Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique Nov 2007

Recommended Posts

Once again thanks for your excellent analysis in terms of "If...Then" Scenario for Wednesday, 7-11, Dogpile. very profitable.

 

After a WRD , once again we could be in for a 80/20 trade (Linda Raschke) ,

20/20 of Arthur Ullirich (Tradetutor).

5aa70e1d80481_ES5MIN.gif.51ae95b7f5854c042dd3f51ce2fe0b2f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wednesdays trading session was quite clean:

 

after 2 'low to high' days, we traded 'high to low'

 

the market tested up into 1514.25 resistance (previous days highest volume price) for a beautiful morning reversal opportunity to enter for the 'high to low' day.

 

note that the market tested towards the 15-min 20ema FIRST. The market will test this ema on the vast majority of days so if it starts too far away from it, it often will 'correct' towards it at some point. measuring the distance to the 15-min ema is a very nice and simple way to measure 'location'.

 

also, the early afternoon move up towards VWAP never 'accepted' the VWAP price. It tested under it and rejected it. This information is very valuable. Along with -2500 breadth (advances - declines) and 'down volume' that swamped 'up volume', you had nice tape-reading signals to tell you the odds remained on the short-side. these signals were loud and clear that this could truly be a dynamic down day (this kind of day is rare so have to 'go with' it when it does happen).

 

the day was a bit unusual in that it broke lower much earlier than it has done on other strong down days. but, the market clearly alternates in it tendencies. this is why the concepts are really the important thing. focus on the concepts and integrate them with right-brain thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dogpile:

 

I have enjoyed reading this thread. You recently pointed out the market's tendency to chop around and build large volume around a particular price before trending away from that area. This concept was something I never paid any attention to but after reading this thread I now notice it on (nearly) a daily basis. Yesterday for example, we built some nice volume in the 1508 area before negative up/dn volume completely took over and the bottom dropped out.

 

BTW, I also enjoyed your prior thread with outlook/chat on the weekly ES action. In a nutshell, thanks for your contributions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This concept was something I never paid any attention to but after reading this thread I now notice it on (nearly) a daily basis.

 

of course, the day I posted it was the rare exception to the rule. but this is where 'tape-reading' gets crucial. you can stay out of a lot of trouble if you can develop a sense for action consistent with a trend vs action consistent with range-trading.

 

yesterday was truly rare action. in fact, the highest volume price of the day was only 39,917 contracts (1482.75). This is the lowest daily PVP since I started tracking this a few months ago. This might be a 'tell'.... I do know that tracking this has been very important as extremely high PVP's become very important pivots. what a super-low PVP means? well, I suspect it means that this is VERY strong trending behavior and we could be going much lower. But I am not sure b/c I don't have much history with the super low ones. Perhaps it just is indicator of extreme panic? I don't know but I don't think it is logical to think that few buyers showing up low in the range is a good thing.

 

watching the daily volume distribution build every day certainly has been helpful for me. integrating this with Taylor is even more helpful. Adding in some market profile and some oscillator patterns has been fascinating mix for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

review for Thursday:

 

Had Low Violation in morning

Formed range trading around previous days low price (1478.75 area)

Market then tested up towards 15-min 20ema

Then Broke Lower (momentum away from VWAP)

Test up fell short of VWAP

Formed Higher Afternoon Low

Broke Up Through VWAP and rallied hard

Traded 'High To Low'

 

2 high to lows in a row now

 

1478.00 was Peak Volume Price

 

Since 1478.75 was previous day low and now we have a PVP at 1478.00, I think this is becoming an important price pivot. Watch action closely around this level.

 

strange sidenote:

NQ dropped -3.4% today while Russell closed up +0.21%

NQ futures were actually limit down at one point today (-100 pts)

5aa70e1dc7073_Nov8ThuFinalTaylor.thumb.png.9152be060dc96f70c0bbc599dadbc452.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1478.75 was previous day low and now we have a PVP at 1478.00, I think this is becoming an important price pivot. Watch action closely around this level.

 

this isn't magic, just monitoring the high-volume zones and highs and lows. Todays afternoon high was 1478.50 and then it reversed by -24 pts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Review for Friday Nov 9, 2007

 

Today was good example of Taylor concepts defining trading

 

1) we had a very low start due to a large gap down. but given the high close of the previous day, we did not violate the previous day low right away. when starting far below the 15-min 20-ema, the market often trades towards this level FIRST. this is what happened on Friday. (note that the overnight move as measured from the 4pm close into the opening bar low was negative -2.0% --- this is the equivalent of an entire 'trend day' happening in the overnight session. this is a massive gap and given our tendency (per Taylor) to look for 'morning reversals' -- shorting right off the bat was not a high-odds trade. note though that there was no 'low violation' right off the bat.).

