Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Blu-Ray

VSA - No Demand/No Supply & Squats

Recommended Posts

A special thanks to PivotProfiler for providing the code for VT, unfortunately I volunteered to translate it into Tradestation. Three weeks later and I'm finally finished. Apologies for the delay but Tradestation doesn't allow future referencing which the code did, so I had to individually make it backwards compatible.

 

For example VT code :

 

c>ref(c,+3) had to become c[3]>c in EasyLanguage.................and doing this for over 150 plots :bang head:

 

Most of the plots require at least 1 bar for confirmation, so I've coded the indicator to show, for example, "No Demand3(1)" in the data window to let you know that it required 1 bar for confirmation before the indicator plotted ( handy for looking over previous charts as well ).

 

I've also coded in Alerts into each one, so all you have to do is format the indicator and enable the Alerts if desired.

 

I've split the code into two ELD's, one for No Demand/Supply and the other for squats.

 

I've also included an input so you can adjust the number of ticks above/below the high/low you want the indicator to plot. Here's a pic of some examples:

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5194&stc=1&d=1202860506

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5193&stc=1&d=1202860506

VSA.thumb.png.d92021e1170b0576d8e34f7c22cda158.png

Alerts.png.4e78f2059aa38d5a0273b380c093670f.png

VSA_SQUATS.ELD

vsa-no-demand-no-supply.eld

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please forgive my ignorance Blu-Ray but could you explain what the numbers on No demand/No supply ranging from 1 to 43 indicate, also what does the bracketed (1) mean?

 

Do I take it that the Squat is part of the Bill Williams system ? This also has numbers ranging from 1 to 35?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please forgive my ignorance Blu-Ray but could you explain what the numbers on No demand/No supply ranging from 1 to 43 indicate, also what does the bracketed (1) mean?

 

Do I take it that the Squat is part of the Bill Williams system ? This also has numbers ranging from 1 to 35?

 

Greycells

 

The numbers indicating 1 -43 are the different variations of how to come up with a no demand/ no supply.

 

I'm unsure on the squat question as it was PivotProfiler's code, all I have done is to translate it into TS.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

 

Thank you very much for providing the indicator. Is it going to work for TS2000i as well?It does not recognize .eld extension.

 

Thank you,

 

Leonid

 

Hi Leonid

 

I don't think it will work, as I'm pretty sure TS2000i only allows 4 plots per indicator and these have over 150 plots, also you can only import ELA files. not ELD's.

 

You could alternatively split it into loads of indicators if you wanted, let me know and I'll attach a text file of the code.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

 

Thank you for your prompt answer.

 

I would appreciate your sending me the code. I hope I can make it into less then 150/4 indicators.

 

Thank you very much in advance,

 

Leonid

 

Here you go Leonid, I've attached two text files, just from my observation, the majority of the signals fired are the NoDem/Supp 3 and 14.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

VSA No Demand No Supply.txt

VSA Squats.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu Ray, thanks so much for converting them. I do plan to donate to your time if I use the code. I have a question for you. Since this is Easy Language will it work with both TS and Multi Charts? I have used neither so far, but looking at them. I would think so because both use EL? Currently I use Sierra Charts so I am attempting to do due diligence before making a forklift upgrade to a new charting platform. Thanks again. :):)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu Ray, thanks so much for converting them. I do plan to donate to your time if I use the code. I have a question for you. Since this is Easy Language will it work with both TS and Multi Charts? I have used neither so far, but looking at them. I would think so because both use EL? Currently I use Sierra Charts so I am attempting to do due diligence before making a forklift upgrade to a new charting platform. Thanks again. :):)

 

Thanks dandxg, I believe it should work with MultiCharts as well, hopefully a MultiCharts user here could confirm this.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Blu-Ray

 

43 different variations of no demand/supply, hardly a KISS system. As the indicator fires off only after 1 to 3 bars, this is a confirming system after you have done your analysis and entered your trade. Is this what TG offers as software?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Blu-Ray

 

43 different variations of no demand/supply, hardly a KISS system. As the indicator fires off only after 1 to 3 bars, this is a confirming system after you have done your analysis and entered your trade. Is this what TG offers as software?

 

Yes there are 43 different variations, but just from my observation there's normally only 2 that will fire off ( No Demand/supply 3 & 14 ).

