Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

drsushi

Trading with PA "No Indicators"

Recommended Posts

This is an interesting topic. I hope this input is not too far removed from it...

 

I think if an indicator can show a certain aspect of price &/or volume &/or time behaviour that you believe is important then it should be used. If you can look at price &/or volume &/or time and trade/invest without the aid of any 'indicator' then that is right too. I actually believe that the better a trader gets the more likely it is she (or he) will use only price, volume and time. I suppose my point here is that there is no one right and wrong way.

 

I say all this because up until recently I have been a 'no indicator' believer (not because I am one of those good traders - far from it). But I have recognised I need to see a relationship between price and volume that my price and volume charts were not showing me clearly, and so now I use an indicator to help me see that relationship. I think the key to using an indicator is to fully understand what it is showing, fully understand the mathematics of its calculation (most indicators are simple enough for me to understand the maths...so anyone can!) and fully understand it limitations and constraints. I would also add that my use of the indicator does not extend to it being the buy/sell trigger - I would be interested if anyone does use an indicator in this way as I believe the entry and exit decisions comes from price alone.

 

 

 

Another point - what is an indicator?

I use the volume at ask minus the volume at bid on my charts - is this an indicator? I think of it as data generated by the market, it only becomes an indicator if I do something like apply a moving average to it.

 

Just wondering what software you might use to get the "indicator" volume at ask minus the volume at bid? Sounds like a great concept.

 

Thank you,

 

HTM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My apologies Joshdance - and thanks for being gracious about it.

 

I noticed your reply was unbiased generally.

I over-reacted to the "without the blessing of Jim" bit!

 

Cheers

 

No worries Ingot, I enjoy your posts on the forum and didn't want you to think I had a particular "side" for things like this.. I'm just here to learn :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just wondering what software you might use to get the "indicator" volume at ask minus the volume at bid? Sounds like a great concept.

 

Thank you,

 

HTM

 

It's in many software packages, usually called "delta" or some type of "bid ask" study.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am New Trader and I read forum Price action Style , But i have a problem , I dont know for Backtest Price action for Plan Trade , Please tell to me for solve problem

 

Thank You So Much

 

I have found back testing price action to be very difficult, as you must go bar by bar, and try to objectively read the action. The difference is also, that you don't see the price moving in real time, you don't know HOW the bar formed, you don't know how fast and where the volume came in the bar, tape speed, other markets at the time, etc. All those factors make objectively back testing price action only quite difficult. Some more mechanical methods may be more well-suited for accurate back testing. This is of course only my opinion and others may have had more success than me. I am great back testing in hindsight, but in real time, and with real money, it's a whole different ball game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, just go to Google and type in Nial Fuller, or you can check his site out here: URL Deleted by Moderator learn to trade the market[/url].

 

Just a quick note on Nial- though there is SOME uniqueness to what he shares, false-breaks have been around forever. And, his setups ARE good but EVERYTHING he sells is in his free videos.

 

Further, he has been kicked-out of MANY fourms/sites for his questionable motives/tactics/ethics. You can check more reviews at many sites including some threads I have been part of at Informedtrades.com.

 

Just my 2 cents. Good luck, All!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have found back testing price action to be very difficult, as you must go bar by bar, and try to objectively read the action. The difference is also, that you don't see the price moving in real time, you don't know HOW the bar formed, you don't know how fast and where the volume came in the bar, tape speed, other markets at the time, etc. All those factors make objectively back testing price action only quite difficult. Some more mechanical methods may be more well-suited for accurate back testing. This is of course only my opinion and others may have had more success than me. I am great back testing in hindsight, but in real time, and with real money, it's a whole different ball game.

 

Thank you so much for suggest and If I backtest by use Trennd line, Resistance Lne , Support Line ( Main Level ) and after that I observe Price Action ( Pinbar , Inside Bar , Fakey ,....) near Main Level for entry trade , I don't know I accurate backtest ? :confused:

 

Thank You So Much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
!

