Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

drsushi

Trading with PA "No Indicators"

Recommended Posts

Why all the fuzz? One day a acquaintance of mine, who is not into trading, came into my office and looked at my charts. Then he cocky said, pointing at all the ups-n-downs: "Why don't you just sell when it is going down and buy when it's going up?". So that's what I am doing now. Works great. :o

 

Laurus

 

Agree with the simplicity, however, ask your acquaintance to give it a try with real money for a month and see how it works for him. Then ask him if it's as easy as it looks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The godfather of candlesticks, Steve Nison, says over and over:

Do NOT use candlesticks without confirmation from other indicators.

 

Nison is hardly the "godfather of candlesticks"

 

The Japanese traders used stix long before Nison was a gleem in his mother's eye.

 

I, for one, don't use other indicators to confirm price rejection following a channel breakout.

 

It's all in the stix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nison is hardly the "godfather of candlesticks"

 

The Japanese traders used stix long before Nison was a gleem in his mother's eye.

 

I, for one, don't use other indicators to confirm price rejection following a channel breakout.

 

It's all in the stix.

 

I would agree with you that it's 'all in the stix', you don't really need indicators to confirm candlesticks, afterall, indicators are just derivatives of price, so you are basically confirming price with a less-vivid representation of it, it just doesn't make any sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol,

 

I'm completely unconvinced that you have an edge with price action. No edge with candlesticks patterns too. On many occasions thecandle patterns fail to deliver winning trades. Some pin bars are fakeys, one rather could filter that with indicator/s.

 

The main issue with price action lobbists is that they never finished studying what indicators work well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol,

 

The main issue with price action lobbists is that they never finished studying what indicators work well.

 

 

Here is a study that sheds some light. Seems one does have a slight edge

with candle formation recognition. But who knows, study was done some 15

years ago so meantime markets have changed with new forces /machines in

play.

 

http://www.pitt.edu/~caginalp/Paper65.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is a study that sheds some light. Seems one does have a slight edge

with candle formation recognition. But who knows, study was done some 15

years ago so meantime markets have changed with new forces /machines in

play.

 

http://www.pitt.edu/~caginalp/Paper65.pdf

 

Yes, the catch is that this study relied on data in a period that TA worked much better and candlestick formations were not fully exploited. I have given links to more recent papers that find no edge in using candlesticks

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/candlestick-corner/3492-trading-pa-no-indicators-9.html#post121101

 

As I have said before there are hundreds, even thousands, of profitable price patterns that do not resemble to any known candlestick formations and they may provide some edge. An example is the price pattern in this blog SPY Found a Crutch and is Thinking of Making a Move | Price Action Lab Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The term "price action" is meaningless. Price performs action of moving up or down. The resistance/ support lines don't derive from price movements for they can be drawn anywhere with potential of price crossing it, avoiding it or oscillating around it. There is no inner intelligence in price patterns.

Some intelligence can be drawn from from indicator's patterns (i.e. ema's crossing etc).

Among some reasons why price avoids resistance line, would bounce from it

or break thru it are algorithms used in computations of averages (ema's) and volumes (limit and market orders).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The term "price action" is meaningless.

 

Maybe you should say that it is meaningless to you. But many famous traders have used it and believe in it. So do we take your word for it or that of some famous traders like LBR, L. Williams, Michael Harris and so many others?

 

This is well-documented evidence by one of the above famous price action traders that S&P 500 patterns included in a book he published in 1999 worked well for a period of 10 years after their public disclosure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always amazing how someone using price action will argue with someone using indicators that indicators don't work. Just the same, its amazing how someone using indicators will argue with someone using price action that price action don't work.

 

I've watch traders in live trading in front of my own eyes using price action profitably and others using indicators profitably. The only commonality they have is that they aren't fools to believe that its their indicators "exclusively" the sole reason why they are profitable or that price action "exclusively" the sole reason why they are profitable.

