Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

[MP] Trading with Market Profile

Recommended Posts

Why in heaven's name, with all the computing power we have, doesn't someone use REAL statistics to compute the value area? And why am I the only one who seems to think this would be a good idea?

 

I pretty much agree. I think you have to put MP into context though. There really hasn't been much evolution of these ideas IMO. I mean in the late 80s the TPO way of viewing things would have been the only way possible as real time volume at price info I assume was just not available and the current way of doing things was just what was possible back in the day computing power wise. There is an incredible amount of stuff to explore here but your going to be pretty much on your own and charting new territory(no pun intended:)

Here is a chart based off volume POC/value area as opposed to TPO for YM.

For my style today is just a mess. I probly won't do anything unless we auction down to that 650 area with the two volume peaks lined up.

ymess.png.0e0d3c3c1b6d552d4204f58de6dbf5b9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a statistics question regarding MP. If you read appendix 1 of Dalton's book (MoM), he gives the method for calculating the value area. To my surprise, there's nothing statistical about it at all. His claims of the VA being "roughly" within one standard deviation are completely bogus. He has no clue what the standard deviation is, because there's no calculation of variance whatsoever. He's simply adding up numbers. I've spoken to traders who use MP and they seem completely unconcerned about this charade. I know from statistics class that amateur approximations of statistical metrics are often wildly inaccurate. Why in heaven's name, with all the computing power we have, doesn't someone use REAL statistics to compute the value area? And why am I the only one who seems to think this would be a good idea?

 

Tasuki,

You will find a (almost) complete discussion of market statistics beginning with the thread [thread=1962], "Trading with Market Statistics" I. [/thread]. There are 11 threads in this series, describing in detail the proper way to compute the standard deviation, SD, and how to use the statistical data for entry and exit. Included in the series, are a quantitative description of the volume weighted average price, VWAP, the peak volume price, PVP, the skew, and how, along with the SD, a trade position can be executed with reasonable likelihood of success. Methods for scalping, position trading, and more complex trades at hold up prices, HUP, are also described.

Market statistics is a very complex subject, and I've tried to make it simple enough in the threads so that both new traders and expert traders would benefit from a proper description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Expecting another tough day on Wall Street and my bias remains short. Below is a market profile chart of the Nikkei futures contract. Nikkei reacted negatively as expected on yesterdays US market decline with a gap down of over 350yen. "D" period broke out of the initial balance to the upside and appeared to show optimism. However, as soon as the afternoon session began (H period) the markets gapped lower and extended the range in the opposite direction.

 

This price action here is showing extreme pessimism.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4765&stc=1&d=1200474492

 

For a more clearer view for non-MP users, below is a 5min candlestick chart of todays Nikkei action.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4766&stc=1&d=1200474524

 

Opening Types

 

I wanted to cover two opening types in todays example. The first opening type is the open-drive in which the markets express strong confidence from the open and trends for the rest of the day. The opening price will usually be the low or high of the day. Also, once price breaks out of the initial balance we are less likely to see price return inside of the IB. Hence, there is strong buying/selling confidence expressed.

 

The second type of opening is when the markets express mediocre confidence. Price will usually fall back into the initial balance once it breaks out before going in the direction of the initial trend. These are the days when one is uncertain if the rejection above/below the initial balance will force the markets to reverse and extend the range in the opposite direction or not.

 

One way for me to play these IB rejection patterns is to plot a midpoint of the initial balance. The chart below shows the 60min high/low (blue line) and midpoint (redline).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4767&stc=1&d=1200474891

 

If mediocre optimism still exists, price is likely to fall back into the initial balance before lifting to the upside again. This is where I use the midpoint as a potential support area. If price holds above the midpoint, we are likely to attempt another range extension to the upside. If price falls below the midpoint, we are likely to extend the range in the opposite direction.

 

In the chart above, the first attempt holds at the midpoint before another rejection causing price to drop below the midpoint and extend the range in the opposite direction.

 

This concept is similar to the value area rule in which price will often test the other value area extreme once rejected above/below value.

 

When playing the midpoint, it is good to have two sets of potential exit points. The two sets should be in expectation of a normal day or a normal variation day. In the chart above, an expectation of a normal day would be 0.5 times the distance of the IB to the upside. While a normal variation day would be double the initial balance to the upside.

 

The same concept applies when price falls below the midpoint. A range extension will usually be 0.5 times or double the initial balance.

 

Lets take another example from yesterdays YM market profile.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4768&stc=1&d=1200475333

 

You can then project potential exit points.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4769&stc=1&d=1200475871

 

Just a simple technique I wanted to share to determine the direction of a potential range extension.

