Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BrandonLG83

Mind Over Markets Opening Types Question

Recommended Posts

I've been studying the book, Mind Over Markets, and I'm having trouble discerning between the Open-Test-Drive type of open and the Open-Rejection-Reverse. On page 66 is an example of the Open-Test-Drive open. It shows that in the E period, price traded right to the opening price then stopped. On page 69 is an example of the Open-Rejection-Reverse. I see that in the Z period, price traded all the way through the opening. I, at first, concluded that the fact that one was unable to traded completely through the open and the other was able to, that this distinguished the two typed from each other. However, on page 75, where it shows the summary of each, it shows that neither type trade through the open. From the last example, I really see no difference between the two except the Open-Rejection-Reverse has a longer selling tail. I know I'm missing something, so could someone please help shed some light on this for me?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Brandon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, they are fairly similar except the fact that in an open-test-drive, the other timeframe enters early to extend the ranage. On the other hand, other time-frame participants enter slightly late in an open-rejection-reverse. Please see charts below.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4706&stc=1&d=1199857436

 

The chart above shows an open-test-drive. Initial balance was upset early in the day by D period. Notice how A period left a single print tail as well. Later on, price did not come back to test the intial balance. This presents strong conviction.

 

On the other hand, the chart below shows initial balance break in D period but a fall back in price into the initial balance in I, J, and K period. This somewhat resembles an open-rejection-reverse. The example is not the greatest because the day ended up being a double distribution trend day. However, the point here may be how price falls back inside the initial balance in an open-rejection-reverse pattern while a more convictional open-test-drive pattern will usually trade away from the initial balance without having to test back into it.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4707&stc=1&d=1199858783

 

Perhaps someone else could shed us some light into this topic as well.

Open-test-drive.thumb.jpg.e0c0224ee8fccf9a943ac21f41a6f8c6.jpg

5aa70e31be159_openrejectionreverse.jpg.3322849179b18eb6abd84c53abd697dc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Good luck studying market profile. I had to reread that book several times before really understanding it. Pick up Steidlmayer once you read Dalton. Itll help expand your understanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea is just to gauge conviction off Opening Price. Extremely strong trend days often show Opening Price as Low or High of Day (Open-Drive).

 

Next is open-test-drive, small quick test but still strong conviction.

 

Next is open-rejection-reverse, test one way and drive the other -- good conviction.

 

The more action around opening-price, the less conviction --- you can call them both 'open-test-drive' -- and just grade the conviction based on how big the tail is, IMO...

 

On page 66 is an example of the Open-Test-Drive open. It shows that in the E period, price traded right to the opening price then stopped.

 

stopped? I don't see that. it shows that price traded down off opening price and then back above in period D. Period E tests opening price one more time and then launches up. it doesn't stop in period E.

 

maybe you can elaborate if I mis-interpreted what you are saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The idea is just to gauge conviction off Opening Price. Extremely strong trend days often show Opening Price as Low or High of Day (Open-Drive).

 

Next is open-test-drive, small quick test but still strong conviction.

 

Next is open-rejection-reverse, test one way and drive the other -- good conviction.

 

The more action around opening-price, the less conviction --- you can call them both 'open-test-drive' -- and just grade the conviction based on how big the tail is, IMO...

 

Thanks for the reply. I think I'm getting this now, but when you say grade it on how big the tail is, would a longer tail be considered stronger conviction or weaker? The fog is slowly being wiped away for me as the book says and I appreciate you guys baring with me here.

 

 

 

stopped? I don't see that. it shows that price traded down off opening price and then back above in period D. Period E tests opening price one more time and then launches up. it doesn't stop in period E.

 

maybe you can elaborate if I mis-interpreted what you are saying.

 

I misworded this. I really just meant that price did not trade through to the other side of the open in E period. I really haven't gotten a sense of how price would have moved within the profile. I couldn't tell if the E period price started above the open, traded down, tested, then moved away or if E started at the open then moved up from there. But from your post, I gather that it did indeed start above the open, tested, then move away, so that answers another question that I was kind of wondering.

 

I appreciate your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No problem. Good luck studying market profile. I had to reread that book several times before really understanding it. Pick up Steidlmayer once you read Dalton. Itll help expand your understanding.

 

Hey, thanks. I actually read the old '80s Steidlmayer book first. Now I'm working my way through Mind Over Markets for my second time. I already have the new updated Steidlmayer book waiting to read, but from the few quick glances I've taken so far, it doesn't seem to be all that different from the first, but I'll read it anyways. After I finish that, do you recommend I pick up Markets in Profile, or is that just a reiteration of what the above mentioned books teach?