 

You guys seem to forget that profitable traders rely heavily on market experience, trading experience, market context, money management, position size management, proper trading environment and many other things in a trading plan that's often forgotten in these silly debates about "indicators versus price action".

 

In fact, the one thing I've seen in the few profitable traders I've had the opportunity of watching them trade in person on a consistent basis is that those other things (mentioned above) that's often forgotten in these types of debates...they are critically important to profitable traders. In fact, on any given trading day, its those other components of a trading plan that's more important than any indicator or price action setup.

 

Simply, if you're consistently profitable using indicators or price action...don't be a newbie nor naive in believing you're able to do such without those other critical components of a trading plan that's mentioned above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's always amazing how someone using price action will argue with someone using indicators that indicators don't work. Just the same, its amazing how someone using indicators will argue with someone using price action that price action don't work.

 

I've watch traders in live trading in front of my own eyes using price action profitably and others using indicators profitably. The only commonality they have is that they aren't fools to believe that its their indicators "exclusively" the sole reason why they are profitable or that price action "exclusively" the sole reason why they are profitable.

 

You guys seem to forget that profitable traders rely heavily on market experience, trading experience, market context, money management, position size management, proper trading environment and many other things in a trading plan that's often forgotten in these silly debates about "indicators versus price action".

 

In fact, the one thing I've seen in the few profitable traders I've had the opportunity of watching them trade in person on a consistent basis is that those other things (mentioned above) that's often forgotten in these types of debates...they are critically important to profitable traders. In fact, on any given trading day, its those other components of a trading plan that's more important than any indicator or price action setup.

 

Simply, if you're consistently profitable using indicators or price action...don't be a newbie nor naive in believing you're able to do such without those other critical components of a trading plan that's mentioned above.

 

I agree with you for the most part. But I do think you are ignoring the fact that MANY trades have a tendency to get caught up in the search for the "holy-grail' trading system and this usually causes them to over-complicate the process of analyzing their price charts. You can't deny that a trader using only price action and maybe an EMA or two is going to have a clearer mindset and less trading stress than someone who has plastered 10 different indicators on their charts. I think the particular trading strategy a person uses is obviously not the key to success, but it certainly can confuse them and cause them to over-analyze the market...that's why i like price action..it's simple and clean, and not confusing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price Action ? Indicators ? Whats all this sorcery ?!?

 

One of my options mentors laughed at me when I told him I use PA, he claims to rely solely on option pricing. How can I argue with someone who made a 30+ years living trading options in this manner ?

 

That is not to say I discarded PA and TA. His trading model works even if I keep my PA. *shrug*

 

Bottom line: I don't care what you use or if you are right or wrong. If you show consistent profits month after month year after year I am willing to learn from you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price Action ? Indicators ? Whats all this sorcery ?!?

 

One of my options mentors laughed at me when I told him I use PA, he claims to rely solely on option pricing. How can I argue with someone who made a 30+ years living trading options in this manner ?

 

That is not to say I discarded PA and TA. His trading model works even if I keep my PA. *shrug*

 

Bottom line: I don't care what you use or if you are right or wrong. If you show consistent profits month after month year after year I am willing to learn from you.

 

Hi always,

Interesting comment

What about showing us his "trading model":question:

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about showing us his "trading model":question:

 

He could show you his model, his strategy, and could sit him down next to you, and you still wouldn't make money with it, because you are asking the wrong question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of my options mentors laughed at me when I told him I use PA, he claims to rely solely on option pricing. How can I argue with someone who made a 30+ years living trading options in this manner ?

 

I would be interested in a cursory explanation of what your mentor meant by this.

If he is a market maker in options then his edge is in taking small clips.

If he is punting cheap options for directional moves, then I wonder his sorcery for diving the moves.

If he is spreading options, then again unless he is a market maker the spread would likely kill him.