5aa70e3377635_Jan.162008NikkeiMPChart1.jpg.ae80913ee4b5f86895e23660a172dcb4.jpg

5aa70e337d7c7_Jan.162008NikkeiChart1.jpg.0782c39e0a707d545962fedcbb118df2.jpg

5aa70e33861aa_Jan.162008NikkeiChart2.jpg.7373e29473858474cce8a3ed4ce2000e.jpg

5aa70e338d21e_Jan.162008YMMPChart1.jpg.41845cd2dbad71293788f51db582b079.jpg

5aa70e33949e8_Jan.162008YMMPChart2.jpg.130ff75577a12db2db377012d2f2a5bc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update due to interesting premarket action. Im still looking for a potential short setup near the VAL pivot point.

 

Chart below shows market profile chart and premarket resistance near this VAL level.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4770&stc=1&d=1200491736

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4771&stc=1&d=1200491736

 

If any case YM breaks this level to the upside, I am looking for a possible rotation towards VAH where I will once again start looking for short setups.

 

Bias is currently short sided looking for possible lower value placement or lower/overlapping placement.

5aa70e3399680_Jan.162008YMMPChart3.jpg.c3e932c335e81a00ebf8d46da19fb115.jpg

5aa70e339d4ea_Jan.162008YMChart1.jpg.1d31fb0fe6791cff48817fc2b3064ee9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excellent charts and analysis SoulTrader, much food for thought and development of strategies/tactics around the concepts outlined,

 

Thank you monad. Just doing my best to contribute :)

 

Below shows short trade from todays session. I initially tried to short at the open but TICKS were still positive and price went on to rally over 70pts swiftly.

 

Short entry was when price was rejected within previous day value and droppped below VAL. Reason again is my initial bias of lower or overlapping to lower value placement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4773&stc=1&d=1200496193

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4774&stc=1&d=1200496193

 

It appears to be a open-test drive. Test upwards for supply which met with selling pressure and then rejection back down below value. Will post eixts later.

5aa70e33a8852_Jan.162008YMShortTrade.jpg.74ed2c4e32d4e701cbad98d46717926b.jpg

5aa70e33ac65a_Jan.162008YMShortTradeMP.jpg.cc52b47f2d657f09b1e35d309c10b2b2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

Below chart shows exits based on market profile. I am taking profits before the 1/15 low as it may take some force to extend price below this pivot.

 

Also using half the IB range as a target point using a normal day in mind. (normal day= IB range extension approx half of the IB range)

 

Further explanation on this short trade can be found on my premarket analysis video here.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4775&stc=1&d=1200498998

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4776&stc=1&d=1200498998

5aa70e33b147c_Jan.162008YMShortTradeExitFull.jpg.363507fe9adc18259240ce8e1b766065.jpg

5aa70e33b8457_Jan.162008YMShortTradeExitFullMP.jpg.4ff0be943eb03f84ef4e7ef3cdb884bc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again great trade and analysis Soultrader, however unable to view the video, a message for permission flashes up.

 

Is the exit strategy applicable only to YM or can it be applied to other indices i.e ES, Dax futures etc.

 

Also it is of interest to note that the trade you outlined conforms to the concepts on Taylor Trading by Dogpile (his modified version) i.e if you put up daily pivots on YM 15min chart , it is around 12484, the market gaps down to that, Dogpile's method would indicate a long to the 20ema (around 12583) followed by a short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once again great trade and analysis Soultrader, however unable to view the video, a message for permission flashes up.

 

Is the exit strategy applicable only to YM or can it be applied to other indices i.e ES, Dax futures etc.

 

Also it is of interest to note that the trade you outlined conforms to the concepts on Taylor Trading by Dogpile (his modified version) i.e if you put up daily pivots on YM 15min chart , it is around 12484, the market gaps down to that, Dogpile's method would indicate a long to the 20ema (around 12583) followed by a short.

 

Very interesting monad. I am not familiar at all with the Taylor Trading Technique but always interests me to know areas of confluence using different methodologies.

 

Regarding the exit strategy, it is one that I use for both the YM and Nikkei. I actually never looked at the Dax and I do not trade the ES so will not be able to confirm it. But I wouldnt be surprised if this technique can be applied to any index futures contract.

 

Regarding the video, I moved it over in the premium forums. I will make another one for tomorrow and will post it in this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres another short setup. Perhaps this belongs in the VSA thread as it is based on a test of the high on lower volume. But at the same time the main concept is for price to remain in the current value area.

