Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Discretionary and Mechanical Trading: Finding Balance

Recommended Posts

I wanted to start a new thread as I have recently gone through a transformation in my trading. For the past 3 years, I have been a purely discretionary trader relying on volume, tape, and market profile.

 

With a new market (shift from US futures to Nikkei futures) I had to dump all of my methodology and find new techniques to trade. Market profile is not a tool available through my current platform and prop firm, VSA techniques do not work as well with the Nikkei, and market profile is not as efficient.

 

First, the Nikkei gaps every single day due to the US markets and the time difference. On many occasions, the previous day profile becomes absolutely useless due to these gaps. There are no premarket sessions and as a result you can not see any premarket support or resistance. Gaps tend to not fill as well. So basically, all I have learned trading the US futures did not work with the Nikkei futures.

 

I struggled to find a methodology to trade this market. I first starting drawing MP charts manually, then started filtering out the tape, then started to focus on candlevolume charts. I realized that this market was dominated by automated systems and big lot scalpers.

 

Here is what I have done that has transformed my way of trading. I never thought I would become this type of trader. My trading is now 70% automated. I have about 6 strategies that look to exploit rejection patterns and follow trends. These are all automated through excel and give me buy/sell signals for various instruments and timeframes. I also apply parameters based on open/close/low/high/volume.

 

The only discretionary part is to decide whether to take the signal and my exit on my last quarter position. (3/4 position is fixed targets per strategy)

 

This has really changed the way I approach trading as it has taken away alot of the emotional elements of trading.

 

First, 2 years of data mining the Nikkei futures has showed me that the market trends intraday only about 25% of the time. Therefore, the edge lies in reversals and fading IB breakouts.

 

How many traders here use both a mechanical and discretionary approach in trading? The number one element that changed my trading is how I used to be glued to tape. Now, I hardly look at any charts but watch spreadsheets all day long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How has the transition from a system you've developed for over 4 years to this new spread sheet type trading effected you James? It must be a real shock to your system to have to basically learn to trade all over again!

 

Has your new system produced decent results for you?

 

Sounds all very interesting but also I can't imagine looking at spread sheets all day, would do my head in!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first month was extremely suprising and frustrating as most of the techniques that I am familiar with did not work. I spent hours and hours backtesting momentum strategies, chart patterns, candle based conditionals, and this is what I was able to come up with in approximately 1 month. I am still brainstorming strategies and devising them as the day progresses. But unlearn and learning is a very hard process.

 

I have attached a snapshot of my semi-automated trading system. Other than this, I scalp off the tape on a few stocks and the index futures through tape.

 

Spreadsheet.JPG

 

Note that I do not take any signals after 2:30pm. Anything after 3:10pm represents evening session hours in which there is hardly any liquidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that you're operating on a slightly higher time frame than when you first started making videos on this site. I can't tell for sure but are you becoming more of a counter trend trader now? The 5 and 30 min time frames would make it easier to set up your trades when trading off the spread sheet like that. Hehe I feel sorry for your eyes though!

 

Btw love your little TRIN calculator :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have mulled over your quite though provoking post. Despite this the thoughts have not really crystallised so I'll just spurt a couple of ideas out half baked!

 

Firstly congratulations, I think its probably a mark of great maturity as a trader that you can change markets and methods and do what it takes to get the job done. Tools are just that - its the cook that makes the meal not the robocheff 2000 delux food processor.

 

Markets sometimes just act up or maybe the trader is just off his game....I think even if he is off his game markets still 'act up' sometimes. For example recently the DAX has been 'weird' with regards volume and spread.

 

Sometimes tools need a tune up for a market. I was thinking MP - for example if there are gaps use something like Jerry's developing MP for the current day, or the MP for the last time that price traded at this level. If Use VSA on hourly bars rather than 5 miutes etc.

 

Finally where to set the discretionary <-----> full mechanical slider. That's a real toughy. Some things are inherently 'visual', channel lines, VSA, tape reading. Personally I feel a draw to these types of methods. The dowside is they are quite hard to make more 'mechanical' so discipline becomes a big issue (for me at least).

