Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant).

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

I guess scaling in is an option that obviates the need to monitor quite so closely until price approaches the 'last line in the sand'.

 

Again, I've never suggested "blind" entry or exit at S/R. The predetermined levels are only potential S/R, and the trader must apply what he knows regarding demand/supply dynamics to the activity that takes place at those levels. If he doesn't understand those dynamics, then he will have no idea what to look for. This is why zeon is continuing to have so much trouble. And, again, explaining those dynamics and what to look for at the various S/R levels was the point of my making those Blog entries.

 

Your note to Erie regarding determining in real time whether potential S/R is going to become actual S/R is of course critical to trading S/R successfully. If one learns how to do that, the hit rate of this approach is unusually high, and there are few stopouts. But if he tries to trade this via a list of instructions, the trader will not only be stopped out regularly but will also spend most of his time on the wrong side of the trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant). You will notice I talked about entry later on in the post.

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

.

 

There are three things here:

1. I need more price info (previous)

2. Our approaches are very different.

3. We do not trade the same instrument.

That may be cause of any confusion. My attempt to answer your question is feeble at best when I am not familiar with your instrument and would be only relating to what I look for in the ES futures.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:\...

 

Am I the only one who's not finding it "trivial" then? Perhaps you could lay out the numbers for the ES today, and we could compare them to what other people have...

 

Maybe calling them trivial is trivialising things :) It's not the lines/zones that matter anyway its how you monitor and trade them that matters :)

 

I have been trading FTSE last few weeks but threw these on an ES chart this morning (europe). They may not be "right" but they will keep me right side up :)

 

Edit I should say they are relatively 'short term'.

5aa70e4f71533_ES06-0801_04_2008(2401Tick).thumb.png.e83f103b4cac9beade5d05e926adb302.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the benefit of hindsight the top line is a little low :) Clearly found resistance at 50 which has held so far. The key thing now is to monitor to see if the bears can sieze control

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lower time frame chart to monitor the turn around 46.25 was the first hurdle.. I was late to the party 47.75. (short of course) edit: Looks like a re-test might be needed before any decent sort of move.

5aa70e4f7a923_ES06-0801_04_2008(96Tick).thumb.png.bf45cb8031010c1c05a982f1a0b80068.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe calling them trivial is trivialising things :) It's not the lines/zones that matter anyway its how you monitor and trade them that matters :)

 

 

Edit I should say they are relatively 'short term'.

 

Actually, it's both. However, the baggage that one brings to the task will in large part determine how he addresses it. Someone coming from an MP background, for example, will likely have far less trouble understanding this than someone from a VSA background.

 

Incidentally, R levels -- again shown on the chart I posted last week -- are 46, 48, and 50, eventually 60.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, it's both. However, the baggage that one brings to the task will in large part determine how he addresses it. Someone coming from an MP background, for example, will likely have far less trouble understanding this than someone from a VSA background.

 

Incidentally, R levels -- again shown on the chart I posted last week -- are 46, 48, and 50, eventually 60.

 

Indeed, though as I said the levels can be comfortably drawn the night before without the pressure of the live market. Actually I know traders that trade successfully with just one or the other though. Furthermore of the vanilla 'levels' guys some trade break outs some trade them as S/R.

 

Anyway I wonder if you spotted my original question concerning corrections that look like reversals off the 'front edge' of a zone? I would be interested in your take on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed, though as I said the levels can be comfortably drawn the night before without the pressure of the live market. Actually I know traders that trade successfully with just one or the other though. Furthermore of the vanilla 'levels' guys some trade break outs some trade them as S/R.

 

Anyway I wonder if you spotted my original question concerning corrections that look like reversals off the 'front edge' of a zone? I would be interested in your take on that.

 

Drawing them in advance without the "pressure" of the live market is the whole point of preparing for the day.

 

And, yes, I spotted your original question, but you must have missed erie's and my responses to it. Without context, what you have is just bars on a page, and shorting at 47.75 or thereabouts is essentially a jump in and hope for the best entry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, it's both. However, the baggage that one brings to the task will in large part determine how he addresses it. Someone coming from an MP background, for example, will likely have far less trouble understanding this than someone from a VSA background.

 

Incidentally, R levels -- again shown on the chart I posted last week -- are 46, 48, and 50, eventually 60.

 

I have no problem seeing why 60 is potential resistance, but having three levels 46-48-50 so close together surely must be causing difficulties if you're trying to trade them? I'm not staying one must, but I thought you said support & resistance are "buying zones" or "selling zones", but in your latest posts you mentioned exact numbers. Even yesterday you posted ES numbers with only 0.25 (a tick) difference. They were amazingly accurate I'd have to say. But then do you consider them breached from 1 point on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
easy in hindsight. not really too hard in real time either

 

 

I guess we have completely different definitions of what makes a "lower low" then :eek:

 

For me, a "lower low" is when price breaks the previous swing low, on the chart I posted (5-minute timeframe) the last swing down touched 1322 and continued higher from there. There is no "lower low" until that level has been broken imho.

 

On a personal note, perhaps I should become a swing trader. Last week the "down days" that I observed seemed like little selling and some sort of retracement back to support on a higher timeframe. This week we continued up, so by the looks of it I was right...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have no problem seeing why 60 is potential resistance, but having three levels 46-48-50 so close together surely must be causing difficulties if you're trying to trade them? I'm not staying one must, but I thought you said support & resistance are "buying zones" or "selling zones", but in your latest posts you mentioned exact numbers. Even yesterday you posted ES numbers with only 0.25 (a tick) difference. They were amazingly accurate I'd have to say. But then do you consider them breached from 1 point on?

