Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

januson

Crash course into MP

Recommended Posts

  ammo said:
you never know if its a trend day until the market closes,but if it gets to the next nip and the bounce doesnt bounce much and you have left several single traded prices, a wide cleavage,chances are it will drop to next nip,you should be prepared on those days with daily trendlines drawn that you can easily refer to so you know where to get in or out of a position since it picks nips or trendlines for major support and you wont know which til after the fact

 

thanks Ammo. next time I get layed I'll be thinking of value areas and points of control... and i'll probably go long :did I say that?: .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Northern boy said:

Or if you have ideas of how to anticipate volatility outside MP maybe you can post it here or PM.

 

I kind of have a speculation that if you look at the shape of the intraday volatility surface of SPX options and how its changing that it will give away exactly what kind of day to expect on the futures because the guys that move the markets are too big and the options markets too illiquid for them to not show that card.

How to actually view that card, I haven't a clue yet though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A simplistic way to look for early identification of a trend day is the amplitude of the brackets together with the degree of retracement. For example in the Dow (or ym if u prefer) if the market has moved more than 34 tics in a straight line and the retracement is 3 to 4 tics then the chances of a trend day are increased dramatically. This was once expressed as being no more that 4 time brackets in a market that is not breaking rotation where the profile looks like a long and thin (as opposed to a fat) profile. Some like Don Jones at Cisco would state that you need to know where you are in relation to the previous 3 days value, others like Bill Duryea at IOAMT would suggest 5 days, others still like the Turtles would state look at 20 days etc. What all of these people misunderstand is that markets are dynamic and they are using static time intervals. You have to use the information given by the market and if that is 18 days rather than 20 so be it. IE look for the unfolding distribution (and this applies to virtually any time frame..... IE for those for example who would say but I can't scalp my 1 minute chart off a 3 day value etc take note). The reality is that trend days are frequently born out of a small early range frequently non trend in nature and not faciliting trade that then explodes into life and catches people off guard. In reality the market trends approx 22% of the time today rather than approx 12% 20 years ago brought about by computer algorithms that only seem to know the go with the momogogo momentum breakout

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a presentaion on June 6th that was for one hour but ended up being 3. (nothing unusual in that when I get involved. lol) It was such an interesting day that it necessitated the extention. With SoulTraders pre-acceptance and permission I place the link here. I urge you to spare the 3 hours needed for it was one of the most interesting days we have had for some time

http://www.tradingclinic.com/oneoff/special20080606/special20080606.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Alex,

 

Just curious if you've addressed this question already here or else where....

 

What exactly are your thoughts of the Soc Gen trader, le petit garcon, Jerome Kerviel?

 

Let us know since you have the experience to render a more nuanced opinion on it...

 

Thanks,

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

foresearch: He thought he was bigger than the market whether with or without upstairs or even on the desk approval. That organization felt that they could always push the market around and what was demonstrated was a total lack of culpability and risk management

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  alleyb said:
In reality the market trends approx 22% of the time today rather than approx 12% 20 years ago brought about by computer algorithms that only seem to know the go with the momogogo momentum breakout

 

Could you point me towards the source of those statistics? I'm interested in this, since I've found the market to have much more 'trending' tendencies last couple of months compared to last year...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of what has become MP today is only a vague resemblance of what MP is all about. Dalton, Alexander, Frank Butera, and a few others are familiar with the range of content and meaning of Market Profile in it's broader context. Don Jones of Cisco-futures.com offers a lot of free content as well as a couple courses as well as various data services. He has been researching this from the beginning; I think his book is available on a pdf file or bound. Trevor Hardnett (sp) is also among those who know MP in it's entirety and he and a few who do, such as those mentioned above, are finding their own method of applying mp to short and longer term trading. Whether the value areas are 70 or 80% is not necessarily relevant. Don uses sextants, octants, etc. More to the point MP has greater value when a balance is achieved over a period of days. He also attempts to show where the money is; i.e. from commercial interests to do to the small trader (the kind of info you get in the pit because you know who the "jamoke" facing you is). Making these numbers just another pivot point without any understanding of the larger context is really just laziness. You're looking for another easy way to trade; and if you were around through the 90's, 2000, to today, you will recognize that people who cannot adapt to changing markets will be short lived. Also, to criticize elite trader, as I noted somewhere on this site earlier is calling the kettle black.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  btfox said:
Also, to criticize elite trader, as I noted somewhere on this site earlier is calling the kettle black.

