Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Ok VSA'ers-- I have a riddle for all of you.

 

Posted below are (2) charts a GBP/USD 1 Hr and a GBP/USD 4 hr.

 

On the 1 hour chart you see a nice WALL of resistance around 1.9705. Indicative of a market rise is coming.

On the 4 Hour chart you see an upthrust after a nice start to the downward move. Which is indicative of further decline.

 

So if you were to take a trade looking at these charts. Would you go long? Or would you go short?

 

Looking forward to how everyone reads and analyzes this to come to a conclusion!

 

1Hr.jpg.66846d25ae3626935d97f4bad5842e58.jpg

 

4Hr.jpg.733e97cfcc3c7a8bc973a08e3ef1913c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
Ok VSA'ers-- I have a riddle for all of you.

 

Posted below are (2) charts a GBP/USD 1 Hr and a GBP/USD 4 hr.

 

On the 1 hour chart you see a nice WALL of resistance around 1.9705. Indicative of a market rise is coming.

On the 4 Hour chart you see an upthrust after a nice start to the downward move. Which is indicative of further decline.

 

So if you were to take a trade looking at these charts. Would you go long? Or would you go short?

 

Looking forward to how everyone reads and analyzes this to come to a conclusion!

 

[ATTACH]5959[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]5960[/ATTACH]

 

Since you are trading spot forex, where are you getting the volume shown in your charts from?

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On the 1 hour chart you see a nice WALL of resistance around 1.9705. Indicative of a market rise is coming.

 

Sledge,

 

Don't you mean wall of SUPPORT around 1.9705 ?

 

 

Regards

Tawe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since you are trading spot forex, where are you getting the volume shown in your charts from?

 

-fs

 

Each platform from your broker should have a volume indicator attached. The MT4 has a pathetic "on-chart" volume (If you go to right click on chart, properties and radio button "volume,) and it also has the nice "tick" volume you see on my charts under the "indicators" tab.

 

But I have used plenty of platforms and all give you access to volume- be sure you are getting TICK volume though- that is the key to success in Forex!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sledge,

 

Don't you mean wall of SUPPORT around 1.9705 ?

 

 

Regards

Tawe

 

Honestly, I guess this is a debatable term. To me the market is working downward, so for it to go further, I call it resistance, whether correct or not as the term I'm not sure. Basically, it is a congestion area that it needs to be cracked, so I personally call that resistance if it is to penetrate it.

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Honestly, I guess this is a debatable term. To me the market is working downward, so for it to go further, I call it resistance, whether correct or not as the term I'm not sure. Basically, it is a congestion area that it needs to be cracked, so I personally call that resistance if it is to penetrate it.

Sledge

 

I get your meaning now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guessed support can turned quickly to resistance, but in formalizing a description, it should probably be called support because it has been the recent past swing lows.

Forex volume data are also 'tick' based data in that it is not something reported by an exchange and therefore only reflects a small subset of the total volume. It is like taking a poll in your own neighborhood which may not accurately reflect the national or international poll.

attachment.php?attachmentid=5969&stc=1&d=1207919493

5aa70e54925be_GBPUSD2008-04-11_090130.gif.c36a2ed3c6a1220d315918ef0ab879ad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forex volume data are also 'tick' based data in that it is not something reported by an exchange and therefore only reflects a small subset of the total volume. It is like taking a poll in your own neighborhood which may not accurately reflect the national or international poll.

 

I have had this discussion before and it is basically, up to the trader to determine whether he/she feels it is valid or not. The principle is as follows:

1. Since Spot FX is NOT centrally Located, tick data will come from your broker and will be based on the contracts THEY carry.

2. My usage of the Tick Volume as per each platform- Each broker is carrying a small percentage of the TOTAL overall contracts being traded at any given time in the market.

3. It is my firm belief after looking at various brokers and platforms tick based volume that the actual # on the volume bar is less significant as the OVERALL relativity of the said bars SIZE in relationship to the preceeding bars on the "left of the chart"

4. So in a sense on a 1 hr bar my broker may have 3,879 as Volume- Your broker may have 4,856. If we compare the relative volume with the background- we are still able to make trading decisions via VSA.

5. I do believe that tick volume of any nature in Forex (because it is the best we are able to attain) is useful as long as we are looking at it in relative terms based on where you trade.

