Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

FWIW, using the volume range "boxes" from my Blog, the first resistance area is 23-23.25 and the second is 26.5-.75.

 

 

I'm sorry but everyone here seems to have different definitions of where to find support and resistance, and I doubt I'm to blame if there's some confusion here, because although in all the PDF files you posted on this site, never once I did see a "box" come up. Then in all the dailies you use boxes,... and to be honest I've tried looking at it in different ways but I just can't seem to find how you come up with those boxes. They seem to be drawn in a very "discretionary" sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply a variety of ways of describing the same thing. The common theme in everything I've posted is price and volume and the dynamics between demand and supply, or buyers and sellers, or buying pressure and selling pressure. It's all the same thing. Beyond that, one looks for those areas where price is trending and where it's "balancing" or seeking equilibrium. These areas or "zones" of balancing present potential levels of support and resistance. I've posted dozens of charts with support and resistance lines above and below these zones. All one has to do to make a box is plot vertical lines on either side of the zone. If one doesn't understand how or where to locate these zones of greatest trading activity or highest volume, he can plot volume at price. If that makes no sense either, he can try the MP software.

 

What one calls all of this is irrelevant. The objective is to locate those areas where the greatest trading activity has taken place. One can then draw lines above and below it, color it, draw a circle around it, draw a box around it. Doesn't matter. What matters is locating the zone. That's what I had been doing for three weeks in my Blog. As for today's numbers, those were derived from the chart I posted last Friday.

 

One can, of course, limit himself to "points" and "levels" without regard for where those points and levels lie. But if they don't work, the logical conclusion is that they don't represent support and resistance after all.

 

This is a chart I posted several weeks ago. The only difference is that I've enclosed the zones:

.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5795&stc=1&d=1206977046

 

.

Image3.gif.13bb53b7812ab306a387750d181dd11d.gif

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Simply a variety of ways of describing the same thing. The common theme in everything I've posted is price and volume and the dynamics between demand and supply, or buyers and sellers, or buying pressure and selling pressure. It's all the same thing. Beyond that, one looks for those areas where price is trending and where it's "balancing" or seeking equilibrium. These areas or "zones" of balancing present potential levels of support and resistance. I've posted dozens of charts with support and resistance lines above and below these zones. All one has to do to make a box is plot vertical lines on either side of the zone. If one doesn't understand how or where to locate these zones of greatest trading activity or highest volume, he can plot volume at price. If that makes no sense either, he can try the MP software.

 

What one calls all of this is irrelevant. The objective is to locate those areas where the greatest trading activity has taken place. One can then draw lines above and below it, color it, draw a circle around it, draw a box around it. Doesn't matter. What matters is locating the zone. That's what I had been doing for three weeks in my Blog. As for today's numbers, those were derived from the chart I posted last Friday.

 

One can, of course, limit himself to "points" and "levels" without regard for where those points and levels lie. But if they don't work, the logical conclusion is that they don't represent support and resistance after all.

 

 

Okay, that makes a bit more sense.

 

Would you, according to the attached chart, then consider 133.50 - 134.00 to be an area of potential support/resistance (depending on the direction that price is coming from)?

spy_vbp.thumb.GIF.d3cafd3619904e20ac959e39a5cd1c28.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33.5-34 and 33-34.5.

 

 

That makes sense, or at least sort of. Although the overlapping of boxes on your charts is still something that can cause issues in my observations. For example, when having multiple S/R levels close to eachother, I can get caught in shorting three times on a signal although only the upper resistance level for example really provided resistance.

 

A question though: what to do with overnight/premarket action? Do you think it's important enough to provide S/R? Or don't you take it into consideration?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That makes sense, or at least sort of. Although the overlapping of boxes on your charts is still something that can cause issues in my observations. For example, when having multiple S/R levels close to eachother, I can get caught in shorting three times on a signal although only the upper resistance level for example really provided resistance.

 

A question though: what to do with overnight/premarket action? Do you think it's important enough to provide S/R? Or don't you take it into consideration?

 

As I've asked several times, why do you continue to trade this if you don't understand it? Study it. Try to understand it. If and when you think you understand it, then paper-trade it. If you never understand it, then don't try to trade it.

 

You're never going to understand the object if your entire focus is limited to what you're going to do about the object. The former is about the object. The latter is about you. This is not about you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

5aa70e4f4875f_z06-0801_04_2008(75tick).thumb.png.bbfa785c32773ce00da9fcd3e0066daf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

 

 

I don't know which instrument that chart is, but it's very similar to yesterday's action on the ES. I was about to ask the same question, but you saved me the trouble. I'm observing price action at important levels and have often found volume to be an important indicator in whether there's a true reaction or not. However, despite the initial reaction, in some cases the reaction doesn't last very long and the trend continues on it's direction. In other cases, a reversal occurs.

 

I can't seem to find anything conclusive to determine whether or not the trade is only worth a handful of points or has a much greater potential.

 

For example, I observed two "reactions", marked by the two blue rectangles on the attached chart (one at 1322 and one at 1330). At first what looked like price was rejecting a higher level, turned out to be nothing more than a pause before the upmove continued. The second one proved to be much more and price went back to 1322, previously resistance now turned into support.

es_20080331.thumb.GIF.ef482d6aa8ff5dd528cee96d13b242cd.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is a chart I posted several weeks ago. The only difference is that I've enclosed the zones:

.

