Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carter

Is Momentum Trading Dead?

Recommended Posts

Prior to the NASDAQ bubble burst, momentum trading would of made you alot of money. Entry timing did not matter... you could simply get in anywhere you want and the market would move in your favor. (to the upside) Nowadays entry has become alot more important.

 

I would like to hear traders opinion on momentum trading. Is it now considered a newbie trading method? Has it now come down to entry based on setups?

 

Carter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still feel that momentum trading is a very interesting, and potentially very lucrative strategy - and it is not dead.

 

If you can spot a change in trend early, you can make a lot of money by riding the momentum. The trick to being a good trader is to buy at the bottom (or as near as possible) and sell before the top.

 

As Lord Rothschild once said "The reason I am so rich, is because I always sold too soon".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly, the days when even a blind pig could find a kernel of corn are indeed over. However momentum is a tricky thing. When it is truly obvious enough for most people to see it, it is often too late to do much about it. Assessing it early enough to benefit from it seems to be the trick. I sat in an online trading room recently for a couple of weeks wherein their software was designed solely to find and benefit from momentum in the market but I was hard-pressed to find better signals there from that jumble of indicators than from following a simple set of smoothed and enhanced moving averages.

 

As the saying goes, one man's meat is another man's poison and I think that holds true in trading as in any endeavor. Certainly momentum still exists in the markets, but it is nothing like was experienced prior to the bursting of the bubble. I try not to get too hung up on the flavor of the day anyway as whatever works today may not be working next year at this time or even six months from now, despite general psychological behavior will be quite similar.

 

I think perhaps there is great merit to the phrase "trade what you see, not what you think." Perhaps I shall change my name to MOTOman... Master Of The Obvious heh, heh.

 

Happy Trading :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ezduzzit

 

You have brought up a very interesting subject i.e. the use of software to spot trends, trading signals, etc.

 

This type of investment strategy can be self feeding, in that if enough major players in the market are using a particular software program, there is the potential for a big herd to chase a stock higher.

 

The downside to this type of trading is when the trend turns - if you are not quick enough, there is a big danger of being left behind, and seeing any profit reduce or disappear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well FTT I may be wrong but I think that is why it makes great sense to go for the "meat in the middle" rather than trying to jump in at bottoms and hope to hold on until tops. Yes, you have to be quick and nimble with your exits, but it is perhaps best not to be too greedy and try to wring every last drop out of each trade.

 

Some even go so far as to play the game in a different manner and scale out of their trades thinking that logically it is a smart way to reduce stress and capture greater profits by leaving the least amount of their position open as a runner. Frankly, unless you are constantly getting stopped out by deep and rapid reversals or you hate having to manually adjust your stops (as opposed to using an automated trailing stop which often gets hit too early in my experience) then scaling out almost assuredly guarantees you a lesser profit than you might otherwise attain. Many traders employ that method anyway, as it lets them feel reduced risk early in the trade. There are numerous ways to slice and dice the action whether you are a momentum trader or not. The key is perhaps to just make sure it fits your personality and keeps you in the game.

 

Happy Trading :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GREAT post ezduzzit. You are absolutely true about going for the "meat in the middle". We are traders in the business of risk. Trying to catch the dead lows and highs is gambling.

 

I do scale out of my trades with strict rules. I understand your point by not letting winners run, but is this even possible in day trading? Yes, we do see the markets trend for 100-150 Dow points but this is not the norm. Most of the time, the markets will move 20-50 points and reverse. What kind of exit rules do you apply in intraday trading? Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never been much of a momentum trader. But the funny thing is, every now and then I will visit free day trading chat rooms. Its entertaining to hear the new traders play any stock on the fly. Regardless of the float and spread, these traders have no clue what they are doing. If you mentioned a penny stock XYZ is on the move, they will blindly buy it.

 

I think anyone can make money in a bull market. But with the way things are now, having a strategy is important. Amateur traders fuel the end of the trend. Dumping it when the momentum is at its peak makes more sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Soul, I would agree with you that when I was trading the YM as you do, movements would often be 20-50 points before a reversal. I only did about 3 trades a day and would usually bring my initial stop back up to b/e +1 after either 10 or 12 points and if I got stopped out so be it (it actually happened about 16% of the time but it only cost me the opportunity cost of having to wait for the next trade). Then I was pretty much in a risk free trade so I often let things run with my full position until price reached the next level of S/R or I noticed that momentum in my direction had seriously begun to stall. At that point I exited regardless. If it ran further without me, I could care less. I am not the kind of guy who after a big purchase gets upset when he finds he could have gotten a better deal. I thank the good Lord for what I was given and move on.

 

As to scale-outs, I could just never personally get comfortable with exiting most of my position early on (dramatically cutting my winners so to speak) while leaving only the barest minimum of my position in for the real run. In trading the Russell I use a bit wider opening stop but I trade it much the same.

 

I feel there is no right or wrong way, only what fits your personality and trading temperament.

 

Happy Trading :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I feel there is no right or wrong way, only what fits your personality and trading temperament.

 

I agree :)

 

I would love to hear some of your exit signals. Do you exit a few ticks above the next line of S&R? Also how do you use momentum to determine your exit?

 

Are you able to captuire the bigger swings without scaling out? Thanks

 

James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one factor which seperates all traders, guts.

 

Some traders are willing to take risks, when some traders prefer to be a little more cautious. As mentioned by a couple of people on this thread, your trading style is strongly linked to your personality.

 

All traders are gamblers to some extent, but do you gamble with a good hand, or take a punt on the final card?

 

You are what you are!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.