 

What I get tired of is day-traders (not so applicable to position traders) choosing trades that fit their minimum risk:reward.

 

Worse is when traders go "OK I can only risk $1,000 / x number of points, so that means my stop is going to be here".

 

I don't like predicting. Guru's and people who can't make money trading, predict and sell software, seminars, etc. Traders trade. It's fine to have scenarios, but it's unwise to make a trading decision before the trade starts.

 

E.g.

 

1. "market is at 1200. I think we will go to 1250 for XYZ reason."

2. "stop is going to at 1190 for ABC reason and target at 1250.

3.risk:reward = 1:5 = meets my trading plan rules, great!"

4. "money management rules I created state I can risk $1,000 a trade which means I'm putting on XX number of contracts"

 

In reality the above 5 sentences are:

1. -Assumption & another Assumption.

2. -Decision based on an Assumption, another Decision based on an Assumption.

3. - Congratulating yourself based on your ability to make Assumptions

4. - Adding another nail in your coffin by making another Decision based on another Assumption. More Congratulations in order.

 

Do you see the problem here? nothing has happened in the market yet.

 

Better trader:

 

1. "market is at 1200. I think we MIGHT go to 1250 for XYZ reason."

2. "enter the market. mental stop on price action/fixed stop I always use. No target because I don't know what the market will do, ever."

3. "money management rules indicate I enter all trades with the same size, and add if the (rare) opportunity arises when the MARKET confirms the situation. I will be aggressive and quick to get out the second I am wrong (can always get back in), and will not let the additional size negatively impact the performance of the trade."

 

It really is just a few core differences, limiting decisions based on assumptions, or decisions before an event has occurred.

 

Don't get me wrong, it's not a clear cut issue. A common bad trade is where you go against the major trend of the day for 1-2 tick trade. The trade goes against you slightly, you average in (only ever hoping for 1-2 ticks), and you end up taking a 10 tick loss. That's a good example of keeping your reward in perspective. If for whatever reason, you DO have a Fixed Target, then (for better or worse) you need to trade that way.

 

Everyone makes money differently. Plenty of people fade moves to average in and take a small profit on a large size. I call it a Rubber Band Reward Curve. If you graphed their "reward curve" it's actually increasing as the market moves away from their entry (because their adding into their position) before it hits zero when you have reached your position limit and the market is still not going your way - hence the 'rubber band curve' - and your trade 'snaps'. Personally, I think that suicide. I prefer to dip my toe in the water, and unleash when the trade is going in my favor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At that point, all the issues regarding stops and r:r and cutting profits short and so forth will for the most part evaporate.

 

You sir, deserve a medal.

 

Amen to that post!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually treat scaling in and out as each separate trades so keep things simple. If I get in at $10 with 900 shares, then scale out 300 (trade 1) at $11, then another 300 at $12 (trade 2), and so on.

Edited by torero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I usually treat scaling in and out as each separate trades so keep things simple. If I get in at $10 with 900 shares, then scale out 300 (trade 1) at $11, then another 300 at $12 (trade 2), and so on.

 

Well if something like that works for you that is great. However, whenever I have run a test of piecing out vs all out, the scaling out has never come out ahead. It always seemed that I would take less on the winners ( since scaling out lowers your average when compared to getting all out). Like your example here. Your average profit is 1.5 instead of 2 if you got all out at 12. But when stops occurred, it was for my full lot. Just doesnt make sense to me that I would be willing to take a full loss on my full lot, all the while taking less on my winners. Maybe it was just me though. Every trader has their own way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually scale in as the market goes my own, sometimes more positions as the trend is confirmed. But I only say this for forex because I have found the e-minis to be less trendy so pyramiding doesn't do as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:helloooo:

 

i strongly advice all newbes to stop, to read, to contemplate and to understand this post

 

Judging by your posts here and elsewhere, you appear to be fairly new, and much of what you want to know may become clear as you become more experienced (I'd like to say "will" become clear, but that is often not the case). Issues of nearby rewards and tight stops and trailing stops and risk:reward ratios and where do I enter/exit and how I do I distinguish up from down are among the most common puzzlements that beset beginners and are all a consequence of their not knowing just what it is that they're looking at.