 

Anyway got to run...travelling again... for me it was a thought provoking post on a couple of levels.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James,

 

One of my favorites: The Ultimate Trading Guide by John R. Hill, George Pruitt, Lundy Hill, is a must read for mechanical trading ideas. John R. Hill is the President and founder of futures Truth, a leading newsletter that analyzes and rates trading systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally once I had a system that I was really confident in, which was in essence really quite simple, I wouldn't hesitate to automate a large part of it to deal with the most basic set ups simply so I could have more time to watch other setups. While I'm not a fan of 100% mechanical systems I do believe they can be beneficial when you use them to free up time that could be spent on other trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:

How many traders here use both a mechanical and discretionary approach in trading? The number one element that changed my trading is how I used to be glued to tape. Now, I hardly look at any charts but watch spreadsheets all day long.

 

Dohhh...I have forgot to even check the premium section of this board in months.

I've just started to move down this path as I'm finally getting the hang of C# and Ninja.

James, what are you using to data mine, just excel? Thats absolutely my focus right now. Have you ever read the "System Development with acrary" thread on elite trader? I think thats far better than any systems book available. One thing he mentions in there that I would like to eventually evolve towards is he has his automated systems and then when he is around he tries to front run them discretionary wise. I think thats a pretty interesting way to trade.

Here is the first potentially useful thing I've done with data mining(if you can call it that) Basically tried to take the daily average range of 5 minute bars on SPY with Ninja and then plot them in Excel. Seems to be a pretty interesting indicator of volatility. The data is not totally accurate as I think I'm missing some of monday morning sessions from my newbness with ninja. Its interesting how that first big spike up in feb 07 had more volatility and a bigger range but was orderly. Current volatility/range is just schitzo.

SPYrange5min.jpg.3a85c58c7e35d37185ec4702982da126.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Here is what I have done that has transformed my way of trading. I never thought I would become this type of trader. My trading is now 70% automated. I have about 6 strategies that look to exploit rejection patterns and follow trends. These are all automated through excel and give me buy/sell signals for various instruments and timeframes. I also apply parameters based on open/close/low/high/volume.
This is precisely what has happened to me over the last few months. I have gone from a discretionary trader with some mechanical rules to mostly mechanical. The biggest change I have seen is how I manage my money. With my discretionary style I would put large positions on and start the scaling out process quickly with a distance target area for the last trailer. With my mechanical trading I use less leverage and exit at one to three target areas depending on the setup. The surprising result is that my average profit has almost stayed the same. However, these two systems are not equal by any means! The mechanical style has been more consistent (less draw down) and has allowed me to explore trading multiple instruments. These advantages are extremely important when scaling up. My current goal is to make the research and recognition part as automated as possible so I can keep track of dozens of instruments and only trade the highest probability setups. Of course like everything else in trading...easier said than done. Programming can be a PAIN IN THE A$$.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
I wanted to start a new thread as I have recently gone through a transformation in my trading. For the past 3 years, I have been a purely discretionary trader relying on volume, tape, and market profile.

 

With a new market (shift from US futures to Nikkei futures) I had to dump all of my methodology and find new techniques to trade. Market profile is not a tool available through my current platform and prop firm, VSA techniques do not work as well with the Nikkei, and market profile is not as efficient.

 

First, the Nikkei gaps every single day due to the US markets and the time difference. On many occasions, the previous day profile becomes absolutely useless due to these gaps. There are no premarket sessions and as a result you can not see any premarket support or resistance. Gaps tend to not fill as well. So basically, all I have learned trading the US futures did not work with the Nikkei futures.

 

Surprised to read this and curious about it as well... aren't we taught that most principles and 'guidelines' work amongst all markets, regardless of what timeframe we choose or what kind of market it is (provided there's sufficient liquidity)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soul is correct.

 

The US tricks don't work well on SPI or STW either although at least Wyckoff style volume interpretation works intraday with them. With HSI even the volume is unreasonably deceptive.

 

Personally I establish intraday trends and then microswing trade the trends until they reverse (if they do) and then swing the other way.

 

Here's a 15 min spi chart. SPI trades ~24hrs so you can see the effect of the Euro/US timezones which I show blue on my charts.

.

spi15.png.91717d3df7e330e5d27b9684edcb8b44.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.