Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

drsushi

Trading with PA "No Indicators"

Recommended Posts

Heya, I understand most of it but as for you number 8-9 (PRH (Pivot Range High , PRL (Pivot Range Low), that I dont' . COuld you please elaborate on them (formula, trading usefullness,etc...) when you have time. Thanks

 

Max

 

 

 

Simply, Yes.

 

They are far better than mathematically derived numbers like "Floor Pivots". Key Numbers, aka floor pivots, derive their utility from two things: regression to the mean, and self fulfilling prophecy.

 

Market profile lines have as their basis the concept that because the market found support/resistance at this level today, all things being equal it should find the same there tomorrow. The market has memory. It knows when a price level is reached that found sellers/buyers the previous time the level was reached. If 510 on the emini, for example, brings in the bulls today as they see value, there is a good chance they will again see value at that level going forward.

 

I have been playing with this concept a bit after reading an article from Straightforex.com. Instead of using key numbers, they use what they call a "Market Map". The map consists of:

 

1. YH (Yesterday's High)

2. YL (Yesterday's Low)

3. DYH (Day before yesterday's High)

4. DYL (Day before Yesterday's Low)

5. PP (Pivot Point) (O+L+H)/3

 

The first 4 are already HUPs (Hold Up Prices) and may continue to be. One thing the map tells us is if price is above the PP the trend may be up. If Price is above either or both YH or DYH and above the PP the trend is up. The reverse would be true for a down trend.

 

After reading a couple of threads on this forum, I have become predisposed to the Pivot Range concept that Pivot profiler talked about. So I add the Range to the map, plus a couple more HUPs.:

 

1. YH

2. YL

3. DYH

4. DYL

5. PMH (Pre Market High= highest high made between 5pm close and 2am open NY time)

6. PML (Pre Market Low= lowest low made between 5pm close and 2am open NY time)

7. PP (H+L+(2*C))/4

8. PRH (Pivot Range High)

9. PRL (Pivot Range Low)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is why it might make more sense to use static levels that are plotted before the day starts.

 

Exactly!

 

I have not read the book so I can't recommend it, but there is a book specifically about this type of method called "Price Action Trading".

 

Some levels to think about could be:

 

1. MP levels (POC, VAH,VAL)

2. Yesterday's High (YH)

3. Yesterday's Low (YL)

4. Day Before Yesterday's High (DBYH)

5. Day Before Yesterday's Low (DBYL)

6. Key numbers (aka Floor pivots)

7. Actual pivot levels-places where the market did react/retrace/stall.

 

Never head about the DBYH or DBYL :)

 

Brownsfan,

Also, my intension would be to use specifc targets for profit such as 4 tics, 6 tics and then moving my stop to B/E or B/E +1tic and letting my other 1/3 of the position run, but manage the trade and take profit at s/r. The last 1/3 should be a free trade at that point based on profit of the first 2/3 and moving the stop. This would be on the ES. I'm not looking to make a fortune in a day. If I can do what I just described on a consistent basis I would be very satisfied. Am I out of my mind or is it reasonable?

David

 

The problem with specific targets, is that they are static while the market is dynamic. You can do a whole lot of backtesting to determine what the maximum favourable excursion (MFE) is, after you enter a trade. You could then determine in what % of the cases price runs 70-80% of that MFE or in what % of cases it goes twice as far (for example). Depending on your strategy, you could then use these reference points as scaling out points. The backtesting might show superior results to real-time, if you try to determine those in absolute values. I think it's better to use values that are a function of the volatility. That way you have a better way of gauging the potential of a move.

 

But most importantly, you need to exit when the market tells you to. Trendlines can help there, volume might also give clues...

Edited by firewalker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello to everyone in this thread and thanks to drsushi for starting it.

 

drsushi ,you are very fortunate to have found that group, very neet. I am a big pivot point trader myself and would be paralyzed if I did not use them.

I see most guys here use the same method I trade with; floor traders pivots, YH, YL, UVA, LVA. A good understanding of chart patterns and candles are essential, especially at resistance or support.

Always on the lookout for triangles, AB=CD, Gartleys will give you a good edge....

Cheers to all,

email

 

 

EasyLanguage Gartley is here:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/pesavento-pattern-6044.html#post66119

 

10942d1243266996-pesavento-pattern-pesavento_patterns_763.png

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Tams,

I know his work well. but an AB=CD is not a Gartley or a Butterfly its an ABCD where AB=CD. This can of course be part of a Gartley/Butterfly.

 

Wht iwas curious about was how people a re actually trading this?

Are you buying the .618 with a stop at the .786 and waiting to see if it fails at "C"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is there any good candlestick identification tool available for metatrader?

