Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

So if a trade goes wrong, this automatically means the trader that has read the market incorrectly?

 

Of course. It's hardly the market's fault if the trader can't hear. Today, for example, we have yet to meet the conditions for a reversal. To short without having those conditions met is gambling, not trading.

 

It sounds like you are advocating than you can get every trade right, if you are skillful enough to read the market :confused:

 

Closer than most traders would expect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now I see a lower high, but no lower low...

 

Yes indeed. One question to ask is 'what must happen next?' i.e. what must happen next to validate/invalidate what you anticipate might happen. For price to go lower it must start making lower lows at some point. I guess this is obvious. Price is still making higher highs and cant take out recent lows so the uptrend is still intact. Having said that it went 'sideways' for a bit if you allow sideways as direction.

 

To look at it another way the bulls could not take price higher however neither could the bears assert themselves. Of course when the old high/DT was taken out and price held above, it was clear who was in control again.

 

Perhaps I'm on a different page to others but this to me is what PA is all about? When you monitor it as it happens that is 'real time price action'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course. It's hardly the market's fault if the trader can't hear. Today, for example, we have yet to meet the conditions for a reversal. To short without having those conditions met is gambling, not trading.

 

I agree, there's no reason to short, other than trying desperately to scalp some points. But can you really blame the trader if he's acting on a perfectly valid signal and suddenly some news is released and the market goes in the other direction?

 

Closer than most traders would expect.

 

I guess I know what to strive for then :)

It does seem like your ability to do so derives from a very fine understanding of where S/R can be found.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree, there's no reason to short, other than trying desperately to scalp some points. But can you really blame the trader if he's acting on a perfectly valid signal and suddenly some news is released and the market goes in the other direction?

 

You're regressing to the realm of the hypothetical again. We were talking about today. Real time, the subject of the thread, is today.

 

As to whether or not there's a reason to short, that depends on what your reasons are to short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes indeed. One question to ask is 'what must happen next?' i.e. what must happen next to validate/invalidate what you anticipate might happen. For price to go lower it must start making lower lows at some point. I guess this is obvious. Price is still making higher highs and cant take out recent lows so the uptrend is still intact. Having said that it went 'sideways' for a bit if you allow sideways as direction.

 

To look at it another way the bulls could not take price higher however neither could the bears assert themselves. Of course when the old high/DT was taken out and price held above, it was clear who was in control again.

 

Perhaps I'm on a different page to others but this to me is what PA is all about? When you monitor it as it happens that is 'real time price action'.

 

All correct, as far as it goes. So why short at 47.75?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another demandline is now broken...

 

Also, the reaction at resistance looks like price didn't want to see 1360. High volume and bar closes well off the highs...

es_tl2.thumb.GIF.5eb4f953ccc50c9808822da753459d1d.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Of course. It's hardly the market's fault if the trader can't hear. Today, for example, we have yet to meet the conditions for a reversal. To short without having those conditions met is gambling, not trading.

 

 

I wonder what those conditions might be, some sort of buying climax I would guess? At least a more fundamental shift in the force Obi Wan :) This is what I am trying to get at :- what the clue in the title might be. :D

 

As to gambling some might argue all trading is gambling. I guess thats not what you where alluding too. Short side trades might be 'gambling' in the context of how you trade. A scalper would certainly disagree. Personally when price started making lower highs on the time frame that was my 'focus' then I considered short side. Apart from a couple of places though the trend was firmly up (by my definition).

 

Of course some one with a weekly focus might see the last 3 weeks rise as a small correction in the weekly down trend for example. Having said that looks like the weekly is trying for a double bottom but below 1400 it is still making lower highs. Of course if the bears take out 1270 then the downtrend is intact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to be as "real-time" as possible, this is a 1-minute chart of the ES.

 

Isn't this supply coming into the market? Notice how all of the bars close well off the highs. I'm not thinking of putting a trade on, but in all honestly this would probably have been a short ...

es_supply.thumb.GIF.a7bce673e768246bd009cd812f8469d8.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder what those conditions might be, some sort of buying climax I would guess? At least a more fundamental shift in the force Obi Wan :) This is what I am trying to get at :- what the clue in the title might be. :D

 

That's largely up to the trader, though it has nothing to do with The Force. At the very least, each trader should define for himself the difference between a retracement (or pullback or reaction or whatever) and a reversal.

 

As to gambling some might argue all trading is gambling. I guess thats not what you where alluding too. Short side trades might be 'gambling' in the context of how you trade. A scalper would certainly disagree. Personally when price started making lower highs on the time frame that was my 'focus' then I considered short side. Apart from a couple of places though the trend was firmly up (by my definition).

