Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jim2000

Writing Naked Calls

Recommended Posts

Writing anything naked is really risky. If you're interested in writing and receiving premium, then sell call spreads. You're hedged that way and the margin required is much less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Writing anything naked is really risky. If you're interested in writing and receiving premium, then sell call spreads. You're hedged that way and the margin required is much less.

 

I understand the risk that the stock could skyrocket up, you get assigned and have to buy the stock at e.g. 70 to sell it at 55, a loss of 1500 per contract. But who would be stupid enough to do that?

 

What do you think of this scenario?

 

When you sell a naked call you don't care which direction underlying goes. It goes down, that is great. It goes up, you buy the stock just below the strike price to cover. If price stays below strike at expiration, great. Then either sell stock or write covered call. At this point there are many strategies to employ.

 

Am I missing something?

 

Who would be foolish enough to not cover if the underlying was approaching the strike?

 

Any thoughts on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do see your point there...I guess a lot of people would prefer to sell options hedged with options so their not having to tie up all their margin in a few trades. Its a huge margin risk to calculate your returns on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do see your point there...I guess a lot of people would prefer to sell options hedged with options so their not having to tie up all their margin in a few trades. Its a huge margin risk to calculate your returns on.

 

Yeah, but it is almost a no lose trade. That is if you watch it carefully.

 

Also, on paper it's a huge margin risk, but in reality there is no risk, zero risk, because you will cover the call at, or just before the strike if needed, even just above strike is ok. If after buying the stock it starts to drop, just sell it at market

above the breakeven point.

 

You enter the trade receiving, not spending, cash.

It doesn't matter if the underlying goes up or down.

Even if it goes above the strike before you can act you have a cushion to

work with, the premium you received.

Sell a call near the expiration to avoid the need to watch it closely for 5 or

6 weeks.

You don't need to study charts to pick a good company, just look at the

options chains for different stocks until you find an option with

a high enough premium to make it worth the while. Probably at least $1

All you really need to do is be prepared to buy the stock, no problem

If it does go above the strike if the option is excercised that's ok because

chances are you will still be within your profit zone, if not and you take

a small loss, that will happen from time to time, but not often

 

Like I said before, a gap up before you buy the stock, or a gap down after buying the stock are the 2 risks to this trade.

 

Oh, this is all my opinion, not a recommendation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was an options market maker for many years and have seen writing naked calls done over time.

 

If the trader has some expertise then it works for a time and profits get re-invested and size increases until the day when an unexpected event happens and the trader goes bankrupt.

 

I've seen it happen over a dozen times in the last 20 years. A great example was on Comex Gold in the late 1980's. Look it up. They were smart rich guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was an options market maker for many years and have seen writing naked calls done over time.

 

If the trader has some expertise then it works for a time and profits get re-invested and size increases until the day when an unexpected event happens and the trader goes bankrupt.

 

I've seen it happen over a dozen times in the last 20 years. A great example was on Comex Gold in the late 1980's. Look it up. They were smart rich guys.

 

Thanks Momentom,

 

I appreciate your reply, and I will heed your words.

 

I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

 

Thanks again. I appreciate your perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Momentom,

 

I appreciate your reply, and I will heed your words.

 

I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

 

Thanks again. I appreciate your perspective.

 

You want to be in a liquid market as well. You need to be able to move the underlying or move the options quickly, or you can get caught. And overleveraging is very risky, but unlikely in stock options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll look up Comex Gold and study that situation. I'm assuming these smart rich guys got cocky, greedy, and over leveraged.

You don't have to look very far or be very cocky to lose when you write options, btw, all these talk of market manipulation below should be prefaced as "alleged". A lot of market makers will claim market manipulation when they lose, which they almost never do when they make money :

Options

Interactive Brokers Cries Foul

Liz Moyer, 07.06.07, 4:00 PM ET

 

For the second time since its public stock debut in May, derivatives trading giant Interactive Brokers Group says options market manipulation is weighing on its business.

 

The firm was hit with a $37 million loss in May because of manipulative trading activities on the German electronic stock market, it said in a regulatory filing late Thursday. News of the loss and its potential effect on second-quarter revenues sent shares of Interactive (nasdaq: IBKR - news - people ) down nearly 8% in heavy trading Friday.

 

Interactive Brokers says several other market makers were also affected by the trading, which is being investigated by German financial regulators, and that their losses are also believed to be "substantial."

 

The activity happened in shares of German company Altana (nyse: AAA - news - people ), which had declared a special dividend early in May to coincide with the sale of its pharmaceuticals division. On the ex-dividend date, 31 million shares, or about 44% of Altana's outstanding shares, crossed the electronic Xetra market. The price dropped 25%, pushing the price of the related options "into the money." Interactive Brokers, as a market maker for Altana, ended up on the wrong side of those trades, to the tune of $37 million.

 

Altana's shares recovered the next day, shooting up 64% after those who sold the previous day to avoid the taxes on the dividend payment bought up shares.

 

Interactive Brokers claims traders "unlawfully colluded" to manipulate the stock.

 

It's not the first time Interactive has claimed market manipulation is costing it money. In May, after its highly anticipated initial public offering, the firm announced a $25 million loss as a result of being on the wrong end of trades. The trading activity suggested some were taking advantage of non-public information in advance of major corporate announcements.

 

Several other options market making firms, including closely held Peak6 in Chicago and Goldman Sachs (nyse: GS - news - people ) in New York, have complained that possible manipulation is cutting into revenues. There are a limited group of such firms, but they control about 44% of trading, according to Options Clearing Corp. As the name implies, options market makers arrange orderly trading in options between buyers and sellers. When a client goes to sell and there is a lack of buyers, the market maker puts his own firm's capital at risk to make the trade. When a customer wants to buy and there are no sellers, the market maker pulls from his own firm's inventory.

 

In recent months, there have been some days when demand for certain call options--a bet that the underlying stock is about to rise in price--overwhelmed supply, and Interactive Brokers had to meet the demand. That meant it was on the hook to lose if the stock shot up, which happened a few times during the first quarter, hence the $25 million shortfall.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You don't have to look very far or be very cocky to lose when you write options, btw, all these talk of market manipulation below should be prefaced as "alleged". A lot of market makers will claim market manipulation when they lose, which they almost never do when they make money :

 

Blaming someone else when things go poorly and taking full credit when things go well? Frankly I am shocked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.