 

No difficulty at all because, yet again, these are only potential levels of S/R. I monitor the balance between buyers and sellers at each of these levels and act accordingly, even if that means not acting at all. I don't "try to trade" anything. I focus on what the market is telling me. If you never get past this, you're never going to understand it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No difficulty at all because, yet again, these are only potential levels of S/R. I monitor the balance between buyers and sellers at each of these levels and act accordingly, even if that means not acting at all. I don't "try to trade" anything. I focus on what the market is telling me. If you never get past this, you're never going to understand it.

 

Okay, I understand, there are no certainties, only possibilities. So we wait and see if there's any rise in trading activity, displayed by the volume as that is the cause, when price approaches S or R. Correct?

 

Perhaps today isn't the best of examples because price travelled towards 48 on the ISM news. It didn't seem to have much trouble at 46, but then again the news kind of blow through those levels. Let me ask you another question that, suppose there is no resistance at 60 and there is nothing on the left of your chart but blank space above 50, when would you exit your trade then?

 

This probably won't be much of an issue, but last year we were going higher and higher and I had very little reference points. Usually I just left my trade open till the close and made some nice profits. It just seems the market has become much less smoother these days and there are more up & downswings which make it harder to trade. Or is it just my imagination? :\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Drawing them in advance without the "pressure" of the live market is the whole point of preparing for the day.

 

And, yes, I spotted your original question, but you must have missed erie's and my responses to it. Without context, what you have is just bars on a page, and shorting at 47.75 or thereabouts is essentially a jump in and hope for the best entry.

 

Actually that wasn't the question. the question was 10 or so posts before and had a chart of the FTSE attached to illustrate it. It was not about trades per se but about real time monitoring of price action

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, I understand, there are no certainties, only possibilities. So we wait and see if there's any rise in trading activity, displayed by the volume as that is the cause, when price approaches S or R. Correct?

 

Perhaps today isn't the best of examples because price travelled towards 48 on the ISM news. It didn't seem to have much trouble at 46, but then again the news kind of blow through those levels. Let me ask you another question that, suppose there is no resistance at 60 and there is nothing on the left of your chart but blank space above 50, when would you exit your trade then?

 

Whether or not there is a "rise" in trading activity is in itself irrelevant. What matters is the dynamic between buyers and sellers and its influence on price. I assume that even VSAers would agree with that.

 

As for when to exit a trade when actual S or R are unclear, what did I say about TDs and trendlines and higher lows/lower highs?

 

And, incidentally, I'm not long today. Price bounced off S at 3 o'clock this morning, and I wasn't about to jump in 35 points later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the spirit of the threads title here is a DT on a lower tick chart also with a line around 52.50 that must break to 'confrm' the DT.

 

If by "DT", you mean downtrend, that's not a downtrend until you have a lower high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether or not there is a "rise" in trading activity is in itself irrelevant. What matters is the dynamic between buyers and sellers and its influence on price. I assume that even VSAers would agree with that.

 

As for when to exit a trade when actual S or R are unclear, what did I say about TDs and trendlines and higher lows/lower highs?

 

And, incidentally, I'm not long today. Price bounced off S at 3 o'clock this morning, and I wasn't about to jump in 35 points later.

 

Price opened a whole lot higher than yesterday, after breaking through several resistance levels overnight. Wouldn't the trader be looking to short the next resistance level then, given where the market opened?

 

I agree, exiting on the breach of a trendline is a good signal, or waiting for last swing low (or high) to be broken. Unfortunately, I've seen price continue much much further after a TL has been broken. For example, today I've drawn a demand line, it is now broken, but resistance is still quite a bit further down the road. By your rules, you'd be out by now, right?

 

Edit: I've drawn a horizontal line, where I think "real-time" support is now being found. There was an earlier volume peak there, than price broke higher and paused at 1351.50, where we are now finding ourselves in some sort of congestion.

es_tl.thumb.GIF.3e450287feb9a1f9e861dc0174125fbe.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In the spirit of the threads title here is a DT on a lower tick chart also with a line around 52.50 that must break to 'confrm' the DT.

 

 

I've observed this phenomenon on several occasions. Price breaks an upsloping trendline, goes sideways for a while, but continues much higher. I suppose moving your stop to 1351 (if you were long) would be the best thing to do here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price opened a whole lot higher than yesterday, after breaking through several resistance levels overnight. Wouldn't the trader be looking to short the next resistance level then, given where the market opened?

 

Yes, he would, if his conditions for a short were met. If his conditions were met and he were stopped out anyway, then his conditions are incorrect.

 

I agree, exiting on the breach of a trendline is a good signal, or waiting for last swing low (or high) to be broken. Unfortunately, I've seen price continue much much further after a TL has been broken. For example, today I've drawn a demand line, it is now broken, but resistance is still quite a bit further down the road. By your rules, you'd be out by now, right?

 

And what are my rules?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If by "DT", you mean downtrend, that's not a downtrend until you have a lower high.

 

No double top, my bad not defining terms. DT warning LH LL (lower high lower low confirmation)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, he would, if his conditions for a short were met. If his conditions were met and he were stopped out anyway, then his conditions are incorrect.

 

So if a trade goes wrong, this automatically means the trader that has read the market incorrectly? It sounds like you are advocating than you can get every trade right, if you are skillful enough to read the market :confused:

 

And what are my rules?

 

 

Sorry if I mistakenly assumed something about your rules. But given the posts in your blog I considered - depending on how much confirmation you want - that either (a) a break of the trendline or (b) a break below the last swing low or high would be a clear exit signal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No double top, my bad not defining terms. DT warning LH LL (lower high lower low confirmation)

 

 

Now I see a lower high, but no lower low...

es_lrh.thumb.GIF.ccf4abff5baa2f6f900c42cc8b5c420d.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.