 

Whether one is a scalper or swing trader or position trader or whatever has nothing to do with whether he's trading or gambling. If he's trading randomly, he's gambling.

 

At the very least, one must have made a clear distinction between reversal and retracement (above). He must also have a clear definition of exactly what will invalidate whatever setup he's implementing.

 

Of course, it also helps to be able to make a clear distinction between "up" and "down". A surprising number of traders have trouble with this (witness the popularity of moving averages).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trying to be as "real-time" as possible, this is a 1-minute chart of the ES.

 

Isn't this supply coming into the market? Notice how all of the bars close well off the highs. I'm not thinking of putting a trade on, but in all honestly this would probably have been a short ...

 

Zeon, what you're doing is not real-time analysis. Instead you're asking, in so many words, can I short now? can I short now?

 

You have yet to break the trendline. If you have some sort of well-defined and thoroughly-tested setup that allows you to short with confidence here, then explain in detail what it is. Otherwise, you're just guessing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zeon, what you're doing is not real-time analysis. Instead you're asking, in so many words, can I short now? can I short now?

 

You have yet to break the trendline. If you have some sort of well-defined and thoroughly-tested setup that allows you to short with confidence here, then explain in detail what it is. Otherwise, you're just guessing.

 

Ok, I'll try to steer away from comments like going short or long then. But what about the supply then? And I had drawn two trendlines that were broken (see my previous charts), are you looking at something on another timeframe perhaps?

 

The "setup" for shorting was like I said before a shooting star like formation (or by blending candles) into resistance, in this case 1360. Something like this ocurred at 1718 PM on the chart I posted, but on the next bar price went up so no short signal triggered.

 

Note: price has just gone below 1360 again hmm...

 

PS: Something you wrote recently just came to mind. You said you didn't take trend into consideration "per se" when buying S and selling R. This seems a bit contradictory to your above post...?

es_1360.thumb.GIF.9ca5c0a564da13a72c9d194d7fcd5c54.GIF

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The "setup" for shorting was like I said before a shooting star like formation (or by blending candles) into resistance, in this case 1360. Something like this ocurred at 1718 PM on the chart I posted, but on the next bar price went up so no short signal triggered.

 

And you consider this to be well defined, thoroughly tested, and consistently profitable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And you consider this to be well defined, thoroughly tested, and consistently profitable?

 

I forgot to say that volume is the confirmation of my trade. There needs to be a peak in the volume in order for the signal to be valid.

 

And ehm, yes, that was basically how I traded for several months last year and managed to actually make a profit. Ofcourse at that time I had no idea what the future profitability of the setup would be, but by the looks of it is has had it's time :(

 

Ofcourse this is just the signal, the complete setup includes where to place the stop, how to determine the target, position sizing, position management, etc...

 

And I also didn't mention that there has to be a sustained directional movement before. So if price is just drifting or ranging, shorts aren't in place.

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have yet to break the trendline. If you have some sort of well-defined and thoroughly-tested setup that allows you to short with confidence here, then explain in detail what it is. Otherwise, you're just guessing.

 

 

I've tried drawing a trendline from the beginning of the day, but even that is breached.

es_tl3.thumb.GIF.076500921f8508af3a85b3f102d833d3.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Which signifies what?

 

Strictly speaking that momentum is changing... slowing down, which was visible on the chart by the sideways movement. And, if I understand the posts in your blog correctly, it signifies a reason to exit longs.

 

Nonetheless, momentum has just picked up again and we jumped higher 5 points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Strictly speaking that momentum is changing... slowing down, which was visible on the chart by the sideways movement. And, if I understand the posts in your blog correctly, it signifies a reason to exit longs.

 

In and of itself, no, it doesn't. You may want to review them. Or become acquainted with Sperandeo.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In and of itself, no, it doesn't. You may want to review them. Or become acquainted with Sperandeo.

 

 

I vividly recall you saying something along the lines of "the trader has several ways of determining to exit: a breach of the trendline or wait for a break of the last swing low; there just aren't that many possibilities".

 

I also remember you saying "I’m going to draw a supply line and use a break of that as a signal to exit."

 

As for Sperandeo, I know the 2B rule and his definition of trend reversal... and I take it that's what you are refering to. Sorry if I wasn't entirely clear, I didn't mean to say a reversal was taking place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I vividly recall you saying something along the lines of "the trader has several ways of determining to exit: a breach of the trendline or wait for a break of the last swing low; there just aren't that many possibilities".

 

True. There aren't all that many possibilities.

