Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sledge

Real Time Price Action- Clue to Puzzle?

Recommended Posts

  zeon said:
Okay, fair enough. I can definitely see price reacting to that level: there's a rise in volume and the bar closes off the highs. But this probably happens all the time when price approaches resistance, because it's very likely that other traders are seeing this area as resistance too.

 

If I may ask, do you focus only on the ES? or do you look at other things to?

 

Price may waffle here and still continue upward later on. As far as looking at other things, yes, but mainly in the evening. I look at the YM and the NQ, small caps, sectors (XLE, etc.) , new highs, new lows, volume of advancers, volume of decliners.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
Looks as if there were more sellers at resistance than buyers at support :)

erie

 

 

No offense meant, but that's easy to say now that the markets are closed... How did you evaluate this during the day in real time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zeon said:
No offense meant, but that's easy to say now that the markets are closed... How did you evaluate this during the day in real time?

 

I didn't, LOL, all I did today was buy support and sell resistance,(according to my levels which were posted ahead of time ) what happened afterwards I watched . I mentioned to you about resistance being made at start of day, we had that conversation. You know I thought price would waffle and rise again, but it did the opposite. All the more reason for me to take the first trade and don't do any more until I get a good handle on this. One trade prevents me from making a mistake. Lots of days there is no trading at all.

And no offense taken. This is serious stuff. I want to improve and move from swing to intraday, one step at a time. It's already been a while Zeon.

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a sample of what I look at to find s/r in the futures ( YM, ES, and NQ are in chart Futures ), the others are marked specifically. Since they may move differently day to day, eventually they come in line as you can see on the charts. I don't follow the NQ so I marked where Db is looking for potential support.

erie

ES2.gif.fdc7b2c5c8f8cdf4735f4eb9ac223071.gif

Futures2.gif.b35da22750d9a30168a64e7a34b217af.gif

NQ2.gif.5f91c9aa63bf683c2218492601e9a2cb.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
Here's a sample of what I look at to find s/r in the futures ( YM, ES, and NQ are in chart Futures ), the others are marked specifically. Since they may move differently day to day, eventually they come in line as you can see on the charts. I don't follow the NQ so I marked where Db is looking for potential support.

erie

 

Actually, it looks arbitrary without the box (all the context charts are posted in my blog). And it's been a confirmed S/R line since the end of January. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Actually, it looks arbitrary without the box (all the context charts are posted in my blog). And it's been a confirmed S/R line since the end of January. :)

 

Would you agree that the line on the attached chart is important?

erie

Futures2.gif.dd086014830245fd692011da7d5ebf24.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
Would you agree that the line on the attached chart is important?

erie

 

I'd look at it this way:

 

.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5712&stc=1&d=1206661625

 

.

As for tomorrow, I may do an ES day for my last day. The numbers will be 23, 30, 40 and 48, for starters.

 

.

Image2.gif.56834abc77243cf6e4c2def2577b2adf.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
All I've got is 1320 and 1340 for tommorrow. Anyone else?

erie

 

Why 40? I see the line comes from the left on your chart but there's nothing there, except for the the high in the middle of your chart. When you look to the right 1340 doesn't look like it provides any sort of S/R, price just goes straight through it. So where does it come from?

 

  DbPhoenix said:
I'd look at it this way:

As for tomorrow, I may do an ES day for my last day. The numbers will be 23, 30, 40 and 48, for starters.

 

Perhaps you could attach a chart from the ES, because the one you posted with those numbers is a different one. For example, where does 48 come from? I know I said 47-49 myself the other day, but that was strictly speaking only from the overnight. Erie said 46 yesterday, so I guess it's all around the same place yet we all have slightly different numbers.

 

As for 30, I'm clueless where that comes from. Price spent some time around 32-34 yesterday and reversed twice of that level. I would think these levels would be obvious S/R? See attached chart.

es.GIF.9606a0ca0c8873649b3fef5c5f2e0bca.GIF

Edited by zeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been suggested that the price level where the greatest number of trades takes place, should provide important S/R in the future.

 

So I tried plotting volume by price on my charts. However this results in having the zone 1335-1340 as important, but when I see other people's S/R levels, that one doesn't quite add up :confused:

spy_vbp.thumb.GIF.1793f96be0920ff3b384b24569ce6e71.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zeon said:
Why 40? I see the line comes from the left on your chart but there's nothing there, except for the the high in the middle of your chart. When you look to the right 1340 doesn't look like it provides any sort of S/R, price just goes straight through it. So where does it come from?

.

