Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

FWIW, using the volume range "boxes" from my Blog, the first resistance area is 23-23.25 and the second is 26.5-.75.

 

 

I'm sorry but everyone here seems to have different definitions of where to find support and resistance, and I doubt I'm to blame if there's some confusion here, because although in all the PDF files you posted on this site, never once I did see a "box" come up. Then in all the dailies you use boxes,... and to be honest I've tried looking at it in different ways but I just can't seem to find how you come up with those boxes. They seem to be drawn in a very "discretionary" sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply a variety of ways of describing the same thing. The common theme in everything I've posted is price and volume and the dynamics between demand and supply, or buyers and sellers, or buying pressure and selling pressure. It's all the same thing. Beyond that, one looks for those areas where price is trending and where it's "balancing" or seeking equilibrium. These areas or "zones" of balancing present potential levels of support and resistance. I've posted dozens of charts with support and resistance lines above and below these zones. All one has to do to make a box is plot vertical lines on either side of the zone. If one doesn't understand how or where to locate these zones of greatest trading activity or highest volume, he can plot volume at price. If that makes no sense either, he can try the MP software.

 

What one calls all of this is irrelevant. The objective is to locate those areas where the greatest trading activity has taken place. One can then draw lines above and below it, color it, draw a circle around it, draw a box around it. Doesn't matter. What matters is locating the zone. That's what I had been doing for three weeks in my Blog. As for today's numbers, those were derived from the chart I posted last Friday.

 

One can, of course, limit himself to "points" and "levels" without regard for where those points and levels lie. But if they don't work, the logical conclusion is that they don't represent support and resistance after all.

 

This is a chart I posted several weeks ago. The only difference is that I've enclosed the zones:

.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5795&stc=1&d=1206977046

 

.

Image3.gif.13bb53b7812ab306a387750d181dd11d.gif

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Simply a variety of ways of describing the same thing. The common theme in everything I've posted is price and volume and the dynamics between demand and supply, or buyers and sellers, or buying pressure and selling pressure. It's all the same thing. Beyond that, one looks for those areas where price is trending and where it's "balancing" or seeking equilibrium. These areas or "zones" of balancing present potential levels of support and resistance. I've posted dozens of charts with support and resistance lines above and below these zones. All one has to do to make a box is plot vertical lines on either side of the zone. If one doesn't understand how or where to locate these zones of greatest trading activity or highest volume, he can plot volume at price. If that makes no sense either, he can try the MP software.

 

What one calls all of this is irrelevant. The objective is to locate those areas where the greatest trading activity has taken place. One can then draw lines above and below it, color it, draw a circle around it, draw a box around it. Doesn't matter. What matters is locating the zone. That's what I had been doing for three weeks in my Blog. As for today's numbers, those were derived from the chart I posted last Friday.

 

One can, of course, limit himself to "points" and "levels" without regard for where those points and levels lie. But if they don't work, the logical conclusion is that they don't represent support and resistance after all.

 

 

Okay, that makes a bit more sense.

 

Would you, according to the attached chart, then consider 133.50 - 134.00 to be an area of potential support/resistance (depending on the direction that price is coming from)?

spy_vbp.thumb.GIF.d3cafd3619904e20ac959e39a5cd1c28.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33.5-34 and 33-34.5.

 

 

That makes sense, or at least sort of. Although the overlapping of boxes on your charts is still something that can cause issues in my observations. For example, when having multiple S/R levels close to eachother, I can get caught in shorting three times on a signal although only the upper resistance level for example really provided resistance.

 

A question though: what to do with overnight/premarket action? Do you think it's important enough to provide S/R? Or don't you take it into consideration?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That makes sense, or at least sort of. Although the overlapping of boxes on your charts is still something that can cause issues in my observations. For example, when having multiple S/R levels close to eachother, I can get caught in shorting three times on a signal although only the upper resistance level for example really provided resistance.

 

A question though: what to do with overnight/premarket action? Do you think it's important enough to provide S/R? Or don't you take it into consideration?

 

As I've asked several times, why do you continue to trade this if you don't understand it? Study it. Try to understand it. If and when you think you understand it, then paper-trade it. If you never understand it, then don't try to trade it.