 

2) after testing the 15-min 20-ema on an up-move, 'location' has now improved for a short (remember, there had been no 'low violation' so fading the initial move up for a 'morning reversal' is reasonable Taylor type of play. the market did reverse and proceeded down until it made its 'low violation'. note that coming into the day, we already had 2 'high to low' days. at this point, we had a third day. now, you have to think. you have had a very large move down. you have a 'low violation' and it was still 'morning session'. after 2 high to low days and a 'morning low violation' --- the Taylor play is to look for a potential LONG.

 

3) the market went and 'accepted' VWAP, confirming the LONG bias. at this point, the market is either going up or its going to chop sideways. in order to short here, I think you need 'renewed downside momentum' away from VWAP. Thus, the default play here is to be long.

 

4) the market did chop sideways for a while (consistent with my 40k contract-rule) then broke UP until reaching its key resistance near 1478.00-1478.75. This was important pivot for 2 reasons:

a) 1478.75 was Wednesdays low for the day --- and highs and lows are important.

b) it was Thursdays highest volume price --- and the daily PVP's are important. (note that this was a significant 'volume price' as over 60k contracts traded at 1478.00 on Thursday --- program trading algorithms seem to respond to these key daily PVP's quite reliably).

 

5) After testing this key pivot, it drove down hard. Note that the entire move up was on low-volume and actually led by the lagging financial sector. After a LONG move up and a test into key resistance, a short here is a reasonable play for at least a short-term trade. You can see how the 'higher timeframe' is in a downtrend and that this was confirmed by aggressive selling to end the day as 'higher timeframe players' came in and sold.

 

3977d1194701407-taylor-trading-technique-nov-2007-nov-9-fri-final-intraday-summary.png

5aa70e1e838e9_Nov9FriFinalIntradaySummary.thumb.png.505c2493899f528000e895119a9fe8c5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Review of Monday Nov 12, 2007

 

Had 1 'Low to High' coming into the day = neutral factor

Had 'low violation' in opening few minutes = factor to look long

Price traded 14-15 pts below 15-min 20-EMA = factor to look long

 

Market traded up and through 15-min EMA. Then tested Fridays PVP of 1465.00 = factor to look short. It then flirted around this pivot and eventually got to 1469.25 before making high for day.

 

Have seen this a lot recently where price tests 4-5 pts above/below the key PVP before reversing. Seems to really want to shakeout a lot of traders watching that level before it reverses. Today was no different.

 

the market then chopped around on opposite sides of VWAP (1460.00). I generally look for 40k contracts to trade at a single price before a directional move occurs. This was good today as S&P's didn't move directionally until they printed 40,903 contracts at 1461.00. The market then did a late vertical plunge all the way down to 1439.50, closing far below 'value'. Down volume swamped up volume in the final hour of trading. Somewhat odd action, IMO. Why did the market let longs out during the day only to plunge at the end of the day? Usually, if the market wants to go down, the bias is for the market to go down hard early in the day and force the weak longs out at bad prices. Today, the market let longs out and then tanked at the end. Perhaps this is a sign of a mini-capitulation? The 'profile shape' does not suggest continuation. Note that Market Profile concept is that a close far away from the days 'value' is most often a 'fade' if the profile shape is not 'elongated'.

 

Note that 1438.50 was the lowest price that has traded since the Fed first eased in that surprise 50 basis points on August 17. The futures tested this level after the close. Will 'value' migrate down tomorrow towards/below this level or was today a 'bear trap' whereby price will revert towards the prior days value? We will have to see but 1438.50 is the key pivot to watch for now...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3991&stc=1&d=1194931422

5aa70e1ef2a23_Nov12MonFinalIntradaySummary.thumb.png.86ae540d7e966e886c1ca2596a42aa46.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dogpile,

Correct me if I am wrong

 

Monday was High to Low following from Friday,

Tuesday expected to a buy day "Low to High" , hence Tuesday can be considered as Sell day, and it did turn out to be "High to Low"

 

So a Buy Day followed by a Sell day, so today it should in theory be a Short Sell Day, "High to Low"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes,

 

note we started out -20pts vs the 15-min 20-ema so we needed to work-off oversold situation. we also had a 'low violation' early on. this argues for a long trade. after we trade towards the 15-min EMA, location is now set-up for the High first...