If he is shorting options, then he still needs some measure to kep him from getting run over by the steamroller as he picks up the pennies.

 

Not having a go here, as I also think there are many ways to make money, however it was an interesting comment you made and my question (be it the right or wrong one) is would you please elaborate?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He could show you his model, his strategy, and could sit him down next to you, and you still wouldn't make money with it, because you are asking the wrong question.

 

Even so, it would still be interesting to see his method / system.

Anyway, what question should he be asking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would be interested in a cursory explanation of what your mentor meant by this.

 

To answer your question I have to start with the believe of what price action and technical analysis means to him (and me):

 

Price action is trading based on what is happening now. At this instance. Using volume and open interest to determine sentiment (bullish, bearish, neutral) and exploit that sentiment for the brief period it exists.

 

Technical analysis is looking at past sentiments to predict future sentiment. The trader places meaning to past events (support, resistance, trendlines, chart patterns) and exploits the statistical reoccurrence of past patterns and the predicted next pattern.

 

My option mentor calls this driving forwards in a car looking thru the back window.

 

Since the Greeks, especially delta, are future expectations of price movement it stands to reason that using option pricing is sufficient for predicting price movement.

 

I can't say I buy his argument 100%.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even so, it would still be interesting to see his method / system.

Anyway, what question should he be asking?

 

His question was along the lines of "How does that guy make money?". I think a better question is "How can I make money?" There's a pretty obvious but fundamentally important difference I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To answer your question I have to start with the believe of what price action and technical analysis means to him (and me):

 

Price action is trading based on what is happening now. At this instance. Using volume and open interest to determine sentiment (bullish, bearish, neutral) and exploit that sentiment for the brief period it exists.

 

Technical analysis is looking at past sentiments to predict future sentiment. The trader places meaning to past events (support, resistance, trendlines, chart patterns) and exploits the statistical reoccurrence of past patterns and the predicted next pattern.

 

My option mentor calls this driving forwards in a car looking thru the back window.

 

Can agree on this....makes sense

 

Since the Greeks, especially delta, are future expectations of price movement it stands to reason that using option pricing is sufficient for predicting price movement.

 

this however makes little sense.....

 

The Greeks are a derivative of the price movement of the underlying.

from Wikipedia.....and the commonly accepted definition of delta when applied to options....

 

Delta

 

Delta,[4] , measures the rate of change of option value with respect to changes in the underlying asset's price. Delta is the first derivative of the value of the option with respect to the underlying instrument's price .

 

 

In a nutshell - the delta tells you nothing more than how much you expect the option price to move in response (ie; his future expectations of price movement) to a price move in the underlying.....

not exactly how that is a future expectation of price movement in the underlying....

the greeks are derived from the underlying not the other way around.

 

(my guess sounds like he is short volatility.)

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Greeks are a derivative of the price movement of the underlying.

from Wikipedia.....and the commonly accepted definition of delta when applied to options....

 

Delta

 

Delta,[4] , measures the rate of change of option value with respect to changes in the underlying asset's price. Delta is the first derivative of the value of the option with respect to the underlying instrument's price .

 

Among option traders delta is also the probability the strike price would be ITM at expiration.

 

With this you can structure your trade and adjust it as delta changes.

 

You can also use option premiums to gauge sentiment. For example, puts and calls with a similar ITM distance and the puts premiums are more expensive means a bearish sentiment.

 

Given the square root of time calculation you can determine the range the underlying is likely to be in. Since a number of options plays short for credit you can then place your positions outside this range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Price action is trading based on what is happening now. At this instance. Using volume and open interest to determine sentiment (bullish, bearish, neutral) and exploit that sentiment for the brief period it exists.

 

Now means: bid price/ask price, bid size/ask size, etc.

 

You can't trade based on now only IMO unless you are a market maker and you look only at bid/ask.

 

Anyaway, any method that relies on the analysis of price, volume and open interest is part of technical analysis IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.