Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Make sure to give the CL (Crude Oil) Contract Consideration!

Recommended Posts

4 months ago I started this thread on the CL. It was more of an FYI thread.

 

Since then I've traded with limited time dedicated to the CL and recently a few things came to light as I began to monitor it more closely during the day...

 

1) This thing can move. Which is great if you are like me and like to see some pretty quick results - good or bad.

 

2) At $10/tick, it doesn't take much of these movements to make some nice profits.

 

3) With volume in the 100k - 300k range, it's fairly deep for a lesser known contract.

 

 

The reason for this new thread is to bring your attention to this contract once again and at least take a look at it during the day while you are trading. Even though the ticks are less than the ES, I am finding the movements MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT than the ES. Allow me to explain...

 

1) Today my average win was 26.3 pts and average loss was 8.88 pts. The average win equates to $260/contract. In order to make $260/contract on the ES, I would need 5.2 pts. Here's the problem - AVERAGING 5.2 pts over the day on the ES is not an easy task in my opinion. For me, on the ES, I have many profitable trades that pop for 1-3 pts approximately. So to almost double that would be difficult to say the least.

 

2) As I said, this contract will tell you pretty quick if you are right or not. I like that. I hate getting into an ES trade that can take hours to develop. With the CL, it's fairly quick.

 

3) Others have said in the other thread that CL can respect technical analysis better and I would have to agree at this point.

 

4) It is independent of the indexes and operates on it's own. If you are looking for a contract to trade that has limited correlation to an index, this could be a great fit.

 

5) Even though commissions are higher, with a larger profit target more achievable here vs. the ES, I don't consider the commissions to be a problem. Also, margins will normally be higher than $500 like the ES. Due to the volatility brokers go into protection mode. Just be aware of what your broker will charge for intraday margins before getting into a trade.

 

It's worth a look, esp if you have free data through your broker like Open ECry offers. Had it not been for this free access, I probably wouldn't have given it a look.

 

 

Before running out and trading the CL, make sure to watch it for a few days/weeks so you can really see it operates.

It can get jumpy and is not for the weak of heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it quite 'technical'? (Hows that for a vague term). Is it 'trendy' on intraday time frames ? I'll try and think of some more vague generic questions :)

 

Which exchange are you trading on? I typed in CL and 'ONE' came up.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it quite 'technical'? (Hows that for a vague term). Is it 'trendy' on intraday time frames ? I'll try and think of some more vague generic questions :)

 

Which exchange are you trading on? I typed in CL and 'ONE' came up.

 

Cheers.

 

BF -

 

1) Not sure what you mean by 'quite technical'. For me, as a candlestick trader, it works well. Not sure how other technicals would handle it.

 

2) You'll find the CL either in a strong trend or very range bound. The nice thing about those ranges is that we are not talking about 1-2 pts, like we can see on the ES. You can easily take 10+ pts on a 'range bound' CL day. I think this is why I am liking it more and more - even when range bound, it is providing profits whereas the ES is not.

 

3) It is traded on the CME through a Nymex partnership - http://www.nymex.com/CL_spec.aspx

 

note - if trading on Open ECry, the symbol is GCL. Current contract is GCLF8 on the DOM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you guys are looking for a contract that doesn't wait around and will let you know real quick if you are right or not, the CL is the place to be. So far this week the results are such that I can't even watch the ES much b/c I can't afford to miss a setup on the CL. I like quick and easy - either I am right or wrong and there's no waiting. If that suits you and your personality, the CL is one nice contract.

 

So far, 3 trades this morning at +125 pts net and working on a long position currently. 125 = $1250/CONTRACT. I would need 25 ES pts on a per contract basis to mimic that. :roll eyes:

 

Seems to me that the risk/reward over here is far superior to that of any other futures contract, incl the big boys - ES, NQ, etc. Even though the CL could be viewed as more 'risky' b/c of the volatile moves, I would actually argue that it's less risky due to the phenomenal risk/reward ratios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that long worked nicely... +148 pts on the long mentioned above.