 

Once you understand what you're looking at and become familiar with it, you should be able to determine the best entry for your risk tolerance, and you will have defined what constitutes a reversal signal (I say "should" because many people never do). Once that's accomplished, it's simply (but not necessarily easily) a matter of entering when you're supposed to and staying in until you get your reversal signal. At that point, all the issues regarding stops and r:r and cutting profits short and so forth will for the most part evaporate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just doesnt make sense to me that I would be willing to take a full loss on my full lot, all the while taking less on my winners. Maybe it was just me though. Every trader has their own way.

 

I pretty much agree totally with what smwinc posted. The problem with scaling out is you need to have an extremely high win rate that is extremely consistent. If your putting on full risk on losers and scaling out then you will never have full risk on for your big wins, but will have it on for losers. To me the long term problem with that is your never going to be able to figure out when a massive buy/sell program comes in and sweeps the market, or a random news event moves the market. You will be on the wrong side of that event with full risk on and not ever get lucky and have full risk on while being on the correct side of that event.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're talking about scaling out, then yes, there are disadvantages but for some, the need for instant gratification is still uncontrollable so by taking off a 1/4, 1/3, etc. to make him feel better and let the rest run. At least he's more of less breaking even if the rest don't pan out. Sometimes, meeting a resistance/support zone with full position can be somewhat risky if prices reverses and runs away. Just saying, taking some profits and let the rest ride wouldn't be a bad option is all. I do it but I do it scaling in a well. I'm speaking of scaling in when the market goes my way, not averaging down.

 

I think the problem with new traders is that they tend to take profits too fast , usually the entire position and miss out on the rest of the trend. I think this is a best progressive way to encourage them to stay in a position longer when the trend is going their way and learn from "holding when you're right". I, for one, get more aggressive when the market tells me I'm right, I'll pile in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

simply put i think trailing stops is the wiser substitute for scaling out.

 

a r:r of 1:3 in a random market will obviously succeed. the market's not random but it's not against you either (so long as you're not a crowd :p). Scaling out is kind of like creating a new position in a new circumstance you're now uncertain of.

 

but yeah, as it was said, scaling out can only neutralize your r:r ratio imo. just trail it.

Edited by Northern boy
error

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps I wasn't clear.

 

 

 

 

2. "enter the market. mental stop on price action/fixed stop I always use. No target because I don't know what the market will do, ever."

 

 

 

actually that's better put.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Judging by your posts here and elsewhere, you appear to be fairly new, and much of what you want to know may become clear as you become more experienced (I'd like to say "will" become clear, but that is often not the case). Issues of nearby rewards and tight stops and trailing stops and risk:reward ratios and where do I enter/exit and how I do I distinguish up from down are among the most common puzzlements that beset beginners and are all a consequence of their not knowing just what it is that they're looking at.

 

Once you understand what you're looking at and become familiar with it, you should be able to determine the best entry for your risk tolerance, and you will have defined what constitutes a reversal signal (I say "should" because many people never do). Once that's accomplished, it's simply (but not necessarily easily) a matter of entering when you're supposed to and staying in until you get your reversal signal. At that point, all the issues regarding stops and r:r and cutting profits short and so forth will for the most part evaporate.

 

 

Hi DB.

 

Good post, and may i say, i'm enjoying reading your 'work' again.

 

I suppose true risk lies within a traders own understanding of supply and demand, greed and fear, market psychology, strength and weakness, price action, support and resistance.

 

People/traders often argue about 'the numbers', different ratios and so on, but this is only in context/reference to thier own ability, and to a certain degree, has no real relavence or bearing to anybody else, or dare i say, even the market.

 

 

Good to read you again, DB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

People/traders often argue about 'the numbers', different ratios and so on, but this is only in context/reference to thier own ability, and to a certain degree, has no real relavence or bearing to anybody else, or dare i say, even the market.

