Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dupaski

"Rebase" function in Tradestation

Recommended Posts

I came across the following chart on a blog (it was Teresa Lo's site). I've been trying to do this in Investor RT for a few weeks now and can only get it to a ratio chart with my primary frame of reference as a line chart.

 

I really like how it appears that Tradestation can reference the benchmark as a zero line, but I can't seem to fins anyplace else that references the "rebase" on the chart. Is that merely what the author has named the function, and if so what is the function I would be able to research in Tradestation to learn more about this.

 

Also, if anyone knows IRT and can point out how I would be able to accomplish this on that platform I would also be grateful.

 

Thanks

-Derek

01-sectors.thumb.gif.0c36ba05001e8942c7501483f257f2f0.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what is the function I would be able to research in Tradestation to learn more about this
Don't know anything about IRT but Rebase is not a built in function or indicator in TS. If your read T Lo, :
The thesis is simple. Identify sectors that begin to outperform the benchmark, get on board and rotate out when the greatest fool is securely on board. Identify sectors that have been totally beaten down and buy after all the weak longs have puked.

 

Start with a rebased chart. In this example, the S&P 500 Index is our benchmark. We plot the nine Sector SPDRs (utilities are missing for now, because my code is out at Sean’s to fix) and look at the performance since the beginning of this year.

TS allows you to insert multiple symbols as datastreams into subgraphs in a chart (as data1, data2 ....) and you can calculate a new stream output for each data in the bottom subgraph using a baseline number from eg 1/1/07 in this case. It looks like that is what Rebase is: a simple indicator calculating a ratio starting in the new year of each data to the first trading day of the year, for each sector listed.

 

If you are using IRT, you just have to find out if IRT supports inserting multiple symbols into a chart and calculate the data and output that into a subgraph or a new chart.

 

There is no reason to do this all in one chart, it just makes it easier to see the whole picture in comparing the nine sectors listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the response.

 

So the chart attached above is showing how each sector did in relation to the price of the S&P on 1/1/07?

 

The article seemed to indicate that crossing the 0 line showed outperformance of the S&P and I just assumed it was year to date, (i.e. a change in a sectors price was in relation to the change in the S&P day over day). In that scenario, if the index rose 1% and one of the SPDRs rose 1% over the same period it would register as a 0%.

 

IRT will allow for the plotting of multiple instruments on the same scale as a percentage change so I may be able to do this with that combo. It almost seems that this would be easier to do in excel.

 

 

-Derek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IRT will allow for the plotting of multiple instruments on the same scale as a percentage change so I may be able to do this with that combo
Good luck with your efforts in IRT. Here is an example of TS code that will do this:

//A look at sector rotation, plot the nine Sector SPDRs vs base line, start at 1st of the year, changeable.
INPUTS: 
MyDate(1070103),
DataNum(9); // match this with number of Datastreams;  also chart limit array set at 24

Var:
Num (0);
Array:
CloseData[24] (0);

For Num = 1 to DataNum
begin
 If date = MyDate then CloseData[num] = Close of data(num);  // assign the start date close value
end;

If date >= MyDate then
begin	
plot1 (Close of Data(1)/ CloseData[1] - 1, "Clo1" , Blue );
plot2 (Close of Data(2)/ CloseData[2] - 1, "Clo2" , Cyan );
plot3 (Close of Data(3)/ CloseData[3] - 1, "Clo3" , Red  );
plot4 (Close of Data(4)/ CloseData[4] - 1, "Clo4" , Green );
plot5 (Close of Data(5)/ CloseData[5] - 1, "Clo6" , DarkBlue);
plot6 (Close of Data(6)/ CloseData[6] - 1, "Clo6" , Magenta );
plot7 (Close of Data(7)/ CloseData[7] - 1, "Clo7" , DarkGray);
plot8 (Close of Data(8)/ CloseData[8] - 1, "Clo8" , DarkRed );
plot9 (Close of Data(9)/ CloseData[9] - 1, "Clo9" , DarkBrown);
end;

 

Sample output, top 6 symbols cut off and not shown.

attachment.php?attachmentid=4384&stc=1&d=1197175958

5aa70e2937569_NineSectorSPDRs2007-12-08_234609.png.67b87808bafc24e7385d4bfc771881dc.png

5aa70e293ac76_NineSectorLookup2007-12-08_234640.png.2992877a965cfdb1299bf629a4637df6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an awesome idea. I am wondering what changes do I have to make to utilize this intraday with like 2min or 5min charts and where all the sectors start together at the beginning of the day and spread from there intraday? Any help out there? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

janlani,

 

using thrunner's code you could probably do something like

in

inputs

change

myDate(nDate) to MyTime(0930),

 

and change

If date = MyDate then... to

if time = MyTime

 

and change

If date >= MyDate then to

if time > MyTime {and barstatus(1) = 2 {if you only need it to update at end of bar}} then...