 

You just cannot get that with ease on the ES on a per contract basis. I understand that if trading size you can, but dollar for dollar, the CL is a nice little contract to add to your arsenal. Or devote your entire trading day to it as I am seriously considering...

 

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you guys are looking for a contract that doesn't wait around and will let you know real quick if you are right or not, the CL is the place to be. So far this week the results are such that I can't even watch the ES much b/c I can't afford to miss a setup on the CL. I like quick and easy - either I am right or wrong and there's no waiting. If that suits you and your personality, the CL is one nice contract.

 

So far, 3 trades this morning at +125 pts net and working on a long position currently. 125 = $1250/CONTRACT. I would need 25 ES pts on a per contract basis to mimic that. :roll eyes:

 

Seems to me that the risk/reward over here is far superior to that of any other futures contract, incl the big boys - ES, NQ, etc. Even though the CL could be viewed as more 'risky' b/c of the volatile moves, I would actually argue that it's less risky due to the phenomenal risk/reward ratios.

 

 

Hello brownsfan,

 

I think the energy market ( Oil, NatGas) is a great place to be for profitable traders...much more interesting than most indices and currencies. However, regarding the risk/reward ratio, I'm not so sure whether oil is better than e.g. the ES.

Moves in both oil and natural gas can be so sharp and drastic that, I'm afraid, no stop loss will help if the market goes the wrong way. I know of a trader who almost lost 6k USD per 1 CL contract in one single sharp move when buses in London where bombed ( don't remember the date). He told me he did have a SL in place...I know that on the same day I was following the ES, it would have allowed you to get out of the down move with much smaller losses.

 

I personally would not want to trade CL with less than 7-8 k. These major events are rare, but they do happen, and if one made use of the low margins offered by some brokers one could go bankrupt pretty easily in a matter of seconds.

 

But nevertheless, CL is great...

 

Good trading :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, what to say. You just have to check this contract out for yourself to see if it suits you and your trading style. So far this week, every day has been a nice winner and to the point that it's challenging my ES gains and some days kicking it's butt! ;)

 

More often than not you will have to pay an extra fee to get this data turned on (free to Open ECry customers), but I would consider turning it on for December (wait until 12/3 to avoid data charges in Nov) and see what you think. I know we had/have some ER2 traders here and I think the CL blows the ER2 out of the water in terms of profit potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello brownsfan,

 

I think the energy market ( Oil, NatGas) is a great place to be for profitable traders...much more interesting than most indices and currencies. However, regarding the risk/reward ratio, I'm not so sure whether oil is better than e.g. the ES.

Moves in both oil and natural gas can be so sharp and drastic that, I'm afraid, no stop loss will help if the market goes the wrong way. I know of a trader who almost lost 6k USD per 1 CL contract in one single sharp move when buses in London where bombed ( don't remember the date). He told me he did have a SL in place...I know that on the same day I was following the ES, it would have allowed you to get out of the down move with much smaller losses.

 

I personally would not want to trade CL with less than 7-8 k. These major events are rare, but they do happen, and if one made use of the low margins offered by some brokers one could go bankrupt pretty easily in a matter of seconds.

 

But nevertheless, CL is great...

 

Good trading :)

 

Mars - We can make that same argument on ANY futures contract. Just ask anyone that was trading the ES, YM, NQ, etc. on Sept 11, 2001.

 

Drastic world events can punish (or make) you. By no means should anyone trade in anticipation of this, but the bottom line is - while your friend lost $6k, someone made $6k. Don't forget that other side of the coin. And if you are afraid of a worldly event effecting your trading, I suggest getting out of this biz now. Sooner or later, another bad incident will occur. Not if, but when...

 

Looking past these unforeseen and unpredictable events, the CL was a great week of trading for myself. I honestly cannot believe the points I took home this week. Today was by far the worst day of the week and net pts was 61.63 after commissions and fees. At $10/tick, not a bad day of work, but the absolute worst day this week for me.