 

Or even to the trader. The trader really has no idea what the risk/reward "ratio" is, only what he hopes it will be. And I suspect that many traders stay in losing trades because of the reward that they are sure they are going to receive.

 

I suggest, therefore, that beginners focus on the risk, then stay in as long as the market allows them to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im surprised no one has directly mentioned position size. If you enter at X and determine Y is a good place for your 'technical' stop based on market structure (for example above the last swing high) you are now in good shape to determine your position size based on how much you want to put at risk.

 

The key metric (imho) is risk of ruin. My favourite site that talks about that is http://www.traderscalm.com/ Im not affiliated just thingk its a great little site and free to boot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 4th April 2025.   USDJPY Falls to 25-Week Low as Safe Havens Surge and Markets Eye NFP Data.   Safe haven currencies and the traditional alternative to the US Dollar continue to increase in value while the Dollar declines. Investors traditionally opt to invest in the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc at times of uncertainty and when they wish to avoid the Dollar. The Japanese Yen continues to be the best-performing currency of the week and of the day. Will this continue to be the case after today’s US employment figures?   USDJPY - NFP Data And Trade Negotiations The USDJPY is currently trading at a 25-week low and is witnessing one of its strongest declines this week. The exchange rate is no longer obtaining indications from the RSI that the price is oversold. The current bullish swing is obtaining indications of divergence as the price fails to form a higher high. Therefore, short-term momentum is in favour of the US Dollar, but there are still signs the Japanese Yen can regain momentum quickly.       USDJPY 1-Hour Chart     The price movement of the exchange rate in both the short and long term will depend on 3 factors. Today’s US employment data, next week’s inflation rate and most importantly the progress of negotiations between the US and trade partners. If today’s Unemployment Rate increases above 4.1%, the reading will be the highest seen so far in 2025. Currently, the market expects the Unemployment Rate to remain at 4.1% and the Non-Farm Payroll Change to add 137,000 jobs. The average NFP reading this year so far has been 194,000.   If data does not meet expectations, US investors may continue to increase exposure away from the Dollar and to other safe-haven assets. Previously investors were expecting only 2 rate cuts this year from the Federal Reserve, however, most investors now expect up to 4. If today’s employment data deteriorates, economists advise the Federal Reserve may opt to cut interest rates sooner.   Therefore, it is important to note that today’s NFP will influence the USDJPY to a large extent. Whereas in the longer-term, trade negotiations will steal the spotlight. If trade partners are able to negotiate the US Dollar can correct back upwards. Whereas, if other countries retaliate and do not negotiate the US Dollar will remain weak.   USDJPY - The Yen and the Bank of Japan The Japanese Yen is the best-performing currency in 2025 increasing by 6.70% so far. Risk indicators such as the VIX and High-Low Indexes continue to worsen which is positive for the JPY as a safe haven currency.   Yesterday Japan released March business activity data that came in weaker than expected: the Services PMI dropped from 53.7 to 50.0, while the Composite PMI fell from 52.0 to 48.9. The data is the lowest in two years. These figures could hinder further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan. However, most economists still expect the Bank Of Japan to hike at least once more. It's also important to note, that even if the BOJ opts for a prolonged pause, a cut is not likely.   Additionally, a 24% tariff was imposed on Japanese exports to the US yesterday. Prime Minister Mr Ishiba expressed disappointment over Japan's failure to secure a tariff exemption and pledged support measures to help domestic industries manage the impact.   Key Takeaway Points: US Dollar Weakens, Safe Havens Rise: The Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc continue to gain as investors shift away from the US Dollar. USDJPY Under Pressure: USDJPY trades at a 25-week low, with short-term momentum favouring the Dollar but long-term trends pointing to potential Yen strength. NFP and Unemployment Crucial: Today’s Non-Farm Payrolls and unemployment figures will heavily influence short-term USDJPY. On the other hand, trade negotiations will dictate longer-term trends. Japan Faces Mixed Signals: Despite weak PMI data and new US tariffs, the Japanese Yen remains strong. Economists expect at least one more rate hike from the Bank of Japan, but no cuts are in sight. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • YUM Yum Brands stock, nice breakout with volume +34.5%, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?YUM