 

and it should take off at the opening from 'rebase'

 

hth

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep on getting cannot divide by zero errors when activating it in tradestation. What am i doing wrong? I have all nine ETF loaded into the page..... Hmmmm stuck.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

//A look at sector rotation, plot the nine Sector SPDRs vs base line, start at 1st of the year, changeable.

INPUTS:

MyTime(0930),

DataNum(9); // match this with number of Datastreams; also chart limit array set at 24

 

Var:

Num (0);

Array:

CloseData[24] (0);

 

For Num = 1 to DataNum

begin

If time = MyTime then

CloseData[num] = Close of data(num); // assign the start date close value

end;

 

If time > MyTime then

begin

plot1 (Close of Data(1)/ CloseData[1] - 1, "Clo1" , Blue );

plot2 (Close of Data(2)/ CloseData[2] - 1, "Clo2" , Cyan );

plot3 (Close of Data(3)/ CloseData[3] - 1, "Clo3" , Red );

plot4 (Close of Data(4)/ CloseData[4] - 1, "Clo4" , Green );

plot5 (Close of Data(5)/ CloseData[5] - 1, "Clo5" , DarkBlue);

plot6 (Close of Data(6)/ CloseData[6] - 1, "Clo6" , Magenta );

plot7 (Close of Data(7)/ CloseData[7] - 1, "Clo7" , DarkGray);

plot8 (Close of Data(8)/ CloseData[8] - 1, "Clo8" , DarkRed );

plot9 (Close of Data(9)/ CloseData[9] - 1, "Clo9" , DarkBrown);

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The market opens at 09:30 EST. Since TS based it's timestamps on the close of the bar, the first bar will have time past 0930. If you trade 5 minute bars, the fist bar will have a timestamp of 0935. So your if statement is never true and CloseData[num] is always 0.

 

Change Mytime(0930) to MyTime(0935) in the case of 5 minute bars. If it is three minute bars, then change it to 0933, etc.

 

Since this will be evaluated at the end of the first bar now, you want to know what the open of the first bar was to rebase, so your for loop should be:

For Num = 1 to DataNum 
begin
If time = MyTime then 
CloseData[num] = Open of data(num); // assign the start date close value 
end; 

 

Also, since you are in TX and in Central timezone, make sure your charts are not setup to run in Central Time. If so, then market opens at 0830 for you in TX when it is 0930 in NY.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sevensa,

I really appreciate your time and help. I made the changes but still receive the divide by zero error regardless if I use 0830 or 0832 with 2min charts of the etf's on the page. Yes, my charts start off at 8:30am (adjusted to my time zone). I am not sure why I am getting stuck still?????

 

 

//A look at sector rotation, plot the nine Sector SPDRs vs base line, start at 1st of the year, changeable.

INPUTS:

MyTime(0832),

DataNum(9); // match this with number of Datastreams; also chart limit array set at 24

 

Var:

Num (0);

Array:

CloseData[24] (0);

 

For Num = 1 to DataNum

begin

If time = MyTime then

CloseData[num] = Open of data(num); // assign the start date close value

end;

 

If time > MyTime then

begin

plot1 (Close of Data(1)/ CloseData[1] - 1, "Clo1" , Blue );

plot2 (Close of Data(2)/ CloseData[2] - 1, "Clo2" , Cyan );

plot3 (Close of Data(3)/ CloseData[3] - 1, "Clo3" , Red );

plot4 (Close of Data(4)/ CloseData[4] - 1, "Clo4" , Green );

plot5 (Close of Data(5)/ CloseData[5] - 1, "Clo5" , DarkBlue);

plot6 (Close of Data(6)/ CloseData[6] - 1, "Clo6" , Magenta );

plot7 (Close of Data(7)/ CloseData[7] - 1, "Clo7" , DarkGray);

plot8 (Close of Data(8)/ CloseData[8] - 1, "Clo8" , DarkRed );

plot9 (Close of Data(9)/ CloseData[9] - 1, "Clo9" , DarkBrown);

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the error is obviously that at least one of your CloseData[num] values is 0. All I can suggest is to look at the actual charts for each of the datastreams and confirm that they all really have a 0832 bar and that the close value is not zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

don’t have much time here and already closed TS down but

1 use iff or related conditions to make sure each of the closeData[n] is not zero and if it is, assign an appropriate value to it ie make sure each of the data streams actually has a value at 830 etc

 

2 make sure your data starts soon enough to have large enough number of records by 830 and maybe use currentbar condition - this prob not an issue here but...

 

If you need it, hopefully someone can help you over the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.