 

u the moderated in this "The Candlestick Corner All about candlesticks. Moderated by brownsfan019."

 

cmon!! is this a joke? i would expect u to be promoting your platform and i bring misery to traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a quick note on Nial- though there is SOME uniqueness to what he shares, false-breaks have been around forever. And, his setups ARE good but EVERYTHING he sells is in his free videos.

 

Further, he has been kicked-out of MANY fourms/sites for his questionable motives/tactics/ethics. You can check more reviews at many sites including some threads I have been part of at Informedtrades.com.

 

Just my 2 cents. Good luck, All!

 

That's not true really. I'm a member at Nial's site and there's WAY more info in the member's area, everything goes much further in-depth too and its a systematic education, whereas the free stuff is just in a random blog format. Plus, he adds new member's material often, usually every two weeks or so there's a new article or video or something.

 

The informed trades thing Nial has responded to, they were trying to defame him unfairly. If you look at their site they are trying to get you to buy a price action course, so they are just trying to make Nial look bad so that people buy an inferior price action course instead of his. This to me makes THEM look bad, Nial is a genuine guy, I've talked to him on Skype.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this kind of trading --- Price Pattern

 

any one have "statistic" or "Search" pattern probability program ffor TS / MC?

 

and most important is

 

Pivot command in TS /MC seem "unstable" @@

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there any good candlestick identification tool available for metatrader?

 

The only decent ones I have found are 2 or 3 at forex-std and they are free, Candlestick-v1 is very good, however, it repaints, on the 4hr t/f it is excellent.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only decent ones I have found are 2 or 3 at forex-std and they are free, Candlestick-v1 is very good, however, it repaints, on the 4hr t/f it is excellent.;)

 

Any idea about the success rate of candlestick identification, in terms of win rate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any idea about the success rate of candlestick identification, in terms of win rate?

 

Without 'context' I'd bet it's about 50/50. Of course you could easily make that 30/70 or 70/30 by adjusting stops and targets (R:R).

 

There are many more variables than a simple entry pattern that determine 'win rate'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there any good candlestick identification tool available for metatrader?
Russ Horn is giving one away free to promote his latest Commercial System release (already sold out I believe).

 

I have it, but I am not interested in using it. Unsure how good it is for that reason.

 

If you Google: Russ Horn Candle recognition software you will find more than enough links to locate the indicator, the manual, and a youtube vid on how to use it.

 

He had "only 750 copies" @ $999 for sale, and suddenly found an extra 21 hidden somewhere, for "those who missed out!".

 

The maths: 750 x $999 = $749,250

 

OR ... you can make 2 x $650 payments instead.

 

Now I don't know about you, but I've got an idea ... :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any idea about the success rate of candlestick identification, in terms of win rate?

 

Check these studies:

 

Performance of Candlestick Analysis on Intraday Futures Data: The Journal of Derivatives

 

Market Timing with Candlestick Technical Analysis by Ben Marshall, Martin Young, Lawrence (Larry) Rose :: SSRN

 

Together they indicate that this is not a technique to use by itself and on its own merit.

 

Besides, candlesticks are a special subset of price patterns. See the link I gave above for Price Action Lab. It can find many more possibilities than just candlesticks. Some of the patterns it can find are typical candle formations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check these studies:

 

Performance of Candlestick Analysis on Intraday Futures Data: The Journal of Derivatives

 

Market Timing with Candlestick Technical Analysis by Ben Marshall, Martin Young, Lawrence (Larry) Rose :: SSRN

 

Together they indicate that this is not a technique to use by itself and on its own merit.

 

Besides, candlesticks are a special subset of price patterns. See the link I gave above for Price Action Lab. It can find many more possibilities than just candlesticks. Some of the patterns it can find are typical candle formations.

 

I think you raise a good point, although indirectly. Candlestick formations are not really a "trading strategy", it takes knowing when and where to trade them and in what combination with other factors of confluence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
like Nial Fuller teaches.