 

Also you are right, these are NOT buy/sell signals, just an aid to help out with the correct analysis. ( thrunner posted some links for explanations here)

 

I believe it is something very similar to what TG offers, however when PP made the original code he might have added/removed some variations.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Blu-Ray

 

Thank you for this nice piece of work, I'm using it daily. However the dots are somewhat misplaced and I've looked into the code to investigate it.

 

Could you please tell me the reason for calculating the following:

HT=Low - NumberofTicks*mintick;

LT=High + NumberofTicks*mintick;

 

HT? LT?

Shouldn't the dot just be placed right under lowest or upon highest and if more than one dot then displace it accordingly?

 

Have I missed something here? :hmmmm:

 

Once again, thank you for your time!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi Blu-Ray

 

Thank you for this nice piece of work, I'm using it daily. However the dots are somewhat misplaced and I've looked into the code to investigate it.

 

Could you please tell me the reason for calculating the following:

HT=Low - NumberofTicks*mintick;

LT=High + NumberofTicks*mintick;

 

HT? LT?

Shouldn't the dot just be placed right under lowest or upon highest and if more than one dot then displace it accordingly?

 

Have I missed something here? :hmmmm:

 

Once again, thank you for your time!

 

Hi januson

 

It should plot the dot above the high or low, depending on which one fired. The reason for the LT & HT were so that you could put the dot x amount of ticks above the high. If I were to just put it above the high, then depending how big you want the dot, it can cover up the high, so when you're doing analysis you then have to click on the bar to find out the true high, rather than a visual look at it.

 

If you want it on the high/low then just set the number of ticks input to 0.

 

Hope this helps

 

Blu-Ray

Edited by Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu Ray, thanks so much for converting them. I do plan to donate to your time if I use the code. I have a question for you. Since this is Easy Language will it work with both TS and Multi Charts? I have used neither so far, but looking at them. I would think so because both use EL? Currently I use Sierra Charts so I am attempting to do due diligence before making a forklift upgrade to a new charting platform. Thanks again. :):)

 

Yes, it works well in Multicharts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again..

 

I'm using MultiCharts and I think the dots are misplaced, for some strange reason they are flying to high or to low. But it's nothing to do with your code, I've just created a support question at TS Support as it must be a bug in MC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi again..

 

I'm using MultiCharts and I think the dots are misplaced, for some strange reason they are flying to high or to low. But it's nothing to do with your code, I've just created a support question at TS Support as it must be a bug in MC.

 

 

Hi januson

 

Yes I think you're right about MC, as I've had another member mention the same problem. Unfortunately I don't have MC to test out the fault, however it seems to be working fine in TS.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I think you're right about MC, as I've had another member mention the same problem. Unfortunately I don't have MC to test out the fault, however it seems to be working fine in TS.Blu-Ray

Thanks for the indicator, BR. The problem with MC may be with scaling to symbol setting.

By default the scaling of a MC indicator is to screen, which is something TS doesn't do.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4719&d=1199973671

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu-Ray,

I was looking through the code and I think I found a possible mistake. Can you verify for Plot21 and Plot22 in the file "VSA No Demand No Supply.txt". Both "if" statements for those plots contain the condition: (H[3]-L[3])<(H[3]-L[3]) which will always be evaluated as FALSE. Perhaps this is a typo???

 

Thanks,

Ben

 

Here you go Leonid, I've attached two text files, just from my observation, the majority of the signals fired are the NoDem/Supp 3 and 14.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray,

I was looking through the code and I think I found a possible mistake. Can you verify for Plot21 and Plot22 in the file "VSA No Demand No Supply.txt". Both "if" statements for those plots contain the condition: (H[3]-L[3])<(H[3]-L[3]) which will always be evaluated as FALSE. Perhaps this is a typo???

 

Thanks,

Ben

 

 

Thanks Ben for pointing that out, yes it is a mistake :doh:

 

the code should read " (H[3]-L[3])<(H[4]-L[4]) ".

 

I've attached the modified ELD ( Hopefully James or a Mod could move it to the front page )

 

Thanks again

 

Blu-Ray

VSA_NODEM_NOSUPP.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Ben for pointing that out, yes it is a mistake :doh:

 

the code should read " (H[3]-L[3])<(H[4]-L[4]) ".

 

I've attached the modified ELD ( Hopefully James or a Mod could move it to the front page )

 

Thanks again

 

Blu-Ray

 

Fixed. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.