 

Thanks for the comments on MP btfox - if you would like to expand on the comments that would be appreciated too.

 

Regarding the criticism of ET - I think there is no denying that there is excellent info on ET and some excellent people there, it is just that there is a lot of personal attack and abuse there, and some posters who seem to concentrate on distracting threads. To be honest, it is quite an entertaining read sometimes! But what we try to do here at TL is focus on the quality input and get rid of the attacks and distractions. It is hard work sometimes, but hopefully you, and others, can spot the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  btfox said:
Most of what has become MP today is only a vague resemblance of what MP is all about. Dalton, Alexander, Frank Butera, and a few others are familiar with the range of content and meaning of Market Profile in it's broader context. Don Jones of Cisco-futures.com offers a lot of free content as well as a couple courses as well as various data services. He has been researching this from the beginning; I think his book is available on a pdf file or bound. Trevor Hardnett (sp) is also among those who know MP in it's entirety and he and a few who do, such as those mentioned above, are finding their own method of applying mp to short and longer term trading. .

Since when did Frank Butera and Trevor Hardnett become legends of MP ?

While you are at it, may be you should add our outstanding member AMMO to the list. Have you read some of his posts here ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mister ed said:
Thanks for the comments on MP btfox - if you would like to expand on the comments that would be appreciated too.

 

Regarding the criticism of ET - I think there is no denying that there is excellent info on ET and some excellent people there, it is just that there is a lot of personal attack and abuse there, and some posters who seem to concentrate on distracting threads. To be honest, it is quite an entertaining read sometimes! But what we try to do here at TL is focus on the quality input and get rid of the attacks and distractions. It is hard work sometimes, but hopefully you, and others, can spot the difference.

 

ET has a much bigger number of visitors and users. As a site grows it's very hard to please everyone and contain all the drama. I think we at TL do a great job compared to on any other market site I've been on. Given the size here...I'll be bold and say James and the mods here do the best job even. ;)

 

While this may be a business for James, it's first and foremost his passion. That comes through in his participation, information and the way he cares about quality over user count. User count is lucrative business, it means more ad exposure. James has never mentioned user count to his mod team as far as I know and he gives us the freedom to ban as needed.

 

Thanks to James and my fellow mods for making this place so clean. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  mister ed said:
Thanks for the comments on MP btfox - if you would like to expand on the comments that would be appreciated too.

 

Regarding the criticism of ET - I think there is no denying that there is excellent info on ET and some excellent people there, it is just that there is a lot of personal attack and abuse there, and some posters who seem to concentrate on distracting threads. To be honest, it is quite an entertaining read sometimes! But what we try to do here at TL is focus on the quality input and get rid of the attacks and distractions. It is hard work sometimes, but hopefully you, and others, can spot the difference.

 

Only when the mods don't join the frey. Otherwise, yes, TL is better than ET in that regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forsearch said:
Only when the mods don't join the frey. Otherwise, yes, TL is better than ET in that regard.

 

I have to disagree FS. The "mods" here are regular people like you and me. They help James out, but they too are entitled to their opinion and discussions.

 

I know you have an issue w/ me since I am a 'mod' of the candle corner, but I started the CC as a way to give back and I "moderate" it but nothing else.

 

If the mods were a paid position, then I would agree 100%. But it is not. It's the community helping the community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  brownsfan019 said:

I know you have an issue w/ me since I am a 'mod' of the candle corner, but I started the CC as a way to give back and I "moderate" it but nothing else.

 

 

Really? I think we put that one to bed quite awhile ago. Looks like you're still bearing grudges or something. Let it go....