 

Notice that the developing value area is overlapping to lower compared to the previous day. This time my exits will be targetted above the developing POC around 12510-12520.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4778&stc=1&d=1200506171

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4777&stc=1&d=1200506171

 

Update

 

Final exit at 12520 as planned. 3am here now and about to get some sleep. Chart shows my final exit. Good trading all and good night. :sleep:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4780&stc=1&d=1200507528

5aa70e33bcce5_Jan.162008YMShortTrade3.jpg.5b7569eca7cb739d198741643d47a8be.jpg

5aa70e33c16e3_Jan.162008YMShortTrade3MP.jpg.ccb8ab1172ee12be05c5068e87d3e6cb.jpg

5aa70e33c7348_Jan.162008YMShortTrade3Exit.jpg.93a2acd0a3112f74c8e59bfb9960f1c1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The return to value area is indeed the main concept Soultrader on this trade, the rise in price on low volume is incidental, as the volume normally drops off during lunch period in NY,

 

Look forward to your charts tomorrow,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The return to value area is indeed the main concept Soultrader on this trade, the rise in price on low volume is incidental, as the volume normally drops off during lunch period in NY,

 

Look forward to your charts tomorrow,

 

Yes, very good way of seeing it. The strategy here was definitely for price to return to value. It seems like price did extend the IB to the upside further before being rejected at VAH and dropping inside of the IB. (quite surprising to see that)

 

Chart below shows final profile for 1/16/08. Profile shows a Neutral Day in which buyers and sellers exits below and above the initial balance. Hence, you will see range extension on both ends with little net change at the end of the day.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4785&stc=1&d=1200532122

 

A neutral day tends to be followed by a neutral day. Also note the TPO count at 68 vs 24 favoring sellers. Asian markets are still pretty choppy at the moment and unclear. Although a range can be expected, I will post some more charts when things become more clearer.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4786&stc=1&d=1200532328

5aa70e33cc004_Jan.162008YMNeutralDay.jpg.654b2eaf7e66099d9da952ce60b093ca.jpg

5aa70e33cfda9_Jan.162008YMNeutralDay2.jpg.958c4d1ee989e8168cb4ab057fc6be97.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your very insightful posts James!

 

Some simple questions:

do you pay any attention to the volume profile, MP and VP look very similar most of the time anyway.

Are VAH and VAL derived from MP or VP, differences should be subtle.

 

Just asking because I'm thinking of doing my own MP, but not sure if and when that will happen and MP is a lot easier to do than VP.

The effort would be worth it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your very insightful posts James!

 

Some simple questions:

do you pay any attention to the volume profile, MP and VP look very similar most of the time anyway.

Are VAH and VAL derived from MP or VP, differences should be subtle.

 

Just asking because I'm thinking of doing my own MP, but not sure if and when that will happen and MP is a lot easier to do than VP.

The effort would be worth it though.

 

I have used VP in the past but have found MP to be more useful in my trading. Every comment I make on VAL, VAH, POC, etc.. is all based on market profile and not volume profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think volume vs time profiles depends on what kind of trading your looking to do. I think volume is probly better for faster trades and smaller moves and time better for bigger moves with staying in the market longer. Ninja has a decent volume profile for free but its a pain because it resets if you add or alter the chart at all.

I think it will be interesting to see if we stay range bound for awhile and fill in the double distribution from yesterdays volume profile to create a more normal looking 2 day distribution. Vwap finished almost dead center in the middle of the valley in the volume profile.

ym1-17pre.png.87f4ba24241a7e45c2906f418529a285.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes great video,

could you elaborate on the logic behind the expectation of another neutral day following a neutral day.

 

I believe Steidlmayer mentioned this somewhere in his book but makes sense to me. We have range extension on both ends indicating that the big money (other timeframe traders) are expressing contradicting opinions. In other words the force of buying and selling is balanced. This shows that the markets (which moves only by big money) is still in the decision making process. So what will alter one side to step off so the buying/selling can push price out of value? Most likely good reaction by global markets or anything fundamental such as good earnings by a reputable company, interest rates, economic numbers, etc...

 

Hence from a technical standpoint, unless these events occur I assume a rangebound day. Not always a neutral day but if I assume for it to be a neutral day, I can implement strategies such as responsive selling above value (or IB) or responsive buying below value (or IB). The tug of war is basically neutral. Something needs to break this force to make it one-sided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soultrader, thanks for the informative post and great video. It really helps a new MP'er to see the analysis done by someone using MP in their trading.

 

A few quick questions:

I am guessing that you mainly analyze the Nikkie and YM markets?