 

There is a product called Autochartist. It works with meta trader. If you have an account with various brokers, it is free. I have never tried it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I joined a google group of traders that trades with price action alone. They use support and resistance areas from higher time frames and use multiple time frames down to 5, 8 or 16 tic charts for entry. The theory is based on six possible scenarios. A double top or lower high, these are both high failures, a double bottom or higher low, these are both low failures and higher highs and lower lows. If the low or high failure takes place at significant enough support or resistance there may be a trade to be had. I've attached (hopfully) 3 charts of 777 tic, 110 tic and 16 tic that is annotated. This is not something I put together. One of the traders in the group did to describe the method they trade by. I posted it for the interest of others and I'm also curious of the opinons of the followers of TL. I for one have struggled a great deal with the right indicator, TS add-on, timeframe blah blah blah and to tell you the truth this makes very good sense to me and If I use it with pivots and VAL POC and VAH for S/R I'm hoping it will have some merit. I'm fairly new to trading, so I'm hoping others with more experience will give thier thoughts.

 

David

 

Cool thread man, do you trade inside bars / pin bars / fakeys too? That's how I trade with PA. Of course also using levels / S/R / confluence, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cool thread man, do you trade inside bars / pin bars / fakeys too? That's how I trade with PA. Of course also using levels / S/R / confluence, etc.

 

Hey pricetrader99,

 

I trade with those price action setups too, if you are savvy on the "fakey setup"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi friends, could u post the google group link, which u are talking about.. Advanced thanks

 

There are lots of great interwebz resources on price action many of the best are free. A few things off the top of my head Thales' excellent trading in real time thread here. There are a couple of decent threads in the candlestick corner too. Joe Ross law of charts is worth taking a look at, also threads by TraderDante and James16 (these are not on this site incidentally they cover pretty much the same material as Nial) BabyPips has good info too. There is a google group called Sanuk not too active but some good archives. I very much like Sam Seidens stuff. Lots of good resources those are just off the top of my head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Sam Seiden's perspective on where the S&R lies can be very helpful. But as has been suggested, it takes a lot of work and time to turn conceptual understandings into successful trading.

 

Here's a link to a thread elsewhere that indexes some Seiden material.

 

URL Removed by Moderator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that Sam Seiden's perspective on where the S&R lies can be very helpful. But as has been suggested, it takes a lot of work and time to turn conceptual understandings into successful trading.

 

Here's a link to a thread elsewhere that indexes some Seiden material.

 

URL Removed by Moderator.

 

One can see supply/demand analysis in "an institutional look at the S&P futures" and "trading adverse events"....

 

The operational basis of supply/demand analysis is simple...at some point along every supply/demand curve there is a point where price goes to zero. When you look at charts....IF you take the time to simply step back and THINK, you can see every point where this happens.....as participants define and re-define the boundaries of "value". Market Profile attempts to do this, sometimes successfully, sometimes not so much. The problem for most students, retail and part time participants is that this looks a bit different on different time frames....so it you are a longer time frame trader...you would look for different "signals" than a person trading 5 minute candles...Here are a few basic concepts

 

First, use candles not bars...supply and demand are easier to see that way

Second...start with longer time frame charts..If you are a intraday participant, start with multi hour charts and work towards your chosen time frame. If you swing trade start with monthly and weekly charts.

Third...begin by identifying trending moves...and by that I mean sustained directional movement. This is subject to each person's definition but for our purposes the longer price can sustain a trend the easier it is to see the "effects" of supply/demand on price action, and the easier to see the eventual reversals

Fourth, Identify the origins of trend...these are often candles with long wicks pointing up or down depending on the direction of the trend.

Look for displays of momentum including...gap moves, wide range bars and parabolic movement.

The best trade opportunities occur when price moves from a significant imbalance through a point of equilibrium (balance) to either a resumption of trend or a reversal....at the boundaries of value, as participants define and redefine what constitutues fair (retail) and unfair (wholesale) you can see volume come in as institutions make the decision to commit capital to specific positions...This happens seasonally (as in my first charts in the thread "an institutional look at S&P futures)...and even on smaller time frames...as participants come in to defend the weekly open for example...

The problem for most folks is that to obtain a significant working understanding takes time..and most retail traders don't want to commit to the process....thats really too bad...I would say obtaining a good understanding of what supply/demand looks like on a chart is really a cornerstone to whatever success I have had...

 

So its Easter weekend...best wishes to all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One can see supply/demand analysis in "an institutional look at the S&P futures" and "trading adverse events"....

