Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

OzFx

OzFx System :) 100-800 Pips Per Trade

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the update, O Z.

The Bill Williams Awesome Oscillator is not well known in the TS circle, but it seems to be a staple with Metatraders. Code listed below is a similar system without the use of stochastics, using the Awesome Oscillator and Parabolic SAR stops. Perhaps those who use Metatrader could report on the result of this similar system:

/*[[
            Description: Awesome Scalper V1.3 Awesome Oscillator auto Trader
            for 15 minutes charts 
Name := 2Extreme4U - Awesome Scalper 1.3
Author := 2Extreme4U
Link := www.omniscienttrader.com
Notes := Scalping expert/Trend follower
Lots := 1.00
Stop Loss := 25
Take Profit := 50
Trailing Stop := 15
]]*/

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Defines
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Defines: Slippage(5);			// Slippage
Defines: EMA1(11);				// EMA 10
Defines: PSARStep(0.0150);		// Parabolic SAR Step
Defines: PSARMaximum(0.2000);	// Parabolic SAR Maximum
Defines: PrimaryTarget(29);     // Primary target to close 1 lot
Defines: BreakEvenSL(11);	    // Number of points made before the stop is moved to breakeven
Defines: TradesPerCurrency(1);	// Number of lots to trade

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Variables
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
var: EMA101(0), EMA102(0);						// EMA 10 Values
var: Psar(0), PsarP(0);							// Parabolic SAR Value
var: Awesome(0), AwesomeP(0), AwesomePP(0);    	// Awesome Occillator Value
var: Accel(0), AccelP(1);						// Accelerator Occillator Value
var: OpenSell(0);								// Sell Trades Counter
var: OpenBuy(0);								// Buy Trades Counter
var: PriceOpen(0);								// Price Open
var: I(0);										// Misc Counter
var: Mode(0);									// Squirl the Mode variable for multiple use

/////////////////////////////////////////////////
//  Main Script Conditions
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
If Curtime - LastTradeTime < 5 then Exit;

If FreeMargin < 500 then Exit;

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Calculations / Setting Values
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
OpenSell = 0;
OpenBuy = 0;
for I = 1 to TotalTrades
{	
Mode = ord(I, VAL_TYPE);
if ord(I, VAL_SYMBOL) == Symbol then
{
	//Calculates how many Sell we have for the current Symbol
	if Mode == OP_SELL then
	{
		OpenSell++;
	};
	//Calculates how many Buy we have for the current Symbol
	if Mode == OP_BUY then
	{
		OpenBuy++;
	};
};
};

Awesome = iAO(0);
AwesomeP = iAO(1);
AwesomePP = iAO(2);
Accel = iAC(0);
AccelP = iAC(1);
Psar = iSAR(PSARStep, PSARMaximum, 0);
PsarP = iSAR(PSARStep, PSARMaximum, 1);

/////////////////////////////////////////////////
//  Comment on the chart
/////////////////////////////////////////////////


/////////////////////////////////////////////////
//  Long/Short Trade Opening
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
If OpenBuy < TradesPerCurrency then
{
// Buy 4 points higher than last candle close
PriceOpen = Close[1] + 4 * Point;
If Awesome > 0 and AwesomeP > 0 and Awesome > AwesomeP and AwesomePP < 0 and Accel > AccelP and Psar < Ask then
{
	if High[0] >= High[1] then
	{
		Alert(Symbol, " BUY ALERT.  Awesome Scalper.  Buy at ", PriceOpen, " or better.");
		if Ask <= PriceOpen then
		{
			SetOrder(OP_BUY, Lots, Ask, Slippage, Psar, Ask + TakeProfit * Point , BLUE);
			Exit;
		};
	};
};
};

If OpenSell < TradesPerCurrency then
{	
// Buy 4 points lower than last candle close
PriceOpen = Close[1] - 4 * Point;
If Awesome < 0 and AwesomeP < 0 and AwesomePP > 0 and Accel < AccelP and Psar > Bid then 
{
	If Low[0] <= Low[1] then
	{
		Alert(Symbol, " SELL ALERT.  Awesome Scalper.  Sell at ", PriceOpen, " or better.");
		if Bid >= PriceOpen then
		{
			SetOrder(OP_SELL, Lots, Bid, Slippage, Psar, Bid - TakeProfit * Point, RED);
			Exit;
		};
	};
};
};

