Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Master the Art of Stop Loss Placement

Recommended Posts

Understanding where to place your stops is an important skill in trading. Many new traders do not place importance on this and will usually place stops at the most obvious locations. New traders also like to place stops at a fixed amount no matter what the setup. Each setup requires a different risk parameter.

 

I base my stops according to my entry. Since I am a pivot based trader, alll my stops will be placed above or below the pivot line. However, ff you entry is based on a indicator signal your stop should be based when your indicator proves you wrong. One mistake I see with new traders is that they will place their stop 1-2 S&P points after a buy/sell signal. If you entry was not based on price action, you are not using a smart stop. Price can drop to your stop loss level without your indicators confirming it. This is a sure way to lose.

 

Tape readers are able to use a tighter stop. This is because they clearly see short-term support/resistance levels on the tape. Most new traders do not understand tape reading. This skill takes months to years to learn. Yet, new traders attempt to scalp placing 30-40 roundtrips a day. This is not the way to learn successful trading.

 

Trailing stops

Once a trade moves in your favor, it is wise to move stops to protect profits. However, trailing stops by a fixed percentage or points is not the greatest way to manage your position. I use what are called "smart stops". As a trade moves in my favor, my rule for stop placement is automatic. After 10 dow mini points, I move my stop to breakeven. I will also scale out half at +10 and a quarter at +20. The last quarter position is the portion I manage. When price breaks a pivot line, I will move my stop below the pivot. All of my stops are based on price levels. Once price breaks that level, I will move my stop. I also combine fibonacci levels and pivots to find good stop placement levels. This gives room for the trade to work out.

 

Wins must be greater than losses. Managing a winning position is crucial in trading success.

 

Good luck and best of trading.

 

Regards,

 

James Lee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP LOSSES

Questions that must be answered when writing your trading rules

 

  • What if your stop is the perfect entry point in direction of your original order? In other words you got stopped out at exactly the wrong place; your original trend analyis was correct, just slightly off. Your original trend analysis would have been correct in most instances, but this is one of those times when the price continues past a typical reversal or continuation point.

  • In this case, averaging in would be better than getting stopped out at a loss. But how do you know the difference? Is this dangerous? How much risk should I increase?

  • How much should a person average in? Should you increase your position to the maximum in order to offset the original loss?

  • What if your stop loss is the price you should reverse at?

  • Even if your entry is totally wrong, should you average in, looking for a slight bounce in the right direction to minimize you losses?

 

To deal with all of these questions, you must define what a total break down of an entry signal is, and what a slight misjudgment in the entry signal is. Determining what factors affect a trend reversal or continuation is critical. News is an obvious and typical influence on price and indicators. I have never seen an indicator that can retrieve, analyze and interpret the news for you. That is one influence that could invalidate a typically good trade entry signal.

 

Every person uses different trade set ups and different indicators, so you must determine for yourself what causes a failure of an otherwise good trade signal. The determining factors are probably very subtle, and difficult to notice in a timely manner.

 

One example is a very fast and substantial price move. A surge in price can come at the beginning of a trend, or at the end of a trend, or at the continuation of a trend. So if a price surge happens, which one of those three is it? How does that affect your stop, and your decision to reverse, or reenter an order in the previous direction? This is something you need to determine in your trading rules.

 

If people have ideas and/or experiences about what the specific answers are for your trade rules and indicators, please post them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop losses must be out of the way as drop dead stops.

 

Exiting on a mechanical stop is the road to losses. Stops should be dynamic and be related to your trade location and you should exit when the market tells you that the outcome of the trade you entered is no longer has a high enough probabiility. To do this you must have a trade structure within which you trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  electroniclocal said:

Exiting on a mechanical stop is the road to losses.

 

I agree. The worse thing that can happen, is that your stop losses become "loss targets". Which can easily happen if the stop loss is not being adjusted, or we just ignore the signs that a mistake was made. When I start thinking to myself, "I would like to cut my losses at X", then bad things happen. If I accept that I just need to take the loss now, and deal with it, then I usually minimize the pain. Actually I shouldn't be thinking of it in terms of pain or profit. That's when logic ceases to operate. If I'm trying to keep track of how much money I'm making or loosing, or whether I'm feeling good or bad about the current situation, then it interferes with my ability to make a decision. That's the psychological and emotional side of the stop loss decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.