Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Overlaying Charts?

Recommended Posts

Hi Chad,

 

Just saw your post on Volume Breakdown. You mentioned you plotted it 3 times? How do I overlay the indicator on top of each other? Thanks

 

You can actually simply drag and drop indicators between panes. That's really the easiest way to do it. However, when adding indicators, you'll also see a choice in the lower left corner of the "Add Indicator" window which allows you to choose which pane the indicator is added to. Standalone indicators like VB will default to "new pane" but you can change that to the pane of existing bars or indicators.

 

There is a 13-minute video at www.linnsoft.com/videos which covers many different aspects of technical indicators, including this one. Here is the direct link:

 

http://www.linnsoft.com/videos/techind/index.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just saw your post on Volume Breakdown. You mentioned you plotted it 3 times? How do I overlay the indicator on top of each other? Thanks

 

ST - when you want to add another indicator to the chart but you want to overlay it on an already existing indicator (so for example putting two variants of the VB in one pane) specify the pane in which you want to place the new indicator as being the same pane the existing indicator is in - see attachment.

5aa70e3d6ac01_STq.jpg.63f62167e2bf0b1de0fc0f0608fec5e4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James,

 

I can't tell exactly how you have that setup unless you share definition, or you share to charthub. However, a few things that could be going on there...you might have the Delta bars drawing behind the Buy and Sell Volume bars...and therefore getting covered up. You can either right-click in the pane title, or shift-click in the horizontal scale to the right, to bring up the element order prefs window. Try adjusting the element order. You can also right-click on any histogram and choose "send to back".

 

Other problem could be that you just have the colors set the same for both the buy volume and the positive delta. Try adjusting the colors of the different VBs so they stand out.

 

If none of this works, share your chart def and I'll take a look.

 

Here are instructions on sharing a chart if you're not familiar with that:

 

http://www.linnsoft.com/qa/a/124.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the delta only work on live data. Or can you for example pull up a daily 1 year $dji chart and analyze that volume breakdown as well?

 

If you can do the latter, could you guys post chart of the DJI daily 1 year.

I was hoping to not spend so much but InvestorRT is really looking so flexible it will make TS cry. And with being able to pick my own data vendor I'm not stuck with TS and their issues. You're almost leaving me no choice here. :)

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Volume Breakdown works not only on live data, but also on historical data. Tick data is however required in order to compute VB. Different data feeds will allow you to download different amounts of tick data. But with Investor/RT, after that initial download, you can choose to retain as much tick data as you like, so each day you will add one day to the amount of tick data you have on hand (and that you can use for VB).

 

You are asking to see the VB values on a daily chart of DJI...for a year back? I may have a hard time coming up with that much tick data. VB also requires that the bid and ask....which our data vendors do provide on historical downloads. That might be why TS doesn't allow delta to be computed on historical data....it might not have the historical bid/ask.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will leave the final word on the question to the company, but this is what I think is correct. You need tick data to get the correct VB numbers (it tracks which side of the price each trade hits on). I don't know if you could save these numbers so that after a period of time you get a long-term chart (daily say) with correct VB figures on it, but you cannot just call up a daily chart now for a year andget the correct VB numbers. Looks like I was a bit slow with the answer...

Edited by mister ed
bit slow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple more notes on VB......I spent a GREAT deal of time on this particular indicator (Volume Breakdown), making sure it is reliable and efficient. It has to process every tick, but does so very quickly....merging that tick in with the data that has already been computed. VB has become very very popular with our user base, and has been hammered on pretty thoroughly. It's much more than an indicator that just computes the delta....it allows you to do cumulative delta (for each session or for entire chart), to compute any indicator or statistic on top of the delta (or buy/sell volume) values, to chart the "trade speed" (volume per bar, ticks per bar, second per bar, etc) and much more.

 

One other note on VB...it is currently "Bundled" with Market Profile...although this will likely change in the near future. So in order to activate VB, you have to activate MP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also wanted to point out another somewhat hidden delta-related feature.

 

Both Trendlines and Zig Zag lines can be labelled with the net delta of each line / leg. Here is an example:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2008/02/18/ZigZagDelta.png

 

ZigZagDelta.png

 

The key to making this work, is to add the Volume Breakdown to the chart...and within the preferences of the Zig Zag or Trendline indicators, just specify "Label With: Total Delta". With trendlines, this allows you to quickly measure the delta formed between any two bars on the chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:cool:

 

OK OK...I am blown away. Please stop, I can't take anymore.

 

Insane capabilities. I cannot wait to get back in gear and trade with this platform.

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

 

One other note on VB...it is currently "Bundled" with Market Profile...although this will likely change in the near future. So in order to activate VB, you have to activate MP.

 

Chad,

 

Has Volume Breakdown been "unbundled" and made available as a standalone option for those of us who might not want or need Market Profile?

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chad, In the attached pic can you see how the two different software packages get different VB levels on the same timeframe chart and the same data supplier (they're running esignal through TS).

I'm thinking about getting IRT but I'm not sure which is right.

The TS indicator uses your same approach in it's calculation as your VB.

Any ideas?

thanks.

VB.thumb.jpg.54c7cf43d1412647c66ff68df3205288.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JJ,

 

I think it's probably more likely that the tickbars themselves are responsible for any differences, rather than the VB indicator itself. It can be difficult to reproduce the same tickbars between two products, as many things can throw tickbar charts out of synch....just a single missing tick will cause the bars to be different. But the tickbars are also heavily reliant on where it chart started building the tickbars (at being of current session, 5 sessions ago, etc). If you want to do a true comparison of VB, comparing 1-min bars would probably be a better measure. The way we classify trades as buys or sells is pretty straightforward...if it trades at or above ask, it's a buy..at or below bid, it's a sell...and then there is some proprietary code for how we handle trades between bid and ask (which is also reliant on previous trades)...which could be coming into play here...although you shouldn't really see many trades between the bid and ask...and it's more likely due to the fact that you're comparing tickbars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • SMCI Super Micro Computer stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 34.06 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?SMCI        
    • UPST Upstart stock watch, pull back to 68.15 gap support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?UPST  
    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.