.

 

 

Thanks for the explanation. Although to be honest, I think on this particular chart it's fair to say that the "balancing zones" seem easier to spot, than on charts from shorter timeframes, like intraday. For example, last couple of days on the ES seem like more choppy than otherwise...

es_sr.thumb.GIF.8d110b38cf405987d58207a3d3e0de5f.GIF

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

 

To me it doesn't matter, it depends on one's plan. If one has resistance as a target he/she simply sells, and that's that. Who cares what price does after that. One may need to define what a reversal is. One example would be the upthrust bar just below your red trendline after the top, could define a reversal ( has the element of weakness in it ). Just my thoughts.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To me it doesn't matter, it depends on one's plan. If one has resistance as a target he/she simply sells, and that's that. Who cares what price does after that. One may need to define what a reversal is. One example would be the upthrust bar just below your red trendline after the top, could define a reversal ( has the element of weakness in it ). Just my thoughts.

erie

 

 

True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The discussion has seems to be centring on drawing the levels or zones of potential S/R. I'd like to ask how people use the 'real time PA' of the thread title to determine whether S/R is holding or breaking?

 

I have noticed that price will often react to the first 'edge' of the zone and in fact retrace some way. It may then push a bit further (perhaps to the midpoint) and then finally turn from the outside edge of the zone.

 

Using lower time frames seems a common approach to detect the turn. Looking harder and closer at price where you anticipate this might occur if you like. The problem is that often (very often) you will get a change in trend on the lower time frame that is actually just the first reaction.

 

One of the answers seems perhaps to be through tactics (e.g. enter 1/3 first edge 1/3 centre 1/3 outside edge). However how does one recognise whether you have a reaction or the final turn?

 

Heres a picture that hopefully might illustrate what I am talking about.

 

These questions are what the three weeks' worth of real-time commentary in my Blog were intended to address. Since your particular chart does not show where the S/R levels or zones came from nor provide volume, it's impossible to answer your particular questions -- at least from the standpoint of how I detect the turns -- using only this chart.

 

If you're genuinely interested in this, I suggest you review the charts posted in Dailies in my Blog and ask specific questions about specific charts. In this way, you'll be better able to transfer whatever you learn to whatever it is you're trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

 

Zeon,

Again , you need to watch and learn more before you post things like this...........

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True erie, but that's talking about the target. If you stubbornly hold on to S/R as a target and don't care what price does in between, I'm sure you'll get stopped out quite often. Take for example the first "upthrust" in my chart, if that was a short (at resistance too) than it'd be a losing trade.

 

Enjoy your holiday.

 

yeah, but....that first upthrust on your chart didn't show any weakness. On the swing upto resistance, price hadn't even made a lower low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

 

Support was 1317, but then again thats subjective to some.:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's because you're placing "resistance" incorrectly. Nor, apparently, are you paying any attention to support (which would have placed you in a long trade at or around 1315).

 

Actually, I had written 1316 as a potential interesting level before the day opened. But then the premarket action went clearly below that and then through it like a knife through butter, indicating (or at least that was my conclusiong) that that level was wrong.

 

I should also point out that each resistance level shown on the chart I posted last Friday and reiterated yesterday was hit exactly.

 

I know, and I observed it in realtime, but that doesn't mean I am able to determine S/R myself using the principles you layed out. Take erierambler for example, he uses volume by price, but despite that each of us seem to come up with different levels each and every day...

:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant).

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

I guess scaling in is an option that obviates the need to monitor quite so closely until price approaches the 'last line in the sand'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yeah, but....that first upthrust on your chart didn't show any weakness. On the swing upto resistance, price hadn't even made a lower low.

 

Yes, that's true, but neither did price on the second upthrust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Support was 1317, but then again thats subjective to some.

 

That's why I said "at or around". Point is that the day began at support and the long side was first up in the queue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

:\...

 

Am I the only one who's not finding it "trivial" then? Perhaps you could lay out the numbers for the ES today, and we could compare them to what other people have...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have been more specific I had assumed (never assume!) entry at the resistance zone rather than exit (though the same question is relevant). You will notice I talked about entry later on in the post.

 

Yes this can cross over to tactics as I mentioned. However I think if you just 'blindly' sell every potential S/R you'll go bust quick, well thats my observation. Determining potential S/R is the easy bit I'd go as far as saying its trivial. There is a bit of 'art' involved but with some diligence its easily accomplished. It's also done 'unreal' time in the calm reflective phase well away from the trade.

 

Erie I would humbly suggest it does matter in fact I would suggest that monitoring to see if potential S/R is really becoming actual S/R is what determines success or failure. I would be interested to hear your take on it, do you just enter at the zone or wait for some sort of price confirmation? Either way you would have been short off of the first edge when price started making LH LL. I figure I can't have expressed too well as it appears clear that not only does it matter its critical.

 

I guess scaling in is an option that obviates the need to monitor quite so closely until price approaches the 'last line in the sand' that is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.