 

Note that there is strong support in the 61.00 - 61.50 area so look to exit shorts above that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yes,

 

note we started out -20pts vs the 15-min 20-ema so we needed to work-off oversold situation. we also had a 'low violation' early on. this argues for a long trade. after we trade towards the 15-min EMA, location is now set-up for the High first...

 

Note that there is strong support in the 61.00 - 61.50 area so look to exit shorts above that.

 

Thanks again for that insight, greatly appreciated. Beginning to get some sense out of this TT stuff.

We ended up with "High to Low" yesterday, and the momentum was such that it broke through the support zone, hene following the analysis, a buy day can be expected especially with LV on the open, i.e Low to High.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dogpile,

Today looks like somewhat similar to last Friday, except that it is a gap up, then the prices test the yesterdays low,, could the rally be sustained so that it would end up as "Low to High" day , remains to be seen,

 

Still that expectation of the test meant that a short after the open was a high probability and also the bounce for quick 10-15min trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

after 2 high to lows, a possible taylor buy is a 'higher bottom'

 

there are 2 entries he looked for, the low violation or the 'higher bottom....

 

today looks like higher bottom buy day...

 

expiration friday can be tough though in afternoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
after 2 high to lows, a possible taylor buy is a 'higher bottom'

 

there are 2 entries he looked for, the low violation or the 'higher bottom....

 

today looks like higher bottom buy day...

 

expiration friday can be tough though in afternoon

 

Friday turned out to be zig zag day (LBR Term) after a wide range on Thursday and also a "Low to High" day , (the second bottom came within a tic though of the prior test). and the previous 1460 support zone turned to resistance.

 

Monday therefore in theory we should see higher prices in which pros. would be selling i.e a Sell Day, and Tuesday therefore a SS day. Hope I am on the right track, we will see how all this pans out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

S&P's did run nearly +20pts up off the 'higher bottom'... you can see how as soon as it fulfilled the 'low to high' move, it reversed. it was its own little 'intraday high violation' after a +20 pt move up.

 

The day ended up a NR7 (narrowest bar of last 7) and an 'inside day'... A narrow, inside day can be a 1-bar breakout pattern so need to think about Monday being a potentially dynamic day with 'range expansion'. a morning high/low violation is still a 'potential' fade but need to be careful as we could get a strong directional move out of the NR7/ID. Will have to monitor volume/breadth and range expansion off opening price.

 

It looks to me like we have had good buying low in the large trading range and that Fridays afternoon 'higher low' might have been a 'tell'... On the other hand, we are still stuck right in a price zone that has built up a ton of volume now near 1461.00. We have not seen any sustained 'initiative' selling below 1461.00 yet. The Thursday-Friday action does not suggest immediate 'downside continuation' to me... Thursdays down day was on weak volume and Friday made a 'higher low' so maybe next auction is up. We'll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a preliminary read of some of the chapter in Taylor's book , especially the one on Pertinent points, am ignoring the chapters 2-4.

You are right Dogpile, the head starts to get dizzy after a while:confused:, have go in the garden to cogitate and assimilate in small doses, however it looks like with some effort and persistance, one can get a handle on it.

 

Overall it is a matter of observing 3-4day swings and making note of their highs and lows and really noting the price action against those for intraday trading , I think the explanations on the central concepts outlined on this thread and the previous one help a great deal in the learning curve.

Keep it up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting correlation with European Markets:

 

Recently the European markets have been leading the US markets, there was a time when it was the other way around, how long this lasts , who knows. Has also been commented upon by some lady traders like Linda Raschke , Nazila Jafari (Top Dax, S&P, Euro trader and a coach, shame she prefers to coach women primarily:rolleyes:, interviewed in http://www.traders-mag.com, Jan 2005)

 

Linda also in one of her interviews states "The Dax is more indicative of Dowtype stocks, while the EuroStoxx is more indicative of the S&Ps and is actually the more active liquid trading contract by about 3 times", she notes,

"What you'll find is, if you pull up a 15Min Eurostoxx chart and observe a strong uptrend, I could just by the S&P futures right then and have very high odds of a winning trade"

 

Lets see the Monday 19th Nov action via TT:

 

1. Wed 14th Nov ---"High to Low" ----- Sell day ??

2. Thur 15th Nov ---"High to Low" -------SS day

3. Fri 16th Nov ---"Low to High" , close near to open ----Buy day ???

 

4, Monday 19th, "Sell day anticipated --- Low to High"

 

On the dax market gaps down , so as per TT, the shorting opportunity would be after a rally, which occurs in the 1st hour and creates a lower high near the previous days High, ideal place to short, the prices then head south for a drop of over a 100 pts. Hence this would conform to TT and would be a Sell Day,

 

5. This weakness is mirrored right from the open on YM and ES. Now can this be considered not only as a sell day but also one where the Low of the Buy day has been violated, if so what is anticipated for Tuesday,

 

6. Following the ideal sequency of SS day, buy day, sell day, it should be a SS day or because of that violation of low of Buy day, could it be a buy day i.e test of low, or gap up, sell off, formation of higher low????