 

In the end, I compare my results to the ES. 61.63 CL pts = 12.326 ES pts. Could I have made 12.326 ES pts today? Perhaps. But considering today was the worst day this week on the CL, the ES can't touch other days in terms of net points per contract.

 

For me, the real question right now is - do I focus 100% on the CL where I can trade less in terms of number of contracts (and much lower commission costs as a result) or trade the ES, but in much higher increments. If my goal is to equal the returns in the ES that I am seeing in the CL, the ONLY way to do that consistently is to increase the size I am trading and only compare actual net dollars.

 

Point being - I can trade less contracts on the CL, pay quite a bit less in commissions and make more money.... This would free up SO MUCH trading capital that I wouldn't know what to do with the excess cash! ;) I can accomplish my income goals with less money tied up in a futures account that earns next to nothing when the money is sitting there...

 

Some food for thought.

 

Thanks for stopping by to the thread Mars and welcome to the board! I thought I was discussing the CL w/ myself. :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello brownsfan,

 

thank you for welcoming me "aboard". Judging from what I have read on this board so far, I think it is a very nice website. Very informative, and less negativity than on other boards.

I also like the fact that several users here are into Market Profile...which I am trying to get into more deeply.

 

Regards,

Mars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Looking past these unforeseen and unpredictable events, the CL was a great week of trading for myself. I honestly cannot believe the points I took home this week. Today was by far the worst day of the week and net pts was 61.63 after commissions and fees. At $10/tick, not a bad day of work, but the absolute worst day this week for me.

 

For me, the real question right now is - do I focus 100% on the CL where I can trade less in terms of number of contracts (and much lower commission costs as a result) or trade the ES, but in much higher increments. If my goal is to equal the returns in the ES that I am seeing in the CL, the ONLY way to do that consistently is to increase the size I am trading and only compare actual net dollars.

 

Point being - I can trade less contracts on the CL, pay quite a bit less in commissions and make more money....

 

Just a word of advice Brown, don't get too excited over a week of oil trading. It's normal to have great gains in CL, but you need these to buffer the big losses you'll eventually get, and they will come sooner or later. The oil market is funny this way, you can get these huge gains but then it can evaporate quick. The swings are fast and furious but it's also great like you said if you don't like waiting.

 

What I mean is, don't look at a weeks performance too critically. I would say, compare your results after 6 months of CL trading vs the Index trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it quite 'technical'? (Hows that for a vague term). Is it 'trendy' on intraday time frames ? I'll try and think of some more vague generic questions :)

 

Cheers.

 

From my experience, CL is most of the time not trendy on intra-day time frames. There are some days where you get really nice trends, good quality, and on these days gains come quick and fast, but most of the time it's pretty choppy and erratic. It's like any market, you get good days then ugly days....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello brownsfan,

 

However, regarding the risk/reward ratio, I'm not so sure whether oil is better than e.g. the ES.

Moves in both oil and natural gas can be so sharp and drastic that, I'm afraid, no stop loss will help if the market goes the wrong way.

Good trading :)

 

In my opinion, no market is better than any other. We trade what we trade, and if we feel more comfortable in one than another - then stick with it. What you are witnessing with CL is a difference in leverage than the ES. Changes in gearing change the feel. For example if you want fast moves, then Henry Hub NG is the market for you. The leverage is high and the moves are fast even for 1 contract it carries good leverage.

 

As far as getting fleeced in the energy markets, yes, with even a single contact like NG, if something goes wrong like a technical problem, you could potentially get hurt much quicker than 1 CL contract or 1 ES contract, simply due to the gearing. The gearing is higher, so if you get a runnaway market (and it happened to me once but I minimized the pain) and your stop doesn't execute, it can get a little hairy. But nobody should even enter these commodity markets unless they are aware of these risks, and are willing to lose that kind of money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.