 

You're never going to understand the object if your entire focus is limited to what you're going to do about the object. The former is about the object. The latter is about you. This is not about you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

5aa70e4f4875f_z06-0801_04_2008(75tick).thumb.png.bbfa785c32773ce00da9fcd3e0066daf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

 

 

I don't know which instrument that chart is, but it's very similar to yesterday's action on the ES. I was about to ask the same question, but you saved me the trouble. I'm observing price action at important levels and have often found volume to be an important indicator in whether there's a true reaction or not. However, despite the initial reaction, in some cases the reaction doesn't last very long and the trend continues on it's direction. In other cases, a reversal occurs.

 

I can't seem to find anything conclusive to determine whether or not the trade is only worth a handful of points or has a much greater potential.

 

For example, I observed two "reactions", marked by the two blue rectangles on the attached chart (one at 1322 and one at 1330). At first what looked like price was rejecting a higher level, turned out to be nothing more than a pause before the upmove continued. The second one proved to be much more and price went back to 1322, previously resistance now turned into support.

es_20080331.thumb.GIF.ef482d6aa8ff5dd528cee96d13b242cd.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is a chart I posted several weeks ago. The only difference is that I've enclosed the zones:

.

.

 

 

Thanks for the explanation. Although to be honest, I think on this particular chart it's fair to say that the "balancing zones" seem easier to spot, than on charts from shorter timeframes, like intraday. For example, last couple of days on the ES seem like more choppy than otherwise...

es_sr.thumb.GIF.8d110b38cf405987d58207a3d3e0de5f.GIF

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

 

To me it doesn't matter, it depends on one's plan. If one has resistance as a target he/she simply sells, and that's that. Who cares what price does after that. One may need to define what a reversal is. One example would be the upthrust bar just below your red trendline after the top, could define a reversal ( has the element of weakness in it ). Just my thoughts.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me it doesn't matter, it depends on one's plan. If one has resistance as a target he/she simply sells, and that's that. Who cares what price does after that. One may need to define what a reversal is. One example would be the upthrust bar just below your red trendline after the top, could define a reversal ( has the element of weakness in it ). Just my thoughts.

erie

 

 

True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

 

These questions are what the three weeks' worth of real-time commentary in my Blog were intended to address. Since your particular chart does not show where the S/R levels or zones came from nor provide volume, it's impossible to answer your particular questions -- at least from the standpoint of how I detect the turns -- using only this chart.

 

If you're genuinely interested in this, I suggest you review the charts posted in Dailies in my Blog and ask specific questions about specific charts. In this way, you'll be better able to transfer whatever you learn to whatever it is you're trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

 

Zeon,

Again , you need to watch and learn more before you post things like this...........

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

 

yeah, but....that first upthrust on your chart didn't show any weakness. On the swing upto resistance, price hadn't even made a lower low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

 

Support was 1317, but then again thats subjective to some.:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

Actually, I had written 1316 as a potential interesting level before the day opened. But then the premarket action went clearly below that and then through it like a knife through butter, indicating (or at least that was my conclusiong) that that level was wrong.

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

 

I know, and I observed it in realtime, but that doesn't mean I am able to determine S/R myself using the principles you layed out. Take erierambler for example, he uses volume by price, but despite that each of us seem to come up with different levels each and every day...

:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant).

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

I guess scaling in is an option that obviates the need to monitor quite so closely until price approaches the 'last line in the sand'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yeah, but....that first upthrust on your chart didn't show any weakness. On the swing upto resistance, price hadn't even made a lower low.

 

Yes, that's true, but neither did price on the second upthrust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Support was 1317, but then again thats subjective to some.

 

That's why I said "at or around". Point is that the day began at support and the long side was first up in the queue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

:\...

 

Am I the only one who's not finding it "trivial" then? Perhaps you could lay out the numbers for the ES today, and we could compare them to what other people have...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant). You will notice I talked about entry later on in the post.

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

I guess scaling in is an option that obviates the need to monitor quite so closely until price approaches the 'last line in the sand' that is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.