Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Ronin

Futures Journal Log

Recommended Posts

9:34am SELL STOP 1472 Filled SOLD

 

Exit Filled 1469.50 -Reason: Gap Above, will bounce big time here

 

Target: 4 ponts 9 no time to type ! ) Canceled

 

Out Flat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of many trades done in the Traders Room:

 

(Feel sorry for Carl Futia, his Stop Loss got hit on his Long Pos for a -25.5 Pts Loss )

 

 

This Trade: Long 1471.50 at 10:45am,

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4537&stc=1&d=1197924431

5aa70e2d4b3cd_Dec-17-Monday-ESH8-5min-8hr-CANDLES-ProfitDay.thumb.PNG.0acbf76bd39336706511acec7d1d0e58.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excelent trading today on the room Ronin ¡¡ if you can explain some of your setups it will be very cool ¡¡ thanks Walter.

 

Yes, very nice trades taken today in the room Ronin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Excelent trading today on the room Ronin ¡¡ if you can explain some of your setups it will be very cool ¡¡ thanks Walter.

 

Will be willing to answer any specific questions in that regard. Price action is second nature to me after so many years so it is better to explain the methodology by answering any question you may have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... so my first question : is the bacbone of your aproach the candles patterns ? or is it the relationship of price and S&R levels or other ?

 

What starts your setup argument ? cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok... so my first question : is the bacbone of your aproach the candles patterns ? or is it the relationship of price and S&R levels or other ?

 

What starts your setup argument ? cheers Walter.

 

The aproach is based on the Candle Patterns combined with price action in relation to S/R Levels withing the 5min and 10min Time Frames.

 

The Setup starts by looking at what the reaction is to the S/R Level and then if Long Entry is chosen at a Low Risk level where the Stop Loss would be minimun.Accurate Entry is very important for Low Risk STOP Loss selection.

 

You start with the premise that if your STOP Loss is too far away because of volatitily argument then your Entry is not going to be accurate enough, and if your Entry Long or Short is not accurate then your risk of been Stoped Out is very high which translate into high stress and loss profits and defeating the whole purpose of trading.To give you a good example, look at the Entry Long of the well known market Analyst in parenthesis. His analysis was compelling convincing but his Entry and stop selection was very slopy and inacurate ( Long 1482.50, STOP 1457 , wuao !, resulting in 25.5 Pts Loss)

 

In that particular example in the Chart posted, the Entry was chosen by calculating the Retracement from the Swing High, taking into account the fact that the Key Resistance Level at 1471.75 was penetrated strongly, then it was assumed that it would continue to go UP to test the next most logical Higher Level.Notice how the Low of the Entry Bar tested exactly the 10 MA.

 

The Target is chosen depending on the Bias of the NQ and the Internals. Today it was highly risky to go Long, therefore Targets to Exit had to be chosen wisely because there was more willing Sellers than Buyers.

 

Also the price action after Entry, determines if the Long Open position will be exited at less than Target or break even. Odviously if there is no follow through when Long then, the decision has to be made in a timely manner within strict guidelines and with strict disipline.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ronin,

 

Leaving aside bias for now, do you use price action to establish your target? For example "we are going to 1471 to test that previous area of support" type of thing?

 

I noticed also you like things to work within a period of time is that along the lines of "if its not moving towards the target on this 15 minute candle Im going to scratch".

 

Thanks,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Ronin,

 

Leaving aside bias for now, do you use price action to establish your target? For example "we are going to 1471 to test that previous area of support" type of thing?

 

I noticed also you like things to work within a period of time is that along the lines of "if its not moving towards the target on this 15 minute candle Im going to scratch".

 

Thanks,

 

Targets are usually the Swing Pivots or reactions to Key Intraday Levels.

The timing requirements after Entry is a safety factor to minimize Loss and make a decison to Exit or not to exit the trade.

