Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

januson

Help Needed with Placing Fibs

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I'm trying to learn something about fibonacci retracement lines, but sometimes I get a bit confused.

 

Please take a look at my screenshot, fibs and fibs1. Fibs is without any retracement lines and fibs1 is my confusement :helloooo:

 

I don't get it, how should I draw the fibonacci retracement lines? Or should I even use them in this scenario?

fibs.png.527724c5a8138f3817ab0c97193e2aad.png

fibs1.png.fcc74c9e8cbce4d237a15c8a5ba6a5dd.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Januson ... I am not really a user of Fibonacci retracements/extensions but plenty of people are. There are some good threads on Fibos, try the ones listed here to start with and they should give you some good ideas:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/search.php?searchid=133324

 

 

Maybe try this thread first, the opening post talks about plotting Fibos between swing highs and lows:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/fibonacci-pullback-strategies-1057.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi januson,

 

well, I think that fib1 is nice, but now I'm confused.

 

But lets get serious, as I see it, lets assume you have been looking for a retracement into the 50 to 61.8 % area. Well, it failed! Thats it.

 

So now draw one more; the 0 % line at 566.20 and the 100 % at something like 543.00.

Well, what do you see?

 

Regards,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, janusson,

 

and now draw another one 0 % at 543.00 and 100 % at 566.20

 

I think, that this makes the difference.

 

0 % is the point, where you are, 100 % where you come from.

A 100 % retracement leads you back to the point where the move started,

but you try to analyze it from the end of the move (i.e. start of potential retracement, 0 %).

 

Regards,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like you are drawing them correctly januson. You can also plot fibs from the swing high (high of day) to the swing low (low of day). You get that nice little retracement around 558 back down to 545.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi James, Januson,

 

maybe I'm wrong, I don't use fibs yet, but regarding to the fib1 example, wouldn't it be right to place the 0 % mark at 566.20 (end of move) and the 100 % mark at 549.06 (start of move)?

 

For example, as result the 61.8 % line should then appear below the 50 % line.

 

Regards,

 

Hal

 

 

P.S.: Maybe my use of you in my above post is somehow misleading, and

but you should try would have been better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you place fib grid, you have to know what you want, a price projection or retracement. Once you've determined that, you have to determine your nearest high and nearest low. Depending on your timeframe and your style of scalping or intraday trading, you can determine if the distance of your target and stop loss to fit in with your style. It look like you did ok on the 2nd chart, using important pivots to place the grid. I usually use 50% most of the time since it's the most reliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use fibs fairly regularly but only for longer timeframes as I find the retracements to be more more complying on longer time frame so therefore i will use an hourly swing high/low combo or daily swing high/lows. The fib you placed looks fine but personally i'd get rid of the other lines except for the 0, 50, 61.8 and 100. If you were looking to short a rally to the 50 or 61.8 then nothing would of come up but that doesnt matter, not good to chase the market anyhow.

 

Once the market made new lows you can replot the fib and it would of worked as a short

at the gap between the 50 and 61.8. Extensions can be used as profit targets, but I don't personally use extensions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever works for you! In all seriousness. If I can quote Tim Morge from medialine (though he was talking mainly about pitchforks). "Draw Draw and then Draw Some More"

 

Normal place is between last swing high and swing low the retracement allowing you to guage the retracement of that swing.

 

On your chart you should draw from the high just before 9.45 to the low bar around 12.45. The current high (just in) should fall at a retracement. The one you drew looks valid but price failed at all levels (notice it did react-at them).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Draw them from swing highs to lows and vice versa. Let me give you a clue that you should find helpful. When the market is pulling back you want to see it pullback on lower volume. Put a volume historgram in the lower section of your chart and verify it for yourself. If you get Tom Obrien's book Timing The Trade or Techniques of Tape Reading by Graifer and Schumacher you will see some good examples of pullbacks on low volume. Fib is related to Elliot Wave. After a confirmed reversal when the trend is strong, you will get a wave 2 pullback to approx. 38% on lower volume and then a break of the swing point on increasing volume. I use 38% and 62%. If it goes below 62% the move is weak and you don't want it. Read this thread, trust me, and print out the pdf photos and thank db phoenix for his wisdom. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=29005&perpage=6&pagenumber=2

Edited by dandxg
To agument post for the better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all.. very nice comments. So to sum things up, I should move the fibs accordingly as the stock hits lower lows or higher highs.

 

So a fibtrader moves the fibs as the day goes on if needed...

 

But that will eventually means that older support/ resistance gets ignored and replaced by new? Have I missed something here?

 

Thanks for the links :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Essentially Yes. Though of course you have to define exactly what a swing is to you. For a scalper it may be a 5 tick pullback for a broader time frame trader it might be the highest high in the last 5 10 minute bars etc. You have to be consistant and should pick something in tune with exactly what you are trying to measure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Essentially Yes. Though of course you have to define exactly what a swing is to you. For a scalper it may be a 5 tick pullback for a broader time frame trader it might be the highest high in the last 5 10 minute bars etc. You have to be consistant and should pick something in tune with exactly what you are trying to measure.

 

Ahh okay.. :cool: I think I get it, so put in another way, the stocks essentially wave according to fibs undependendant the timeframe. So if one is looking for daytrades, would the fibs go from day high to day low.

 

I know there's a lot of nuances besides this basic stuff, but things are getting clearer :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully this helps. There are several trades like the ambush which sometimes work, sometimes don't. I like to plot fibs and use them to find future support/resistance levels. Obviously I use the 127 as an extension to the current trend. So if the market is moving down like in my examples, I make sure the 127 is lower than the current price. If I used something like CL, then I would want it to be higher. I don't trade based off Fib lines, but I do like to know where they are especially on a daily basis.

 

This was from today, and I used the Fib lines during a range to plot where price would go if it broke the low. Notice how the 127 worked out very well for support.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5358&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

I went ahead and plotted where the ambush zones would be.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5359&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5360&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

Heres a closeup of the 61.8 and 127

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5361&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

Here are some daily charts of the YM and ES. I didn't really include the whole chart because it's rather irrelevant. price is what matters in these examples.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5362&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

Now if you are a longer term trader, one could argue this would be the proper fib placement. It really just goes by what your trading plan and style. There isn't really a right or wrong way to do it.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5364&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

Heres a shorter term view. I pointed out how the 127 line almost matches up with the open and close of the two candles back in January. I see this come up a lot with Fib lines, and I always find it interesting and it tends to be more powerful.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5363&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

This is a weekly ES chart. I threw this one in here for fun, because I could see the market hitting those levels and I find it ironic (or not?) that the 127 nearly matches with the old support levels from 2004!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5365&stc=1&d=1204357530

 

 

Hope it helps!

fib2.thumb.jpg.933018fba31fac7763fd3c89e57aabf5.jpg

fib3.thumb.jpg.54d3e872beeb7bd013eb598b9dca421f.jpg

fib4.jpg.a9cece4cb249a8457496cbb31466465f.jpg

fib5.jpg.f62fbf566c358003dbf341c6aff67293.jpg

fib6daily.jpg.6eb62ae9dbc90a0b14ad248bd0b58173.jpg

fib8daily.jpg.10dbdd70aa1212fac9ead45630f86336.jpg

fib7daily.thumb.jpg.4657020af5acbaf87e056b9c93336d0d.jpg

fib9daily.thumb.jpg.e31f45b0309b3237dbef385b48986e2a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.