/////////////////////////////////////////////////
//  Trade Management
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
for I = 1 to TotalTrades
{	
Mode = ord(I, VAL_TYPE);
if ord(I, VAL_SYMBOL) == Symbol then
{
	If OpenBuy > 0 then
	{
		//If Primary target is met, close half play and move stop to 0 for other lot.
		if (Bid - ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE)) >= PrimaryTarget * Point then
		{
			Alert("Primary Target met.  BID = " + Bid + ".  Closing order at market for " + Symbol + " on " + Period + " Period.");
        	CloseOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_LOTS), Bid, Slippage, Orange);
        	Exit;
     	};
		// PSAR Stop
		if Psar > PsarP and ord(I, VAL_STOPLOSS) != Psar and (Bid - Psar >= 4) and (Psar < Bid) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), Psar, ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT), BlueViolet);
			Exit;
		};
		// If 10 pips profit, move Stop to BreakEven
		if bid - ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE) >= BreakEvenSL * Point and ord(I, VAL_STOPLOSS) < ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE)) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT), Cyan);
			Exit;
		};
		/*
		// Psar has changed direction so we want to exit at breakeven
		if psar > Bid and ceil(ord(i, VAL_OPENPRICE)*10000) != ceil(ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT)*10000) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), Orange);
			Exit;		
		};
		*/
	};
	If OpenSell > 0 then
	{
		//If Primary target is met, close half play and move stop to 0 for other lot.
     	if (ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE) - Ask) >= PrimaryTarget * Point then
     	{
     		Alert("Primary Target met.  Ask = " + Ask + ".  Closing order at market for " + Symbol + " on " + Period + " Period.");
        	CloseOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_LOTS), Ask, Slippage, Orange);
        	Exit;
     	};	
		// Psar Stop
		if (Psar < PsarP) and (ord(i, VAL_STOPLOSS) != Psar) and (Psar - Ask >= 4) and (Psar > Ask) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), Psar, ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT), BlueViolet);
			Exit;
		};
		// If 10 pips profit, move Stop to BreakEven
		if ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE) - Ask >= BreakEvenSL * Point and ord(I, VAL_STOPLOSS) > ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE)) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT), Cyan);
			Exit;
		};
		/*
		// Psar has changed direction so we want to exit at breakeven
		if psar < Ask and ceil(ord(i, VAL_OPENPRICE)*10000) != ceil(ord(I, VAL_TAKEPROFIT)*10000) then
		{
			ModifyOrder(ord(I, VAL_TICKET), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), ord(I, VAL_OPENPRICE), Orange);
			Exit;		
		};
		*/
	};
};
};

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

 

It is good to be back home. I had a nice short vacation and I am so glad to see that people have kept the forums busy and alive in the meantime. I’d loads of email/PMs to reply back and I hope everyone received the reply. I also tried my best to read every single post on the forums and reply where ever I could. If I’ve missed out on anyone then please send me an email and I’ll reply back to you.

 

 

When I left we had 5 trades open, out of which EUR/USD performed just great. I closed it at +445 pips at 1.5000. If you are still in the trade then you should be looking at +530 pips right now.

 

 

EUR/GBP second lot closed at +100, currently at +130.

CAD/JPY closed at BE after making +100.

CHF/JPY got closed out at -150.

And finally USD/JPY closed out at BE after making +50

 

 

GBP/CHF trade from today had already made +50 and I’ve moved the Stop Loss to Break Even icon_smile.gif

 

Total for the month now is +1265 and so far we have 33/39 successful trades.

 

 

Oz

 

 

Edited by Soultrader
link removed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

Trades from this morning are all going in our favor big time. So far we already have banked +300 pips plus more to come :)

 

Currently Open Positions:

 

1. EUR/JPY - Short - 2nd lot closed at +100

2. AUD/JPY - Short - 2nd lot closed at +100

3. NZD/JPY - Short - 1st lot closed at +100

4. EUR/GBP - Long - Already had 3rd lot closed at +150

 

Month Total: +1615

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OzFx, congratulations on finding something that works for you. You apparently have the edge that so many seek. Way to go!

 

If I may make one suggestion - it would be more realistic to people reading your thread if you converted your "total pips" earned into pips equivalent to the full size you are using. For example, if you are trading 7 lots and booked profits as follows:

 

+50 on first lot,

+100 on second lot

+150 on third lot

+200 on fourth lot

+300 on fifth lot

+400 on sixth lot

+500 on seventh lot

 

Since you are using 1/7th of your entire position in each scaleout:

 

size = 1/7

 

The actual total amount earned as if you held the full 7 lots to the very end would be:

 

(50*size) + (100*size) + (150*size) + (200 * size) + (300 * size) + (400 * size) + (500 * size)

 

which equals 242.8 pips of profit on 7 full lots.

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the method you are using simply adds up all of the pip sizes of the various scale-outs (in this case, it would be: 50+100+150+200+300+400+500 = 1700 pips).

 

Stating that your total pip profits is 1700 pips sounds a lot more impressive than 242.8 pips, but it is misleading (particularly to people new to forex).

 

I personally have always preferred people who have computed the total pip profit or loss that is translated into equivalent full-size positions (if we know the size used). It's far more realistic.