 

The operational basis of supply/demand analysis is simple...at some point along every supply/demand curve there is a point where price goes to zero. When you look at charts....IF you take the time to simply step back and THINK, you can see every point where this happens.....as participants define and re-define the boundaries of "value". Market Profile attempts to do this, sometimes successfully, sometimes not so much. The problem for most students, retail and part time participants is that this looks a bit different on different time frames....so it you are a longer time frame trader...you would look for different "signals" than a person trading 5 minute candles...Here are a few basic concepts

 

First, use candles not bars...supply and demand are easier to see that way

Second...start with longer time frame charts..If you are a intraday participant, start with multi hour charts and work towards your chosen time frame. If you swing trade start with monthly and weekly charts.

Third...begin by identifying trending moves...and by that I mean sustained directional movement. This is subject to each person's definition but for our purposes the longer price can sustain a trend the easier it is to see the "effects" of supply/demand on price action, and the easier to see the eventual reversals

Fourth, Identify the origins of trend...these are often candles with long wicks pointing up or down depending on the direction of the trend.

Look for displays of momentum including...gap moves, wide range bars and parabolic movement.

The best trade opportunities occur when price moves from a significant imbalance through a point of equilibrium (balance) to either a resumption of trend or a reversal....at the boundaries of value, as participants define and redefine what constitutues fair (retail) and unfair (wholesale) you can see volume come in as institutions make the decision to commit capital to specific positions...This happens seasonally (as in my first charts in the thread "an institutional look at S&P futures)...and even on smaller time frames...as participants come in to defend the weekly open for example...

The problem for most folks is that to obtain a significant working understanding takes time..and most retail traders don't want to commit to the process....thats really too bad...I would say obtaining a good understanding of what supply/demand looks like on a chart is really a cornerstone to whatever success I have had...

 

So its Easter weekend...best wishes to all

 

Unfortunately there is poorly worded sentence in my quote above...It should read

 

"At some point along the supply/demand curve there is a price at which no participants are willing to buy or sell" (volume falls to zero).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can anyone tell me what the difference is between J16 and Nial Fuller teachings? Or perhaps tell me your opinion on which is better?

 

Nial was originally a member of the J16 group, then he went to do his own thing, without the blessing of Jim I might add (thread over on FF where they both tell their side), thus to my knowledge they have very similar methodologies. As Jim as stated before, he took his ideas from Martin Pring and others, so as they say, "nothing new under the sun."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One can see supply/demand analysis in "an institutional look at the S&P futures" and "trading adverse events"....

 

The operational basis of supply/demand analysis is simple...at some point along every supply/demand curve there is a point where price goes to zero. When you look at charts....IF you take the time to simply step back and THINK, you can see every point where this happens.....as participants define and re-define the boundaries of "value". Market Profile attempts to do this, sometimes successfully, sometimes not so much. The problem for most students, retail and part time participants is that this looks a bit different on different time frames....so it you are a longer time frame trader...you would look for different "signals" than a person trading 5 minute candles...Here are a few basic concepts

 

* First, use candles not bars...supply and demand are easier to see that way

 

* Second...start with longer time frame charts..If you are a intraday participant, start with multi hour charts and work towards your chosen time frame. If you swing trade start with monthly and weekly charts.

 

* Third...begin by identifying trending moves...and by that I mean sustained directional movement. This is subject to each person's definition but for our purposes the longer price can sustain a trend the easier it is to see the "effects" of supply/demand on price action, and the easier to see the eventual reversals

 

* Fourth, Identify the origins of trend...these are often candles with long wicks pointing up or down depending on the direction of the trend.

 

* FifthLook for displays of momentum including...gap moves, wide range bars and parabolic movement.

 

* SixthThe best trade opportunities occur when price moves from a significant imbalance through a point of equilibrium (balance) to either a resumption of trend or a reversal....at the boundaries of value, as participants define and redefine what constitutues fair (retail) and unfair (wholesale) you can see volume come in as institutions make the decision to commit capital to specific positions...This happens seasonally (as in my first charts in the thread "an institutional look at S&P futures)...and even on smaller time frames...as participants come in to defend the weekly open for example...

 

* SeventhThe problem for most folks is that to obtain a significant working understanding takes time..and most retail traders don't want to commit to the process....thats really too bad...

 

* EighthI would say obtaining a good understanding of what supply/demand looks like on a chart is really a cornerstone to whatever success I have had...

 

 

Steve - this is one of your best summaries of how to approach trading - I can only applaud your words and the man behind them for sharing it.

 

As a starting point for trading, the things you have written need to be printed out and glued to the screen of every aspiring trader. Apologies for adding the extra bullet points

 

You nailed it in one.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve - this is one of your best summaries of how to approach trading - I can only applaud your words and the man behind them for sharing it.