 

In counter-trend trades time is of the essence and 15mins was establish after many years of practicing and looking at the behavior price action of the ES and the SP.Other factors beside time comes into the decision, one of them being the testing or NOT of certain levels for a good judgment of price continuation in the direction of the Trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - one more quicky if I may. Looking at your chart I am guessing the black horizontal line segments are key levels?

 

The last one at 71.50 I guess is to do with the fib level rather than price action? I see the candle you drew from and it didn't seem that significant except it came back to test that 38.2.

 

Also I wondered why you adjusted the globex level at 88.25 to 88.50 later on?

 

Many thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8:30am - Limit BUY ZBH8 114-15

 

8:35am - FILLED , Long 114-15

 

STOP 114-11 Risk 4 Tics or $125

 

Trade Setup: Pivot was 114-15

RSI ( 5 ) = 42 and rising

 

Target 114-29 Filled +14 Tics GAIN

 

New Balance: $ 10,617.75

 

Out Flat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - one more quicky if I may. Looking at your chart I am guessing the black horizontal line segments are key levels?

 

The last one at 71.50 I guess is to do with the fib level rather than price action? I see the candle you drew from and it didn't seem that significant except it came back to test that 38.2.

 

Also I wondered why you adjusted the globex level at 88.25 to 88.50 later on?

 

Many thanks.

 

Would have to look at the chart and explain the sequence of price action. Now getting ready to trade the ES and don't have much time.Will look at it after close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10:45 Long 1458 Limit Filled - Old habits never die, picking the Low bounce

 

Trade Setup: MACD Divergence, 1min SP and Volume Osc at extreme oversold value

 

Target : 1464

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10:45 Long 1458 Limit Filled - Old habits never die, picking the Low bounce

 

Trade Setup: MACD Divergence, 1min SP and Volume Osc at extreme oversold value

 

Target : 1464

 

Out early at 1462.25 + 4.25 Pts Gain

 

Out Flat New Bal : $ 10,830.25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - one more quicky if I may. Looking at your chart I am guessing the black horizontal line segments are key levels?

 

The last one at 71.50 I guess is to do with the fib level rather than price action? I see the candle you drew from and it didn't seem that significant except it came back to test that 38.2.

 

Also I wondered why you adjusted the globex level at 88.25 to 88.50 later on?

 

Many thanks.

 

What is your trading method? need to know your trading background before further discussing my technique.

 

Notice you don't have a Profile or Trader Specs either.

 

By the way, the GLobex Level, has no relevance to my trading technique. Trivial question, lol

 

Waiting for your complete Profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I am a terrible cynic but I think the reason anyone does anything is essentially selfish. There is nothing wrong with being selfish imo. Put another way people do things for others because it makes them feel good. Or as has been said they hope to learn something through the exchange (self interest). Or they just want to 'show off' (look at me aren't I clever). I think even when we do things for our children or loved ones it is because when they feel good we feel good (so a selfish action even if for another). Even when we do things out of a sense of responsibility or guilt it is to assuage feelings within ourselves.

 

btw Isn't a speculator simply someone that assumes risk for a potential reward. Not quite sure how that fits in (yet).

 

Personally I always wanted to be hugely succesful at trading (10's or even 100's of millions). Apart from satisfying my Ego I'd really like to make a big difference in the world (money affords that opportunity). The reason? to make me feel good. (Who wouldn't feel good about improving society?) Personally I see no conflict between altruism and selfishness.

 

 

I think I know where you're coming from,

Cheers, Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - one more quicky if I may. Looking at your chart I am guessing the black horizontal line segments are key levels?

 

The last one at 71.50 I guess is to do with the fib level rather than price action? I see the candle you drew from and it didn't seem that significant except it came back to test that 38.2.

 

Also I wondered why you adjusted the globex level at 88.25 to 88.50 later on?

 

Many thanks.

 

You wrote a while back:

 

Here are are a couple of charts of the DAX that I have wanted to post for a while. There is a 3 minute and a 10 minute to give a couple of perspectives of the action.