 

Here Zeon, look at the last two days, with the circles.

erie

ES2.gif.efa4c63a44aa45d995540d15dda7abc6.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the gamut of s/r I'm using for today. Chop zone 1334-1344.Resistance 1352,60,74. Support 1325,17,10

 

Zeon, I agree with you. I don't like the subjectivety of hand drawn s/r. Having said that, they are just lines on a chart. I just keep asking myself the same question...are buyers showing strength? or weakness? or better yet....are buyers accepting or rejecting these price levels?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  heretodaygone... said:

Zeon, I agree with you. I don't like the subjectivety of hand drawn s/r. Having said that, they are just lines on a chart.

 

No problem, I don't need to post the charts with explanations, I can agree with that as well.......

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
Here Zeon, look at the last two days, with the circles.

erie

 

Sorry, not trying to be the proverbial pain in the ass here, but...

 

I'm seeing price go through that level as if nothing is there, about 5 times in last two days. I agree the "sideways volume" there is noteably higher than elsewhere, but that's about it...

 

See my chart, the pink line is where you and dbphoenix have resistance, the blue lines is where I would mark them. That, and the bigcharts volume by price chart.

 

The only thing that strikes me is that 1340 happens to be the middle of yesterday's action. But why would a calculated point provide s/r anymore than for example pivot points or fibonacci levels for that matter?

es_sr.thumb.GIF.b3c89f77710d966bd4c72cac9da7ee30.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
No problem, I don't need to post the charts with explanations, I can agree with that as well.......

erie

 

It was a blanket comment, not meant to insinuate anything or anyone. I quite enjoy your perspective as it helps me see what others are seeing.

 

good trading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  heretodaygone... said:
Here's the gamut of s/r I'm using for today. Chop zone 1334-1344.Resistance 1352,60,74. Support 1325,17,10

 

Zeon, I agree with you. I don't like the subjectivety of hand drawn s/r. Having said that, they are just lines on a chart. I just keep asking myself the same question...are buyers showing strength? or weakness? or better yet....are buyers accepting or rejecting these price levels?

 

But what's the alternative for drawing s/r by yourself? How else would you determine these levels? I've counted on s/r to guide me through the day, as they used to be levels where I could find nice entries in the past. Lately though it seems as price couldn't care less where there's s/r... They are just lines on a chart I agree. Trading without them would be like trying to find the keyhole blindfolded with your hands tied behind your back and the key in your mouth. Eventually you might succeed, but not before you've bumped into the door several times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zeon said:
But what's the alternative for drawing s/r by yourself? How else would you determine these levels? I've counted on s/r to guide me through the day, as they used to be levels where I could find nice entries in the past. Lately though it seems as price couldn't care less where there's s/r... They are just lines on a chart I agree. Trading without them would be like trying to find the keyhole blindfolded with your hands tied behind your back and the key in your mouth. Eventually you might succeed, but not before you've bumped into the door several times.

 

Personally, I use market profile levels with an emphasis given to more recent levels.(traders have good memories but not that good :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zeon said:

I'm seeing price go through that level as if nothing is there, about 5 times in last two days. I agree the "sideways volume" there is noteably higher than elsewhere, but that's about it...

 

See my chart, the pink line is where you and dbphoenix have resistance, the blue lines is where I would mark them. That, and the bigcharts volume by price chart.

 

The only thing that strikes me is that 1340 happens to be the middle of yesterday's action. But why would a calculated point provide s/r anymore than for example pivot points or fibonacci levels for that matter?

 

For one thing you need data for the ES, not bigcharts data. It's not price going through those levels it's the volume traded at price at the end of day one looks at. To see where the most volume occurred. If looking above existing price then where does all that volume start? Right now the chunk of volume starts at 1340, that's where possibly one would start to see resistance , if any If not, then it's not resistance. It's not 1340 is the middle of yesterday's action , I only look at volume traded at price. Regarding pivots and fib's, I won't even go there........

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  erierambler said:
For one thing you need data for the ES, not bigcharts data. It's not price going through those levels it's the volume traded at price at the end of day one looks at. To see where the most volume occurred. If looking above existing price then where does all that volume start? Right now the chunk of volume starts at 1340, that's where possibly one would start to see resistance , if any If not, then it's not resistance. It's not 1340 is the middle of yesterday's action , I only look at volume traded at price. Regarding pivots and fib's, I won't even go there........

erie

 

Ok, point taken. I didn't realize you only looked at volume by price, and not the "normal" volume...

 

My point about pivots and fibs was that I don't believe they could provide resistance. Sorry if I didn't quite make that clear.

 

I tend to look at swing points primarily. Like yesterday price tried to go higher but failed twice at a level where it had already failed before (1347-1349). The other place are the lows, around 1332-1335, as price first made a potential selling climax there and later reversed of there again (but not very far) it would be my guess that these levels are important. Perhaps I've completely misunderstood the concept of support and resistance, but that's what I used to do last year and it seemed to work fine then :\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.