 

Any comments from TT experts here.

5aa70e24428c5_DAX15min.gif.c5cf5440c0d9184d6a27d089a32148f7.gif

5aa70e24484a3_ES15Min.gif.154eb06fdbae736ba9b9b8879db6d626.gif

5aa70e244d1b0_TRADINGWITHTHEWOMANSTOUCH.gif.1b1cfbb11f4c29a11148d96932f8af73.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Review of last few days. There is not necessarily a 'Taylor Play' every day. For example, as noted before, an 'inside day' can set-up a breakout where the H or L violation is a 'go-with' -- not a fade.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4201&stc=1&d=1195737387

5aa70e24d8f2c_Nov21Wed2007Taylor.thumb.png.e3a424e0ced27534e5041a4a6436c9d4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Review of last few days. There is not necessarily a 'Taylor Play' every day. For example, as noted before, an 'inside day' can set-up a breakout where the H or L violation is a 'go-with' -- not a fade.

 

 

Have been following your thread with great interest, think your modification on the Taylor method especially using Market Profile etc, appears to be more suited to today's markets.

How do you read this past week's market action in the context of your method.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote a long and detailed response and then proceeded to erase it by accident. The net of it was that this was a great week to be a Taylor/Market Profile disciple. I have annotated a chart and hopefully it makes some sense as I don't want to write out my entire post again.

 

Maybe someone else can take a crack at a detailed write-up of this week.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4295&stc=1&d=1196610252