    • Date: 3rd April 2025.   Gold Prices Pull Back After Record High as Traders Eye Trump’s Tariffs.   Key Takeaways:   Gold prices retreated after hitting a record high of $3,167.57 per ounce due to profit-taking. President Trump announced a 10% baseline tariff on all US imports, escalating trade tensions. Gold remains exempt from reciprocal tariffs, reinforcing its safe-haven appeal. Investors await US non-farm payroll data for further market direction. Fed rate cut bets and weaker US Treasury yields underpin gold’s bullish outlook. Gold Prices Retreat from Record Highs Amid Profit-Taking Gold prices saw a pullback on Thursday as traders opted to take profits following a historic surge. Spot gold declined 0.4% to $3,122.10 per ounce as of 0710 GMT, retreating from its fresh all-time high of $3,167.57. Meanwhile, US gold futures slipped 0.7% to $3,145.00 per ounce, reflecting broader market uncertainty over economic and geopolitical developments.   The recent rally was largely fueled by concerns over escalating trade tensions after President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new import tariffs. The 10% baseline tariff on all goods entering the US further deepened the global trade conflict, intensifying investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold. However, as traders locked in gains from the surge, prices saw a modest retracement.   Trump’s Tariffs and Their Market Implications On Wednesday, Trump introduced a sweeping tariff policy imposing a 10% baseline duty on all imports, with significantly higher tariffs on select nations. While this move was aimed at bolstering domestic manufacturing, it sent shockwaves across global markets, fueling inflation concerns and heightening trade war fears.   Gold’s Role Amid Trade War Escalations Despite the widespread tariff measures, the White House clarified that reciprocal tariffs do not apply to gold, energy, and ‘certain minerals that are not available in the US’. This exemption suggests that central banks and institutional investors may continue favouring gold as a hedge against economic instability. One of the key factors supporting gold is the slowdown that these tariffs could cause in the US economy, which raises the likelihood of future Federal Reserve rate cuts. Gold is currently in a pure momentum trade. Market participants are on the sidelines and until we see a significant shakeout, this momentum could persist.   Impact on the US Dollar and Bond Yields Gold prices typically move inversely to the US dollar, and the latest developments have pushed the dollar to its weakest level since October 2024. Market participants are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a Fed rate cut, as the tariffs could weigh on economic growth.   Additionally, US Treasury yields have plummeted, reflecting growing recession fears. Lower bond yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, making it a more attractive investment.         Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch Gold’s recent rally has pushed it into overbought territory, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) above 70. This indicates a potential short-term pullback before the uptrend resumes. The immediate support level lies at $3,115, aligning with the Asian session low. A further decline could bring gold towards the $3,100 psychological level, which has previously acted as a strong support zone. Below this, the $3,076–$3,057 region represents a critical weekly support range where buyers may re-enter the market. In the event of a more significant correction, $3,000 stands as a major psychological floor.   On the upside, gold faces immediate resistance at $3,149. A break above this level could signal renewed bullish momentum, potentially leading to a retest of the record high at $3,167. If bullish momentum persists, the next target is the $3,200 psychological barrier, which could pave the way for further gains. Despite the recent pullback, the broader trend remains bullish, with dips likely to be viewed as buying opportunities.   Looking Ahead: Non-Farm Payrolls and Fed Policy Traders are closely monitoring Friday’s US non-farm payrolls (NFP) report, which could provide critical insights into the Federal Reserve’s next policy moves. A weaker-than-expected jobs report may strengthen expectations for an interest rate cut, further boosting gold prices.   Other key economic data releases, such as jobless claims and the ISM Services PMI, may also impact market sentiment in the short term. However, with rising geopolitical uncertainties, trade tensions, and a weakening US dollar, gold’s safe-haven appeal remains strong.   Conclusion: While short-term profit-taking may trigger minor corrections, gold’s long-term outlook remains bullish. As global trade tensions mount and the Federal Reserve leans toward a more accommodative stance, gold could see further gains in the months ahead.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.