 

Just a thought...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello friends,

 

As soon as I finished writing my previous post prices move incredibly in our favor banking us total of +450 pips :)

Currently Open Positions:

 

1. EUR/JPY - Short - 3rd lot closed at +150

2. AUD/JPY - Short - 3rd lot closed at +150

3. NZD/JPY - Short - 3rd lot closed at +150

4. EUR/GBP - Long - Already had 3rd lot closed at +150

 

Month Total: +1765

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OzFx, congratulations on finding something that works for you. You apparently have the edge that so many seek. Way to go!

 

If I may make one suggestion - it would be more realistic to people reading your thread if you converted your "total pips" earned into pips equivalent to the full size you are using. For example, if you are trading 7 lots and booked profits as follows:

 

+50 on first lot,

+100 on second lot

+150 on third lot

+200 on fourth lot

+300 on fifth lot

+400 on sixth lot

+500 on seventh lot

 

Since you are using 1/7th of your entire position in each scaleout:

 

size = 1/7

 

The actual total amount earned as if you held the full 7 lots to the very end would be:

 

(50*size) + (100*size) + (150*size) + (200 * size) + (300 * size) + (400 * size) + (500 * size)

 

which equals 242.8 pips of profit on 7 full lots.

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the method you are using simply adds up all of the pip sizes of the various scale-outs (in this case, it would be: 50+100+150+200+300+400+500 = 1700 pips).

 

Stating that your total pip profits is 1700 pips sounds a lot more impressive than 242.8 pips, but it is misleading (particularly to people new to forex).

 

I personally have always preferred people who have computed the total pip profit or loss that is translated into equivalent full-size positions (if we know the size used). It's far more realistic.

 

Just a thought...

 

The way I post pips is that I add/subtract the maximum pips you could have won/lost on a pair. If a trade makes +300 pips I don't add 50+100+150+200+300 = 800 pips. I only record 300. Same goes for losses.

 

If I do the way you think I am do it then it would result in more than 10000 pips :)

 

hope it make sense.

 

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The way I post pips is that I add/subtract the maximum pips you could have won/lost on a pair. If a trade makes +300 pips I don't add 50+100+150+200+300 = 800 pips. I only record 300. Same goes for losses.

 

If I do the way you think I am do it then it would result in more than 10000 pips :)

 

I still need a little clarification, if you don't mind.

 

Let's take this as an example: You trade 3 lots and close one lot at each of the following profit targets:

 

First lot: +100

2nd lot: +150

3rd lot: +500

 

How would you calculate your total profit? Would it be +500?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

 

What a great Friday we had. We were able to bank +550 pips in 3 trades which were opened the same morning. I expect these pairs to consolidate a little bit before falling further next week. I am holding all my positions for now.

 

 

Friday was a great day to end Feb. We achieved a total of +1865 pips which is more than Jan. Last month not only was short but we also faced slow market movement for first 12 or so days due to Chinese New Year holidays, plus I had my personal 3 days off. I hope everyone achieved similar success.

 

 

If you would like then please leave a feedback here

 

 

Currently Open Positions:

 

1. EUR/JPY - Short - 3rd lot closed at +150

2. AUD/JPY - Short - 4th lot closed at +200

3. NZD/JPY - Short - 4th lot closed at +200

4. EUR/GBP - Long - Already had 3rd lot closed at +150

 

 

Have a great weekend.

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I still need a little clarification, if you don't mind.

 

Let's take this as an example: You trade 3 lots and close one lot at each of the following profit targets:

 

First lot: +100

2nd lot: +150

3rd lot: +500

 

How would you calculate your total profit? Would it be +500?

 

Thanks.

 

Thats right. I would only add 500 to total pip count. Same for losses. It basically shows that how much you could have made/lost using the system regardless of MM method you using.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im kinda confused how much you make (or loose) is a direct function of the MM you deploy isn't it?

 

EDIT: Having said that your MM is clear so if you report +300 that means that price has hit T3 or greater before hitting your stop? But then was stopped on the remainder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats right. I would only add 500 to total pip count. Same for losses. It basically shows that how much you could have made/lost using the system regardless of MM method you using.

 

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

 

The only problem with your method is that people will get an incorrect idea of how much money they can make, especially if the people who are interested are new to forex. For example, many newbies will simply multiply the 500 pip total by the dollar amount per pip that they are trading to derive a possible income. But as you and I both know, that's not the way it works in reality, because anyone worth their salt will employ money-management techniques that involve removing portions of the entry from the table (scaling out), to protect the entry and ensure profitability. That's why I prefer the method I explained earlier. It gives a realistic indication of how much profit you have actually made and doesn't inflate reality.

 

Your system seems to have some merit, but everyone should convince themselves with a good prolonged period of testing on their own before they commit any cash to it.

