Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

That One Guy

Random?

Recommended Posts

I don't, understand why folks think the markets are random. What is the real definitions of random in the markets? I really don't know, but often when I view stocks and put random lines of support and resistance they seem to go back for years and be in play. If the markets were really random, would these lines really be in play for 30 or so years? I dunno, more I follow these markets, the more I learn to love VSA. It, just seems so right, it makes me giggle. If, I had millions, why wouldn't, I take advantage of the f*cking idiots? Follow my post in the Docs, thread and you will see my thinking to this. Happy holidays and a happy new years.'

Ps. I, am, intoxicated!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JW - it's easy for people to say the markets are random b/c from a bird's eye view they are - sometimes up, sometimes down, sometimes makes sense, sometimes doesn't, etc. etc. It's also easy for the random theorists to put holes in your 'see this trend line hold' ideas by saying you just cherry pick the obvious times a line may have held.

 

And the other side of the coin technical trader can point out many times a trend line, support area, etc. held over and over and over again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading is a curios game. It attracts some of the smartest minds there are. Yet, most traders loose. So, if the best and the brightest can not figure it out, it most be random. Or so the thought process of the 90% who fail to make money goes. Most people spend their time trying to conquer the market, rather than learning how to surrender to it. Guess which group doesn't even care if the markets are random or not ? And they aren't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember back when you first started trading? Or at least if your trading the minies, buying tops and selling bottoms using the wonder of indicators out there and wondering why every time things lined up your way and you took a trade you lost money.There is no answer to to the question of rondom vs chaotic, in my opinion the word is logical.The market will trade higher until no more buyers are willing to buy ,then sellers will sell until there is no one left to sell.Over and over the cycle goes . If your not using some way of reading order flow and volume ( market generated info not indicators) you will be forever in the dark and at the mercy of those who have taken the time to learn how to determine these things. After all the name of this game is for my account to get larger at the expense of your account.Screen time with real info will do you more good than any course or indicator,save your money for trading when you're ready. Happy holidays to all and good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remember back when you first started trading? ... buying tops and selling bottoms ... and wondering why every time things lined up your way and you took a trade you lost money.

 

Are you bugging my house?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand that the markets can move because of just one person. That's why they are random, because one person can disagree with a trendline and bid up/down the price and then the trendline is broken. If that makes sense.

 

But in all honesty, I don't believe it's random just like I don't believe anything is random. I think there are some complex mathematic equations that can predict the market and be right 100% of the time. I don't believe that will ever happen, but I think it's possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somewhen maybe James, but I don't think that will happen any time soon, it's difficult to accurately model a complex system. We certainly haven't figured out how to do it e.g. for the weather.

Remember markets are not only driven by price action alone but also by other events like wars etc. etc., basically fundamentals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, and that's why I said I don't think it would ever happen. But I do think it's possible. I don't think it will be a formula that you could just plug in a few numbers and get the answer. Maybe I don't explain what I'm talking about properly, some will understand and some won't.

 

If we have come as far as we have with physics and math, then I think it's entirely possible it could be used with the markets. I believe everything can be broken down into math and physics, but that's just my opinion.

 

But for the time being, a single trade can offset the market and make it random. But we have trendlines, support and resistance, market profile, and all those other tools that helps us rule out some of the randomness. Those tools help us break the market down into probabilities which is why trendlines work. That's also the same reason why sometimes they don't work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In chaos theory chaotic implies a higher form of order. In other words, non-randomness on a higher level. An example of this would be the fractal nature of the markets. A 5 min. chart looks like a 15 min. chart looks like a 240 minute chart. The higher timeframes tending to influence the lower ones. If markets were random this would not be the case.

 

As far as saying the markets are logical, this can't be the case. In that markets are driven by FEAR and GREED two emotions that defy all logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I think we need a definition of random before this thread goes on anymore.

 

I agree exactly with what PP says but when I'm trading I know that anything can happen therefore I believe it's random. And by random I mean when I enter my trade it could go up or down, and I don't know and that's what makes it random. Hopefully that makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And I think we need a definition of random before this thread goes on anymore.

 

I think the problem is we have a bias in everday life towards randomness being like a coin flip and not the more precise definition of a stochastic process:

"A stochastic process, or sometimes random process, is the counterpart to a deterministic process (or deterministic system) in probability theory. Instead of dealing only with one possible 'reality' of how the process might evolve under time (as is the case, for example, for solutions of an ordinary differential equation), in a stochastic or random process there is some indeterminacy in its future evolution described by probability distributions. This means that even if the initial condition (or starting point) is known, there are many possibilities the process might go to, but some paths are more probable and others less."

 

It just seems like the popular financial literature on this gets these two mixed up. Shows a chart of coin flips and how it looks just like a stock chart, hence the market must be just like flipping coins. That would only make sense if each market participant were making a buy/sell decision with one piece of information on both sides. The reality is its thousands of participants each making decisions on thousands of pieces of information. I think the markets are random as I can't think of a better definition than a stochastic process but the reason you can trade is because of the bold part in that definition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And I think we need a definition of random before this thread goes on anymore.

 

I agree exactly with what PP says but when I'm trading I know that anything can happen therefore I believe it's random. And by random I mean when I enter my trade it could go up or down, and I don't know and that's what makes it random. Hopefully that makes sense.

 

Random:

 

Having no discernible structure or repetition. An uncertain or equally probable choice or outcome, without pattern and dictated by chaos or chance.

 

Perhaps if anything can happen you mean unpredictable?

 

Financial markets are not random. Chaotic systems maybe (I'm not qualified enough to give a definitive answer), unpredictable yes.

 

Weather forecasting is a great example someone else mentioned earlier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.