 

Remember, you're not the only mod who has "opinions" on this site that occasionally cross the line.

 

 

  brownsfan019 said:

 

If the mods were a paid position, then I would agree 100%. But it is not. It's the community helping the community.

 

Fair enough. Just don't care for double standards, is all. Guess that's why Reaver was shown the door, I suppose.

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forsearch said:

Fair enough. Just don't care for double standards, is all.

-fs

 

There are no double standards here, you've instigated on many occasions with no course of action taken. Everyone gets some leeway...there is a reasonable level that can slide, then it crosses the line and something has to be done.

 

I would also suggest those with thin skin shouldn't trade barbs. If one can't take the heat, they should stay out of the kitchen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've been crying all morning,had to open 2nd box of tissue,over oac's comment,seriously tho,if you get insulted,and don't respond or respond like a gentleman ,any barbs should just burn themselves out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ammo said:
i've been crying all morning,had to open 2nd box of tissue,over oac's comment,seriously tho,if you get insulted,and don't respond or respond like a gentleman ,any barbs should just burn themselves out

Ammo:

You are obviousely a very modest individual. The comment was meant to be an endorsement. It is obvious to me that you do use floor trader's market profile lingo. First let us get some facts straight :

(1) Peter Steidlmayer invented MP, but Market Profile is OWNED by an Exchange, in this case the CBOT.

(2) Floor Traders are members of the exchange and probably the first ones to try out market profile.

(3) Foor Traders are known for their vulgar languages with occasional sexist overtone.

 

 

So ammo, when you speak, I believe you are speaking from the source.

Whereas Btfox named a whole list of individuals, with the exception of John Dalton who authored two books, the rest are just vendors. One thing that I hate is getting caught up in a vendor's hype.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wasn't offended oac,i've read your posts,i just used it as an opportunity to expose the value/or lack of, taunting people on threads,i'm interested in any trading site that can improve my bottom line and when people come on here and emulate sword fights over the toilet like a couple of 8 year old boys,they are embarassing themselves,and its a lot of crap that others have to read while searching for trading info,good luck,i'm enjoying your posts p.s. i mentioned on here that those could very well be drew cary's boobs and didn't mean to offend any of the ladies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, well I don't know Trevor but I thought the MD had promise. He is using some MP ideas in developing his software and I thought that even Don Jones has mentioned him. I've watched Frank Butera call trades and though he may is not among the older generation of MP users, he does know Dalton's work and has adapted it for his own use.

Btw, there is a Jones who is co-author of Dalton's book and he is the son of Don.

 

As I mentioned Don Jones has been associated with MP since the 80's. I don't know if he was working hand in hand with Pete S. when he developed MP, but he is obviously an authority. And he will talk to you and mull over trading ideas. I had no problem making money in the short course using just the basic information...but you are watching probably a dozen markets and looking for the best trades.

 

I'm not so sure that floor traders cared about MP, because MP delivers what you get from standing in pits. As the 30-yr pit dried up, bond traders walked over the the Ag pit. The best have good memories for levels and you get lots of info standing shoulder to shoulder with traders. As markets go electronic traders have had to adapt. The most successful trader I know, a bond trader for 20+ years, "trades by feel." He does, of course, have all that experience up his sleeve. He would still go down to the pit on occasion but he said that he was making more screen trading--probably 3 5-min interest rates charts (5s,10s,30 yr), the dow, sp, are hidden under a screen filled with TT Domes. He day trades, also holds overnight, and scalps the dow.

 

In general, I would say that the best MP trades are breakouts from a balance, especially those of a minimum of 2-3 days. Reactive trades from extremes are less dependable, but once the market begins a move out of it's current balance it will be seeking a new one--those are the days where you can count on the best moves.

 

I think a lot of pit traders are having trouble adapting to the screen and they are the ones looking at what's out there to help them. If anyone is interested in MP after learning the rudiments, then I think Dalton is the next logical step. Cisco-Futures and a lot of information; PS's original work is in pdf file at cbot website under Education-Market Profile. Just don't expect to see anything resembling a trading system. Good Luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.