5aa70e2713097_Nov30WeekSummary.thumb.png.2d888729af7a95a5b358574cd059e334.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • re TikTok Recently metafakebook made what was apparently a move to stay aligned with ‘culture’ - no more fact ‘checking’, no more censorhip... basically ‘Zucker’ was shown that his mission was failing because they were only building profiles on ‘useful idiots’ instead of those who oppose the great centralization  (... just like long ago he only saw campus potential and had to be shown the promise and rewarded for fronting the great spyware and social engineering project called Fakebook)... ie they could have replaced him long ago In the same vein, who holds ‘title’ to tiktok doesn’t matter either... it will remain a spyware project regardless of who ‘buys’ it... and the data will forever be available to the CCP Just sayin’
    • Omobola,  As an engineer surely you have money to buy a ticket to Monterey, Mexico... just a hop and a jump from there to Texas...  hth zdo 
    • Date: 20th January 2025.   The NASDAQ Rises As Trump Inauguration Edges Closer!   US indices increased in value for the first time after struggling for 5 consecutive weeks. Of the main US indices the NASDAQ witnessed the strongest gains (4.12%). Risk indicators point to a higher risk appetite under the new US President, Donald Trump. President Trump's inauguration will take place this afternoon and has promised to sign over 100 consecutive orders within his first week. NASDAQ - Higher Investor Confidence! NASDAQ traders begin to stomach less frequent interest rate adjustments, the market turns its attention to earnings and Trump’s presidency. Investors are becoming more bullish under expectations that Trump will apply policies to support the US economy and entice further investment into the US stock market. A "risk-on" sentiment is evident in today's sessions, reflected in risk indicators like the VIX, High-Low Index, and Bond yields.     Investors this week will concentrate on two factors. The first factor is Trump’s consecutive orders which he has advised will be signed within his first week. Investors will closely monitor how and if these policies influence the US economy and stocks. The second factor is earnings season, which will start to gain momentum this week. Tomorrow, Netflix will release its quarterly earnings report after the market closes. Netflix is the NASDAQ’s 10th most influential company and 11th most impactful stock. Analysts expect the company’s earnings per share to drop from $5.40 to $4.21, but for Revenue to rise to $10.11 Billion. If Netflix is able to beat the earnings per share and revenue expectations, fundamental elections would indicate a rise in the price. Over the past 12 months the price has risen 76%. A further increase would further support the NASDAQ. Thereafter, investors will turn their attention to Intuitive Surgical’s earnings report. Currently, investors believe the company’s earnings per share and revenue will rise compared to the previous quarter. Intuitive’s stock has risen by more than 9% in the past week alone indicating that investors believe the company will continue to beat earnings expectations. The company has beat expectations over the past 12-months. How are Markets Reacting to Trump's inauguration? Trump pledged to issue executive orders aimed at advancing artificial intelligence programs and establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Analysts expect these two alone to support US stocks. However, investors are not yet certain to what extent upcoming tariffs will pressure the NASDAQ and stocks. During the previous trade wars, the NASDAQ fell by 25% over a period of 4-months. Traders also should note that the NASDAQ rose in the 6-weeks after Trump won the elections. Over the past week, the VIX index fell by more than 12% indicating that the market believes US stocks will perform well under a Trump presidency. Simultaneously, US Bond yields have fallen from 4.80% to 4.58% which is known to positively influence the US stock market. Both the VIX and lower bond yields indicate higher investor confidence as Trump advises that policies will prompt more employment, US made products and more pro-US policies. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis The price of the NASDAQ trades above the 200-bar Moving Average on a 5-minute Chart indicating bullish price movement. Moving Averages have also crossed over upwards and the price trades above the VWAP indicating that the asset is maintaining its bullish momentum. Price action is also forming clear higher highs and higher lows, but investors will be cautious if the price does not find resistance at the $21,637 resistance level. In order to break above this level, investors will be hoping for positive earnings data from Netflix and Intuitive.     Key Takeaways: President Trump's inauguration will take place this afternoon with promise to sign over 100 consecutive orders within his first week. US indices rise after 5 weeks of declines, with the NASDAQ leading at 4.12%. Trump pledged to issue executive orders aimed at advancing artificial intelligence programs and establishing the Department of Government Efficiency. Analysts expect Netflix earnings per share to drop from $5.40 to $4.21, but for Revenue to rise to $10.11 Billion. Investors are becoming more bullish under expectations that President Trump will apply policies to support the US economy and entice further investment into the US stock market. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Consider: some 80% of small to medium-sized businesses around the world don’t have a website.   Many businesses in emerging economies rely on social media platforms (e.g., WhatsApp, Facebook) as their primary digital presence instead of formal websites.   But even in more digitally advanced economies, the number can hover around half.   Why? Simple answer: although we’ve made it easier to make a website, it’s still not easy enough.   Let’s say a yoga instructor wants to offer online classes but lacks tech skills or a budget.   Instead of struggling with confusing platforms, she tells her AI agent, “Set up a website for me to host yoga classes.”   The AI handles everything.   It integrates Stripe for payments, Zoom for live classes, scheduling services for in-person classes, and a chat module for inquiries.   It even suggests templates.   When the instructor picks one and asks for a purple and white color scheme, the AI updates it instantly.   No coding. No frustration. Just results.   And the best part? She didn’t have to touch a single screen or key.   This is the future Wilson describes in Age of Invisible Machines.   And, as mentioned, it’s powered by three core technologies:   Conversational User Interfaces (CUIs): Say what you need; the system handles it. From building websites to booking flights, it’s fast and human-like.   Composable Architecture: Traditional business solutions become “modules”. Like LEGO bricks, modular tools—payments, chats, scheduling—snap together to create custom solutions without starting from scratch.   No-Code Programming: AI agents code for you, empowering anyone to create without needing a developer. It’s not just a better way to interact with technology…   It’s a complete reimagining of how industries operate.   As Harvard Business School’s Marco Iansiti says, “This isn’t disruption—it’s a fundamental shift in production and interaction.”   And, the thing is…   It’s not just possible. It’s already happening.   Early examples are already here. – Chris Campbell, AltucherConfidential Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • Question: My name is Omobola Sikiru from Lagos, Nigeria. I am mechanical engineering. Where can I find someone that can be my helper to relocate me to the USA?   Answer: According to your own profile, you are trying to enter other countries through deception and immigration fraud.   You are an engineer in Nigeria, but you are not licensed as an engineer in any other country.   There are no helpers, no sponsors, and nobody is going to give you money, get you an engineering job, or get you a visa.   You must qualify to immigrate. Nobody can help you with that.   Either you qualify and have settling in money, or you don’t.   You need to improve your English before trying to get a job in a Western, English speaking country. Engineers write reports. You wrote, ‘I am mechanical engineering’. Nobody will hire you if you write like this. Rathkeale Source: https://www.quora.com/My-name-is-Omobola-Sikiru-from-Lagos-Nigeria-I-am-mechanical-engineering-Where-can-I-find-someone-that-can-be-my-helper-to-relocate-me-to-the-USA   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.