 

As a starting point for trading, the things you have written need to be printed out and glued to the screen of every aspiring trader. Apologies for adding the extra bullet points

 

You nailed it in one.

 

Thanks

 

thanks for the formatting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nial was originally a member of the J16 group, then he went to do his own thing, without the blessing of Jim I might add (thread over on FF where they both tell their side), thus to my knowledge they have very similar methodologies. As Jim as stated before, he took his ideas from Martin Pring and others, so as they say, "nothing new under the sun."

 

Rather than repeat the words of others, why not simply email Nial, or ring him, and discuss this issue with him as I have.

 

Should Nial require the blessing of Jim?

 

What would you like Nial to do? Invent Price Action himself?

 

He never claimed he did.

 

Nor did Jim. Nor did Martin Pring. Nor did Austin Passamonte. Nor did Todd Mitchell. Nor did Steve Nison.

 

No one did. It was a process of recognition, evolving amongst traders as time went by, until it has become what it has today.

 

As you said: "Nothing new under the sun."

 

PA has been around for many many years. The issue comes down to the "brand" of PA that is being taught.

There are always going to be similarities, but it is the teacher and the philosophy behind it (approach) that creates the brand. There is certainly enough of a distinction in that.

 

Nial initiated the "Fakey" setup - that was a fairly original concept.

I think he can fairly claim to be the originator of that.

 

Nial Fuller will go ten miles to help you after you buy his course - I know - I bought it.

And if you find out that there is another ten miles to go to reach the next goal.

Guess what ... Nial will say: "C'mon mate. Let's go. This is the next step."

 

Get in touch with Nial Fuller, and ASK HIM THE SAME QUESTIONS face to face. The man is open and humble.

 

How many coaches do you know who put this information on the Internet?

 

Contact Us - Learn To Trade The Market

 

But please think about who you are hurting when you post stuff you have no personal experience of.

 

I hope my post is simply an over-reaction.

 

Regarding whose course is the best - I can only speak from experience.

 

I had a guest look at J16 inner forum. It is good - no doubt about that. However there are volumes of stuff to trawl through.

 

The Nial Fuller course is cheaper, more accessible, more compact and more specific about the setups. I can not comment about the support, because I didn't join J16. I have a friend who did, and paid a monthly for a year, to continue to get access to the trading course.

 

Please note - I am going purely on the experiences of a friend, who no longer trades, as he is heading up a franchising business interest overseas. (Google: popcake )

 

After that, you get life-time access to J16.

Current prices - I just looked - are USD$129/month.

That takes USD$1548 to get to life-time membership status.

 

With NF you get life-time access after just one payment!

Current life-time price - I just looked - USD$337.

 

J16 is 4.5 times more expensive.

 

I can't offer more than that. To me the choice is fairly clear - the people who write the testimonials regarding their experiences at both places are probably right.

They look through their own colored glasses - both groups have their devotees.

 

My choice is for the NF group. That's just me though.

YOU will need to make the assessment yourself if you are going down the PA route.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rather than repeat the words of others, why not simply email Nial, or ring him, and discuss this issue with him as I have.

 

Perhaps you should quote the person who asked me, as I was simply giving an answer to his question. I belong to no group, and I'm sure either would be fine. The free material available online is sufficient IMO. I have no horse in this race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps you should quote the person who asked me, as I was simply giving an answer to his question. I belong to no group, and I'm sure either would be fine. The free material available online is sufficient IMO. I have no horse in this race.

 

My apologies Joshdance - and thanks for being gracious about it.

 

I noticed your reply was unbiased generally.

I over-reacted to the "without the blessing of Jim" bit!

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very valid concept which I have used since 1994 , however let me add the idea has been taken from the teachings of Charles Drummond [ Drummond Geometry ] .

 

Furthermore any attempt to computerze or mechanize the concepts and rules are doomed to failure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a very valid concept which I have used since 1994 , however let me add the idea has been taken from the teachings of Charles Drummond [ Drummond Geometry ] .

 

Furthermore any attempt to computerze or mechanize the concepts and rules are doomed to failure.

 

Hi Coogee - and welcome to the forum.

 

Is there any benefit in digging up the original writings etc of Charles Drummond? I haven't Googled his work yet, it would be interested in what you have to add about his work.

 

Quite often these guys had a lot more peripheral information to share, that adds much more depth to the approach. But it is possible that much is lost by those who promote their work or translate it, through trying to popularise the best concepts. We get the icing, but there is more to the cake than the topping.

 

Thanks for postin

 

Edit: I found the Canadian link to the site - it looks reasonable

Edited by Ingot54

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.