 

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
Each platform from your broker should have a volume indicator attached. The MT4 has a pathetic "on-chart" volume (If you go to right click on chart, properties and radio button "volume,) and it also has the nice "tick" volume you see on my charts under the "indicators" tab.

 

But I have used plenty of platforms and all give you access to volume- be sure you are getting TICK volume though- that is the key to success in Forex!

 

So it's not traded volume, but just the tick movement of each bar on the chart, correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forex volume data are also 'tick' based data in that it is not something reported by an exchange and therefore only reflects a small subset of the total volume. It is like taking a poll in your own neighborhood which may not accurately reflect the national or international poll.

 

That's true. But, even if one were able to obtain universal tick volume, it would indicate only the "busy-ness" of the trading, not share or contract volume. Whether one finds it useful or not depends on whether or not he's tossing virgins into the volcano.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So it's not traded volume, but just the tick movement of each bar on the chart, correct?

 

Well it is traded volume- volume = activity

High Volume means pro $ is in on the bar (and the herd will be there as well)

 

So say you are at a market top- you see a high volume bar- with a narrow spread. It is an indication that there are herd demanding higher prices and professional money offloading all the longs to them as fast as they can. But the pro $ is bearish. So on that bar that looks "little" the volume is very high, because their was a transferring of ownership going on.

 

That bit of information will tell you quite a bit about what is coming next in the trend.

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
Well it is traded volume- volume = activity

High Volume means pro $ is in on the bar (and the herd will be there as well)

 

Sledge

 

OK. :crap:

 

So it's not really volume then. Just price movements on the chart.

 

Good to know you agree. :rofl:

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have had this discussion before and it is basically, up to the trader to determine whether he/she feels it is valid or not. The principle is as follows:

1. Since Spot FX is NOT centrally Located, tick data will come from your broker and will be based on the contracts THEY carry.

2. My usage of the Tick Volume as per each platform- Each broker is carrying a small percentage of the TOTAL overall contracts being traded at any given time in the market.

3. It is my firm belief after looking at various brokers and platforms tick based volume that the actual # on the volume bar is less significant as the OVERALL relativity of the said bars SIZE in relationship to the preceeding bars on the "left of the chart"

4. So in a sense on a 1 hr bar my broker may have 3,879 as Volume- Your broker may have 4,856. If we compare the relative volume with the background- we are still able to make trading decisions via VSA.

5. I do believe that tick volume of any nature in Forex (because it is the best we are able to attain) is useful as long as we are looking at it in relative terms based on where you trade.

 

Sledge

 

Sledge consider getting the GTIS feed from Esignal. They aggregate tick volume from a number of broker dealers and ECN's. It's $100 per month I believe but would easily pay for itself if you trade enough. I have never traded forex, but ppl. that do, that I have chatted with, said it's pretty much the gold standard if you are going to trade forex. Now with that said Esignal has had some issues recently in fast moving markets with data lag on ES and CME in general so take that for what's it worth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan-

Excellent- great to know, well I have been in discussions for a broker move soon to an ECN anyways. This would require me to get my own charting and datafeed- and Esignal is on the list to consider.

Thanks.

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok VSA'ers-- I have a riddle for all of you.

 

Posted below are (2) charts a GBP/USD 1 Hr and a GBP/USD 4 hr.

 

On the 1 hour chart you see a nice WALL of resistance around 1.9705. Indicative of a market rise is coming.

On the 4 Hour chart you see an upthrust after a nice start to the downward move. Which is indicative of further decline.

 

So if you were to take a trade looking at these charts. Would you go long? Or would you go short?

 

Looking forward to how everyone reads and analyzes this to come to a conclusion!

 

[ATTACH]5959[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]5960[/ATTACH]

 

 

Still no takers on this? Wow, I'm stunned really. Thought it would be a great discussion at a live edge of a market. I decided to use the 1 hour timeframe and take a quick long at 1.9717

Closed out after the test followed by upthrust formation at 1.9745.

Quick and dirty for a 28 pip grab.

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still no takers on this? Wow, I'm stunned really. Thought it would be a great discussion at a live edge of a market. I decided to use the 1 hour timeframe and take a quick long at 1.9717

Closed out after the test followed by upthrust formation at 1.9745.

Quick and dirty for a 28 pip grab.

Sledge

 

Hey Sledge, maybe no takers because it doesn't fit anybody's personal style for long or short at the moment of your chart. From where it was sitting I wouldn't take any postition. I'd have to see how it acted in real-time.