Do you find strong correlation between the 2?

Any specific reason the YM over the ES?

Are you just looking for a few trades a day based on MP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Soultrader, thanks for the informative post and great video. It really helps a new MP'er to see the analysis done by someone using MP in their trading.

 

A few quick questions:

I am guessing that you mainly analyze the Nikkie and YM markets?

Do you find strong correlation between the 2?

Any specific reason the YM over the ES?

Are you just looking for a few trades a day based on MP?

 

Hi 404,

 

There is definitely an interesting correlation between the Nikkei and YM. Strong at times but because the Nikkei here is not a 24 hour market, gaps occur and I am unable to take advantage of the correlation. Therefore, I use the Nikkei reaction to trade the YM.

 

The reason I trade YM is simply because I am familiar with it.

 

Also with MP, I look for 1-2 trades a day. Over 3 will beovertrading in my style of trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SoulTrader,

 

I've enjoyed your posts. Please keep it up.

 

Can you please comment on today's profile 1/17. It had quite a wide IB, so I was anticipating a Normal day to the downside. However, it eventually turned into a trend day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SoulTrader,

 

I've enjoyed your posts. Please keep it up.

 

Can you please comment on today's profile 1/17. It had quite a wide IB, so I was anticipating a Normal day to the downside. However, it eventually turned into a trend day.

 

Yes, my analysis for 1/17/08 was quite wrong. TICKS was extremely weak to the upside making it very risky for any long sided trades. (I dont stay up into the afternoon often due to the time difference) I had one trade at 12408 on the long side which turned out horrible as I watched price jump 40pts in my favor and then getting stopped out at break even. I guess I was too optimistic.

 

Below shows my trade:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4801&stc=1&d=1200625245

 

Below shows a few mp explanations:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4802&stc=1&d=1200625296

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4803&stc=1&d=1200625296

 

So what to expect today?

 

My analysis for January 17, 2008 was in expectation of a rangebound day. However, TICKS were trading mainly below the zero line throughout the entire morning session hinting extreme weakness and it turned out to be a trend day. Quite interesting.

 

We can expect to see the markets take a breather after a trend day. Hence, will look to play within value. 12190 - 12420 are rough figures of the VAH, VAL extremes and will be focused on these levels as well as the previous day low.

 

Asian markets as I write this is in a complete range with absolutely no movement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4804&stc=1&d=1200625569

 

I mentioned before that I try to hold a macro view using market profile and using internals to confirm that view. Thus having an understanding of market internals is critical in my opinion. TICKS definitely did not confirm price action to remain inside of 1/16/08 range or value.

 

Will post an update if I find something new.

5aa70e3461fed_Jan.172008YMLong.jpg.61c3aeea27abe0f6630f93e20448b3da.jpg

5aa70e3468d47_Jan.172008YMChart1.thumb.jpg.591cd44c2cdebb739a7878863c4dec97.jpg

5aa70e346e4ad_Jan.172008YMChart2.jpg.7ae32fcf44ddef7564db7bada73a82bd.jpg

5aa70e34725c3_Jan.172008Nikkei.jpg.67fbb835c5021a7277bf5a8e30fc73d9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Upate for January 18, 2008

 

WOW Nikkei! After a dead morning session, afternoon session gapped up and took off. This optimism comes after the downtrend day in the US markets. I havent seen such a big rally on the Nikkie in quite some time.

 

Will look for this positivity to be transferred into the US markets and will be looking for long setups for today. Previous analysis mentioned a possible rangebound day. However, I am looking for a potential rotation back into the 1/15 - 1/16 value area.

 

Video can be view here.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4805&stc=1&d=1200634070

5aa70e3478614_Jan.172008NikkeiWow.thumb.jpg.cdc4e6b4fd7b8e309762a58dff0aa3a0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soultrader, if I may, we all have gone through the experience of market going in our favour, then sit there and see the trade get stopped out. As Mark Douglas puts it sometimes our bias of a target blinds us to the info. market is giving us.

 

I have learnt via Wyckoff and Dbphoenix to make use of Support/resistance from the left, now in that respect, although now it is hindsight observation but perhaps something to keep in mind , there was a pivot low at 12450 between 3-4p.m on your chart and the take out of that level via that wide range downbar (prior to your red arrow) on huge volume would appreciate an effort to fall, which is normally followed by some short covering (profit taking) rather than real buying effort and also the 12450 support having been broken so decisively would now represent a resistance level (breaking the ice in Wyckoff Jargon)

 

my 2 cents worth:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.