 

I also remember you saying "I’m going to draw a supply line and use a break of that as a signal to exit."

 

Every day? All the time? Under all circumstances?

 

As for Sperandeo, I know the 2B rule and his definition of trend reversal... and I take it that's what you are refering to. Sorry if I wasn't entirely clear, I didn't mean to say a reversal was taking place.

 

So you haven't seen any shorting opportunities today after all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True. There aren't all that many possibilities.

 

Every day? All the time? Under all circumstances?

 

No, not every day. But it was either a warning signal in anticipation of exiting the trade when the last swing was breached.

 

So you haven't seen any shorting opportunities today after all?

 

 

I'd probably should have said this, but when price breaks through an important area of resistance (or support if it's on the downside) I tend to look to entries with the trend. Otherwise I just short resistance or buy support. For example, if the day opened around 1325, I would have been on the lookout to short 1330. We opened way higher, so the odds were that this "gap" was going to be a continuation higher.

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd probably should have said this, but when price breaks through an important area of resistance (or support if it's on the downside) I tend to look to entries with the trend. Otherwise I just short resistance or buy support. For example, if the day opened around 1325, I would have been on the lookout to short 1330. We opened way higher, so the odds were that this "gap" was going to be a continuation higher.

 

I don't recall you mentioning any of this earlier. You appeared to be looking for shorting opportunities all day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't recall you mentioning any of this earlier. You appeared to be looking for shorting opportunities all day.

 

 

I'm sorry if that was the impression you got. I did focus on finding the elements that are components of the setup I earlier described. As I don't have a real strategy to handle trending days, I try to steer clear from them. I'm either 'in early' or out for the whole day.

 

Perhaps I should illustrate this by a short signal yesterday (just an observation, I didn't act on it) at 1330 resistance. Price was making higher highs and higher lows (annotated x'es on the chart) along the way but there was no break. Are you saying 'xxx' would not constitute as a short entry then, because the demand line is not broken?

es_short.thumb.GIF.8f090d7ee392276a9ce7128cc2b631e2.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm sorry if that was the impression you got. I did focus on finding the elements that are components of the setup I earlier described. As I don't have a real strategy to handle trending days, I try to steer clear from them. I'm either 'in early' or out for the whole day.

 

However, you didn't mention any of this at or before or after the open. Since you could not have known in advance that this was going to be a trend day, that's not a factor.

 

The point of a RT thread is to discuss what you're doing and plan to do in RT. To go back and say that the probabilities were for a "continuation higher", particularly when you never went long, doesn't count.

 

Perhaps I should illustrate this by a short signal yesterday (just an observation, I didn't act on it) at 1330 resistance. Price was making higher highs and higher lows (annotated x'es on the chart) along the way but there was no break. Are you saying 'xxx' would not constitute as a short entry then, because the demand line is not broken?

 

Yesterday doesn't count either. If you're unable to act in RT, that's fine. But that's what you need to work on. You can't trade hindsight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However, you didn't mention any of this at or before or after the open. Since you could not have known in advance that this was going to be a trend day, that's not a factor.

 

That's why, if I am trading, I'll usually get in a couple of losing trades before I realize it's a trend day. When I finally do, I quit because I can't find an entry in the direction of the trend or - by the time I do - the trend is exhausted.

 

The point of a RT thread is to discuss what you're doing and plan to do in RT. To go back and say that the probabilities were for a "continuation higher", particularly when you never went long, doesn't count.

 

I wasn't trying to fabricate anything to make it look like I would have taken a long, when I wouldn't have. I was merely pointing out that based on my observations, there's usually a high probability for price to continue in one and the same direction after a significant breakout has taken place.

 

 

Yesterday doesn't count either. If you're unable to act in RT, that's fine. But that's what you need to work on. You can't trade hindsight.

 

What I meant to say is that yesterday was a short signal according to my "plan". I didn't act because I am trying to observe price from a neutral point of view, without trading or papertrading. But the setup still was there and I noted it during the day. This seems in conflict with the higher highs and higher lows that the trend showed yesterday. Or at least up till the point of my short...

 

To summarize things, I see little difference between the first half of yesterday and today. So, assuming there was that short signal yesterday at 1330 and today at 1360, and in both cases the trendline wasn't broken, how could I have know that yesterday's trade would've been a profitable one and today's not? This is why I find it hard to come up with a system that has anything more than a 50% win rate :\

 

Ofcourse I could pre-empt my plan by saying shorting is only allowed after the TL breaks or after price failed to make a higher high, but by then I'll most likely be shorting when price has already moved a significant part lower. I hope all of this makes sense somehow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.