 

FX is funny to. Do we really want to include bars from the Asian session and call them no demand or no supply just because Asians weren't interested in Cable? If I were trading cable then I'd be interested in what London and NY are interested in. Tradeguider doesn't teach it that way but it's just something I'd give more weight to.

 

How about you post a chart and tell us what you would do. I think that would get more feedback.

 

cheers mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JJ-

Fair enough. I know some folks have asked to have "live edge" trading examples if at all possible. I figure if it was "I'd take no position" accompanied by reasoning for such- would be a benefit to anyone trying to navigate through this muddy time on the GBP.

 

You are correct that the Asian session is always the slow time in the Cable market, but if Tom Williams states that "The professionals never sleep" I can only assume that we must give some weight to the movement- no matter how little the volume is.

 

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok VSA'ers-- I have a riddle for all of you.

 

Posted below are (2) charts a GBP/USD 1 Hr and a GBP/USD 4 hr.

 

On the 1 hour chart you see a nice WALL of resistance around 1.9705. Indicative of a market rise is coming.

On the 4 Hour chart you see an upthrust after a nice start to the downward move. Which is indicative of further decline.

 

So if you were to take a trade looking at these charts. Would you go long? Or would you go short?

 

Looking forward to how everyone reads and analyzes this to come to a conclusion!

 

[ATTACH]5959[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]5960[/ATTACH]

 

Ok, this is just priceless.

 

First - no responses from anyone even taking a stab at whether you go long or short here.

 

Second - the fact that the question is - should I go long or short here - just emphasizes how arbitrary this VSA stuff really is. It's either a long or short and it should not be hard to figure out which one IMO.

 

I have NO IDEA the answer to your riddle, but it sure is entertaining to read yet another post in this thread about whether to go long or short...

 

This VSA thread is quite the interesting read from afar. Seems like a lot of the blind leading the blind... is anyone actually using this stuff in real-time? If so, where are they at?

 

I just can't get over the 'do I short or go long here' posts... If that's difficult, good luck managing your stops and profit targets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bf-

Well I actually posted this so that people could attempt to answer what they see. I wanted to spark some conversation about what people saw and how if they were faced with this chart- what would their move be?

 

JJ stated he would take no trade.

I happened to go long but CAREFULLY long

 

I wouldn't say that because it failed to spark the conversation I hoped for, that VSA should be written off as a form of technical analysis.

Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bf-

Well I actually posted this so that people could attempt to answer what they see. I wanted to spark some conversation about what people saw and how if they were faced with this chart- what would their move be?

 

JJ stated he would take no trade.

I happened to go long but CAREFULLY long

 

I wouldn't say that because it failed to spark the conversation I hoped for, that VSA should be written off as a form of technical analysis.

Sledge

 

I guess I don't understand how you can't tell if you should go long or short. That's about as elementary as trading can get - long, short, no action - and throughout this thread there are examples of people not sure which one to do! And it's all about VSA.

 

From an outsiders view, that would say this VSA thing isn't nearly as clear as some may think it is, ESPECIALLY in real-time. And in the end, that's all that counts. After the fact charts do not put real $$$ into an account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess I don't understand how you can't tell if you should go long or short. That's about as elementary as trading can get - long, short, no action - and throughout this thread there are examples of people not sure which one to do! And it's all about VSA.

 

From an outsiders view, that would say this VSA thing isn't nearly as clear as some may think it is, ESPECIALLY in real-time. And in the end, that's all that counts. After the fact charts do not put real $$$ into an account.

 

I wasn't asking for personal advice. I saw a nice real live situation present itself while I was flicking through my timeframes and said- Hey this would be a good lesson for others to try and figure out as well.

 

Since it was a real-time, live edge chart(s)- my basic question was if you were sitting there, you saw what I posted, what would you have done? I may have gotten a range of answers such as:

 

A. I'd wait for a higher volume downward move through the 1.97 area and confirm to go short

B. I am a scalper and I would have used the 1 hr chart to go long, watch the bars form and manually exit.

C. I would have done nothing since their was low volume and it was the Asian Market.

 

It was more of a curiosity as to what others see when looking at the very same information. I made my trade, banked $ and was happy. Guess I thought others may have seen it totally different and taken their own path.

Sledge

Edited by Sledge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.