 

One of the two remaining questions I find I ask myself asking frequently is "was that enough volume to stop the move (rather than just pause it)". The charts show the last two legs of a down move. To me they look very similar.

 

You have a down move with high volume and then a test of that area over two bars (point 1) on diminished volume. The only small clue is at point 2. Apart from that one bar before the final drop I would say the first 'bottom' looked weakest to me!

 

I'd really welcome comments as it seems the differences between the two are really subtle. Of course if we could read supply and demand with crystal clarity on every occasion then we would never have losing trades. I believe this is impossible so it is probably safe to say that it is not possible to read supply and demand with crystal clarity on every occasion!!

 

This is going to be more helpful than explaining my ES chart:

 

Remember that VSA is not everything to go with, you must see what price failed to do or what is expected to do in the next bar within the context. Do not rely on the 3min, it will drive you crazy and more confuse. Stick with the 10mins and use the 5min for accuracy of Entry.Precision and Timing is everything.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4556&stc=1&d=1198015402

5aa70e2daf666_Dax-10min-VolumeandNotesforNickBlowFish.thumb.PNG.6ca1efdef53918ce6870adeaf05f54a3.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7:56am Limit BUY 1461 Filled Long 1461

 

Target: Prev Close

 

8:30am Target getting close

 

8:45am Target Filled: +5.5 Pts GAIN

 

New Balance: $ 11,105.25 455% GAIN on Intitial Balance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You wrote a while back:

 

Here are are a couple of charts of the DAX that I have wanted to post for a while. There is a 3 minute and a 10 minute to give a couple of perspectives of the action.

 

 

Thank you for taking the time to find and annotate a chart I had posted! Pure VSAers (which I am not though I follow along hoping to improve) seem to approach slightly differently. I notice a subtle difference in your approach in so far as the price action - S/R levels appear to be key. Seems like you then use volume to help confirm or deny. Personally I also tend to look at volume over a few bars and spot changes of pace. Really price is king, despite needing fuel (volume) to drive it.

 

I think VSAers tend too break individual bars into strong/weak and look for strength to appear (e.g. selling climax). Seems that the focus is less on the context but more on what's in the background.

 

It's all good :)

 

Cheers.

 

EDIT: I guess whats in the background (strength/weakness) is context really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11:51am- Limit Buy ZBH8 at 116-25 ( Trade #5, don't have time to post all trades)

 

Filled Long 116-25 Traget 117-00 Filled , + 7 Tics GAIN= $218.75 New Bal: $11,324

 

Observations: Bid / Ask Trading Pad 11:51am

 

5 - 1

1 - 201 ( Clue that Long Trade was going to work)

6 - 25

12 - 1

2 - 4

12 - 22

24 - 29

8 - 25 Goes UP 5 Ticks: Volume +3K

 

Here is the Trade:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4577&stc=1&d=1198175124

5aa70e2e5f8cf_Dec-20-Thursday-ZBH8-5min-8hr-LongProfitTrade.thumb.PNG.e2729828f50c2c7e65b07af7f65cc02d.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4pm - Long 1474 ESH8

 

2am - Exit Target Filled: 1483 + 9 Pts GAIN, New Bal: $11,774

 

Trade Setup : NR 9 and Inside Day with CLosed near High

 

RSI(2) = 70 Rising and Vol. Osc: + 3% Rising after cross UP of 20% BUY Signal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9:30am SOLD - ZBH8, 116-02 ( Prev Low ) STOP 116-07( Swing High)

Risk 5 Tics ( $156.25)

 

Exit Target Filled: 115-18 , 16 Tics GAIN = $ 500

 

Trade Setup: Bullish Pice action in Equities and Overbought 60min Stoch.

 

New Balance: $12,274 , 513% GAIN on Initial Starting Bal. :applaud:

 

Not bad for a poor guy like me, :beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.