 

stpips, are you here for anything except to promote Nial? You've had 40 posts on this forum and you mention his name or web site in at least 20 of those posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any idea about the success rate of candlestick identification, in terms of win rate?

 

There are other threads here at Traderslaboratory about this specific topic and the success rate is greatly different from one trading instrument to another and from one candlestick pattern to another.

 

It's just best you get access to historical data of whatever it is that you're trading and then do your own personal testing (manually if needed) via any particular candlestick pattern you like via your particular trade management of candlestick patterns.

 

My point with the above statement is that its a proven fact that the trade management after entry has a dramatic impact on the success rate of any particular candlestick pattern and such has been proven many times by backtesters that differ from each other via how they manage the trade after a candlestick pattern signal has been given.

 

As for auto trading via candlestick codes...highly not recommended as a price action method.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've attached (hopfully) 3 charts of 777 tic, 110 tic and 16 tic that is annotated. This is not something I put together. One of the traders in the group did to describe the method they trade by. I posted it for the interest of others and I'm also curious of the opinons of the followers of TL.

 

I LOVE this style of trading. It is simply the best style. Al Brooks does ES price action videos to help you learn. I to had a ton of indicators on my screen. Blew out a small account. Then found this Pure Price Action approach. This all happened about a year ago. Then I found a theory about something called Zones. Dynamic S/R that are on key timeframes. 4 hour charts, 60 min charts, 30, 15min.... These zones work based on your rules of pure price action. Yet they give you market memory! So I did a ton of looking around and I didn't find anything that identified these zones for you so you spend all your time when you are not trading drawing zones, and lining up good entries for the next day from the confluence of these zones. Nice thing about this is you only get a couple of good entries a day so I'm not trading and paying nearly as much in commissions anymore. . The other wierd thing about these zones are they line up with a lot of key fib point, as well as pivots. I'll be trading with someone and I tell them I will buy here or there, and they will tell me ohh that's right ontop of a 50% retrace, and a R1 level. There's some really cool other features too. But I don't want to spoil it for you.

 

Being the techie that I am, I was able to actually recall some of my C++ programming; learn the new ideas in C#; and program out these zones. So now I trade pure price action with these zones. I call it Advanced Price Action (APA zones).

 

My suggestion would be continue to hang out with these people! you might also try a 5 min. chart.

 

Here's what my charts look like now.

 

TF_7-6.png

 

These zones change color with how many times price has retested them.

Aqua = fresh,

1 bounce = blue,

2 bounces = yellow,

3 bounce =purple,

4 or more =grey.

 

I want to take the first retest of zones because that's usually the strongest. Even if that first retest is a few day after that zone was drawn. Can be a day high/low. :)

Edited by doubletop11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I LOVE this style of trading. It is simply the best style. Al Brooks does ES price action videos to help you learn. I to had a ton of indicators on my screen. Blew out a small account. Then found this Pure Price Action approach. This all happened about a year ago. Then I found a theory about something called Zones. Dynamic S/R that are on key timeframes.

 

Al Brooks uses an indicator called EMA (exponential moving averages) in his method. Thus, some traders need to sit down and decide if they want to trade without indicators or trade with one indicator. If the latter, it's OK but its not trading without indicators. Anyways, I think some traders get a little lost with Al Brooks because many of them believe using "one indicator" is still price trading without indicators.

 

If someone saids the EMA indicator is not important in making trade decisions...then remove it from the charts. :doh:

 

Regardless, glad you found Dynamic S/R Zones and I too think they are useful.

Edited by wrbtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stpips, are you here for anything except to promote Nial? You've had 40 posts on this forum and you mention his name or web site in at least 20 of those posts.

 

So you've been counting? I mention him a lot because he really helped me. I was lost in a sea of confusing indicators and then I found his site and realized I didn't need them at all. Since then, about 1 year has passed, and I am now making money every month. I am not really so much as promoting him as I am "paying it back". He offers more value in his education services than anything else I have seen, and I've seen about all of it as regards Forex system / strategies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.