 

I appreciate your help,

 

Brandon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
when you say grade it on how big the tail is, would a longer tail be considered stronger conviction or weaker?

 

yah, I see how this can be a little confusing. the longer tail actually means less conviction in this context. in other places, it shows a period of 'higher timeframe' activity.

 

whenever you see strong 'range expansion off opening price' --- be on alert. this is especially the case if you 'gap out of value'.

 

the vast majority of days, price will trade back to opening price. so when it doesn't do this -- and instead 'dogpiles' away from opening price -- check to see how much activity there was on other side of opening price.

 

also, see this video on trading the first 30 minutes of the day:

 

http://www.cciclub.com/marketvu/linda-raschke-30mins.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, thanks. I actually read the old '80s Steidlmayer book first. Now I'm working my way through Mind Over Markets for my second time. I already have the new updated Steidlmayer book waiting to read, but from the few quick glances I've taken so far, it doesn't seem to be all that different from the first, but I'll read it anyways. After I finish that, do you recommend I pick up Markets in Profile, or is that just a reiteration of what the above mentioned books teach?

 

I appreciate your help,

 

Brandon

 

Theres some really good insights in Markets in Profile so it wont hurt to read it. Steidlmayer's book is pretty similar to Daltons but its one of those reads that may you go Ah Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thank you both for your help. Great video dogpile. I'll have to watch it again because it was a little over my head but very informative stuff. And thanks again SoulTrader. I just love this site and I'm following your Market Profile thread very closely. Keep up the great work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • SMCI Super Micro Computer stock watch, attempting to move higher off the 34.06 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?SMCI        
    • UPST Upstart stock watch, pull back to 68.15 gap support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?UPST  
    • Why not to simply connect you account to myfxbook which will collect all this data automatically for you? The process you described looks tedious and a bit obsolete but may work for you though.
    • The big breakthrough with AI right now is “natural language computing.”   Meaning, you can speak in natural language to a computer and it can go through huge data sets, make sense out of them, and speak back to you in natural language.   That alone is a huge breakthrough.   The next leg? AI agents. Where they don’t just speak back to you.   They take action. Here’s the definition I like best: an AI agent is an autonomous system that uses tools, memory, and context to accomplish goals that require multiple steps.   Everything from simple tasks (analyzing web traffic) to more complex goals (building executive briefings or optimizing websites).   They can:   > Reason across multiple steps.   >Use tools like a real assistant (Excel spreadsheets, budgeting apps, search engines, etc.)   > Remember things.   And AI agents are not islands. They talk to other agents.   They can collaborate. Specialized agents that excel at narrow tasks can communicate and amplify one another’s strengths—whether it’s reasoning, data processing, or real-time monitoring.   What it Looks Like You wake up one morning, drink your coffee, and tell your AI agent, “I need to save $500 a month.”   It gets to work.   First, it finds all your recurring subscriptions. Turns out you’re paying $8.99 for a streaming service you forgot you had.   It cancels it. Then it calls your internet provider, negotiates a lower bill, and saves you another $40. Finally, it finds you car insurance that’s $200 cheaper per year.   What used to take you hours—digging through statements, talking to customer service reps on hold for an hour, comparing plans—is done while you’re scrolling Twitter.   Another example: one agent tracks your home maintenance needs and gets information from a local weather-monitoring agent. Result: "Rain forecast next week - should we schedule gutter cleaning now?"   Another: an AI agent will plan your vacations (“Book me a week in Italy for under $2,000”), find the cheapest flights, and sort out hotels with a view.   It’ll remind you to pay bills, schedule doctor’s appointments, and track expenses so you’re not wondering where your paycheck went every month.   The old world gave you tools—Excel spreadsheets, search engines, budgeting apps. The new world gives you agents who do the work for you.   Don’t Get Too Scared (or Excited) Yet William Gibson famously said: "The future is already here – it's just not evenly distributed."   AI agents will distribute it. For decades, the tools that billionaires and corporations used to get ahead—personal assistants, financial advisors, lawyers—were out of reach for regular people.   AI agents could change that.   BUT, remember…   We’re in inning one.   AI agents have a ways to go.   They’re imperfect. They mess up. They need more defenses to get ready for prime time.   To be sure, AI is powerful, but it’s not a miracle worker. It’s great at helping humans solve problems, but it’s not going to replace all jobs overnight.   Instead of fearing AI, think of it as a tool to A.] save you time on boring stuff and B.] amplify what you’re already good at. Right now is the BEST time to start experimenting. It’s also the best time to find investments that will “make AI work for you”. Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential)   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.