 

Kudo's to you for your willingness to share.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-Cap from post 1:-

______________________________________________________________

Money Management:

 

* Trade with 5 Lots with Stop Loss 100 pips away

* Take Profit on 1st Lot at 50 pips. Move Stop Loss to Break Even (BE).

* Take Profit on 2nd Lot at 100 pips.

* Take Profit on 3rd Lot at 150 pips.

* Take Profit on 4th Lot at 200 pips.

* Let the 5th Lot run until you see an opposite entry signal.

______________________________________________________________

 

So when you report +100 it is

2/5@ +100 | 3/5 Scratch

 

Makes sense now :)

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im kinda confused how much you make (or loose) is a direct function of the MM you deploy isn't it?

 

EDIT: Having said that your MM is clear so if you report +300 that means that price has hit T3 or greater before hitting your stop? But then was stopped on the remainder?

 

If the price is hit 300 then we have closed 4 lots and fifth lot is at 300.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Re-Cap from post 1:-

______________________________________________________________

Money Management:

 

* Trade with 5 Lots with Stop Loss 100 pips away

* Take Profit on 1st Lot at 50 pips. Move Stop Loss to Break Even (BE).

* Take Profit on 2nd Lot at 100 pips.

* Take Profit on 3rd Lot at 150 pips.

* Take Profit on 4th Lot at 200 pips.

* Let the 5th Lot run until you see an opposite entry signal.

______________________________________________________________

 

So when you report +100 it is

2/5@ +100 | 3/5 Scratch

 

Makes sense now :)

 

Cheers.

 

When I report +100 it means that first lot closed at +50 and second closed at +100. 3 lots still in play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the method you are using simply adds up all of the pip sizes of the various scale-outs (in this case, it would be: 50+100+150+200+300+400+500 = 1700 pips).

 

The way I post pips is that I add/subtract the maximum pips you could have won/lost on a pair. If a trade makes +300 pips I don't add 50+100+150+200+300 = 800 pips. I only record 300. Same goes for losses. :)

 

Cheers,

OzFx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

 

We had an excellent start for this month. Though marred by slow market due to NFP we still manage to bank +350 Pips. We only took 4 trades last week and all 4 of them were successful.

Some traders mentioned not getting filled on 2nd profit target for USD/CAD when we saw sudden price movement just after the news release. I can’t emphasize enough about trading with a good broker for same reason. All positions on my account and on managed accounts got filled easily.

 

 

We have 4 open positions at this stage, all in green and currently we stand at 41/47 successful trades.

 

 

Have a great weekend.

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

Few days back I mentioned reconsidering 200SMA filter rule and now I am convinced that we can relax this rule a bit specially in times when most pairs are trending against the established trend. So here is what I recommend:

 

1. Wait for AC to cross “0″ line.

2. Go down to 4hr and 1hr to see if you still see AC and Stot in the same direction.

3. Risk less percent of equity for trades against the trend.

 

I would welcome your ideas and thoughts on this.

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

Here are the trades from today:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/USD - Short

 

2. Daily Signals:

NZD/USD - Short

USD/JPY - Long

AUD/CAD - Short

 

3. AES Signals:

None

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

Here are the trades for today:

1. Oz Special:

None

 

2. Daily Signals:

GBP/USD - Long

 

3. AES Signals:

None

 

Please note that there is holiday in Japan today. I am still holding all positions from yesterday:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/USD - Short

 

2. Daily Signals:

NZD/USD - Short

USD/JPY - Long

AUD/CAD - Short

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here the pips updates of trades from today and yesterday:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/USD - Short

First lot closed at +50 . Currently at +78

 

2. Daily Signals:

NZD/USD - Short

First lot closed at +50 . Currently at +71

 

USD/JPY - Long

Currently at -41

 

AUD/CAD - Short

Currently at -20

 

GBP/USD - Long

Closed at -100

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

Here are the trades for today:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/CAD - Short (Stop Loss 130)

CHF/JPY - Short

 

2. Daily Signals:

None

 

3. AES Signals:

None

 

Previous Trade update:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/USD - Short

First lot closed at +50 . Currently at +48

 

2. Daily Signals:

NZD/USD - Short

Second lot closed at +100 . Currently at +95

 

USD/JPY - Long

Closed at -100

 

AUD/CAD - Short

Currently at -5

 

We will discuss the signals here.

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here the pips updates of trades from today and yesterday:

 

1. Oz Special:

EUR/CAD - Short

Second lot closed at +100 . Currently at +97

 

EUR/USD - Short

Second lot closed at +100 . Currently at +85

 

CHF/JPY - Long

Currently at -35

2. Daily Signals:

NZD/USD - Short

Second lot closed at +100 . Currently at +41

 

AUD/CAD - Short

Currently at -11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Friends,

 

I don't see any good trades. Also due to "May Day" holiday I would recommend not to trade today. Later I'll send an email with updated open and closed positions.

 

Cheers,

Oz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.