Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

illumintai

Transaction Details ?

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I just participated in an investment game. I am supposed to analyse the transactions and compile a report.

 

We are given $10,000,000 cash and margin spending doubles our buying power to $20,000,000.

 

Here is the transaction detail: -

 

Trade Date Order Sym Qty Price Paid* Comm. Amount

01/10/08 Buy BPH8.CME 650 122,006.2 25.00 -79,304,087.50

 

First off, this is a GBP-USD fx futures transaction. I cannot in the world understand how the amount paid can be around 80 mil ?

 

Look forward to your replies.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  illumintai said:

 

Trade Date Order Sym Qty Price Paid* Comm. Amount

01/10/08 Buy BPH8.CME 650 122,006.2 25.00 -79,304,087.50

 

 

Hi illuminatai,

 

well first I'm not in currencies, so beware, but I will tell you my understanding and others will surely correct me if I'm wrong on it.

 

First of all, I think that CME is the exchange, so you don't traded via Forex,

instead you have bought a future; namely BP with expiry H8.

 

So your price paid, was 122k for 650 contracts.

You paid 25 $ commission. Don't know if this is realistic, but anyway.

 

Now the 79 mio. $ are the total value of contracts, but not what you have paid. I think that no futures trader thinks about this total value, because its not realistic, that the contract goes to zero, or that he waits so long until ... .

But if the underlying would go to zero, thats the amount you have to pay

to your broker.

 

Hopefully this doesn't make it complicated, all what I like to say is:

122k $ are somehow your marging. 79 mio. $ is the total value of contracts.

 

And now you should be able to calculate your leverage.

 

Hope it helps.

 

Hal

 

P.S.: Leverage is is key to make :) or loose :doh: more money than others in a shorter period of time.

Edited by HAL9000
Minor corrections and contracts vs. underlying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some more,

 

it seems to me that you are new to business, but if not,

maybe it will help someone else:

 

BP = British Pound

H8 = March 2008

 

A CME future contract.

 

Maybe you start here, to get some more information:

 

Contract Listings

 

Let me know, if this has helped you, or if I can help you in an other way.

 

Anyway good luck, and remember, the key is not that you win the match, just learn.

Edited by HAL9000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help,

 

Yes, its a CME futures contract. There is a 10% position limit, meaning we can only spend upto a million per trade. As such most futures contract I made were close to Million USD in margin payments. So I very much doubt it will be 122k for 650 contracts.

 

Look forward to more help please !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  illumintai said:

 

I very much doubt ...

 

 

You doubt?

 

You are (were?) in a contest (like every trader), then ask (i.e. ask the right questions)!

I see that you try to learn, to understand! (But you are in a contest, and maybe responses are unfair to others in it.)

 

I recalculated and 122k $ as margin would be OK for me.

 

If you tell me the leverage, I will tell you the multiplier, and what a multiplier is good for.

 

 

Regards,

 

Hal

 

 

P.S.: Something about Margin (finance) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edited by HAL9000
P.S. added.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,

 

This is the information currently available to me.

 

Ah, I forgot to mention you account was based on GBP and exchange rate at the time was 0.514 USD-GBP. The transaction detail i mentioned above is all in GBP too.

 

The competition is over and all securities liquidated.

 

-Account Balances-

Available Cash £12,580,029.86

Credit Balance £0.00

Loan Balance £0.00

Interest Earned £6,528.97

Interest Charged £0.00

Buying Power £8,209,511.93 (initially this was 20 mil)

Portfolio Value £12,580,029.86 (initially this was 10 mil)

 

-Market Data-

Market Value of Long £0.00

Market Value of Short 0.00

Margin Requirement £8,475,273.90

 

-Margin Requirements

 

The margin requirement for equity(I think it includes futures too) purchases and short sales is 50%. This means that for equity purchases you can borrow up to 50% of the total cost. For short sales, you must deposit an amount equal to 50% of the current market value of your short positions.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway maybe I'm wrong,

 

will simulate on Monday regarding margin requirements.

 

Hal.

 

OK, lets assume that the total value is 79 mio. $.

Further assume that the max. overnight margin is 4 % of the total value,

so it would be ca. 3.2 mio $. This would make more sense.

 

The 122k $ are near to (a close of 1.94 $ per contract * multiplier (i.e. 62500)).

And 122k $ * 650 are nearly 79 mio. $.

 

So excuse my above statements :doh:. I've learned too on your question/call.

And I hope that this makes more sense to you :confused:.

 

Have a nice weekend,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems that we have written at the same time,

 

somehow I don't think that the 50% rule was for futures, but will think about it.

 

But, as I said, I will simulate on Monday and post the results of my broker.

Even if they have nothing to do with your contest.

 

Once more,

have a nice Weekend,

 

Hal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.